iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Susan Gregory Thomas
 

All Apologies: Thank You for the 'Sorry'

Posted: 08/23/11 03:12 AM ET

When I wrote a Generation X memoir of our baby boomer parents' divorces, and our own that we try to stave off at all costs, I expected to get a lot of flack from baby boomers--especially from moms. The statistics measuring their child-rearing skills were grim. Frankly, they just weren't there.

After the epidemic divorces of the '70s and '80s were finalized, the dads mainly receded into the background (as everyone whose dad went through the Disco Dan phase can attest). In fairness, though, even if they'd wanted to stay involved, dads didn't have much legal pull. In the '70s, only nine states permitted joint custody; today, every state has adopted it. Consequently, most of us with divorced parents were raised by our single mothers--and at that point in U.S. history, many moms were applying themselves to "self-actualization," plotting career routes and exploring the nuances of their newly found sexual and political freedoms. What were the kids doing?

Generation X, according to a 2004 marketing study about generational differences, "went through its all-important, formative years as one of the least parented, least nurtured generations in U.S. history." Census data show that almost half of us come from split families; 40 percent were latch-key kids. We were making our own meals by age 8, letting ourselves into empty homes after school, numbly watching program-length commercials on TV, and trying to get to sleep while they "entertained" their male--and/or female--friends in the living room.

It's not fair to blame the moms completely. After all, they were doing the important work of the Women's Movement, often without back-up, financial or otherwise. But they shouldn't be surprised that we're such edgy Eisenhower throw-backs now, that we'll do anything for our kids, most especially avoid divorce at all costs. We divorce far less than our parents: 77 percent of us have made it to our 10-year anniversaries, a good indication of longevity. Many of us never marry at all. Friendship is more important to us than sex in marriage, say the studies. Time with our kids is more important to us than corporate ladders, say the studies.

So, when my editor at Random House suggested that we send advance copies of the book to people like Nora Ephron, Nancy Friday, and Erica Jong, I cringed out loud. I knew exactly what they'd say: Baby-wearing prude! Whiny slacker! Anti-feminist ingrate! Thanks for the suggestion, I said to my editor--I'll pass.

But it seems like the Greeks get you coming or going. The first week of my book's publication, I was paired up with Erica Jong on an NPR radio show. We were meant to ruminate on Jong's concerns that Generation X had given up on sex (Jong's own daughter had written an awesome essay entitled, "They Had Sex, So I Didn't Have To"). Since my own marriage, which I had vowed never to quit because of my own parents' monstrous divorce, had dissolved in spite of everything, I was crushed on a number of fronts. In this case, the boomer mom was yet again grabbing center stage to tell an Xer what a loser she was: that she was right, and I was wrong. Even more humiliatingly, she would be kind of on the money.

But the first thing Jong said was that I was right: boomer mothers had not given enough thought to how their behavior would affect their children. I was right: the sexual revolution, as enacted in one's childhood home, must have been terrifying. I was right: the divorces were bombs, and we were casualties. It was, she said, completely understandable that women of our generation would never want to divorce, to protect our children--that we might let sex take a back seat in marriage. We were right.

The producer later told me that it had gone undetected, thank God: ridiculous tears were lolling down my middle-aged face. Everything in me vibrated "thank you."

I then received emails from an astonishing number of divorced boomer moms. Phrases such as "your book makes me cringe in places, but I'm learning a great deal," and "Now I understand why my children act that way!" have been ricocheting in my uncomprehending mind. A recent text from my own mother, who--though she'd read my book to read prior to publication--simply said: "I did not know, and I don't know how I couldn't have known. I'm so sorry. I am so proud of you."

It occurs to me now that I, and maybe many of us, have spent so much time criticizing our mothers for their self-centered disregard of us as children that perhaps we have not spared them a minute to wiggle in an apology. It also occurs to me that our collective quest to be perfect parents is inherently shaming. Maybe they can apologize when we admit we can muck things up, too.

For me, it's simply: Thank you, moms. You have no idea how much your being sorry goes, in the wake of my own fallen marriage. Apologizing means understanding why I had no idea of what a marriage was supposed to be, why I opted for a best friend rather than a husband, why parenthood trumped a healthy conjugal relationship. Thank you for seeing this.

Now, what do you think I should look for in a middle school for my oldest daughter?

Susan Gregory Thomas is the author of In Spite of Everything: A Memoir (Random House: July 12, 2011)

 
When I wrote a Generation X memoir of our baby boomer parents' divorces, and our own that we try to stave off at all costs, I expected to get a lot of flack from baby boomers--especially from moms. Th...
When I wrote a Generation X memoir of our baby boomer parents' divorces, and our own that we try to stave off at all costs, I expected to get a lot of flack from baby boomers--especially from moms. Th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 136
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:17 PM on 08/27/2011
The wisdom of waiting until one is mature enough and has had experience in the world is proven by this article. At 61, I have a 22 year old. I made the decision to be largely a stay-at-home mom during his early childhood years, after which I worked part time until he was in college. I have friends who are parents of 42 year olds and I remember how trapped most of them felt in those early days. I had years to sow my oats, though I married at 21 (divorced at 23, no children from that union). My girlfriends who were raising two, even three toddlers while in their twenties, were chomping at the bit to get out into the world. Many of them put their children in daycare, where a caregiver witnessed the first steps, first words, etc....I remember my best friend telling me that her daughter's first word "mommy" was voiced to her childcare provider. By the time I was pregnant at 38, I had gone on most of the adventures I wanted to experience. I had purchased a home as a single woman, dated extensively, and lived on my own for over 15 years. I believe youthful parents in this era are repeating the pattern their own parents established. I know this sounds self-righteous, but I am just pointing out that not every baby boomer chose to have children early.
03:38 PM on 08/24/2011
MP, I am well aware of the difference between anecdotal and statistical evidence. However, Thomas wrote: "Generation X, according to a 2004 marketing study about generational differences, 'went through its all-important, formative years as one of the least parented, least nurtured generations in U.S. history.'" That, to me, sounds like an indictment of a generation of parents -- and more mothers than fathers, as it turns out, since I guess mothers are still more directly responsible for latch-key kids than fathers, in the eyes of society as well as (apparently) their children.

In any case, I don't see what is gained by picking through the indictment and finding reasons to excuse myself from its scope and say, in effect, "Oh she's not referring to me. I'm a good mother. She's just referring to those other bad mothers." I've had enough of articles that seek to divide women against each other: stay at home moms versus working moms, for example. Or, more recently, tiger moms versus not-so-tigerish moms. This seems just another version of that.

Since time began, I suspect, parents -- no matter what their generational membership -- have had varying degrees of success in parenting. Sometimes the causes of success or failure are within a parent's control; sometimes not. There may well be some generational "trends" in both those kinds of factors. But this article, IMO, goes beyond that and makes some sweeping generalizations about boomer moms.

(more to come, I hope)
03:50 PM on 08/24/2011
Just a little bit more...

By definition, there is a self-selection thing going on with the boomer moms who chose to apologize, but I'm not sure it's dispositive in favor of Thomas' theory. It could simply be a reflection of being open to expressing regrets -- and who doesn't have those?

Some parents are clearly bad bad bad. The papers are full of heart-breaking stories. Beyond that, as someone else here posted, there's a lot of pure chance in whether your life turns out the way you might've wished. I would hope all parents are open to hearing their children, considering their own actions and inactions, changing what needs to be changed and apologizing for hurt caused. None of that, however, means we were "bad" parents. Maybe we were "good enough" parents who nonetheless caused hurt, as people are wont to do.
06:08 PM on 08/24/2011
Thank you for your reply to my post. I needed a sympathetic ear. You are so right-parenting is a difficult job with varying degrees of success. My daughter is 24 now and is trying to figure life out-she has a good job (not fulfilling) but is finding out she should have listended to me with choices she has made with work and personal relationships. There is a wonderful quote from the movie "P.S. I Love You"- that fits my sentiments right now: "You know the worst thing for a parent other than the first thing -losing a child, it is seeing a child headed for the same life they had". Thank you, Mom 87
07:07 PM on 08/24/2011
Hi mom87, you're welcome. You're the one I was referring to above who posted about the luck involved in your life turning out as one might have wished. There's a lot of truth there, but you don't really know it when you're young and waiting for it all to begin. At least I didn't. :)
02:22 PM on 08/24/2011
Yet another divorce article that fails to even acknowledge the many single-parent fathers who raised their children with little or no assistance from their ex-wives, "who receded into the background." Absent mothers, many of whom, without consequence, paid little or no child support. Here's to all the single dads out there, past and present. Good job dads!
12:10 AM on 08/27/2011
Yeah, they should get credit for ruining their children's lives too!
09:39 AM on 08/27/2011
They've been getting most of the blame for far too long. Still waiting to hear the phrase " Deadbeat Mom."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Savage Saint Roger
Card Carrying Liberal
04:33 PM on 08/27/2011
I was a single custodial dad. I got plenty of credit for ruining her life! ;) Now, she's ruining my grandson's life. And the beat goes on...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AHMatron
02:03 PM on 08/24/2011
I'm a boomer mom and though I never divorced, I have a clue for you. ALL WOMEN make certain that they never make the mistakes their mothers made. They make different mistakes.
I can't wait to read what your children write about you.
P.S. My mom is long dead, but my big sister still whines about all she did wrong. I tell her, "hey, you're 60, get over it." Good advice for all crybabies here.
01:23 PM on 08/24/2011
I'm a boomer and can assure that, not only would my parents not have considered the consequences of their own behavior on their kids (much less apologized), they would've told us to quit whining and grow up. It's in reaction to not being heard by our parents that we learned to listen to our kids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EddieRascal5
Fear is the mindkiller..
01:00 PM on 08/24/2011
I am a GEX Xr with kids. I have been thoroughly disappointed with the boomer generations unwillingness to help with the grandkids. When I was a child, we went to grandmas all of the time so the parents could fulfill their needs. Now that the boomers are grandparents they are too busy with traveling, gambling, and fulfilling their needs to fool with the grandkids. I know that I am generalizing and there are great boomer grandparents out there, but this is a trend that I have observed repeatedly with my generation. I just feel like the Boomers have a strong selfish streak that is pretty lame.
01:26 PM on 08/29/2011
I can't wait to be a grandma so that I can be part of raising my grandchildren. My mother (83) and dad before me gave me a hand when I was ready to go back to work. They watched my son, nurtured and played with him for over 5 years while I returned to teaching part time. My son is only 22 and not ready for children, but a 61 I am totally ready, willing, and able. Please don't dis all the boomers on the basis of your own parents. Chances are good that 60 year olds who are selfish now have always been that way....same for 40 yr. olds and so on. It has nothing to do with which generation you've been born into.
12:55 PM on 08/24/2011
I don't understand the distinction between a husband and a best friend? You made your husband just being your best friend sound like a negative there at the end. I think the thing people have to realize is the sex part of a relationship takes work. No one last 60 years on good sex alone. Sex is more easily fixed than friendship.

Don't really know why women can't understand this. There shouldn't be a distinction between a husband and a best friend. Just because sex drops off doesn't mean it has to forever. It's up to you to do something about it.
11:50 AM on 08/24/2011
About 60% if first marriages and 80% of second end in divorce, with about 90% of them filed by women. Women are the same ones who make a big deal about weddings, wanting to make all the decisions on lavish ceremonies while spending other people's money. Go figure.
photo
BettyBoop200
Left is right
11:38 AM on 08/24/2011
Thank you for helping me understand why I parent the way I do. I can't wait to read your book.
10:39 AM on 08/24/2011
The big loss here was the dads getting tossed off the side of the boat, so these Gen X kids lost out on half of the parenting that kids with a nuclear family had. Not to mention the destruction of the relationship between the kids and dad-oftentimes accomplished by all the negative comments about Dad's many inadequacies. I had to give up being a dad because the alienation done by my ex-wife made my kids unable to engage me at all. A sad deal.
01:32 PM on 08/24/2011
For every story like yours -- and I agree it's a sad one -- there's a story about a mom who worked hard to maintain the relationship between dad and the kids even if it meant keeping her mouth shut.
photo
Ed Baker
All Hail Big Mother
10:39 AM on 08/24/2011
Is it a "bad rap" to face the truth?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jbh2009
10:33 AM on 08/24/2011
so Dan Quayle was right about Murphy Brown?
08:42 AM on 08/24/2011
I am confused here. I am a baby boomer (late 50's) and my mom's generation was called "the silent generation" however, I thought it was her generation with all the divorces. My mom left my Dad and kids at home during the 70's sexual revolution for us to fend for ourselves- I in turn became the type of parent this article is decribing as the Gen Xr's. - I thought it was baby boomer's that wanted to do everything for their children that was not done for them because they were brought up by the "silent generation" that were seen and not heard. There were many parents my age that were helicopter parents at my daughter's high school (Fairfield County, Ct.) to make sure their kids had everything they didn't. I resisted having children and only have one because I did not want to experience seeing another child going through any pain caused by a parent. My mother's generation had a "tuff shit" attitude toward kids. I have stayed in a bad marriage to make sure my daughter had everything but that wasn't good either. Because of my parents neglect, I married the wrong person to get out of my house. I had no were to turn when things got bad in my marriage. You can't win. I say it's luck if your life turns out right.
01:36 PM on 08/24/2011
Good post. I hope things are improving a bit for you as your daughter grows up. :)
11:04 PM on 08/23/2011
I respect my mother's hard work in returning to school, getting another degree, and changing careers to something more fulfilling, all while also working, and my dad's working very hard in a crap job to also support our family. I know they had hard choices, and I respect them for doing what was needed for our family.
But as the oldest of three children in this family, I identify with the description of the working, latch-key child. At 8, I did all household laundry and cared for my younger sister daily. By eleven, I was a main caretaker for my infant brother too. During the summers, I was their full-time caretaker, feeding/bathing/disciplining, and was expected to ensure the house was clean, laundry done, dishes washed. I was an honors student and nearly had a nervous breakdown in middle school from the pressure but no one in my family noticed.
This continued until I turned sixteen; then my parents bought me a car so I could ready my brother for school, drop him off at daycare in the morning, and pick him up after school. I finally went to work at a fast food restaurant because at least that was paid labor.
I wish I'd had had more of a childhood. I told my parents this once, and said I understood, but wished they'd said "thank you" for helping. They were resentful and angry.
10:36 AM on 08/24/2011
This post hits home. Completely. My childhood was exactly as you described. By the time I was 15 or 16 my two younger siblings were older than I was when I started caring for them. I decided it was time they did. I turned into a latch-key teen. I was annoyed with my parents, but what hurt the most was the guilt they laid on me for abandoning my "duties."

My rebellion was spending the next few years acting like a child and habitually under-achieving. I can't help but think that things would be different had I been allowed to be a child during my actual childhood.
04:32 PM on 08/24/2011
I think I did the same thing you described in your rebellion, too, but more as a young adult. Also it's taken me a long time to become interested in having children myself - for a long time I felt that I'd done all the child-rearing I needed for a lifetime. I wonder if it was the same for you as well, marcus?
It's good to hear someone else had the same experience.
whinenot
Actions speak louder than words.
09:01 PM on 08/23/2011
This puts some current trends in perspective for me. I worked in the public schools a few years back and saw what we now call 'helicopter' parents swooping in a saving, or defending their children at all costs. There was nothing a parent wouldn't do for their child, including absolving them from any accountability. This may very well be compensatory behavior on the part of the parents, who faced divorce as children. The sad thing though is that these same 'helicopter children' now are having their mom's call their employers when things aren't going well in their newly found jobs. I am not kidding...The overcompensation may be every bit as debilitating as the 'ignoring behaviors' which occured back in the 70's and 80's. Thanks fo this post.