Stephen Kaus

Stephen Kaus

Posted March 28, 2009 | 05:56 PM (EST)

Athletics Owner Wants Baseball in Oakland to Fail

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

The ownership of the Oakland Athletics does not really want fans to come to the ballpark. There is no other way to explain the systematic downgrading of the experience of attending a game and the As' refusal to provide the amenities that fans of every other team take for granted.

Since they came to Oakland in 1968, the Athletics have won four World Championships, have been in two other World Series and have been in the playoffs several more times. During the late 1980s, when the Bash Brothers As were in three straight World Series and four straight playoffs, attendance was over 2.5 million for three straight years and over 2 million for six straight years.

No one ever confused the Oakland Coliseum with Fenway Park, but it became an enjoyable place to watch a game. In 1983, Roger Angell described it in glowing terms in a New Yorker article about baseball in Oakland. The As led the way in the Bay Area with varied food, particularly Saag's sausages, that was way ahead of the rival Giants' offerings at Candlestick Park.

But then, In 1995, after the death of owner Walter Haas, the team passed to some local home builders and then to Lew Wolff, a hotelier who is the present owner. Lew Wolff does not want to own a team in Oakland, home of the Bloods and the Crips and police murders. He wants to own a team in San Jose, gateway to Silicon Valley.

So while making a passable effort to put a decent team on the field, Mr. Wolfe has set about to publicly denigrate baseball at the Coliseum and is apparently happy to have the ballpark fall down around everyone's ears. He called the stadium "despicable" when he bought the team, even as he claimed to want to stay in Oakland, and has continued to bad mouth it and let it rot ever since.

Wolff shows nothing but contempt for Oakland's present fans as he eyes the golden wallets of Santa Clara County. The Coliseum has always been a mass of grey concrete (Sal Bando called it the Mausoleum), but there were TV screens at the concession stands and reasonably modern scoreboards. No longer. The TVs are few and far between and you cannot see the field while you wait. Combined with the indifferent "service" from the food servers, you can stand in line for two claustrophobic innings and not see a pitch or even hear a broadcast.

And the food is awful, particularly in comparison to the offerings at AT&T Park across the Bay. It is embarrassing to bring a Giants fan to a game. The staple is doughy hot dogs wrapped in tin foil. There are some specialty foods, but they taste like rubber. The only bright spot is some decent beer.

All the while, Wolff denigrates the place and drives people away. Recently, in a press release, he referred to the Coliseum as "an aging and shared facility" and provided the following upbeat description of baseball in Oakland:

We understand the facility continues to cost the city of Oakland and Alameda County millions of lost dollars per year. Sadly, the business and corporate base of the city of Oakland was very limited when we purchased the team and has eroded since. Our attendance and low number of season ticket holders (both one of the lowest in Major League Baseball) also continues to decline; even when our on-field performance produced play-off participation.

Of course, the As have been nowhere near the playoffs the past two years, but the fact is that if the As put a little effort into the ballpark, maybe got on a radio station that fans actually could hear and cultivated the fans in the entire East Bay, including prosperous Contra Cost County immediately to the east, this team could be a success. This would require investing money in a stadium that is owned by Alameda County, but the As rent it for peanuts and could put a shekel or two into the place.

Don't get me wrong, Oakland officials, and particularly former mayor and life-long baseball hater Jerry Brown, have a lot for which to answer. But Lew Wolff is the one who is destroying Oakland baseball right now.

(UPDATE: Ray Ratto in the S.F. Chronicle tells Wolff that a vow of silence should last more than a week)

Soon we will be back to the days of Charlie Finley, who owned the team for five straight playoffs and three straight World Championships. He had a bare bones staff and offered a total lack of amenities. In 1974, the year of the As third straight World Series victory, the total attendance was 845,693.

It will be difficult for Wolff to reach this goal, but if he fails, it will not be for lack of effort.
2009-03-29-Notafunday1.jpg
Not a fun day at the ballpark

Photos by Stephen Kaus

 
Comments
13
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- igorz I'm a Fan of igorz 25 fans permalink

FEW things are sadder, these days, than professional sports in the Bay Area...foo­tball, basketball, baseball, they are ALL pathetically sad

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 04/01/2009

Is Lew Wolff taking tips from Rachel Phelps??

I try to visit 1 or 2 new ballparks each year. Last year I went to AT&T and Oakland and I have to say Oakland was a real dump. I bought tickets on their website a few rows from 1st base for face value - quite a treat coming from the northeast - and the place was empty. It was a sad sad place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 03/31/2009
- luisroman I'm a Fan of luisroman 2 fans permalink

Kudos for the "Major League" reference!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 03/31/2009

Why thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 03/31/2009
- Bloodwart I'm a Fan of Bloodwart 2 fans permalink

Wake me when football season starts.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 03/30/2009
- KCFreedom I'm a Fan of KCFreedom 18 fans permalink

As a resident of Kansas City, we know all too well about being crapped on by baseball team owners, especially that Charlie Finley fella and the Athletics ball club. Oakland will only receive mixed sympathy from us.

Baseball owners like the late Ewing Kaufman, the original and long time owner of the Royals cared about his fans as much as his teams. He'd put his own money into the stadium and the team and didn't suck the blood out of the city and the fans. Plus he was a native of our own city. Not anymore. A rarity these days.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:43 PM on 03/30/2009

But at least you guys have the Chiefs because the Texans of the old AFL moved to KC. Boy, the Chiefs were fun to watch in the late 1960's and early 1970's.

Yeah, you also lost the Kings, who were formerly in Cincinnati, to Sacramento. Not to mention the Monarchs to the MLB color line being ended. But were the Kings worth keeping just for Tiny Archibald?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 PM on 03/30/2009
- KCFreedom I'm a Fan of KCFreedom 18 fans permalink

I was too young to be bitter about the Athletics, I was only ribbing them (I may have seen a few games when a toddler). However, I must admit that men over 60 in KC still hate them for what they did to us. Making us a secret farm club for the Yankees was unforgivable, among other things. In then end, KC was betrayed all around.

There is no doubt the current ownership of the Royals, an ex-Wal Mart CEO, has no desire to spend enough resources to field a contender, let alone a WINNING ball club. As one of the lowest paid teams (consistently in the bottom) they are lucky to get anyone out there to pay for $7 beers and watch their team usually lose.

As for the Chiefs, well, they certainly had their heyday back in the 1960s and early 1970s. Not too much spark these days. One thing for sure, the food at the Royals stadium has always been superior to the dog food they've been serving at Arrowhead many years.

KC did not support the Kings like they should have. I have been told they didn't fill Kemper Arena in their later years very often, so just like the free market should be, they left when they had a chance for someone who actually wanted them. At least I don't recall they blackmailed us to get a better arena which they all usually do now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 03/30/2009

The Coliseum is indeed an aging facility, though. There are only four ballparks older (and I am taking into account the new Mets and Yankees ballparks, so Shea and the original Yankee Stadium aren't counted here):

Fenway Park
Wrigley Field
Dodger Stadium
Anaheim Stadium (extensively remodeled, though, and it is like a new ballpark)

There is also the fact that it has been renovated to please Al Davis and, really, it has become something of an eyesore. It's only advantage is that it isn't as bad as Candlestick Park was during night games. Too bad that the Fremont ballpark didn't happen. The move to San Jose is kind of pie in the sky right now. AFAIK, there have been no talks to make that happen and that city doesn't have the facilities for it. The Giants minor league squad is also located there. I don't think that the Giants are willing to have the A's just slide on in there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 03/30/2009
- Stephen Kaus - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Stephen Kaus 19 fans permalink
photo

In my view, the Mount Davis controversy is overblown. The view was not so great and the structure blocks the cold wind, making the ballpark considerably more comfortable.

Plus, we got to sing YMCA all summer!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 03/30/2009
photo

I've sat up on Mount Davis a couple times - if you're above the first several rows, your view of center field is limited to about the first 50 feet or so past second base. To me, that's a lot worse than "not so great".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 AM on 03/31/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect