iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Stephen Elliott

GET UPDATES FROM Stephen Elliott
 

Memo to the Anti-Defamation League: These Jews Don't Share Your Position

Posted: 08/03/10 03:40 PM ET

The following letter is from a group of concerned Jews, connected by their community, responding to the Anti-Defamation League's Statement on the Islamic Community Center Near Ground Zero.

Dear Mr. Foxman,

Last week the New York Times reported on the Anti-Defamation League's decision to oppose the building of the Islamic Community Center, the Cordoba House, near Ground Zero. You were quoted comparing the anguish of the 9/11 victims' families to that of Holocaust survivors and their relatives. "Their anguish entitles them to positions that others would categorize as irrational or bigoted," you said.

We can relate to these "irrational" feelings. We are a diverse group of Jews, many of us from New York. Many of our families lost members to the Holocaust. Some of us are lucky enough to still be able to spend time with parents, grandparents, uncles or aunts who made it through the Nazi death camps. We remember how uneasy many Jews felt about the Christian crosses placed at Auschwitz-Birkenau, a situation with many parallels to that of the Cordoba House.

And yet we believe that your position on the Cordoba House is wrong and that it goes against the ADL's description of itself as an organization that fights "all forms of bigotry."

Cordoba House is not a mosque, it is an Islamic Community Center, similar to a Jewish Community Center, with a board comprised of members of different faiths. The center is not "at" Ground Zero, as certain politicians looking to exploit this divisive situation have stated. It is well-documented that the Cordoba initiative and its head, Imam Faisal Abdul Raouf, have done much to promote tolerance and interfaith relations. This, we feel, is something to celebrate. Seeking transparency from it is fine and right, but saying, as the ADL does, that "questions have been raised" about its sources of funding or its ideology is a form of scaremongering that obscures the issue. We should welcome a Muslim leader who has worked hard to overcome hatred.

There are other reasons not to oppose the project. We agree with you that some victims of 9/11 are entitled to "irrational" feelings as a result of their loss. But being less tolerant will not help us heal, and it is not wise for America to alienate millions of its own citizens, let alone the hundreds of millions of Muslims in countries that Americans visit around the world. Remember, there were Muslim victims on 9/11, too, Muslims that worked in the World Trade Center, or were part of the rescue crews that bravely entered the buildings that day.

Previously, the ADL has won respect for its historical defense of the freedoms of others, and helped make more widely known the Jewish commitment to tikkun olam. We fear that your position on the Cordoba House project will tarnish that reputation.

This issue is emotional and complex. No matter what happens with the Cordoba House now, feelings are going to be hurt. But a fundamental principle of tolerance is at stake -- one we look to the ADL to uphold. Tolerance for one means tolerance for all, or else we slip down a dangerous slope.

We urge the ADL to change its position, and we urge everyone who agrees with us to sign the online petition that was started by J Street.

Endorsed by,

Sandi DuBowski, filmmaker

Eli Pariser, organizer

Nicola Behrman, writer

Robert Russell, artist

Francine Hermelin, author/entrepreneur & resident of Lower Manhattan

Julie Hermelin, filmmaker

Tarah Malhotra Feinberg, creative director

Elisha Levin, publicist

Douglas Rushkoff, author

Maya Benton, art curator

Jen Cohen, cantor

Ethan Sandler, writer/performer/producer

Rabbi David Adelson, East End Temple, New York

Michaela Watkins, performer/writer (and cousin of WTC victim)

Rachel Sklar, writer/social entrepreneur

Scott Belsky, author, entrepreneur

Adi Cohen, human rights activist

Mark Hanis, human rights activist

Kristopher Brown, attorney

Simon Glickman, writer/editor

Charles London, author

Juliet Simmons, creative director

Gideon Lichfield, journalist

Molly Rosen, writer

Stephen Elliott, author

Scott Goodstein, writer & activist

Rebecca Goldfarb, artist

Adam Werbach, environmental activist

Stacy Horne, producer

Davy Rothbart, writer/filmmaker

Jessica Tully, artist

Alan Light, writer/editor

Alana Klein, law professor

Adam Dorn, musician

Ari Wallach, social agenda strategist

Gillian Laub, photographer

Rachel Weinstein, activist and educator

Aaron Davidman, playwright

Audra Lehman, M.D.

William Wimsatt, social entrepreneur

Jeremy Goldberg, digital media entrepreneur

Joanna Rudnick, documentary filmmaker

Justin Ruben, organizer

Mireille Silcoff, writer/editor

Jeremiah Lockwood, musician

Amichai Lau-Lavie, rabbi

Ilyse Hogue, organizer

Josh Kun, professor

Josh Spear, digital strategist

Joshuah Bearman, writer

Eric Heiman, Design professor, writer

Jason Turbow, author/journalist

Zach Arrick, banker

Alan Light, writer/editor

Eugene Mirman, comedian


Cross-posted from www.jewcy.com.

 
 
 

Follow Stephen Elliott on Twitter: www.twitter.com/the_rumpus

The following letter is from a group of concerned Jews, connected by their community, responding to the Anti-Defamation League's Statement on the Islamic Community Center Near Ground Zero. Dear Mr.
The following letter is from a group of concerned Jews, connected by their community, responding to the Anti-Defamation League's Statement on the Islamic Community Center Near Ground Zero. Dear Mr.
 
 
  • Comments
  • 62
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:26 PM on 08/06/2010
Can anyon explain to me why the majority of people on this thread truly believe this issue has to do with religious intolerence? I have been commenting about this topic for a while now and I think that based on what I've presented shows that this has NOTHING TO DO WITH RELIGION. I think my strongest argument is the fact that New York has so many denominations and with that so many religious facilities and institutes and that does not bother anyone but, this one Islamic Center changes every New Yokers' sentiment about Muslims of all of a sudden. If that was the case why didn't we see such protests towards Muslims after 9/11? Why cannot anyone accept the fact that this has to do with location. Where are the facts that illustrate that the oppostion against the center stems from intolerence just like how I presented facts that it doesn't? And more importantly why cannot anyone emphathize with the 9/11 families who lost someone that day and are asking the center to be moved somewhere else and not near the ground where their family member(s) died? Before you jump to conclusions I suggest you do some home-work first, not everything is as simple and black-and-white as an issue like this. People are preaching about tolerence well what about sensitivty?
01:24 AM on 08/06/2010
What is happening to the 'Left'? Is it possible that these people really have no idea that they are bigots? How can you begin an argument, protesting your tolerance and then immediately begin to associate all things Muslim with 9/11. Look, your post-traumatic stress disorder is completely understandable - still, it is a disorder; and though it is understandable, it cannot and should not be enabled.

Born black, in the south, in the 60's, I can tell you that I have been privy to my share of 9/11's and 8/11's and 5,6, & 7/11's (just pick a month) - all orchestrated by Christians who read the bible a bit differently (and more often) than most. But, although you cannot burn a crucifix in my yard and although I do not practice a religion - you can still build a church next to my house. I would recognize that the crucifix on the door of the church and the one that is burned to intimidate are completely unrelated. If I could not make that distinction, the problem would be with me.
03:35 PM on 08/06/2010
You preach about tolerance but you make some ridiculous, almost mocking assumption that the reason behind those that are objecting to this center being built has to do with them suffering from post-tramatic-stress disorder. I can tell you that is not what is ailing them or the reason as to why the don't want this Islamic Center built near Ground Zero. The only thing that is ailing them is suffering that comes from loosing someone and how this center, near Ground Zero will remind them of that. Also I suggest you stick to the topic at hand and the facts. This has nothing to do with the issue of people always equating or tieing Muslims to terrorism. This has to do with the controvery that stems from where the center will be located NOT THE CENTER ITSELF or HOW THE CENTER IS AFFLIATED WITH A CERTAIN RELIGION.
08:08 PM on 08/07/2010
Loud. (and wrong) You believe that my understanding of the situation is limited (by something). I believe your that understanding of the situation to be limited (by something). We may both be correct in our assessment of the other. BOLD TYPE will likely not have any additional influence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Naazish YarKhan
08:53 PM on 08/05/2010
Loved this Post!!!! Thank you, thank you, thank you!
10:15 AM on 08/05/2010
This notion that religion in-tolerence is the reason behind why opponents do not want this Islamic Center built near Ground Zero is a rather irrational if you take time to think about it. New York is pretty much a symbole of the great "melting-pot" that is the United States of America. New York has people of all sorts of backgrounds, including those who are Arabs or Muslims and practice Islam. In addition we (I'm speaking as a New Yorker now) have many mosques and Muslim owned buisnesses that most importantly were never subject to any sort of attack or protest after 9/11. Now taking that all into consideration, does it make sense that the construction of one Islamic Center could all of a sudden bring-out such anti-Muslim sentiment from New Yorkers? Seriously does that sound rational to anyone? What is certainly not rational is the imam's reluctance to understand why building this Islamic Center is such a sensitive issue for New Yorkers. If this imam truly believes in tolerance, why can't he be tolerate of the fact that the Islamic Center near Ground Zero pulls on the sentiments of 9/11 victims and families of vicitms and based on he should find another location for his center?
03:38 PM on 08/04/2010
Bigotry is bigotry, even when "good" people express it. Is a two-block radius some magical sterile zone that people of certain religious belief can't be allowed into? Is Ground Zero some kind of walled sanctum that everybody except Muslims has a passkey for? An organization known for trying to counter bias against the children of Abraham and Isaac is *promoting* bias against the children of Abraham and Ishmael?

For shame.
04:29 PM on 08/04/2010
The protest against the center being built has nothing to do with Ground Zero being some "holly" ground, where Muslims cannot erect or build anything that symbolizes their religion. Again, the situation about building this center has nothing to do with religion, people who have protested the construction of this center have openly said that they have no problem with the center being built, just not around the area of Ground Zero because it is inappropriate based on the fact that Muslims were the ones that perpretrated the act . You can compare it to a scenario if the Japnese wanted to erect a monument near Pearl Harbor. Again something like that would be deemed insensitive which is the same issue in regards to the center being build near Ground Zero. The issue has nothing to do with religion but location and sensitivity for those that don't want the center built near Ground Zero.
11:13 PM on 08/04/2010
I might believe this if it wasn't for all the other protests going on when Muslim communities try and build mosques and recent/semi-recent incidents of vandalism of Muslim schools and community centers.

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/05/26/muslim-americans-right-worship/

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/02/texas-mosque-vandalized/

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/29/right-anti-islamic-bus/
10:02 AM on 08/04/2010
I feel like I am living in the Twilight Zone listening to what everyone has to say. I cannot believe that there are some many people blinded by this notion that bigotry and hatred is driving the issue when it's actually not. The reason why the majority of New Yorkers do not want this mosque or cultural center built near Ground Zero again has nothing to do with being anti-Muslim. The issue here is not about religion it is about LOCATION and the location of this center is, unfortunately, a reminder for us and especially the victiams and the families of victiams of that tragic day. I mean would you people be this outraged if the Japanese were denied the opportunity to build a monument that is dedicated to Kamakzi Pilots near Pearl Harbor? In 1984 the Camalite Nuns opened a convent near Auschwitz ( roughly 45 years after WWII) and the Jewish community and groups called for it's removal and Pope John Paul II obliged them out of sensitivty and respect; he didn't make it an issue about religious rights (even though that inccident had more to do with religion then this issue does). That's what we, New Yorkers are simply asking this imam to do, to build the center some where that is not close to Ground Zero, I seriously don't see the harm with that request...
01:52 PM on 08/04/2010
The issue here is not about religion it is about LOCATION "

Yea, its about not wanting Islam in a certain location. Hypocrite.

" mean would you people be this outraged if the Japanese were denied the opportunity to build a monument that is dedicated to Kamakzi Pilots near Pearl Harbor?"

That is your foolish view. We are not building a shrine to the terrorist you fool. You, contrary to your claim, are completely Islamophobic.
04:47 PM on 08/04/2010
So what you are saying is that it's appropriate to build an Islamic Center next to the very sight where Muslims, motived by an extreme version of Islam, killed thousands of New Yorkers? That's not insenstive?

Have you even question or even rationalized why the center has even be built there or better yet if there is such an out-cry against the center being built by Ground Zero why doesn't the imam behind this construction move the center somewhere else in New York?

You might disagree with the example I gave but whether (hypotheically) the Japanese did construct some sort of monument near Pearl Harbor why people would be appauled by it. It's the same reason behind this scenario.

I don't know if you are a New Yorker or not. If you are not and you ever get an opportunity to come here, please check out the hole where the Twin Towers once stood. Maybe then you'll get a better perspective on why this is an emotional issue and why people need to be sensitive to other peoples wishes and not trying to distort the true topic at hand. Trust me, New York is a very tolerate place, made up of people with different religions and cultures. In fact we have many mosques here and no one has a problem with it, just like we wouldn't have a problem with this center being built just somewhere else, away from GZ.
10:06 PM on 08/03/2010
Excellent letter, which expresses the feelings of many (the silent majority, I hope, who will not be silent any longer). Thank you!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
06:57 PM on 08/03/2010
I am so glad yet another group steps up to oppose the ADL's stance on the Cultural Center. i think far more of us are both shocked and shattered that the ADL came out in opposition and I think many of us found their reasoning very weak. I wrote to them- I wouldn't be surprised if thousands of Jews wrote to them to complain. Certainly enough that Foxman felt the need to defend his stance. I was raised to believe that justice must be equally applied to all, and that all are equally deserving of it. I look forward to the center, and I think that the best way to conquer our fears and xenophobias is to meet people face to face, because I truly believe our similarities will always be greater than our differences. If we don't recognize our common humanity, there really is no hope for us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Muslimhumanist
Liberty for the wolves is death for the lambs
06:21 PM on 08/03/2010
As a progressive Muslim I offer you my heartfelt thanks. Just as all Muslims are not responsible for the actions of those who preach intolerance in the ummah, it is important that everyone--especially Muslims--recognize that not all Jews share the voices of intolerance in inherent in Mr. Foxman's statement. We Muslims need to affirm that Jews have been at the center of peace and justice issues in America for decades. Jewish voices were among the loudest critics of the Iraq war. Progressive Jews and Muslims need to find common ground as religious minorities to stand up against all forms of intolerance be they racism, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, homophobia or misogyny. We are, in fact, natural allies.

peace, salaams, shalom
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
06:59 PM on 08/03/2010
There are so many of us who want the same things- the ADL does not speak for me. It's like the old Hebrew National ad - we answer to a higher authority. :-)
10:12 PM on 08/03/2010
I agree with you. All of us want a safe and happy world in which we can watch our children thrive, and in which we can grow old in peace. Fundamentally, at the root of most evil are ignorance and greed. We need to work together to bring the torch of tolerance, understanding, generosity and humanity to the places, minds and hearts where ignorance breeds fear and where greed corrupts souls.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James McGill
06:08 PM on 08/03/2010
I've seen so many comments from people who have obviously never set foot in NYC, who wouldn't realize that "a few blocks" is a*world away* in Manhattan.

Basically opponents were saying that no mosque should be built in Manhattan. Obviously any argument that the government should stop one from being built would fail on First Amendment grounds.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
chaya
Another proud veteran
05:52 PM on 08/03/2010
This was nice to hear, that these Jews got together to write this letter to the ADL.

Since the Holocaust, many Jews have felt that it was critical to stand together, because historically it has been so easy for those who hate us for no reason to take us down and beat the pulp out of us. Jews didn't feel that way in the early 1900's--they were just busy assimilating and paying no attention to their difference--and look what happened.

But lately I've been feeling less and less represented by the ADL, Israel, and others who seem firmly entrenched in fundamentalism and right-wing politics. They seem to be shriveling more and more into themselves and becoming ever more hateful and reactionary.

And lately I've been wondering if a deep schism is developing in the Jewish world today, between those right-wingers and all the others.

Do the right-wingers really think they can survive all on their own?

I guess most right-wingers do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
07:03 PM on 08/03/2010
I totally agree with you, Chaya. It's my fear too, that the right wingers will be the most destructive force to Judaism. Even my sister (who is no rightwinger by any stretch of the imagination) seems to be buying into Israel right/everyone else wrong meme. The younger generation is more open and liberal- I think that will eventually be our saving grace.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mishal Zeera
04:52 AM on 08/04/2010
Did you read that piece that Roseanne Barr wrote about a month and half or so ago? She said that they changed the words in the prayer books in the 60s to reflect the right wing agenda. Do you recall that, or maybe someone in your family? I find that sort of scary.
10:29 PM on 08/03/2010
I agree with you regarding the separation, but I would call it a natural gap rather than a schism. Historically when a group is attacked, as a whole, it develops a collective identity. We must stand together to survive the external threat which is preeminent, overwhelming and dwarfs our individual differences. When the external threat subsides, we have the freedom and the space in which to express our individuality - our personal values, philosophies and beliefs emerge once again.

I think that is where we are now, and frankly, I think it is a healthy and a good place to be. The freedom to be fearless in expressing your individuality, the freedom to be a human being first and foremost, and NOT to be lumped into a group and persecuted or elevated (as the case has been with various groups in history) simply because of a single shared characteristic, is a fundamental human right.

The right wing in the US (GOP) as well as in Israel (Likud) work against this individual humanity and they know that fear is the best way to corral people into a herd and create herd mentality. This way they can force us to compromise our values and principles for the supposed "common good".

We are individual human beings, with brains, hearts and minds. We are not willing to compromise our integrity and our values, apply double standards, or divide the world into "us" and "them" when we know only the opposite will bring peace.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kimpeach
Progressive Independent and proud of it!
05:42 PM on 08/03/2010
The ADL has tarnish and damage their reputation and image for a long time with their recent stance. While they might win new allies (from the extreme right) they have lost crediability from average Americans, Civil Rights and Human Rights organizations. I am so glad to see many people standing up and exposing the ADL's hypocrisy.
photo
Ainsaade
Covered in bees
05:08 PM on 08/03/2010
Thank you Mr. Elliot and co-signors of the letter for standing up for what's right - tolerance.
04:55 PM on 08/03/2010
Bigotry? Some members on this thread make it seem that there wre terrible atrocities and civil right violations that were committed against Muslims after 9/11. I don't recall Muslims being rounded up like the Japenese were after Pearl Harbor. I don't recall any incident where entire shops and buisness owned by Arabs or Muslims were destroyed in this country that can be even compared to when Nazis in Germany went into Jewish communities and destroyed their stores and shops. If anything, these examples should show how far this country has come to restrain ourselves from over-reacting against certain groups of people who appear or look-like the very enemy that we are facing today.
05:38 PM on 08/03/2010
And we want to keep it that way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:41 PM on 08/03/2010
Memories are short.

There were entire families incarcerated in Detroit. Series of unlawful arrest.

In Arizona a shop of an Indian family was burned.

"On January 28, 2002, Dr. Raman Aziz al-Abi, a university professor, went to work. He was teaching a class to some 100 students when, suddenly, a group of men burst into the lecture hall, shackled the professor and whisked him away. Professor al-Abi's students said he pleaded with the men to let him speak to an attorney but they physically dragged him off. The men who took him away refused to answer any questions and Professor al-Abi disappeared. This isn't an abduction story from some distant land run by a tin pot dictator or a scene from a Hollywood thriller. This event took place right here in the United States. Professor al-Abi was a teacher at the University of Northwest Central Texas at South Pantego. He had lived in the United States for 27 years and had been accepted for citizenship just a week before. His naturalization ceremony was two weeks later."

Ok, there was panic and
04:33 PM on 08/03/2010
Okay again people in this thread are discussing religious tolerance when this issue has nothing to do with that. Has anyone on this thread even questioned or reflected on why this imam wants to place his so called Islamic Cultural Center near Ground Zero. I mean you are telling me that he didn't see the kind of controversy or issue that he was bringing to the "table" when he made this decision? Again, speaking as a New Yorker this has nothing to do with religion. If anything it has to do with sensitivity. And building and Islamic Cultural Center next to a site where thousands of people were killed by Islamic Extremists is insensitive. Trust me New York has it's share of mosques, so adding one more will not be a problem, as long as it is not near Ground Zero.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
James McGill
06:12 PM on 08/03/2010
"Has anyone on this thread even questioned or reflected on why this imam wants to place his so called Islamic Cultural Center near Ground Zero."

He wants it to be located in Lower Manhattan, all of which could be claimed to be "near Ground Zero."

That's the whole problem. Too many of the most vocal opponents clearly want there to be no mosque anywhere.
06:21 PM on 08/03/2010
They can put a mosque for the mooselums in your back yard, honestly, I don't care! ROFLOL
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
07:07 PM on 08/03/2010
This same old argument.It has everything to do with religion, fear and intolerance. Make no mistake. Speaking as a New Yorker.