More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Steven Weber

GET UPDATES FROM Steven Weber

The Fox, the Fool and the Facts

Posted: 06/19/11 09:41 PM ET

Watching Jon Stewart's appearance on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, it would be unlikely that one would walk away doubting that he is a comedian first and a political commentator second or that the comedian/pundit/macramé enthusiast was in any way disingenuous about his show's portrayals of Fox's many detestable attributes (although when he said he'd voted for G.H.W. Bush, visions of a spindly, younger Stewart being shoved into a voting booth by a cigar butt-chewing construction worker wearing an "America: Love It Or Leave It" sticker on his helmet mitigated the wholly improbable admission). After all, his show airs on Comedy Central, and a more truthful and less misleading advertisement -- other than, say, The Food Network -- would be hard to find.

It would be equally unlikely (a pairing of words that Tom Brokaw would have pulled a muscle trying to pronounce) that anyone who wasn't a devotee of Chris Wallace (whose fan base must consist of those left disenfranchised after the death of Lawrence Welk) wouldn't wonder what Stewart was doing spending his morning defending himself. Did you understand all that? I'm not sure I did.

Wallace has the bearing and the regally smug heft of an old style heavyweight network anchor, amid trappings which suggest to the Fox viewer that "it's Sunday -- God's day -- so we're gonna tone down the garishness -- until tomorrow", but with a touch of Ted Baxter thrown in; the smirk is printed into his puss as if it had been kicked there.

And as Wallace rolled clip after clip in an effort to debunk Stewart's description of the network as being anything but fair and balanced, he, being an archetypal Fox bully-boy, inadvertently proved Stewart's point. No one but an organization with an enormous chip on its shoulder engages in schoolyard "see-I-told-you-so" antics, especially an organization which continually bullies people into believing it isn't a bully. But Stewart, unfazed by the snarky posturing, mostly took it all in stride.

But the telling moment when Stewart said to Wallace "You're insane!", to which the veteran newsman responded with a rather weak "I am?" seemed to boil the dynamics of the so-called culture war down to the small. The moment and the interview overall was redolent of the exchanges between King Lear and his Fool, the jester's barbed truths vexing the exalted bully, now deposed and dithering.

It's not like Fox and the rest of the right-wing media hasn't got the talent to get its messages across, though their casting is a bit labored, consisting mainly of square-jawed daddy-warriors and comely mommy-pinups. It is, rather, the message itself that fails to convince the audience outside the one it's aimed at (the one that prefers victory rather than veracity) that it is in any way fair or balanced. An organization which has to resort to fear mongering, intimidation and flat-out bullshit kinda loses its journalistic credibility.

It's almost as if Jon Stewart was giving Chris Wallace and Fox yet another chance to come clean and stop with all the nonsense about their not being possibly the most successful propaganda arm of a political ideology that there's ever been. Of course, those with an opposing political bent might say the same about Stewart. But they'd be wrong (See what I did there???).

The artfulness with which Fox can deliver its product is a wonder to behold, but owes more to the reach technology has within our media-addicted culture than the actual validity of what's being broadcast. That, and the relentless repetition of suggestions both superficial and subliminal, has an impact not unlike the hammer has upon a nail.

But when the hammer is wielded by Fox News, the truth -- and Jon Stewart -- prove to be rather slippery nails.

 

Follow Steven Weber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheStevenWeber

Watching Jon Stewart's appearance on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, it would be unlikely that one would walk away doubting that he is a comedian first and a political commentator second or that t...
Watching Jon Stewart's appearance on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, it would be unlikely that one would walk away doubting that he is a comedian first and a political commentator second or that t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 762
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
02:45 AM on 06/27/2011
The thing that frustrates me so much with a lot of you guys on the left is, you are all so convinced that your ideals are 'the truth' and 'facts' that you can't even point to liberal bias when you see it. Half of the people in these comments are going as far as saying liberal bias is something that only out of touch conservatives believe in, and that its a complete myth. How can any rational or logical person honestly believe that of all the news networks, only fox is bias and the rest are just 'truth tellers' and 'fact givers'? Are you people really that arrogant?

I've seen countless people on here actually make the claim that Jon Stewart is subjective and it just completely blows my mind. This is a guy who loves to point out when people get caught in a lie, yet do you recall when MSNBC edited a clip of a African American tea partier, so it didn't show his skin color, and they zoomed in on the gun he had with him at the rally, and proceeded to discuss how the tea partiers were motivated by racism against obama, and that's why they had guns.

I watched that entire week and not ONE WORD was said by Jon Stewart. Something that huge and that obvious, and it was being exposed by fox over and over all week of course, so there is no way he missed it, yet he says nothing.
03:04 AM on 06/27/2011
(3/3)I do not think Jon Stewart should change his material or change what he does, I can respect that he has different viewpoints then me, but I would have a lot more respect for him if he could admit that he does have a political agenda. Before the bush years, I would have agreed that he was a comedian first, influenced by his political ideas, like he said, but since bush won that second election, he had been a political critic first and a comedian second.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
courtb
10:11 PM on 06/26/2011
What people aren't discussing is that if Fox News was different, it wouldn't be viewed the way it is. There's nothing wrong with conservative talking heads. There are many intelligent conservatives out there whom I don't always agree with, but find interesting.

Fox News isn't the conservative news channel. It isn't the "counter point" to so-called liberal media. If it were, the news segments wouldn't be as partisan and untruthful as they currently are. At Fox News, opinions have become the new facts and that's why it is disgraceful and that's why the name "Fair and balanced" doesn't apply.

Fox News has a very specific perspective, message, and purpose and it isn't conservative ideology.
photo
larryvnyrd
Left wing, long haired, trade unionist, liberal
06:21 PM on 06/26/2011
What amazes me is not Faux news. It's email. People who belive in the liberal bias of the media, won't believe anything on CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC, MSNBC etc. But let someone send them an email, and it's the gospel. The "liberal bias" is the smartest ruse ever. It gives people who don't want to be confused with the truth, a way to feel smart, and right in the face of facts to the contrary.
Tthey can never lose an argument, because their oppostion never has any facts. It is not a fact, after all, if you got it from the "government controlled, liberally biased, drive-by media".
05:25 PM on 06/26/2011
Does anyone really take all these talking heads as serious, they all project thier own bias. No one even really reports the news, it's either right or left. If you want the facts, you have to read, read somemore and dig out your own facts. They all have big salaries,maids and live life large, not like the average viewer. They all have bosses that tell them what to do,right or left.. They take our money and time and give very little in return.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Articulator
09:30 PM on 06/26/2011
Faux is a propaganda machine. That is the point.
CactusTom
My New Novel
04:00 PM on 06/26/2011
The first step in a strongman takeover is to undercut government in the eyes of average citizens. The government must be portrayed as both inherently evil and incompetent, which in the messy world of true democracy is not a particularly difficult task. Moreover, dictatorial forces must create situations that prove their point. This greasing of the skids for strongman takeover by undercutting the role of government the eyes of the public has been underway for at least 30 years by the Republican far right, which today is basically the entire Republican party, fronted by the so called Tea Party.

Next the dictatorial forces need disinformation organs like Fox News, Limbaugh and Grover Norguist to spread lies and fear among the masses. Third they need to expound a simple bumper sticker ideology that they ruthlessly enforce among their own. Grover Norquist does not mince words when he states that anyone who hopes to continue their Republican political career dare not tray from his ideological dictates.

The last step is to totally crash the economic system by any mean possible, causing the masses to reach out in blind desperation to those who would offer certainly and action. That final step may very well come about if congress fails to raise the debt ceiling, sending the US and world economies into the dumpster. I can just see Mr. Norquist licking his chops over that prospect.
03:00 AM on 06/27/2011
Did all these things not occur under the bush administration? Wasn't MSNBC's entire image born from catering to the tons of liberals who were out buying bush lied people died bumperstickers? Wasn't it so common for liberals to bash bush that it became 'trendy' to do so? Kind of like it is now to attack fox and palin?

How can you possibly see things from such a one sided lens? Fox might be the biggest offender and the least truthful news organization, but MSNBC is getting right there with them. Don't believe me? go watch the ed show. Dont believe me? Look up the 'racist tea partier' that had a gun, it was edited by msnbc to HIDE THE GUYS SKIN COLOR because he was black. Then they proceeded to talk about how tea partiers had guns cuz they were racist and obama is black.

How is that not on the same level as what fox does?
02:26 PM on 06/26/2011
What do you mean unfair ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:49 PM on 06/26/2011
Altho my politics are so far left I can't put my pants on, I watch a lot of Fox. Firstly, one ought to know what "the folks" are being fed. Second, it's like passing a car crash & stopping to gawk. Something so astonishing, grisly, & distressing, requires you to to slap your face & put Rachael back on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johnagain
WTFWJD?
12:21 PM on 06/26/2011
If only FOX could use it's powers for good, instead of evil. To build, instead of tear down. To inspire our better angels, instead of instilling chronic fear.

This network proves the old adage that it is always easier to destroy than it is to build.
04:26 PM on 06/26/2011
That's not their goal. Their goal is power. And money. Power and money for them. That's all.
07:43 PM on 06/26/2011
MSNBC should be in your post as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
courtb
10:05 PM on 06/26/2011
Why?
11:31 AM on 06/26/2011
The thing I love about Fox News is how many Liberals have to watch. The whole. Thing. in order to write a spiteful column about it. But as for the mommy pinups? I thought you guys were pro Feminists. Those mommy pin ups are all lawyers. Foxes too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cheryl tobin
Alpha Dog with my pack!
03:26 PM on 06/26/2011
Feminists do not need to dress up like "mommy pinups" even if they have a law degree. Republicans seem to need their women to spout nonsense and look like "Foxes". I call that sexist.
04:27 PM on 06/26/2011
It's all part of the power game.
Threepointturn
Jon Stewart watches Fox "news", so you don't have
10:17 AM on 06/26/2011
Fox uses a specially, hand-picked focus group to test their propaganda out on beforethey send it out along the airwaves. This special group happens to be 3rd grade children or this group happens to be special 3rd grade children.

The selection of this special group of children is especially complicated, because the collective IQ in the room has to be equal to the collective IQ of millions of Fox Viewers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwashmon
Usually, everyone is right to a certain degree....
10:15 AM on 06/26/2011
Facts and accuracy are what makes The Daily Show more of a news program than FOX! But that is not Jon Stewart's fault, it is FOX that chooses to be the pernicious propagandist that it is.
indyclem
looking for logic
05:39 PM on 06/26/2011
politifact does not agree on who is more informed but dont let that get in the way of your agenda
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proudtohaveserved
08:29 PM on 06/26/2011
INDY politifact corrabotated that fox "news"is a lier, many times over
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:56 PM on 06/26/2011
LOL! Facts and accuracy,… are you high? It’s a satire of a FAKE news show on the comedy channel! Stewart is as partisan as they get and displays that nightly. He try’s to hide behind his satire but consistently goes after Republicans, the Tea Party, and conservatives in general far more often and with much more virtual than he does for democrats or any progressive. And the few times he does “ball bust†a democrat it’s done with a velvet glove.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Articulator
09:32 PM on 06/26/2011
There is no equivalent on the left to the propaganda machine of Faux on the right.
If there was and equivalent, that made things up as much as Faux did, you'd see it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwashmon
Usually, everyone is right to a certain degree....
10:12 AM on 06/26/2011
The Daily Show will dump on anyone who needs dumping on. The fact that he does it in such a funny and intellectually satisfying way is a bonus. Otherwise, it would be so sad nobody would want to hear it on a regular basis. Now if you wanted to take a look at what FOX said was a counter ballance of the liberal media you would find that hate and finger pointing is their preferred way to view things.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wallyone
08:23 AM on 06/26/2011
How hard was it to convince people that everything about Obama and his agenda were evil and dangerous? That everything he thinks and does is bad for America? Fox is brilliant at accomplishing the goal of bringing down the president. I hope all their employees are proud of themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
De Tocqueville and Marx were both right
06:42 AM on 06/26/2011
Fox viewers are 35% more misinformed than viewers of any other source.

That pretty much speaks for itself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:53 AM on 06/26/2011
Courtesy of Left oriented pollsters funded from the Left.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
De Tocqueville and Marx were both right
11:02 AM on 06/26/2011
The Truth hurts!
02:07 PM on 06/26/2011
I guess only poll that prove your views are accurate
indyclem
looking for logic
05:42 PM on 06/26/2011
proof please politifact found just the reverse somebodys not telling the truth
08:06 AM on 06/24/2011
Oh , you are an actor! Why didn't you say so? actors are naturally morally and intellectually superior right? We all know that famous people must be smarter and their opinions hold more weight for sure!
photo
The Smartest Monkees
Planet of the Apes? We're on it, baby!
07:10 PM on 06/24/2011
Ooooh those actors!

Politicians, firemen/women, priests, scientists, truck drivers, lawyers, beauticians, lumberjacks, taxi drivers, CEO's, writers, barbers, tug boat captains, pilots, oil rig workers all have the right to voice their opinions and do so, but actors?????

What makes them think THEIR opinion should be heard? Egomaniacs!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rowsdower
I'm Rowsdower. Zap Rowsdower.
02:45 AM on 06/26/2011
Which party did the actors Reagan and Schwarzenegger belong to again?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rowsdower
I'm Rowsdower. Zap Rowsdower.
12:07 PM on 06/26/2011
Uh-huh, no reply to that.

I think someone's mad that the only Baldwin on their side is Stephen.