More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Steve Clemons

Steve Clemons

Posted: July 10, 2010 11:48 AM

Brookings Loses Bid on Orszag but Takes Kagan From Carnegie

What's Your Reaction:

kagan_robert.jpgYesterday, when I was at this meeting with Special Representative to Muslim Communities Farah Pandith and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs Cheryl Benton, Benton asked me off camera if I followed the LeBron James stuff. I sheepishly had to say that I had thought LeBron James was a soccer player -- and when I learned later that he was a baseball, oops, basketball player -- I felt even dumber than I should have on the subject.

While I don't know squat about sports -- I do watch the think tank all stars pretty closely.

For instance, Peter Orszag will not be going back to his home institution of Brookings after his role as OMB Director and is instead headed to the Council on Foreign Relations.

But Brookings is getting another prize.

Word has just reached us that Robert Kagan, currently Senior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, is moving his franchise over to Brookings.

While Brookings President Strobe Talbott can staff himself on Russia, China and India -- three big stakes foreign policy challenges -- it seems that much of the foreign policy team -- particularly in Brookings Foreign Policy Chief Martin Indyk, Saban Center Director Ken Pollack and now Robert Kagan -- is hardening its capacity on the Israel/Iran front.

Kagan -- next to Francis Fukuyama, Elliott Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz, and David Frum -- is one of the top tier serious intellectuals among neoconservatives, though it's clear that Frum and Fukuyama have distanced themselves from the broader movement to establish their own reformist franchises.

Kagan's move is important for Brookings as the institution has been working hard to get Haim Saban to give another large infusion of resources to his namesake unit, the Saban Center for Middle East Policy, at Brookings. Securing Kagan is one way that Brookings may have sweetened the pot for Saban who is according to one Brookings source "painfully flamboyant" about using his money to try and influence the DC establishment through think tanks and other vehicles to secure Israel-first, Israel-defending policies out of Washington.

-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note. Clemons can be followed on Twitter @SCClemons

 

Follow Steve Clemons on Twitter: www.twitter.com/SCClemons

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
margoharris
I used to be Snow White but I drifted.
01:29 AM on 07/12/2010
Why they think they need Kagan, I don't know. Neocons in "stink" tanks are a threat to all of mankind. They sit there in their little neocon world, drawing up grand plans of world domination and religious wars. When they get the levers of power like Cheney, the real world suffers, death and destruction. Everythinggetsfuckedup.
06:14 PM on 07/11/2010
Wow! How exciting! Beltway blogging bandit!
How often have the liberal or conservative wonks or the think tanks made right predictions or anticipated events. After the fact they are absolutely brilliant.
11:59 AM on 07/11/2010
Think tanks are another way for the elite class to make a fortune promoting stupid ideas for their particular party. It is all part of a corrupt system driven by money. I am not impressed by any of these people.
10:29 AM on 07/11/2010
Moving from one stink tank to another. Momentous.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
07:09 AM on 07/11/2010
Brookings used to be considered a liberal think tank. Getting one of the Kagan brothers certainly makes that seem like a lost concept. Of course those who are all about Israel first would like to muffle or co-opt an outfit like Brookings to be sure no serious challenge exists to the status quo. The sad thing is that think tanks in general are used to crank out talking points and propoganda.
04:58 PM on 07/10/2010
Robt Kagan -a prize? When did he find those WMD's in Iraq?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
07:10 AM on 07/11/2010
That's no longer an acceptable topic in DC.
04:24 PM on 07/10/2010
Why do we need "think tanks?" Why are these people wasting time and money telling us "ordinary folk" what the "ordinary folk" living the real, difficult working life already know...? Aren't most of these think tanks funded by the Right-Wing Conservative Chr!st!an types...?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
07:11 AM on 07/11/2010
Brookings used to be considered a liberal think tank, but I think that was the only one I can think of.
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
03:31 PM on 07/10/2010
ok Brookings follows Wapo to the dark side. at least I have a heads up on it next time I encounter any bleatings from brookings
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
02:48 PM on 07/10/2010
So I guess the Goopers are going to keep telling us how Brookings is "left leaning"?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Puller58
Man of Mystery
07:12 AM on 07/11/2010
Don't think they even mention it much anymore. Pollack and O'Hanlon clearly put that one to rest.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:05 PM on 07/10/2010
What they really ought to have done is trade Kagan to the Yankees for a raft of minor league prospects and a left-handed closer to shore up their bullpen going down the stretch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jobrien1950
fired up
03:25 PM on 07/10/2010
lol. Seriously, I think it has to do with Haim Saban and his money going to Brookings. But you might be right about the Yankee bullpen.