Dear Fellow Law Enforcers,
The federal government has put up another $72 million in "war-on-drugs-grants" to redirect your police resources once again from true public safety duties in order to extend their failed war on drugs; this time with a savage assault on California's 15-year-old medical marijuana law. Are you going to take the money and enforce federal law in lieu of upholding the will of the people of California or are you going to honor your sworn oath to uphold the laws of our sovereign state and send the money back?
August Vollmer, the police chief whose name is synonymous with the origins of professionalism in American policing, would urge you to send it back.
In his work as president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) and the Wickersham Commission Vollmer contributed to the successful campaign that led to the repeal of alcohol Prohibition. In an address to the IACP he stated "drug addiction is not a police problem; it never has and never can be solved by policemen, but by scientific and competently trained medical experts..."
Unfortunately Vollmer wasn't around when Nixon decided to wage his war on drugs against the American people in 1971. I was a police commander in South Central Los Angeles at the time, and most of us believed Nixon's propaganda; that it was a just war, that the "druggies" were evil and comprised a threat to our communities.
We saw our resources dedicated to public safety bought off by Department of Justice and White House grants so that we could leverage their political priorities at the expense of our communities. Using their grant money and the lure of budget dollars though asset seizures they co-opted our public safety priorities and our role as public servants in deciding what was best for our communities. Evidence based budgeting and responsible, prioritized policing went out the window in favor of the war on drugs. We morphed from public servant to drug warrior; blindly serving their interests and their agreements with those who benefited most by a continuation of their war on drugs. We helped them invade and occupy our poorer communities. Their money allowed us to build war machines to batter down doors, purchase sophisticated weapons, surveillance equipment and intelligence apparatus. We arrested and imprisoned thousands and then hundreds of thousands, and while most users were white, the majority we sent to prison were from our minority communities.
Most of us stood proudly at the show and tells hovering over tons of drugs, mountains of cash and hundreds of weapons as a compliant media snapped our pictures and hailed our progress toward winning Nixon's war on drugs.
But, many of us came to see that we were not winning. We saw the gangs grow, fueled by drug money, the cartels better armed, death squads trained by our own military unleashed across Mexico and our border states. The bodies began to stack up, the gangs became more and more violent, the cartels outgunned us and many of our police officers, our public servants, were killed and maimed for life while the communities we were sworn to protect and serve huddled in their homes dodging bullets and watching their children die by gunfire, night after night after night. For what?
That's what I asked myself when we lost our department's first officer to Nixon's war. For what? And then another ended up in a wheel chair for life. For what? So that we could continue the futile effort to keep a recreational or medical cannabis user from getting what he or she wanted? So we could continue failed programs keep an addict from getting a fix? So we could continue to rake in federal funds and shape our budgets around asset seizures rather than evidence based policing aimed at criminals who impose actual harm? For what?
I answered that question for myself and took a hard look at all of it. I came away from that "look" convinced that we were creating more economic and physical harm for the people we served than we prevented by taking their autonomy away and subjecting them to punishments far harsher than would have resulted from drug abuse alone. We destroyed generations of young people by labeling them as drug offenders, denying them education and job opportunities, we fueled the violence in our communities by allowing a black market to thrive, rather than providing the leadership to oppose Washington and the federal drug warriors. We allowed our children access to dangerous drugs by serving as catalyst that allowed an army of pushers to thrive rather than regulating the market for adults and drying up the pushers and the hierarchy of gangsters and drug lords that fed them. We threw soft-drug users into prisons awash in hard drugs. People entered jail with a diploma in marijuana and left jail with a doctorate in fraud, extortion and rape. We built more and more prisons while we fired more and more schoolteachers. And in the end, today, sadly, our communities have lost respect for the rule of law.
The one bright light came from the people of California when they took the first step toward regulation. They passed Prop 215, the medical marijuana law, in 1996. And after 15 years of regulated sales to those under doctors' supervision, we find the sky has not fallen and society has not suffered. In fact, not only has cannabis been more fully researched as a medicine, but crime has decreased in the areas that have allowed medical marijuana dispensaries, legal job opportunities have increased dramatically and tax dollars have gone into our treasuries.
This experience of the advantages of regulation of cannabis sales in California, though not perfect, has mirrored the experience in Holland, where drug policy experts have concluded that closing down safe, regulated, supervised points of marijuana sales would shift to the streets and that young people would become dependent on the criminal underworld for the purchase of drugs.
And yet, regardless of the successes, on October 6, 2011 U.S. Attorney Laura Duffy delivered Obama's declaration of war against the sovereignty of the people of California when she declared on his behalf that: "Under United States law, a dispensary's operations involving sales and distribution of marijuana are illegal and subject to criminal prosecution and civil enforcement actions. Real and personal property involved in such operations are subject to seizure by and forfeiture to the United States... regardless of the purported purpose of the dispensary."
Obama's weapons had already been fired. The IRS launched a devastating attack on tax-paying dispensaries by denying standard business expense deductions. The Department of Treasury has brow beaten banks into closing accounts of medical marijuana collectives. The ATF has warned firearms dealers not to sell firearms to medical marijuana users. The DEA has blocked a nine-year-old petition to reschedule marijuana for medical use, ignoring extensive scientific evidence of its medical efficacy. NIDA has blocked proposed research on medical marijuana to treat post-traumatic stress disorder for our veterans and -- in order to once again invade our communities with mass arrests, prosecutions and jailing of our citizens -- they have resorted to their tried and true strategy of buying you off -- this time with $72 million designed to divert 192 of your peace officers to drug warrior duty, once again, in order to carry out their assault on the sovereignty of the people of the State of California.
So, if you have taken that "hard look" as I did many years ago, you too have come to that fork in the road.
Down one path we can continue to attack and destroy the lives of harmless people -- often sick and dying people -- for exercising their free will...
...Or you can look to the words of August Vollmer, the father of professional policing in America, and return your share of the $72 million with a note explaining you would rather the money go to finding missing women and children -- investigating crimes with victims.
You can also vocally and economically support efforts such as the Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012.
Vollmer would tell us that we don't have to be the stormtroopers following orders from the Obama administration and its dedicated horde of prohibitionists -- we can use our time-honored option -- our duty -- to prioritize crime according to public sentiment and evidence based policing as well as our own growing awareness over the relative seriousness of the harms to justify putting our energies elsewhere.
With our help, society may one day awake from this nightmare called drug prohibition in the same way that August Vollmer helped bring America out of the nightmare called alcohol prohibition nearly 80 years ago. It's never too late to start doing the right thing.
Sincerely,
Stephen Downing, Deputy Chief, LAPD, (ret.)
Executive Board Member, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition:
Member and co-author: Regulate Marijuana Like Wine initiative
Most of us are aware by now that individuals who use illegal drugs are going to get high, 'no matter what.' So why do you not prefer they acquire them in stores that check IDs and pay taxes? Gifting the market in narcotics to ruthless criminals, foreign terrorists and corrupt law enforcement officials is seriously compromising our future.
Even if you cannot stand the thought of people using drugs, there is absolutely nothing you, or any government, can do to stop them. We have spent 40 years and over a trillion dollars on this dangerous farce. Practically everybody is now aware that Prohibition will not suddenly and miraculously start showing different results. So why do you wish to continue with it? Do you actually think you may have something to lose If we were to start basing drug policy on science & logic instead of ignorance, hate and lies?
Maybe you're a police officer, a prison guard or a local politician. Possibly you're scared of losing employment, overtime-pay, the many kick-backs and those regular fat bribes. But what good will any of that do you once our society has followed Mexico over the dystopian abyss of dismembered bodies, vats of acid and marauding thugs carrying gold-plated AK-47s with leopard-skinned gunstocks?
Kindly allow us to forgo the next level of your sycophantic prohibition-engendered mayhem!
Anyone goes in and he/she the dr. says... So you're having headaches...no? Back problems...no?
ummmmm.... Crazy kids/wife/husband...ok here you go........
Of course, cannabis is not the problem cocaine, or meth, or X, or heroin and pharmaceutical opiates are. Strangely, the feds want to make it illegal to own weapons if you have a medical marijuana card.
And yet, people on strong, prescribed opiates, people who really shouldn't own guns, have no problem.
This law will affect a person who uses weapons for hunting. It's insane.
Now they have a toy they can't use, because that thing can rupture eardrums. Oakland PD has one. I wonder if they'll use it and make some ears bleed next.
My issue isn't with the author's stance on marijuana. It's with his insistence that law enforcement agencies turn down money. In today's times of tight budgets, public safety is much more important than a principled stance on only one drug.
people versus profit..
smart money's on the latter!
IF it does lead to harder drugs, it is only because ALL of them are lumped into the same "bad" category. How are kids to know the difference when they see weed is not so bad? And then how are they to believe anything they are told? Kids aren't stupid. If they were treated with more respect and encouraged to be independent, they wouldn't have so many self-image issues and looking to self medicate. Blaming drugs is a cop out.
According to Paul Craig Roberts, a former editor of the Wall Street Journal and former assistant secretary to the treasury under Ronald Reagan, "Police in the US now rival criminals, and exceed terrorists as the greatest threat to the American public."
"Narcotics police are an enormous, corrupt international bureaucracy and now fund a coterie of researchers who provide them with ‘scientific support’, fanatics who distort the legitimate research of others. The anti-marijuana campaign is a cancerous tissue of lies, undermining law enforcement, aggravating the drug problem, depriving the sick of needed help, and suckering well-intentioned conservatives and countless frightened parents." – William F. Buckley, Commentary in The National Review, April 29, 1983, p. 495
There is no conflict between liberty and safety. We will have both or neither.
William Ramsey Clark (1927--)
Gosh! This reminds me of what happens in the FAMILY LAW INDUSTRY.
The Family Law Industrialists seem to rationalize and even theologize indulgence and case protraction at the expense of the most vulnerable people of all: our children and emotionally captive parents. Like problematic drug users, various bureaus voraciously consume two things:
Time... and Money.
Now I'm not saying that all lawyers and judges are "bad."
I am saying there is an alarming misuse and abuse of power by our many professionals, politicians, bureaus, agencies and corporations. Especially in the often collusive & self-protecting, Shadowy Syndicates of the Family Law and CPS Industries...
Alan Ernesto Phillips
https://profiles.google.com/115902390478619061589/about?hl=en
(I'm a fan, MK!)