I got "Lost in Translation."
Dear Suzanne,
My wife is off to our house in the country and I'd love to have some sexual fun to relieve the usual stress. All I want is casual sex with a like-minded individual. You, for instance...
Dear Suzanne
How does one meet you? I am married and live in Spain, but that's not a problem...
Dear Suzanne
I wanted to ask you which is the best way to give a woman an orgasm. I also want to know if we could meet sometime...
Some writers receive fan mail. I get come-ons from married men whose sex lives have stalled.
That's because, as the author The Butcher, the Baker, the Candlestick Maker and The Not So Invisible Woman, two erotic memoirs that recount my sexual adventures, they know I like men. They also know that, unlike prostitutes, I give it away for free.
Men are my buddies, my friends, my handymen, my toys -- depending on their talents and whether I want them to stick around after the sex. That may sound unromantic, but at 45, I've learned that monogamy is just not for me, at least not at this point in my life.
Some readers do not approve, of course. "You're just like a prostitute," read one recent comment on my blog. Like a lot of people, he just doesn't get it -- probably in more ways than one. Prostitutes are short-term playmates paid to bring about someone else's fantasy. When they're not simply satisfying the urges of the undersexed.
I make my own fantasies happen.
It's too bad that so many people, particularly those who aren't in a relationship and want to be, do not like hearing the truth. The truth is this: I get lots of dates. I have lots of sex. I don't want monogamy.
What I have in common with prostitutes is this: I use my body to give men pleasure. And I do it because men give me pleasure in return. I tell my readers what I tell my lovers: "Be honest. Share your fantasies. Talk about your desires." My sense is that most people don't do this.
One upside of the recent scandals involving politicians and prostitutes is that it finally got people talking. But if the words of my critics are an accurate gauge, much of the talk was probably steeped in hostile judgment. From resentful girlfriends to moralistic book reviewers, I have learned that my contentment puzzles and even threatens a lot of people.
This may be because women are socialized to desire monogamy. Men, meanwhile, learn to accept, or at least profess, monogamy because they have to. But whether it's nature or nurture that makes monogamy life's bulls-eye for most people, my target is pleasure -- shared with fun-loving people, liberated, randy, and male. When it comes to relationships, I opt for the plural over the singular, the now over the forever. When I want an orgasm, it's just a phone call away.
I have lots of phone numbers in my little black book, and it's not because I give it away for free. It's because I enjoy sex, I know what I like and don't like, I communicate my desires. And I allow men to communicate theirs. Too bad sex seems to be something that a lot of couples can't discuss, even behind the proverbial closed doors. Their fate is as tragic as it is typical. One day the gap between fantasy and monotony becomes too great, and the couple find themselves living in the no-sex zone. That's when men (and increasingly women) go to prostitutes and share their desires with a stranger instead of the person they are closest to. Soon enough, the person formerly "closest to" drifts off.
I got divorced five years ago, at 40, and like so many middle-aged divorcees, I spent a lot of time searching for another man. I tried internet dating, the bars and clubs, the dinner party circuit. I hoped to meet "someone special" but really was just looking for a replacement. It wasn't much fun, the hunt. Eventually I realized it wasn't any particular man that I needed, but rather a certain kind of fun.
Today, I'm getting plenty of it. I've learned to separate my sexual desires from my need for emotional fulfillment. I've also learned about my own body and learned to communicate my likes and dislikes. The payoff, besides a fulfilling sex life, is a number of deep friendships with men. Many of my guys tell me I've got a real grasp of the male psyche. That's no cheap compliment. Knowing they're not my one and only, men find it easier to share their own likes and dislikes in bed.
"Why aren't there more women like you around?" I hear that question surprisingly frequently. Perhaps it's because I'm a dream date. In this sense, maybe I am a bit like a prostitute -- the woman with whom a man can share his sexual fantasies without being judged, the woman who doesn't expect a follow-up call. Yet men do tend to call back -- because I'm their party girl. And, in every sense of the word, I'm free.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

I got "Lost in Translation."
I've always been openly non-monogamous. I'm not "polyamorous", as I don't love everyone I have sex with, nor am I a swinger, as I'm not in an emotionally monogamous marriage and don't approach my sex life as an organized couples activity. Rather, I'm a libertine, a sexual and emotional free agent, being not socially, physically, nor emotionally monogamous.
I don't believe humans are naturally monogamous. I have no desire to try; but prefer living in harmony with my own nature. My sex/relationship life consists of having several "friends with benefits", along with occasional one-night stands. Occasionally, I have deeper emotional relationships,
There are many women like this -- I've slept with quite a few of them. They're not wanting to invest in committed monogamous relationships for many valid reasons. Some have recently ended long term relationships and don't want new ones -- but still have sexual needs. Others have careers that are the focus of their lives -- but still have sexual needs. Others prefer living alone and maintaining emotional independence -- but still have sexual needs. There's nothing wrong with this, as long as everyone involved is happy. I've been the friend with benefits to many such women and will continue as long as I'm able.
Many women realize what most men already know -- that sex and love aren't the same, nor should they always have to occur together.
Nonmonogamy isn't for everyone -- but neither is monogamy. But there's room for both (and many other variations!) out
As much as I agree with you...."humans were NOT made to be monogamous"... I think that pertains to men more than women..... I must remind you about the world of STD's... which are in RECORD numbers these days.... spread by the ill informed new slacker society of college girls who think being a feminist means blowing the whole football team and flashing her boobs to a camera at a night club.
HPV is rampid... many young girls have it and many don't know that they have it.... thereby spreading the cancer causing virus to more girls. Once you get HPV..it's forever and may lead to cancer.
Herpes... can be transmitted through SALIVA....not necessarily sexual organ contact. A person may have an open sore in their mouth and spread the more common herpes... to infect your blood... the old "fever blister".... which is actually herpes.... but, they can also spread genital herpes to you via the mouth. A LIFETIME std.
Need I mention Chlamydia and AIDS?
So.... sleep with a lot of men/women? don't care? That's ok. Just tell me before we go out... cause all we're gonna do is talk. But will you be honest ....or will you look to just get some?
Sexual freedom is great.... but it is full of consequences in today's society.
Wait, I don't get it.
You can't embrace your body, enjoy giving and receiving se/xpleasure AND be in a monogamous, trusting, adult relationship? Who knew?! Wait til I tell my boyfriend. I bet he'll be shocked to hear it. lol
how can you give a woman the best orgasm? I tell you how. Be honest, be trustworthing and trust her, send flowers out of the blue and state I love you. Tell her how comfortable you feel in the home
she makes for you. Take her dancing . Gives me an orgasm every time.
A little off topic: How bad does the price of oil / gas have to get before the government nationalizes it?
Corn Ethanol is a political pay back to Archer Daniels Midland, for all of their donations over the years to the politicians, and is just driving up the price of food.
Our government is subsidising this industry with million of dollars and it pollutes the environment.
Ethanol uses more oil energy than it produces.
A terrible waste!
He probably already knows but hasn't elected to inform you. ;)
A little off topic: But because you have used sex in the subject, I knew there would be a lot of people to view this site!
The question is:
How bad does the price of oil / gas have to get before the government nationalizes it?
Corn Ethanol is a political pay back to Archer Daniels Midland, for all of their donations over the years to the politicians, and is just driving up the price of food.
Our government is subsidising this industry with million of dollars and it pollutes the environment.
Ethanol uses more oil energy than it produces.
A terrible waste!
I'm halfway with you. I'm also over 40. I've also given up on the fantasy of finding that 'someone special'. I'm also in better shape now than i was 10 years ago.The big difference is I'm not getting laid. This reminds me of a recent PBS show on Gelada baboons. The males do all the posturing and fighting and pursuing, the females do all the choosing. Beta male blues.
You can have pretty hot sex with one man (the right one) and not jump from bed to bed. Moreover, in today's world of STD's you are literally playing with fire. Monogomy is outdated. Back when it was the norm, people lived to be 39 years old. Also, the idea of staying a virgin until married, back then, they married at 14 to 16 years of age. Pretty much as soon as the girl started menstruating and her hormones didn't kick in until then so staying a virgin until married was easier too. But today with marriage being put off until around 25 or older, it's almost impossible to stay a virgin until married. Also, being married for 10 or 20 years makes ones libido dead toward your spouse so monogmy isn't realistic either. I think that a marriage should be up for review every 10 years and if the couple wants to stay married, no problem, but if they want to go their separate ways they can. All of this can be planned for prior to the marriage and the prenuptual agreement would be used instead of divorce attorneys and courts. It would save a heck of alot of money too.
Yes, one can have steamy sex with one person, but how long will it remain that way before the novelty wears off and a rut sets in and it becomes the same old thing with the same old person.
It''s like a steak dinner being one's favorite meal. Usually we only have our favorite meal every now and then. If we had to have that steak dinner 3 times a day, year in, year out, we'd soon be sick of it. If we'd varied that steak dinner with fish, chicken, spaghetti, and so on, we'd appreciate the steak dinner so much more.
Some people don't mind familiarity and established patterns when it comes to sex, and monogamy works better for such people. Others prefer more variation and novelty, and for us, monogamy is a bad fit.
Society would do a who lot better if it didn't take a "one size fits all" approach to sex and relationships.
Sex can be primarily a physical sharing. And that's where novelty is essential to keep it fun and exciting. But sex can also be secondary to a great emotional relationship filled with fabulous revealing communication, in which case novelty is huge step down.
It's disappointing that so many people think the author is not extracting emotional satisfaction from these friendships. I suggest looking up the terms "compersion" and "Mudita". Non-monogamous relationships are certainly capable of having emotional depth.
I would wager that some have *more* depth. I'm 25, and in the best relationship of my entire life. My lover and I have an exceptional drive for affection. Yet we also love our friends, and either of us can cuddle with numerous other people *in front of each other* and still smile. Our friends form a sort of tribe, and we all support and love each other.
Most people think it is perfectly okay for a parent to love all their children equally, and that having another child does not mean you love the first one less. Some of us understand the same principle applies to other forms of loving relationships as well. Love is not a zero sum game; loving one person does not mean there must be less love for others. The more everyone gives love, the more everyone receives it.
Drop pants, not bombs. Shoot pool, not people. Make love, not war.
Nor should sex always have to be about love, either. I'm nonmonogamous, but I'm not polyamorous, in that I accept that I won't love everyone I have sex with, nor will I always want to. And there's nothing wrong with this as long as those involved want the same thing and are honest about it.
Sometimes it's just about the sex, and that's OK,
Wow, not quite sure I wanted to read about someone else's sex life over my morning coffee...I enjoy sex too, but I don't need to post about just how much I enjoy it and why and how on a news blog...thanks for sharing though, wish more women could admit they like sex like we do, apparently.
I don't think humans are meant to be monogamous by design. It is a choice many make and one that is 'recommended' by the moral police of our society. It works fine for some but not all. Sometimes, as with the author, changes happen as one goes through the various phases of our lifetimes.
The desire for sex is one of humans' greatest drives, second only to survival. The sex drive varies in levels from one human to the next and also within each individual through varying phases of life.
I don't see the author as attacking anyone; rather she is trying to show another view of sexuality in our society.
I get this very strange picture of the author jumping up and down on her bed like a six-year-old, pleased as punch that she's figured out some basic truth in life. Like sharing means you can get stuff, too. That's where the image stalls, in this monotone of insistence on how incredibly much fun she's having with the boys (boing, boing). All she has to do is pull up her dress and then they pull down their pants (jumping for joy), and then they all play Grey's Anatomy with their bathroom parts (boing, boing, boing) until the nannies show up and the play date is over.
"I have lots of sex" is the erotic version of "Check it out, they gave me extra fries with my Big Mac," and it scores about as high on the sensuality meter. Animals rut; it's not exactly news. Women in their forties behaving promiscuously as they rebound from stifling marriages is pretty old hat. The fact that men like it when women put out with no fuss and are easy to leave--that, too, won't make Page One. I wish the author well in her conquests, but I hope she understands that when one of her Big Gulps turns out to be a Sauvignon Blanc, she'll probably have a hard time convincing him that she's actually filet de boeuf en croute, not a Baconator with a choice of sides.
You'd be surprised.
You go girl. One of the very few women I've ever heard about or met who begins to have a clue about men.
Monogamy exists as an attempt to insure genetic lines of fiscal inheritance. Those who have power and/or wealth seek to insure their genetic material receive what has been accumulated. Since progeny rarely learns how to keep, and generate more, wealth, this is an empty/vain hope. The accumulator has to set up a responsible mechanism apart from the DNA carrier to see to it that the acculmulated wealth remains intact thereby demonstrating the vacuity of passing resources to one's own genetic material.
The resources of a society should remain with the society rather than with individuals who are trained to avoid knowing how to make and accumulate wealth, rather trained to waste it.
It makes sense to me that a divorced woman might choose to stay single and have sexual relationships with lots of men. So why does the author defend her choices by attacking others? Women choose monogamy for reasons other than socialization; men don't just go along with it because they have to. We have plenty of pleasure in our lives, too. We're not doomed to the "tragic fate" the author describes as typical where sex becomes boring, then non-existent, and then one person cheats on the other. Why does the author have to gloat that men say she understands their "male psyche" and ask why there aren't more women like her? Why does she sound proud that married men are writing to her to ask for an affair?
If people want acceptance of their lifestyles, they have to be tolerant themselves.
Maybe she has to justify a low opinion of wives to sleep with their husbands. I dunno. Seems to me that would amount to bourgeois justification for this supposedly non-bourgeois person.
But whaddya I know. I'm on the sidelines. Happenstance has put me here and I don't know if or why I'll leave it.
Nowhere has the author said she sleeps with husbands, and she's not saying monogamous relationships are doomed. She's saying that a lack of communication between men and women in relationships often causes their mutual sex life to fail. Also, I think "gloating" is your interpretation. She sounds proud that she understands "the male psyche." I think that's a pretty large claim, but it's hers to make.
Then how come she is printing letters from married men wanting to hook up with her? She doesn't say she discourages 'em, does she? So, it's it fair to conclude that she has sex with married men?
Well, I wondered at first and after looking at the article came to the conclusion that she didn't actually say she was sleeping with married men. She does, however, seem to be saying look at me, other people's husbands wish they could sleep with me.
I looked up some reviews of her books on the Internet. Based on her published memoirs, I doubt she always knows whether or not she is sleeping with married men. She has had a lot of casual sex; the most extreme example was providing fellatio to penises while the men were hidden from sight (from an interview with Howard Stern).
A little more that seems relevant to how she talks about marriage: According to the reviews of her memoirs, Portnoy's marriage broke up because they weren't having any sex and she decided to have an affair with a married man. After her divorce, she tried casual sex and various relationships that were unsuccessful. She decided that the casual sex worked better.
The reviewers' opinions of her were divided, but I now find it hard to think of her as liberated. I wouldn't trade a penis in a hole in the wall for the man who took me out to lunch yesterday for anything.
If one wants to go out and party, or sow wild oats, then why get married first?
I read Portnoy's Complaint a few years back...are you the same lady who took a "Crap" on a glass coffee tabletop?.....
Along the same line, talk about "performance pressure"....man, who'd want to worry about being written up in one of her memoirs as "Portnoy's Complaint"?
Thanks for the wonderful truth telling. At 46 and single, I can agree wholeheartedly.
I think both men and women are insecure when confronted with a powerful woman who knows what she wants and knows how to get. Especially when that woman is strong enough that she doesn't NEED anyone for emotional security. Recently divorced, I too am a successful professional going through a sexual awakening and having been monogamous most of my life, am discovering it's not for me. Good for her, good for me and good for other women out there who are brave enough and strong enough to throw off the shackles of a patriarchal society that has long placed a double standard upon the two sexes. Here's to great sex and lots of it !!!
When one partner is too tired, too self-loathing, too emotionally wrought, or too focused on their own needs, recreational sex might be exactly what the other partner needs.
This is fabulous. I love it! I am so not surprised to see the negative comments below. I get the same ones. But what can you do? I'd rather live my own truth than take to the sea with the lemmings. I admire your humor and candor and cannot wait to read your new book!
Brava! Bravissima! For more information see the Wikipedia article about polyamory.
I'm hard pressed to believe this woman. It's easy to write stuff like this confidently and convincingly. It's also provocative, which in itself serves a purpose for the person writing it. But whether it's an accurate reflection of her life and times is another thing completely. I'd have to observe her over a period of months, like Jane Goodall taking notes, to see if it's legitimate or self-serving B.S. I'm leaning towards the latter, but as a man, I'd love for it to be true!
Problem is, she spends all this time in the article justifying her actions, culminating with the statement, "When I want an orgasm, it's just a phone call away." Uh, okay. When I want an orgasm, it's some lotion and 2 minutes away. That doesn't prove much beyond...I can get an orgasm. I suspect there's a lot missing to this story, and it's a lot more complicated than the writer's letting on.
Maybe she forgot to mention she wants an orgasm that doesn't involve just her in the room.
Posted April 4, 2008 | 12:20 PM (EST)