iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Susan Ohanian

Susan Ohanian

Posted: September 1, 2010 11:00 AM

Forget that cliché that Vermonters are independent, resourceful, and people who value the consensus of town meetings. Like the lemmings in other states, Vermonters just let Bill Gates take charge of education policy and practice in our state. With barely a whimper.

This radical deformation of Vermont education policy, which will change the education of every child in the state, has rated barely a notice in the press, with nobody pointing out that, as of August 17, 2010, the Common Core standards paid for and promoted by Bill Gates are a done deal -- with no public discussion.

This is in sharp contrast to what happened in 1968, when the State Department of Education issued a remarkable document, The Vermont Design for Education, which called on Vermont values and strengths in setting the course of education of Vermont children. The opening sentence set the tone:

Education in Vermont, if it is to move forward, must have a goal toward which to move, a basic philosophy which combines the best of what is known about learning, children, development, and human relations, with the unique and general needs and desires of Vermont communities.

Then, every town in Vermont was asked to hold meetings and talk about how they wanted their children educated. They wrote local plans. Now the Board of Education is saying, "Just do what Bill Gates wants."

Money carries a big stick.

During the "Public to be Heard" part of the August 17, 2010 Vermont State Department of Education meeting agenda, I was the only one in the audience and spoke very briefly of my disappointment that there had been no public discussion of these Common Core standards. There were two responses:

One board member disagreed, saying she'd been to a meeting in Philadelphia where the Common Core standards were discussed.

If that wasn't bizarre enough, another board member said, "We will be discussing the Common Core after we adopt it today."

The Board of Education meeting was late getting started. When I arrived the board was still at their "Networking Breakfast and Joint Discussion with Vermont Business Roundtable Education Working Group." Finally, we had the pledge, roll call, introductions, and such. Then, just 35 minutes after calling the meeting to order the board went into executive session. This meant the public had to leave the room. Department of Education employees were told, "We'll call you when we resume -- in about 45 minutes."

There was no mention of how "the public" would be informed, and so I hung around. Their executive session extended to an hour and 20 minutes. They opened the doors at 12:13PM and then adjourned for a catered lunch at 12:15PM. So I hung around some more. I didn't want to miss the vote on the Common Core standards. When it came, it was unanimous.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also financed The Common Core Curriculum Mapping Project, designed to plug in specific curriculum to align with the standards. They point out that the virtue of this plan (for which Gates paid $550,844) is that it's free. Experienced teachers will be hard pressed to find any other virtues. Here are some of their recommendations:

12th grade: Vicar of Wakefield by Oliver Goldsmith & Sufferings of Young Werther by Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe

11th grade: As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner

10th grade: short stories by Luis Bernardo Honwana (only available used for $29.68 and up) and One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez

9th grade: Preface to Lyrical Ballads by William Wordsworth

8th grade: Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by James Joyce is recommended for "advanced readers." Others can read Little Women by Louisa May Alcott, and Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger.

I wonder whether members of the Vermont Board of Education will go to Philadelphia to discuss these reading lists for the Common Core standards to which they have pledged allegiance or whether they might consider launching discussion here in Vermont.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Sugarmaker
Act like what you do makes a difference, it does
08:02 PM on 09/13/2010
Forget that cliché that Vermonters are independent, resourceful, and people who value the consensus of town meetings. Like the lemmings in other states....

Speak for yourself lady, I'm a Vermonter and I'm no Lemming.
08:14 PM on 09/05/2010
Interesting article and comments. As an advocate for turning around the illiteracy dilemma in the state of Mississippi, I would consider supporting "out of the box" methodologies. Although I don't claim to be an education expert, major change could be helpful.

Being that Mississippi possesses the highest illiteracy rates in the entire country, we'll take all the help we can get down here.

Regards,
Benjamin Inman
The OXE Group
(Oxford Education Group)
Oxford, MS

www.twitter.com/theoxegroup
http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-OXE-Group/114902805231745?v=wall
11:14 AM on 09/02/2010
Susan, thank you for sharing your experience with "public" officials and how their meetings work :) You really should have mentioned those board members' names! I was speechless to read their
comments. Of course it is happening everywhere, but so few people know as they don't go to such meetings. Who too can stand watching them lauding and buying the propaganda from the top without critical thought or ethical concern about its impact on children?

Key education activists, please join forces with those already joined in the Uniting 4 Kids group on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=111772538876554&v=info
It connects with a Yahoo group in which national experts/authors are joined.
05:52 PM on 09/01/2010
Yes, I would like to see everyone on your list read Little Women and As I Lay Dying--and discuss both works at public meetings.
02:48 PM on 09/01/2010
You know what's going to happen, don't you? When the teachers can't get their high school students engaged in, let alone able to master Wordsworth and von Goethe, as measured by our old friend the standardized test, said teachers will get blamed for the low test scores and will be labeled incompetent.
And I just can't wait to see how all those English Language Learners are going to fare trying to make sense of these selected works, especially those who've only been exposed to English for a year or two.
Over the past few years, we've seen the 2nd and 3rd grade curricula get pushed down to kindergarten in the name of "rigor." Guess it was inevitable that college level readings would get foisted onto high-school aged students...again all in the name of "rigor" and "accountability."
I sure would love to see part and parcel of the common core requirements include forcing every single legislator to read and master what we expect students to...might change their perspective a bit...
05:50 PM on 09/01/2010
I predict drop out rates will soar if teachers actually implement the recommended works of literature. Krashen is right: Kids who plow through all this should be awarded a BA in literature as well as a high school diploma. It was appalling to see people who knew absolutely nothing about the Common Core cheerfully adopt it.
02:10 PM on 09/01/2010
Yes, the content of the standards is insane. Those completing grade 12 should be awarded at least a BA in English literature. And the whole idea of focusing on standards now is more insane. Standards mean standardized tests, the means of enforcing the standards, and new tests mean new textbooks. All this will cost billions, while school budgets are strained, while children of poverty have no access to books in their school libraries, no science equipment in science labs, no toilet paper in the bathrooms. Vermont may get the standards and an accompanying curriculum for free from Gates, but will pay a steep price after that. Who will profit? Textbook and test producing companies, not our children.

What is happening in Vermont, of course, is happening everywhere in the US.
12:53 PM on 09/01/2010
Once again, Susan Ohanian gets it exactly right. The billionaires now dabbling in education and dictating what and how to teach our kids through the power of their obscenely deep pockets should be required to pay lots more in taxes. With the increased revenue available to build better schools and buy lots of books, parents and educators should democratically decide educational policy.
By the way, let's revive the demand from a few years ago that all these pontificating policy makers (CEOs and politicians) take the high school exit exam and publish their scores. What's good for the goose.....

Pete Farruggio
Ass't Prof of Education and 25 year public school teacher