iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Steven Van Zandt

GET UPDATES FROM Steven Van Zandt
 

There Is Only One Issue In America

Posted: 12/10/11 12:56 PM ET

I was obsessed with politics in the '80s. I've recovered and I'm feeling much better now thank you.

By the time I realized, as interesting as it was, I'd better stop this stuff and try to earn a living, I had discovered many of our social problems and quality of life issues could be traced to the same political source: our corrupt-by-definition electoral system. The solution to the problem was as easy to discover as the cause: The elimination of all private finance in the electoral process.

I was working doing most of my research in the area of our foreign policy since WWll, whatever fell under the umbrella of international liberation politics, but I examined and analyzed a fair amount of local issues as well.

I wanted to know how things work? Where's the power? Who's pulling the strings?

The economy of the world came down to the unholy trinity of guns, drugs and gasoline -- military industry, drugs (legal and illegal), and energy -- and now I would add agribusiness as the fourth controlling commodity, and always with the enabling bankers never too far out of sight making their profits far too often from wars and slave labor.

While that readily explained the suffering of the Third World, it didn't immediately answer why in America it was possible for so many people to be unhappy with our government's decisions, both foreign and domestic, when we're supposedly living in a democracy.

A quick analysis of our electoral process revealed the obvious answer. The simple fact is we do not live in a democracy. Certainly not the kind our Founding Fathers intended. We live in a corporate dictatorship represented by, and beholden to, no single human being you can reason with or hold responsible for anything.

The corporation has but one obligation, which is to increase profits for its shareholders by any legal means necessary by the next fiscal quarter.

They have no moral, patriotic, social, environmental, generational or even sustainable responsibility. They have only a short-term economic mandate and their only responsibility to society is to stay within the law to accomplish it.

This doesn't mean corporations shouldn't exist or even that their directors are evil by their very DNA. It has been a legally acceptable basic flaw in the form of our capitalist system that allows corporations to operate without a moral compass or obligation to society -- but that's a discussion for another day.

The law is rarely a problem because the corporations' legal obligations are pretty much designed first and foremost for their maximum profit by the legislation created by the legislators belonging to our two national political parties, both of which are wholly bought, sold and controlled by Wall Street. The banks and the corporations. In other words the game is rigged. Feel like a sucker? We all do because we all are.

The manipulation, aided by a very willing media also owned by the corporations, has made things easier beginning with what has become the amazing Orwellian staple of every newscast, selling the public on the lie that the Dow has somehow become America's scoreboard!

We're all hypnotized, rooting for them like they're our home team at a football game, cheering for THEIR scoreboard mindlessly forgetting WE'RE THE AWAY TEAM!!

You think your congressman is working all day to get you a job? He may want to. He or she is probably not a bad person. They probably want to do the right thing. But they can't. Long-time Capitol Hill staff and campaign strategists tell me the average legislator spends one-third of their time (or more) every day raising money or on activities related to raising money.

Yes, they are "elected" which creates the mass delusion of democracy to keep the masses from rioting, but congressional races are costing millions of dollars and some Senate seats are going for tens of millions each, and they're predicting well over one billion dollars for the next presidency.

That's some democracy we've created there, isn't it?

Of the people?

By the people?

For the people?

What people?

Democracy in America is a sick joke and the masses aren't laughing anymore.

Yes, we can demonstrate. We can march. We can write and sign petitions to our Representatives. We can occupy.

And we should because it's healthy to vent, and we don't feel so all alone. But the truth is, other than the value of venting, we're wasting our time. It is naïve to expect political results from any of these activities.

Our representative can give us lip service. A lot of sympathy. Empathy even. But we don't pay their media bills, gabeesh?

We need to eliminate all private finance from the electoral process.

And let's not be distracted by "reforms." Let's spare ourselves the unnecessary discussions about transparent disclosure, or the conflict of interest of foreign countries buying favorable treatment, or protection after protection being gutted by dangerously diluted regulations, or trying to impose this limit or that limit, etc., etc., etc.

Campaign finance doesn't need reform. It needs elimination.

To accomplish this we must overturn Buckley v. Valeo, one of the two or three worst decisions in the history of the Supreme Court.

The ruling makes the extraordinary decision that money is protected by the First Amendment.

Presumably Chief Justice Gordon Gekko presiding!

These smartest guys in the room actually decided that spending money is the equivalent of free speech. You might wonder why no one in that smart room stood up and said wait a minute, if money is speech, isn't lack of money lack of speech?

You know, as in the rich get to talk, and the poor don't? How are the non-moneyed classes represented by this decision?

I guess nobody stood up then, but it's time to stand up now.

In fact, I am now introducing a new pledge to be signed by our legislators. Of both parties. Indies too. Everybody's welcome.

THE PLEDGE FOR A DEMOCRATIC AMERICA

(We'll need someone more educated than me to draw it up, or we can copy Grover Norquist's anti-tax pledge, but it would go something like this.)

I, The Undersigned, pledge to overturn Buckley v. Valeo and eliminate all private finance from the electoral process, thusly restoring America to its democratic principles. I may take corporate, PAC, SuperPAC, or Chinese money to get elected or reelected (martyrdom accomplishes nothing), but upon my election I will make campaign finance elimination one of my immediate top priorities.

Now somebody should be starting a new Third Party whose platform is dedicated to this one idea. Twenty-five years ago that's what I'd be doing right now.

But the need for a Third Party aside, this idea applies for everyone. Just as much for the Tea Party on the right as the 99 Percenters on the left (the corporate oligarchy actually has no Party affiliation, it just looks Republican).

Both groups should adopt this issue. The Occupiers need not agree on anything else, because frankly nothing else matters, and a bit more focus on the root of our problems for the Tea Party certainly wouldn't hurt them either.

Let's see who's serious about representing the "people."

And you know what?

We might be pleasantly surprised at how many congressmen and senators sign this thing who would rather be doing something more dignified with their lives than spending half their time begging for money.

 
I was obsessed with politics in the '80s. I've recovered and I'm feeling much better now thank you. By the time I realized, as interesting as it was, I'd better stop this stuff and try to earn a li...
I was obsessed with politics in the '80s. I've recovered and I'm feeling much better now thank you. By the time I realized, as interesting as it was, I'd better stop this stuff and try to earn a li...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,691
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (61 total)
10:51 AM on 02/03/2012
It is time that we stop regarding our Constitution with so much reverence that the very people it was designed to serve are made to believe that they are not competent to improve and build on it. There are two fundamental schools of thought on constitutional law: those that believe that our Constitution is a living document whose meaning can be stretched to adapt to new American realities, and those who treat this document with pious devotion to interpretations of the various framers original intent. Both perspectives are served by Americans behaving like they are the living component of this democracy, and that a constitution that frames a government of, by and for a people must evolve with the people.

We need to not just install a bump in the road of history to the momentum of money - we need to be as effectively bold and as definitive as the best of the framers of our constitution. Only a constitutional solution can be binding to all branches of government and can hope to be enduring. The pledge for a democratic America may represent one of many roads that will be needed, all leading to the likes of the Bernie Sanders petition for a constitutional amendment.
02:13 PM on 02/02/2012
This IS the problem with our Country. He is so right. If we don’t change this, eventually this will lead to this county's destruction.
07:17 AM on 02/01/2012
You make perfect sense, which is why the politicos won't go for it.
Oh...what is "gabeesh?" Some kind of goulash? ;-D
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clifton Middleton
Plant It Everywhere
03:54 PM on 01/01/2012
Universal Birthright
Nationalize the oil, gas and coal
Free Market Hemp
10 Percent Wealth Tax
welcome to 2012 and the beginning of a new world
forget being against anything, the power come from being for the Thing ...
10:49 PM on 12/22/2011
Check into Louisiana's Buddy Roemer. Campaign Finance is his platform highlight, even as a Republican. I wish we could get him more pub.
11:39 AM on 12/22/2011
I agree with everything the author writes up until his proposed solution: to ask our representatives in Congress to pledge to overturn Buckley v. Valeo and eliminate private finance from public elections. If most people in this country have been politically disenfranchised by corporate interests, and if elected officials are so dependent on corporate financing for reelection, can we really expect them to sign such a pledge? Why in the world would they do so? And if they refused to sign it, would they face any adverse consequences? The real power held by average citizens is not from our votes, our letters to Washington, our rallies at City Hall - our power is not political at all. Our real power is economic. The money that corporations use to buy our government comes largely from profits on consumer sales (and unfortunately, wars). When we want to make our government responsive to our needs, we need to make corporations responsive to our needs. We can do this by boycotting products from as many large corporations as we possibly can, and at the same time, choosing new products from local, small businesses or buying second-hand items from thrift stores. Nothing will make Washington and Wall St more responsive to us than a plunge in consumer spending.
06:36 AM on 12/18/2011
Are you going to stop union influence as well ?
photo
BigJohnfromMN
Expecting Logic (YES even here)
03:13 PM on 12/18/2011
Did you read the article? He did
08:15 PM on 12/19/2011
That's always a corporatist's first retort. Just stop it. Unions are not nearly as powerful as corporations. But the corporations are afraid of their potential to be.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p47nandmosquito
09:28 PM on 12/16/2011
I agree that the issue raised is enormously important. But I don't understand why it is that whenever someone says "there's an enormous systemic problem with our election system" they immediately follow it up with "we need a third party that focuses only on this issue." First of all, anyone you elect is going to have to take a stand on other issues as well once they get to Congress, and voters will want to know what they're going to say first, so a one issue party is pretty foolish anyway. Moreover, why would you decide to make solving this problem in the system contingent on first fixing another one, namely the fact that third parties almost never have a chance? I do think that we need to fix this, but this isn't the way to get it done effectively.
08:55 PM on 12/16/2011
SVZ, this is dead-on. They don't care about protests. They care about any threat to their continuance in office.

The only area of disagreement would be that lawmakers can not take a dime from corporate interests. Once they do, they're effectively owned.

What's needed is a movement to elect candidates who pledge not to take a dime in corporate money. Rocky Anderson has started in that direction with his Justice Party and if this becomes a tenant of that party if could gain tremendous popular support.
05:25 PM on 12/16/2011
I actually had this same thought with our electoral system. My solution is a bit different than yours thou. "Of the people, for the people, by the people” When has the last president been middle or lower class? Our current system is tailored to allow only a select few to be viable presidential candidates. Why isn't there a tiered system that starts locally in your county? If I wanted to run for governor, Mayor, Senator, or even President I go to my county/district representative and put my name in the bucket. All campaign funds are regulated from this organization evenly for all runners. The funding isn't on the responsibility of the runner, but rather the citizens of the United States through donations, taxes, whatever is decided on isn't the important issue here. If I was running for president and I won in my county/district I would move to the next stage, state election funded the same way and divided equally as well, than up to region at which point you have four presidential candidates. This In my opinion takes away the corruption that comes from big corporations, or private investors having a congressman or woman in their pocket, frees them from having to worry about coming up with organizations to fund their next election, and ensures that they are actually working for the people again.
photo
bentenrai
The guy who fixes stuff everybody's given up on.
04:23 PM on 12/16/2011
Democracy happens only when the deimos participates. If you enact laws that eliminate a portion of the people able to vote by age 18 or 21, or play around with census numbers to achieve about the same technical result through indirect means, then yes people get cynical and don't want anything to do with voting. The first step is for the people to reclaim their right to vote without any kind of obstruction from their government, be it a Democratic or Republican led one. And then apply that right to vote without ever forgetting what it means, or taking it for granted.
11:38 AM on 12/16/2011
While I appreciate and agree with the spirit of the article, the result of such a change wouldn't be as different as one would hope. Without private campaign financing you'd be left with billionaires, the ones who can afford to finance their own mega-media campaigns, to be the only visible candidates for office. And where do you think their allegiance will lie? With the corporations that made them rich in the first place!
photo
bentenrai
The guy who fixes stuff everybody's given up on.
04:18 PM on 12/16/2011
That is not entirely true. The Obama campaign of 2008 changed the rules of the game in a rather tremendous way. The GOP is only now catching up to the grass-roots contribution model, and of course reserve the right to dislose who their real donors are. They want to have cake and eat it too.
photo
CosmicFreddy
Anthropocene: will be the shortest epoch ever...
05:55 PM on 12/16/2011
I think, the point of the article is that there cannot be ANY private financing of elections. It must be an accepted cost of our democracy. Certainly one I'm willing to agree ot.
05:58 AM on 12/16/2011
It is right that Steven goes on about lack of democracy. I see the same thing happening in the UK. Over the last 30 years there has never been a government elected with over 50 per cent of the public vote. Surely a democracy runs on the overall majority vote. Of course, a major problem inherent in this is getting the voters to vote and apathy has taken place. This has given those in power carte blanche to use their power to their own means.

With voter apathy, the government knows it is easier to push through things that they want wich the public wouldn't necessarily want. The majority of these non-voers are the normal everyday working people and the ones who do vote are middle/uppper class who have settled into their jobs and can look forward to a good retirement. By courting these voters the government guarantees funds for its campaign and in return can give backhanders to certain companies.

Business should be kept entirely seperate from politics and returned to the people. Only in that way will we have a true democracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GlennBeckReview
Media critic, blogger
07:59 PM on 12/15/2011
The campaign finance reform group from OccupyCooridation.com is working on a strategy to fix this. Early next year, you will see this approach unveiled.

We will fix this system or this system will kill us all.
05:15 PM on 12/15/2011
When need a Constitutional Amendment. This is the site where people need to go to get the ball rolling. (I signed up.)

www.getmoneyout.com/about

I whole heartedly agree with Van Zandt and Dylan Radigan. Get the money out of politics and our voices can no longer be ignored.

Here is a quote from their About page above:

"Today we face a crushing burden of foreclosures, dropping incomes, and a financial elite that has bought our government. The elite consensus is powerful enough to prevent change, no matter who is elected. The situation seems, at least in electoral terms, hopeless. Yet, America has been here before, and has shown remarkable resilience in the darkest of times.

So just how do we get the debate we deserve? How do we root out the corruption, greed, and fraud in our system? Clearly, the root of much evil in our system of government comes from the financing of political campaigns by powerful interests. And the Supreme Court has said that money is speech, and thus, protected by the Constitution. So we must pass a Constitutional amendment to speak back to the Supreme Court, and assert the primacy of government by the people."
photo
bentenrai
The guy who fixes stuff everybody's given up on.
04:25 PM on 12/16/2011
Money does not matter as much as participation and making sure votes are not rigged.
The debate you deserve, you have to clamor for it. Politicians are people pleasers, they'll go for whatever makes them look good.