More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Steve Bloom

Steve Bloom

Posted: November 5, 2010 09:37 AM

Deep in the lush mountains and valleys of California's Emerald Triangle, marijuana farmers have been making a decent living, albeit illegal, off the land for at least four generations. The medical cannabis boom, which began in 1996 with the passage of Prop 215, made them even richer. So when it came time to consider a law that would tax and regulate their skunk-scented crops, the growers of Humboldt, Mendocino and Trinity counties decided it just wasn't right for them.

"They're country people," says Bret Bogue, who owns Apothecary Genetics, a marijuana breeding and seed company. "They don't know how to pay taxes."

The denizens of the Emerald Triangle spoke loud and clear on Tuesday when they voted against Prop 19 by a 55-45 margin. The measure would have legalized marijuana for commercial sales, regulating what is currently an untaxed black market. Prop 19 lost statewide 54-46, with only 11 of the state's 58 counties backing it.

Bogue contends that Prop 19 "would have destroyed Northern California. It would have suffered tremendously."

One of the stipulations of Prop 19 was that every Californian would've been able to cultivate a 5x5-foot garden-room for about 10 fully grown plants. "Mom and pop operations cannot live on a 5x5," Bogue says. "They're the unsung people in the trenches who get the medicine to the people. The reward is worth the risk. They saw the reward totally diminishing to the point that they would not even exist."

Kyle Kushman doesn't see it that way. He's a legal medical grower who lives in Mendocino County and plays by the rules, which allows for up to 99 plants, indoors or outdoors. "There are different types of growers," explains Kushman, who's pioneered a technique he calls Veganics. "You have the outdoor generational farmers in Humboldt and Trinity. You have illegal indoor growers. And you have growers like me who are trying to follow the law."

A pot grower at heart, Kushman left his lofty position as High Times cultivation reporter in 2005 and moved to Willets, where he's been breeding luscious strains named Strawberry Cough and Blackberry Kushman ever since. Kushman's carved out a piece of the pie for himself, without getting greedy.

"I'm heartbroken and deflated," he says about Prop 19's failure. "The people here are so small-minded. They're afraid of change. I have the right to grow a 10x10 for myself. They thought Prop 19 would take that away."

To the contrary, Prop 19 would not have changed any of the existing laws that protect medical-cannabis cultivators. "I have the right to grow for 40 people," Kushman adds. "That wasn't going to change. It was a small progression. All of that fear prevented these people from thinking into the future. They just don't get it."

Bogue blames Prop 19 proponents for not consulting the NoCal growers before writing the initiative. "They needed to include the backbone," he says. "They voted 'no' because they didn't take the people into consideration. It starts from the ground up. You have to be able to walk in their shoes."

Among the pot farmers' concerns were being forced out of business by mega-grow operations (Oakland had already licensed four and Berkeley voters approved six more on Election Day) and the declining wholesale price of marijuana, which has dropped from $4,000 per pound to $1,500 over the last decade.

"If they had dealt with Northern California," Bogue insists, "Prop 19 would've passed."

Prop 19 proponent Chris Conrad begs to differ.

"If growers are against legalization, they can't be part of the legalization process and now it's up to them to show good faith support or be left out of the process," says Conrad, who publishes West Coast Leaf. "That's just political reality. The growers basically shot themselves in the foot. Prop 19 offered them a legal customer base, a statewide regulatory framework and a local voice to protect their interests. The next campaign is more likely to pitch a more restrictive approach to bring more conservative voters like Asians and housewives, who want heavy-handed controls, and will consider whether growers deserve any consideration at all. Those folks are unreliable at best, traitors to the cause at worst, and possibly a useful target to pit public opinion against as a foil for a winning campaign without a legal cultivation component.

"The growers lost a lot of potential influence on the process by showing a lack of political savvy," Conrad continues. "They'll possibly be grouped in with the narcs as being fundamentally opposed to legalization and not worth courting as an ally. So, they will need to come to the table with some proposals on how they would create a legal market for cannabis while protecting their interests, or they will be left out of the next round of decisions."

Though Conrad claims that since the Emerald Triangle cast just 64,000 votes out of nearly 7.5 million statewide (3.4 million voted for Prop 19) and that "the problem is that other segments of the population are not on board," Prop 19 organizers should listen to Bogue and others who felt disenfranchised.

With plans already being drawn up for another tax & regulate initiative for 2012, Bogue says he doesn't want to "bash Richard Lee," the Oaksterdam University magnate who bankrolled Prop 19. "I just want him to talk to the people. He didn't talk to them at all."

Then, and perhaps only then, will marijuana legalization in California stand a chance of becoming a reality.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 75
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:37 PM on 11/11/2010
Well, since prop19 didn't win, and the government does not get the taxes from the sale of weed, it's all over. Mexico gets the money!
11:26 AM on 11/11/2010
Let's not forget Sherrif Baca's Reefer Madness campaign right before Halloween about tainted halloween candy. How many marijuana tainted candies were found in 2010 Halloween? Will LA Times or Huffpost do a story about that?

How about the Dispensary owners, many of whom were against prop 19? Will LA Times do a story about that?

How about LA Times running daily articles against prop 19? Did that sway enough votes?
11:24 AM on 11/11/2010
Sad the 20 somethings were too lazy to turn out the vote. Maybe in 2012.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:02 PM on 11/10/2010
Even though Prop. 19 didn't pass last Tuesday, thanks to the help of supporters like you, we were able to work with the Yes on 19 campaign to get more than 3.4 million Californians to vote to end marijuana prohibition.

The debate over legalizing marijuana has entered the mainstream. And now that we've changed the conversation, we're in a better position than ever to end marijuana prohibition.

Assembly Member Tom Ammiano will re-introduce legislation to legalize marijuana in California, but he needs to know he has the support of our movement. Write him a letter and show your support today!

This year Assembly Member Ammiano was the first elected official in the country to get a marijuana legalization bill through a legislative committee. Building on the momentum created by Prop. 19, we need to show him that his leadership in Sacramento is more important than ever.

Write Assembly Member Tom Ammiano today and tell him you support his legislation to legalize marijuana for adults in California!

With your help, we’ll end marijuana prohibition in California and across the country.

Sincerely,
Ethan Nadelmann
Executive Director
Drug Policy Alliance

Click on the link below to write Assm. Tom Ammiano.

http://www.taxcannabis.org/page/m/1c6125f2/50605201/36d5b205/abad654/3557248580/VEsF/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:48 PM on 11/09/2010
If prop 19 had passed MENDOCINO WEED WOULD HAVE BEEN OBSLETE!

The only reason to grow weed in Mendocino is it rains and you don't have to water it.Long ago lazy pot growers tired of carrying water found they could grow in Mendocino without watering therefore more crops could be planted and the more grown means the cops could not catch everything.

If it was legal commerically it would be better to grow in the big valley with full sun. And irrigated crops in full sun do better than half sun with rain to promote mildew. When the real farmer....not those amatuers from Mendo get there hands on marijuana we will have the best in the world....until then we gotta avoid the police and let those amatuers in mendo grow our medicine!

Or grow your own ........painlessly at home.
02:53 PM on 11/08/2010
five farmers had a lot less to do with this than the cartels telling all the illegals to vote against it
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gwensgal
08:56 PM on 11/07/2010
What was so telling was the fact that many of the hardcore proponents of this bill were so expecting a landslide in their favor that they themselves skipped voting. Here in LA, KKPC, 89.3 FM, did a story which exposed the ganja-clouded logic of the many of the backers of the bill. One young woman couldn't make it to the polls because she was a student and had a poodle to take care of. What?!

I am all for legalizing and taxing Mary Jane, but if the feds are gonna override and prosecute anyway, why bother? We'll be solving one set of state-level issues only to open up national ones for our citizens. It's not worth it right now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aqueryan
Neo-gnostic, radical centrist
11:37 AM on 11/07/2010
Nothing too surprising here. Hypocrisy is/was/will always be rooted in blind $elf(ish)-interest.
01:58 AM on 11/07/2010
You've gotten a very important fact wrong: Prop 19 would have allowed a 5' x 5' plot Per Residence, not per person. This is constantly mis-portrayed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GuyCybershy
10:13 PM on 11/06/2010
They voted in their own best interests, if the rest of us did the same pot would have been legal decades ago.
07:42 PM on 11/06/2010
So prop 19 was voted Down because illegal pot growers didn't want to pay taxes like everyone else? And Californians voted in major liberals that want more taxes! If this article is correct, sympathy may be in short supply when the Goldeon State needs its bailout.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgateman
07:18 PM on 11/06/2010
I remember when weed was $100 per pound off the farms in KY and that's how they made ends meet. Half an acre of weed in the tobacco barn paid better than all the rest of their production of tobacco and food combined.... way more. Mexican cartels make more than most of our businesses and pay no taxes. They will fight legalization at all costs since $3,000 per pound is way more than $100. The Federal gubmint will help them because that's their job and depends on keeping it illegal. Private prisons will fight to keep it illegal for continued payments from the gubmint for housing non-violent offenders. If made legal and taxed it would save hundreds of billions of wasted tax dollars in courts, law enforcement, incarceration and bring in billions of tax dollars. That's way to smart for merika to understand. Way too smart.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Neal Jansons
Author and Poet
06:48 PM on 11/06/2010
Of course they don't want it legal...anymore than Al Capone wanted liquor legal. Follow the money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
04:00 PM on 11/06/2010
"If they had dealt with Northern California," Bogue insists, "Prop 19 would've passed.", translation, if greed had not gotten the better of the proponents (10 mega-grow operations pre-approved was bad idea) Prop 19 would have had better chance of passing. You can hardly blame the voters for looking out for THEIR interests when no one else was....
12:08 AM on 11/06/2010
I was partially quoted in Steve Bloom's report "Why Northern California's Pot Growers Said No to Prop 19" but in the edit, it didn't come out quite as I had intended. I didn't say that people who voted 'no' are traitors, etc., I said that from a funder's point of view it might look like that and so I suggested that the growers themselves need to do some outreach and fence mending.
My personal point of view is not so different from others expressed here, that we all need to work together. I was speaking from a political analyst point of view -- people who are against legalization, whether narcs or growers, will not have much say in the form that legalization ultimately takes.
When you read or discuss this article with other people, please bear this context in mind. I asked Steve to clarify that if possible. Hopefully a revised version will be online shortly. I just wanted to be clear with everyone that the comments do not reflect my personal feelings, they reflect my concerns about a political perception that may result from many growers and trimmers apparently having voted in 2010 to keep marijuana illegal.
Thanks for your understanding. -- Chris Conrad
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
claygooding
12:42 AM on 11/06/2010
Due to the fact that no matter how the law is written,if marijuana follows the free market system,profits are going to go down.
And no matter how the law is written,growers,dealers,cartels and narcs will find enough wrong to oppose it.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
01:27 PM on 11/06/2010
yup.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgateman
07:20 PM on 11/06/2010
That's why it was $10 a lid back in the day! lmao $100 pound at the farm! woo hoo!