Breaking News from MSNBC:

The passport files of Senator Barack Obama were inappropriately accessed on January 9th, February 14th, and March 14th of this year by contract employees of the State Department.

The facts being presented on MSNBC (or perhaps I should say "information being presented as fact") as coming from the State Department is that the fact of these breaches of Senator Obama's files was not reported beyond the mid-level managers who first learned of these events until this afternoon. In other words, Secretary of State Rice -- we are told by the State Department -- did not learn these facts until yesterday. And we are told that Senator Obama's office was not told about any of this until today.

However, the State Department's Inspector General has NOT conducted an investigation. So, all that MSNBC has to go on is the State Department's own statements. An investigation WILL be conducted.

Former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger is telling MSNBC (by phone), "It's pretty clear to me that this was not done for political purposes."

Sorry, Secretary Eagleburger, but you have no more ability to know why Senator Obama's files were broken into than I do.

What I will hold out for is verifiable truths resulting from an independent, absolutely impartial investigation.

I will hold out for verifiable truth regarding not just how this happened and who knew about it and when... but also why it happened.

I hope you will all do the same.

UPDATE:

The State Department's Inspector General's job is currently vacant. The last Inspector General resigned last December.

Also, MSNBC now reports that Secretary of State Rice learned about this today, not yesterday.

UPDATE: Friday morning

I just want to state for the record that there's a reason I didn't say anything about who I think was behind this break-in. The reason: I am not going to pre-judge that issue until the facts come out. Some may think the Clinton's were behind this... some may think the Bush administration... some may think this is all just government contract employees with "too much time on their hands." What I do know is that for the Bush administration's spokespeople - or former Republican officials, such as Lawrence Eagleburger - to be saying "Oh, don't worry. We're sure this was all an innocent case of contractors behaving badly."... and for any reporter or citizen to then say "Okay. End of story" is crazy!

That's why I wrote this post: to demand that this story be followed where ever it goes. The days of taking the Bush administration's word for why anything has happened - without a verifiable, independent investigation proving them right or wrong - are over.

UPDATE: Friday evening

This afternoon, I blogged on the related issue of the State Department refusing to give out the name of the contractor involved in this story.

And sometime between 5 and 6PM Eastern, AP reported that it has learned that two of the three employees involved with Obama's passport files worked for Stanley, Inc. of Virginia. That's two down and one to go.

I note that on the web site for Stanley, Inc. there's a press release - dated March 17, 2008 - touting the firm receiving a "$570million Contract To Continue Support Of Passport Program"... support which the company has been providing for 15 years. From this press release:

This contract award follows Stanley's announcement in December 2007 that it had begun construction of a secure passport production center in Tucson, Ariz., expected to begin operations in spring 2008. The Tucson Passport Center and an existing facility in Hot Springs, Ark., opened in March 2007, were authorized under a 10-year Department of State contract in October 2006, initially valued at $164 million. Stanley oversees operations and the printing, quality control and mailing of U.S. passports and other travel documents at these locations.

The company began its relationship with the Department of State in 1992 when it assisted in establishing the National Passport Center in Portsmouth, N.H. Since that time, Stanley has expanded its services to support passport operations at all 18 locations nationwide.

UPDATE Very Late Friday Evening:

Thanks for the large number of comments everyone.

I regret that a number of people have taken my post as a starting point to get into various forms of Clinton vs. Obama vs. McCain back and forth stuff. Not everyone, of course, but a bunch of people. My post was not meant to be about any one candidate, including the theory that any one candidate might have been responsible for these events. My post was about the issue of the investigation being done by the Bush administration (in which case it is not a real investigation... just a white wash) vs being done by an independent body with the assistance that comes from letting a free press do its job.

And for that same reason, I didn't think it important to focus on the expanded number of candidates whose files were broken into, once that information came to light. I acknowledge that Senator McCain's files were broken into (also on March 14th, the last day Senator Obama's files were broken into) and that Senator Clinton's files were accessed (which happened during a training class, which is not the same thing as what happened to Senators Obama and McCain, because that happened in plain view of an instructor) and certainly want the investigation to include those incidents as well.

I have a very central concern in general.... that we have lost a lot of our ability to know what's really going on (vs. what our elected officials tell us is going on). We cannot be informed citizens - which is the fundamental premise for a healthy democracy - if we don't insist that information is accurate... produced with honesty and integrity. That's one reason why I list Al Gore's book "The Assault On Reason" as one of my two blogger's books.


 
 

Comments
175
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

The CEO of one of the companies linked to the improper access to the passport files of presidential candidates is an adviser to the Obama campaign. Mmm. Interesting. I had suggested before that the breach was a deliberate act by those acting on behalf of the Obama campaing, a deliberate act intended to create a controversy and to be used when Obama was sinking in the polls.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:42 PM on 03/22/2008

And somehow, in all these updates, Mr. Brant neglects to mention that Senators McCain and Clinton ALSO had their files breached. Where's the over the top outrage about their files?

I guess if you're not Obama, an invasion of privacy doesn't matter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:58 PM on 03/21/2008

What you and a great many people who have taken my post as a starting point to get into various forms of Clinton vs. Obama vs. McCain back and forth stuff have failed to understand is that my post was NOT about any one candidate. It was about the issue of the investigation being done by the Bush administration (in which case it is not a real investigation... just a white wash) vs being done by an independent investigation aided by a free press.

I'm sorry I didn't make that point clear enough for people like you. Next time I'll see if I can do a better job at being clear about my central point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 AM on 03/22/2008

It seems HILLARY doesn't take her privacy as seriously.
Her file was breached last year. Not a word from her.
She was the dog that didn't bark.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 03/21/2008

Well I sure hope they don't waste 2.2 million dollars investigating this farce. They did that on Bill Clinton and guesssssss what? They did not find anything to charge anyone with. So all you neocons masquerading as Democrats put away your stones.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 03/21/2008

In case you haven't heard, the breach has also occured on Clinton and McCains passport as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 03/21/2008


obama's records were breached 3 times in 3 months by 3 different people

then, only after condi's state dept. is busted, does she decide to announce that clinton and mccain had their records breached as well ?

GIVE ME A BREAK !!!!!!!!

how long did it take for condi to get on the phone with rove and come up with this effort to diffuse the situation politically ?

just now, as i write, cnn is headlining the story this way

"obama, clinton and mccain passport records breached" which is a very different story than

"obama passport records breached"



    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 PM on 03/21/2008

It is going to be a long news cycle this weekend.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 03/21/2008

On March 13th, the Clinton campaign wrote in an email: "As voters evaluate you as a potential Commander-in-Chief, do you think it's legitimate for people to be concerned that you have traveled to only one NATO country, on a brief stopover trip in 2005, and have never traveled to Latin America?"

I don't see how the Clinton campaign could have known Obama's travel history down to the details of his stopovers on international trips without having viewed his passport file.
Perhaps there is another explanation but I don't know what it would be.

See the story at the link below. The relevant quote from the Clinton Camp is:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08073/864842-176.stm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:48 PM on 03/21/2008

I am just curious if he made the same enthusiastic calls for accountabililty and investigation when it was shown that the Clintons were perusing FBI files of Americans they saw as imagined or potential enemies.


Anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 03/21/2008

I find it ironic that on January 9, 2008 when the first breach of Obama"s passport records was discovered the following notice was published in the Federal Register ;)

[Federal Register: January 9, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 6)]
[Notices]
[Page 1660-1664]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr09ja08-83]

SAFEGUARDS:
Passport records are protected by the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C.
552a (2007). All employees of the Department of State have undergone a
thorough background security investigation and contractors have
background investigations in accordance with their contracts. Access to
the Department of State and its annexes is controlled by security
guards, and admission is limited to those individuals possessing a
valid identification card or individuals under proper escort. Passport
office annexes have security access controls (code entrances) and/or
security alarm systems. All records containing personal information are
maintained in secured file cabinets or in restricted areas, access to
which is limited to authorized personnel. Access to computerized
databases is password-protected and under the responsibility of the
system manager and persons who report to him or her. The system manager
has the capability of viewing and printing audit trails of access from
the electronic media, thereby permitting monitoring of computer usage.

Only in D.C. where Tweedledum and Tweedledee are the intelligentsia LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 03/21/2008

Heh Heh Heh,,,, Now that McCalain's and Hillary's passport was "breached".... can't you just say looked at..... will you be so hell bent on finding the verifiable truth? I hope you all will. This is just so audacious

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 PM on 03/21/2008

Of course we will. Why wouldn't we be?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 03/21/2008

this is as outrageous as those who looked at Brittny Spears and George Clooney's hospital records and not as interesting , but keep up the audacity of rage

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:30 PM on 03/21/2008

Except that Britney Spears and George Clooney aren't potentially the most powerful people on earth, and that in their cases it was a private hospital and not the Department of State which is an arm of the Presidency and as such has a sacred trust with U.S. citizens.

Other than that....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 03/21/2008

The story is a non-starter. It is outrageous that it happened but it is also no shock as J. Degeneva (spelling?) stated on MSNBC last night. LOTS and lots of people have access to our records and if anyone wants to find out what the motivation was here it will be VERY easy to find out the names (and probably addresses) of the two civil servants who were fired for it - the one who is still working may be more difficult to locate due to, funny enough, privacy concerns. The passport application crunch only made things worse and now even more people have access.

Twenty-five years ago I worked for the phone company and people were always talking about "this is so-and-so's unlisted phone number..." and doing just what these people were probably doing.

Using this story in an attempt to bash Bush, even indirectly, is just silly, but it is a free country and some people can't get through a day with out letting some of their pain out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:21 PM on 03/21/2008

Excuse me, but I can't let this go without a direct reply. First, I think Bush has earned some bashing on privacy issues, don't you?

Second, this is serious. We are talking about candidates who are running for President, who are under the protection of the Secret Service. Those records include -- at a minimum -- home addresses, social security numbers and dates of birth. Depending on how deep the snooping went, they could possibly have access to more detailed information.

Third, saying that 25 years ago somebody else did something with an unlisted telephone number is not the same thing. The fact that someone else did it is NOT an acceptable excuse. By your logic, murder would be okay too. "Oh, but Ted Bundy killed some people. So what if it's against the law? If he did, I can do it." That's fabulous, and just the kind of twisted logic that has led to our civil liberties being stripped away, one by one.

So, YES it is a big deal; YES the American people deserve a thorough and accurate investigation of these breaches; and YES, if we keep allowing people to whittle away our rights, we'll wake up one day to find we're living in a Fascist country and people with your attitude will be shocked that it's come to this; when really, you should have seen it coming all along.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:56 PM on 03/21/2008

All the Obamaniacs can settle down... all three candidates files were breached. Put away the conspiracy theories and torches... this is clearly a case of a group of government workers who have way too much time on their hands. Shocking though I know...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 03/21/2008

Example number 3,234,542,352 of the rule that "when someone uses the word 'clearly', what follows will be rank speculation.

I doubt Obamaniacs (nice) are the only ones who think this at least deserves looking into? But hey - anything to poke fun at your political opponents.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:55 PM on 03/21/2008

Steven,
I am waiting for you or one of the other Obama Kool-aid drinkers to put into print that it was Hillary plotting with Bush to destroy the young prince!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 03/21/2008

Nope it was Hillary all by herself. Thanks for helping to spread the word.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 03/21/2008

Steven,

I am sure by now you have read the multitude of posts that confirm your assumption. It is really sad to see this sort of swill in print. I would love to believe that it is all the work of the Rovian Neo-Con Repugnants. In reality however I know that at least a small portion of these posts come from Obama supporters who are blind to the fact that Hillary Clinton stands for the same core principles that Obama does.
You can blame it on youth, lack of knowledge , mis-information,or media hype or what ever, this sort of blind loyalty only hurts there cause. I urge all well intended Obama supporters to take a step back from this sort of mean spiritedness and recognize that we both , Obama supporters and Hillary supporters must stand together United to assure Victory in November.
I for one am willing to overlook all the bad feelings and hurtfull remarks cast about during this Primary. It is my hope that all Democrats will do the same.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:07 PM on 03/21/2008

Where to start? Executive priviledge. Classified. State secrets. Terrorism investigation. Ongoing investigation. The list of reasons that this will NEVER be persued is endless. I can just see Bush and Condi sipping tea laughing their asses off. Yeah, we'll get right on that. HA!! Remember, the law is what Bush says it is. Or rather what the DOJ says it is in memos written to the president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 AM on 03/21/2008

This is an outrage to the government, that we absolute no security even in our own country. The fact that this occurred THREE times is unbelievable is a proof that it merely is a "curiosity" but an act of a political AGENDA - do you smell Hillary Clinton?
Again and again, Barack Obama will come through this with dignity and calm and reposition our focus to what really matters - our future! Hence Hillary keeps dragging us back to the dirty laundry. sigh

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 03/21/2008

Get us the names of these SD contractor flunkies, so we can look `em up on Opensecrets.org, and learn how much they have contributed to Senator Clinton's campaign(s).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 AM on 03/21/2008

That is probably the only real investigation that will ever get done on this case. I hope it happens soon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 AM on 03/21/2008

I don"t care who you support.. All Americans should see this as a outrage. This is a violation of one of our basic fundamental rights, our right to privacy. We should ask our government where does our right to privacy end and our national security begin. I have some questions. Why are contractors handling such sensitive documents. How many others has this happened? What did the accused parties do with this information and who are the responsible parties. I am angry and you should be too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:25 AM on 03/21/2008

If you think this is outrageous, just wait until our medical records are centralized under national health care.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 AM on 03/21/2008

Now, I certainly wouldn't put it past any vast number of people and groups in DC to do this with malicious intent. So let's investigate... it seems the only right thing to do.

What we SHOULDN'T do though, is assume from the start that something nefarious is afoot.

I've worked in jobs where I've had access to privleged information, and I hate to admit it, but yeah... sometimes you just go typing in famous names, or joke names, and see what comes up. I mean, that's how I found out that there really WAS a "Mr. Assmann" living in my state! So it certainly wouldn't shock me if some low level lackey decided to fart around and play "I wonder where the candidates have been?" on the computer.

I'm a big Obama backer, and I'd love to see this be something that'd blow up in the face of the Clintons or the Republicans, but honestly? I'm not going to go making assumptions about it being anything other than innocent, until an investigation is conducted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:57 AM on 03/21/2008

It is interesting that it was only Senator Obama. Three times. But I agree with Steven, that we should not point fingers, but push for an exhaustive investigation into this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 AM on 03/21/2008

This is a tempest in a teapot.

And it's happened before. A State Department official was dismissed for improperly looking into President Bill Clinton's passport files, during Clinton's presidency.

Now two State Department officials have been dismissed for improperly looking into Barak Obama's passport files.

It wasn't a grand conspiracy then and it isn't one now. Just small, in the scheme of things, idiocies.

Besides which, Obama has written his biography and has been in public life for the past 20 years. Everyone knows where he has gone (Indonesia. Hawaii, Africa, and one stopover in London) and where he hasn't (everywhere else, including Europe when he SHOULD have gone as Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's Subcommittee on European Affairs.)

But carry on Morama-bots - there are millions of straws out there, waiting to be grasped.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:51 AM on 03/21/2008

In Clinton's case, it triggered an investigation by a Special Prosecutor who concluded that there was no "there there" only after hours of interviews.

I don't think a little diligence here is too much to ask.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 03/21/2008

The site, CAPITOL HILL BLUE, published a blog today, 3/21/08 which says a former ambasador during Wm Clinton's administration now works at State & is connected, in some way, with the invasions of BHO's passport file. Is there another source to confirm the info CAPITOL HILL BLUE put on its site? This could embarrass her Hillaryship if she, her campaign or Slick Willy was involved in this thing. If anybody says the tampering with BHO's passport file was a 3rd rate anything, we, the paranoid, will think that it's a Watergate like plot. A new conspiracy will be exciting & the conspiracy theories will be jucicy, if not original.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:12 AM on 03/21/2008

Yeah, but plenty of people from Clinton's state department are now endorsing Obama and working on his campaign... the fact that he workED for a clinton doesn't mean he's workING for one now! Investigate, but don't jump the gun!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 03/21/2008

Hey, check out HP's blogs. It seems that State Dept Security is an oxymoron. It could be that everybody had a mole or troll in state to mine data that could be used against an opponent. Foggy Bottom appears to have been & still is a large & foul DC cess pool.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:30 PM on 03/21/2008

Yeah, right. I dont believe the Clintons had anything to do with it. I think we have people out there that would be really stupid to do this with no connection to anyone. When I read these posts, it seems to me certainly possible by the content of them. If some of you are so suspicious and off the mark, why would these employees be?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 03/21/2008

Why did Hillary Clinton start questioning Obama's travel experience, with very specific data on March 12?
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=6495

"As voters evaluate you as a potential Commander-in-Chief, do you think it"s legitimate for people to be concerned that you have traveled to only one NATO country, on a brief stopover trip in 2005, and have never traveled to Latin America?"

What did she know, and how did she find out... hmmmm, Obama's records breached March 14... WHAT A COINCIDENCE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 AM on 03/21/2008

Maybe she found out, uh, from HIS WEBSITE?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 03/21/2008