The MSM (MainStream Media) have been late to the dance in recognizing or even considering the effect of blogs on the, well, media. Bloggers, regardless of their experience and credentials, are often derided, and depicted as amateurish and ineffectual, and their acceptance has been slow in coming.
But our friend skippy tells us we may have a case of a Professional Writer™ who just may have, ahem, 'borrowed' from a blogger. Without attribution or credit.
The normally Right-wing crazy Patterico (a prosecutor in Los Angeles County; keep that in mind, would-be criminals) notices this little bit of coincidence:
Here's Joel Stein, November 2:There's more at the Patterico post. And if you follow the links to both Media Bloodhound and Stein's posts, the similarities are indeed similar!
Just how easy is it for Coulter to offend someone? Would any words from her mouth do the trick? To test this theory, I developed the Ann Coulter Mad Libs.™
It's a good thing he used that ™ mark. He wouldn't want anyone to steal his concept.Oh, look! Here's Media Bloodhound, October 18 (two weeks earlier):
In honor of Ann Coulter's influence on American media and politics, the Penguin Group (USA), in a joint venture with Ms. Coulter's Random House publisher, the Crown Publishing Group, is releasing a special edition of Mad Libs titled Ann Libs.
As skippy points out in an email to me:
granted, there are no copied jokes other than the premise, but the premise, prima facie, is identical to the point approaching zero percent of difference.
why not help out by emailing the latimes editors, their readers' representative, and/or joel stein, and pointing out this obvious bit of literary thievery?
Follow Steve Anderson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/SteveAudio
I have written comedy professionally for a dozen years; yeah, the premise is the same, but it's not a deep premise. It is certainly possible that both parties came up with it (as a matter of fact, a few others on other blogs said they also had the same thought).
Point is, if you want to be RESPONSIBLE, confront Mr. Stein, weigh (and report) his response and THEN write the article before tarnishing his reputation.
I have not heard this type of charge leveled at Joel Stein before, so that might give him the benefit of the doubt.
What you have done here (and others elsewhere) is flat out wrong AND bad journalism.
A person only has one reputation; it takes very little to spoil it (and it doesn't matter whether or not you're a fan of Joel Stein).
Try to think about the effects on a person before you trash him (something Ms. Coulter is as far from doing as anyone).
Thanks Steven.
1. There's no proof he got the idea from that site, and in any case it's not such an outrageous idea that others probably haven't thought of it.
2. Stealing a joke isn't "plagiarism", which generally implies lifting whole parts of something else.
3. There are much more important things to discuss.