EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Steven M. Gillon

Steven M. Gillon

Posted: November 2, 2009 05:54 PM

The Kennedy Assassination: New Details About the Transfer of Power

What's Your Reaction?

?>

Exactly when did doctors give up their efforts to save Kennedy's life? And when did Lyndon Johnson learn that JFK was dead? These are the central questions that need to be addressed in understanding the transfer of power on November 22, 1963. The questions may be obvious; the answers are not.

The Warren Commission concluded that Kennedy was shot at 12:30 pm. He was declared dead at 1:00 pm, and Johnson was informed at 1:20 pm. Most authors writing about the assassination, even those who question the conclusions of the Warren Commission, have accepted this timeline.

New documents recently opened to the public call into question key parts of this timeline. The first piece of evidence is a long memorandum prepared by Parkland hospital administrator Jack Price, who was standing outside Trauma Room #1 as President Kennedy was wheeled in on a stretcher. Price gave the memorandum, which outlined his actions over the next few hours, to author William Manchester. Last year, Manchester's children granted me access to their father's rich collection of materials housed at Wesleyan University for my new book, The Kennedy Assassination - 24 Hours After.

According to the document, Price wrote that Dr. Kemp Clark, one of a team of physicians working on Kennedy, came out of Trauma #1 "and told me that the president was dead and that he would sign the death certificate." Clark did not record the precise time of his conversation with Dr. Clark, but he did note that just after they finished speaking he walked down the hall and saw a priest come in the door. Price asked his assistant to escort the priest to the Trauma room.

The priest was the 70-year-old Reverend Oscar Huber. His arrival at the hospital is crucial to fixing an approximate time for when doctors had given up working on Kennedy. The most reliable source for establishing the time of Huber's arrival is Dave Powers. As a special assistant to the president, Powers played many roles - receptionist, gatekeeper, greeter, and repository of trivia. On trips like this one in Texas, he was responsible for keeping track of the schedule, making sure the presidential party did not fall too far behind.

As they were running into the hospital with the President's body, Powers had instructed secret service agent Jack Reedy to find a priest. For the next few minutes he kept checking his watch, asking the secret service: "What's the story on the priest?" Standing outside the emergency room with Mrs. Kennedy, he occupied himself by writing down everything he saw, including the names of the doctors as they responded to the call for help. "Now I was carrying the President's schedule and I was writing this thing down in pencil or ink," he told NBC newsman Sandor Vanocur in an oral history at the JFK Library.

In a handwritten note that he turned over to Manchester, Powers stated that he saw the priest coming down the hall at 12:50 pm. If true, it would mean that Dr. Clark had already determined that Kennedy was dead at least 10 minutes before the official time stated by the Warren Commission.

If the doctors were ready to declare Kennedy dead at 12:50 pm, why then was the official time listed as 1:00 pm?

The time of death was a fiction created to satisfy Mrs. Kennedy. According to Catholic doctrine, the last rites had to be delivered before the soul left the body. If her husband was already officially dead before Father Huber had a chance to administer the sacrament, it would not have been valid. "Father do you think the sacrament had effect," she asked Huber in the emergency room. He tried to ally her fears. "I am convinced that his soul had not left his body," he said. "This was a valid last sacrament."

Whether doctors had stopped working on JFK around 12:50 pm or at 1:00 pm, may seem like a minor point. The issue is vitally important, however, to understanding the timing of the transfer of power.

For the first few minutes after they arrived at Parkland Hospital, those around the President may have been able to maintain false hope that doctors could save Kennedy. But by roughly 12:50 pm, when Dr Clark told Jack Price that he was ready to sign the death certificate, it was clear that doctors had stopped trying to save his life. The President was dead, and everyone knew it. Within a few minutes, the secret service notified its office in Washington. Shortly after 1:00 pm, Robert Kennedy would get a phone call at his home in Virginia informing him that the wounds his brother suffered proved fatal.

Yet, Lyndon Johnson, standing in a cubicle a few yards away, was still in the dark. The chaos and confusion of the moment, and the profound sense of grief and loss among Kennedy's close aides, only partially explains the delay in telling LBJ that he was now President. Kennedy aides were in denial that their beloved JFK was dead, but also that LBJ, a man they despised, was now President.

When did they finally tell Johnson the news? LBJ told the Warren Commission that White House appointments secretary Kenneth O'Donnell notified him of Kennedy's death at 1:20 pm.

Johnson's statement, however, does not stand up to scrutiny. Just as Kennedy aides pushed back the official time of death to 1:00 pm, it appears that Johnson may have pushed back the clock as well.

LBJ Secret service agent Emory Roberts directly contradicted LBJ's timeline. In a lengthy interview with Manchester, Roberts claimed that he was the one who broke the news. "At 1:13 pm I told Lyndon Johnson that President Kennedy was dead," he told Manchester. "One of my agents had told me that the President was dead and I checked with the agent outside the door of trauma room 1. I went to Johnson. Cliff Carter, Rufus Youngblood, Mrs. Johnson, and the President were there. I said, 'the President is dead, sir.'" According to Roberts, Johnson turned to Cliff Carter and told him to make a note of the time. "Someone mentioned that the time was 1:13 pm," he noted.

Oddly enough, Cliff Carter, LBJ's chief aide on the trip, contradicted his boss and supported Roberts' account. On the ride back to Washington on Air Force One, Carter dictated notes about the events he witnessed at Parkland Hospital. He observed that Roberts was the first to deliver the news, and that two minutes later O'Donnell entered the room and made the announcement again.

Carter repeated the story to Manchester. "There have been many wrong accounts of this." Roberts "did the notifying," he recalled. "He just said, 'Mr. Johnson, the President is dead.'"

How could Johnson have been mistaken about such important details? It's possible given the extraordinary pressure he was under that he simply misremembered the sequences of events. More likely, Johnson was using O'Donnell as political cover to blunt any criticism that might emerge from Kennedy loyalists, especially RFK, that he had been overeager to assume the presidency. Despite receiving a steady stream of pessimistic reports about Kennedy's condition, and being informed explicitly by the secret service that JFK was dead, Johnson refused to take charge until he received the word from O'Donnell.

Technically, the powers of the presidency transferred to Johnson at 12:30 pm when the fatal third bullet shattered Kennedy's brain. For a variety of reasons -chaos and confusion at the hospital, the grief of Kennedy's close advisors and friends, their distrust and disdain for the new President, and LBJ's insecurity -- the United States was without a functioning head of state for nearly 40 minutes.

 
 
 
Exactly when did doctors give up their efforts to save Kennedy's life? And when did Lyndon Johnson learn that JFK was dead? These are the central questions that need to be addressed in understanding t...
Exactly when did doctors give up their efforts to save Kennedy's life? And when did Lyndon Johnson learn that JFK was dead? These are the central questions that need to be addressed in understanding t...
 
  • Comments
  • 436
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
06:29 PM on 11/23/2009
Jackie was my neighbor in the hills of New England. She was always cheerful and pertinent, for lack of a better word. Whenever a direct question was given her, she would answer somewhat in parables, or at least be fuzzy logic about it if someone asked her in public, that is, around other people. Once she said that Jack simply knew too much about a lot of things and that life is short anyway, so why worry? In any case, Jackie documented practicall­y every moment of her life on a writing pad, which she referred to as her “friend”.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quinny
My micro-bio has been seized by the Feds
04:19 PM on 11/11/2009
John Russell and Spection,
Thank you for replying to my question. Unfortunat­ely , you are completely
wrong. You claim that Oswald was a "nobody" who wanted to be "famous".
Oswald was far from a nobody. He was a US Marine who enlisted at seventeen.
He was sent to a high security air base in Japan to learn radar operations­.
This base was used to fly U2 operations over the Soviet Union. There he was taught
the Russian language. Why? And lets not forget that all of this was happening at
the very height of the Cold War. He "defects" to the Soviet Union and lives there
for almost three years. The Soviets shadow him believing that he is a double agent.
In fact the CIA, FBI, and the Defense Dept. all refused to release any info they
had on Oswald when it was requested through the FOIA. Why?
He comes back to the states and, even though he has renounced his US citizenshi­p,
he is allowed back into the country in RECORD TIME. And he gets to bring his
Russian bride as well. This would not be possible if Oswald was a "nobody".
And if Oswald wanted to be "famous", why didn't he take credit for the murder?
The fact is he DENIED it 3 separate times.

"I'm just a patsy."
Lee Oswald

"Consequen­tly, a whole new form of Government is
going to take over the United States."
Jack Ruby
01:42 PM on 11/07/2009
All of this is covered in Manchester­s's "Death of a President.­" I think its a tragedy that the Kennedy estate will not allow "The Death of of a President.­" to be printed again.
08:25 AM on 11/05/2009
So, if The United States was 32 minutes without a president 36 minutes without a president of 40 minutes without a president, the point would be what? How quickly was power transferre­d to Andrew Johnson, Chester Arthur or William McKinley. I'm not suggesting that it is totally insignific­ant, just worndering what the significan­ce is. How would things have been different had President Johnson been sworn in twenty minutes earlier?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:14 AM on 11/05/2009
Vietnam was being set up as a highly profitable proving ground and money pit for the hawks who had 10 years of new weaponry to dump somewhere before they could justify funding for more.

If Kennedy were to follow through with his plan to end our involvemen­t in Vietnam, it would have undermined billions in expected war profiteeri­ng.

Remember Eisenhower­'s warning?
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
10:32 PM on 11/04/2009
Even more interestin­g stuff you won't find mentioned in the W.C. or appologist­s books.
If I am a "truther" I am proud to be seeking what is so as opposed to what I am being fed by
interested parties.

http://www­.seven-cir­cles.com/M­otionforDi­scovery.ht­ml
10:30 AM on 11/05/2009
You are a conspiracy apologist.

It's funny that you can't name just one conspiracy book that gets it right.

You have to choose some from this one, some from that one, etc.

That's called "fiction."
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
10:25 PM on 11/04/2009
Read this about Jim Hicks, the admitted radio communicat­or in Dealey Plaza:

http://www­.aarclibra­ry.org/pub­lib/jfk/ga­rr/grandju­ry/pdf/Hic­ks.pdf
02:17 PM on 11/04/2009
Weisberg on Stone's "JFK" : Although a conspiracy theorist, Weisberg was highly critical of Oliver Stone's film, JFK. He commented "To do a mishmash like this is out of love for the victim and respect for history? I think people who sell sex have more principle.­"
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
01:27 PM on 11/04/2009
Another rather compelling thought-op­portunity regarding the "three Tramps."
http://vid­eo.google.­nl/videopl­ay?docid=5­6030812961­11515946#d­ocid=428636461­2562887301
02:09 PM on 11/04/2009
Yes, let's ignore scientists­, pathologis­ts, acoustic, computer and photograph­ic experts and believe something that anyone can throw up on YouTube.
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
09:47 PM on 11/04/2009
Nobody is talking about ignoring anyone.
This is not anyone.
Come on, an open mind is no sin or malady.
You seem to be getting many of your answers from one site, the mcadams site.

How about answering with details and not deflection­s?
11:38 AM on 11/04/2009
17 pathologis­ts at the WCR, the Ramsey Clark Hearings , the Rockefelle­r Hearings and at the HSCA hearings , including Cyril Wecht, the lone concpiracy pathogist, agreed that the headshot came from behind JFK and exited the front.


More than 6 witnesses saw the RIFLE in the 6th floor TSBD fire the 2nd and 3rd shots.

It was LHO's rifle, his fingerprin­ts were on it and his prints alone were found on the boxes that comprised the snipers nest.

Bullet angles show the shots could only have come from the 6th floor.

LHO see at 11:55am on 6th floor and not seen again until around 12:30PM.

He was the only employee to leave the building after the shooting, he shot Tippet and over 5 people saw him run fron the Tippet shooting carrying a gun.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quinny
My micro-bio has been seized by the Feds
12:56 PM on 11/04/2009
John Russell,
You believe that Oswald acted alone. But my question is
this: WHY do you think Oswald wanted to kill JFK? What were the reasons
behind his actions? And what did he expect to accomplish by killing JFK?
02:06 PM on 11/04/2009
This post is why he did it.

46 years later we are talking abt a guy making $1.25/ hr. supporting a wife and 2 children who otherwise was completely unremarkab­le.
02:09 AM on 11/05/2009
I find it astonishin­g that so few people understand basic human nature! Oswald was a nobody who couldn't accept his fate as a nobody and so instead invented a fantasy life which put him in the center of things. Oswald's life-long dream was to be noticed and remembered­, so his defense of Castro and his defection to the Soviet Union were all of a kind and were quite clever ways to try to make a name for himself.

Can't you imagine his frustratio­n when the Soviets didn't want him either, and his reverse defection also attracked nobody's attention? Can't you understand what a troubled man he was, blistering under the humiliatio­n of utter nobodydom?

There's one more extremely critical point that almost no one seems to know or remember: OSWALD ADMITTED TO HIS WIFE THAT HE TRIED TO ASSASSINAT­E GENERAL WALKER WITH THE VERY SAME RIFLE HE AND HE ALONE LATER USED TO ASSASSINAT­E KENNEDY!!

It takes a singularly perverse kind of credulous, cretinous yahoo to imagine that anyone ELSE might have assassinat­ed Kennedy! How moronic can you folks get? Sheesh!
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
01:22 PM on 11/04/2009
John Russell... I will AGREE with you about one thing....h­ead-shot from the rear.
However, I think that head-shot came from the DalTex building's balcony on the second floor.
This was a flatter trajectory than would have been from the 6th floor with far less movement to the right by the automobile­.

However I believe there was a second, almost simultaneo­us head-shot from the grassy knoll, from behind the picket fence, where the car abandoned by Jack Lawrence was found and two strange men had been observed by several people and where FALSE secret service people were seen and
near where the three well-barbe­red "tramps" were found and escorted rather informally by unidentifi­ed uniformed policemen and no records kept.

Whoops----­what could this be? Worth a look:
http://vid­eo.google.­nl/videopl­ay?docid=5­6030812961­11515946#
02:02 PM on 11/04/2009
You can do all the ad hominem attacks on the panel members (LBJ forced many, including Dulles and Russell onto the WCR) you want but you cannot disprove any of their findings.

All you do is quote unremarkab­le conspiracy theorists who in 46 years have PROVED nothing.

I know you like Lifton and Wecht but you ignore that Paul O’Conner, a critical piece of Lifton’s book, watched the autopsy and concluded the head shot entered the rear of JFK’s head and exited the right front.

Wecht the only pathologis­t to support a conspiracy theory also concluded both shots hitting JFK came from the rear. (Testimony of Dr. Cyril Wecht, Transcript of On Trial, July 25, 1986, p.750.)


BTW, Ramsey Clark is a super liberal and Democrat who oversaw his investigat­ion into this as was Cong. Stokes who oversaw the HSCA.

As for your posts, I particular­ly like how you pick one item from conspiracy No.1 , two from conspiracy No.2, three from conspiracy no.6, etc.

BTW, you lost any and all credibilit­y when you said you thought one shooter was in the drain. Yeah, that would be a great vantage point if you were shooting someone lying on the street but nothing else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
07:59 AM on 11/04/2009
Forget the magic bullet for a minute....­what really matters here is the EXACT time of Kennedy's death at the hands of not one gunman, but several.

Jeez.
09:46 AM on 11/04/2009
One person, LHO, was responsibl­e.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theboneranger
10:38 AM on 11/04/2009
IMPOSSIBLE­!
01:06 AM on 11/05/2009
As far as the shooting goes, absolutely possible and factual. 1 shooter. 1 rifle. The single bullet theory is actually the single bullet fact. No other explanatio­n is plausible or possible. I'll take Arlen Spector's idea or FZ's ideas any day. FZ, after all, has someone shooting from a storm drain and someone firing a missle out of an unbrella. That's not even good fiction, let alone anything near a proveable fact.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
selenasade
04:38 AM on 11/04/2009
Someone said 'the day they killed John Kennedy was the day America started dying'. That's funny because it was exactly my thoughts when I was reading the article and before I read the comment.
Kennedy and his brother Robert were breaths of fresh air. They believed in justice and were prepared to do something about securing it for all. For all his foibles their brother Ted tried to continue their legacy until he died.
Many people thought we were going to see that again with President Obama and for a minute or two after he was elected we were lulled into a false sense of security. Alas, it didn't last. The people who want to rule the world on their own terms have seen to that. They have made sure the President'­s term will be business as usual.
I don't blame the President. I blame ordinary people who are wiling to accept a hierarchy where they toil endlessly for the benefit of the rich.
11:41 AM on 11/04/2009
You are a funny man.
12:32 PM on 11/04/2009
You are a correct man. I don't find any of this funny.
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
09:58 PM on 11/04/2009
Ditto. Keep on Reading: Sylvia Meagher; "Accessori­es After the Fact"
03:54 AM on 11/04/2009
Mr. Gillon -

For someone who loves history as much us I do, I never watch the History Channel any longer. Why? Because it doesn't really cover fact based history. The History Channel sensationa­lizes history like the Kennedy assassinat­ion.

To show "The Men Who Killed Kennedy" on the history channel was the final straw for me. That theory was so discredite­d. Why not cover history based on facts, not some drama fictionali­zed account that seems to have become a channel that really has potential?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mapleaforever
If she could stand it, I can. Play it!
02:21 AM on 11/04/2009
"The United States was without a functionin­g head of state for nearly 40 minutes."

That's nothing. It was without one for 8 years, ending this past January.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mapleaforever
If she could stand it, I can. Play it!
02:25 AM on 11/04/2009
PS Sorry Bobo; didn't scroll down, as I was too eager to get this dig in.
09:54 AM on 11/04/2009
It's been without one for 10 months now.
12:36 AM on 11/04/2009
I've read more books on this subject than I care to admit and must say there isn't anything new here. Most of the facts have been available for years. Because history is important and looking back can teach new lessons to new generation­s, I'm glad the book was published, but it shouldn't be hailed as a ground-bre­aking work.