Don't Want Swine Flu with Lunch? Then Offer Paid Sick Leave
The spread of the swine flu contagion has yet to reach scary I Am Legend proportions, but things are getting pretty hairy out there. The World Health Organization has declared a pandemic, the first flu pandemic in 41 years, as infections continue to climb in the United States, Europe, Australia, South America and elsewhere.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States has confirmed 45 deaths associated with swine flu among more than 17,500 cases reported. With the U.S. economy already reeling, workplaces also have been affected, causing President Obama to urge workers with flu symptoms to "stay home."
But for far too many American workers, that is easier said than done. About 160 nations provide mandatory paid sick days, with 127 providing a week or more annually. Unfortunately the U.S. is not one of them, leaving some 60 million workers -- 43% of the private industry labor force -- without any paid sick days.
What that really means is that, in all these other countries, when you're sick, they want you to stay home and take care of yourself. In the United States, when you're sick we want you to report to work and infect your coworkers and customers.
Leaving aside the moral arguments, such a policy makes little economic sense. Coverage is missing most for many service sector and low-income workers who can least afford to self-subsidize their own sick leave. So when you go to a restaurant, or to your local grocery or office supply store, there's a good chance that the employees handling your food or handing you your change don't have any paid sick leave coverage. If they get sick, they probably cannot afford to stay home.
Care for some swine flu served with your French fries, anyone?
Who could be opposed to policy as sensible as making it possible for workers to stay home when they are sick? Business owners, that's who. Owners of small companies argue that forcing them to offer paid sick days would be a costly mandate, especially at a time when businesses already are coping with a struggling economy.
Certainly that is an important consideration. But why is it that small businesses in over 100 nations around the world -- including relatively poor or modestly wealthy nations like Croatia, Poland, New Zealand and many others -- can afford paid sick leave for their employees, but American businesses cannot?
Dr. Jody Heymann, founder of the Harvard-based Project on Global Working Families and author of a global study on workplace policies, says the United States is only hurting itself.
"If you look at the most competitive economies in the world, all the others except the U.S. have these policies in place," she says. Heymann and other advocates believe paid sick time should be an employment standard, just like the federal minimum wage.
Need more proof it can be done without hurting competitiveness? Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer -- which is practically a small country unto itself -- already provides paid sick days to employees who work more than 34 hours a week.
Here's to hoping the swine flu pandemic is just the kick that policymakers need to lead other businesses to their senses. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) has introduced a bill that would require employers to provide their workers one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of seven paid sick days a year. The benefit would be pro-rated for part-time workers, but unfortunately companies with fewer than 15 employees would be exempt, which makes little sense.
Still, it's a start.
Candidate Barack Obama voiced strong support for legislation giving all American workers paid sick leave. But President Obama has made a habit of backtracking on things he said on the campaign trail. Perhaps the swine flu threat will prompt him, and the rest of Congress, to come to its senses.
Originally published in the New York Daily News
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
As can be seen from the health care debate, the re-regulation debate, and any other worker protection debates in this country: profit uber alles. Consequences be d@mned.
My company generously gives me 3 (count'em) sick days per year!
Napolitano chose Commerce over Public Safety in the H1N1 case...that's some Head of Homeland Security..
It still never ceases to amaze me that so many businesses are so short sighted. I worked for 18+ years for a small family owned company & usually had to take my vacation time for sick leave. They did not seem to care that their family got sick too. And BTW, I only got 1 week vacation.
Listen boss, I am feeling too good to come to work today, but if I don't feel any better tomorrow, I'll come in early.
Yeah well it will never happen here as employers have the upper hand because there are very few jobs available.
Yawn. I usually stay home for a day or two and then I go to work because I totally don't mind sharing the goodies with everyone on the train and the bus and in the lunch room.
:-)
The swine flu has yet to reach the proportions of any other flue. If I get a choice, I take the Swine Flu with that, please. It seems to be the less harmful variety.
You might want to think twice about that.
I have. As soon as it became clear that his thing is less harmful than what I had last year, twice, I decided that having a bit of Swine Flu is not going to kill me.
:-)
36,000 people die from the regular flu each year. Here's to perspective...
Yeah well, if it takes hold in the fall then that number will be turned into millions with this particular flue and of course much more deadly.
Except that it isn't any more deadly than the "ordinary" flu. You can blow up the numbers and nothing special will happen. At least nothing special for those of us who know what they are talking about.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
