Obama's Pastor Warren Pick; A Bridge Too Far
Obama's version of the game has always been bridge building. He's completely serious about reaching out, transcending red and blue, and etc. But this is a bridge too far.
Obama's version of the game has always been bridge building. He's completely serious about reaching out, transcending red and blue, and etc. But this is a bridge too far.
Steve Young | Posted 01.22.2009 | Media
(December 22, 2008) As Los Angeles Metblogs reported, the normally very reliable Rawstory.com picked up this column's "Rick Warren Likens Gays To Piz...
Mark Green | Posted 01.20.2009 | Politics
Is Obama's choice of Rick Warren another example of the president-elect giving conservatives the visual while later giving progressives the policy?
William Fisher | Posted 01.20.2009 | Politics
We can dialogue with them from now until the Rapture, but many evangelicals' ideas will still be anathema to most of those who elected Barack Obama.
Hilary Rosen | Posted 01.19.2009 | Politics
The power of gay people is not in our numbers, it's in the number of people we touch. It is hard work to convince people that when it comes to equal rights, we are all in this together.
Alan Cumming | Posted 01.19.2009 | Entertainment
Would Obama have been fine with saying his parents entered into a civil partnership? Maybe. But would he be fine with hearing that his parents' marriage was akin to a brother marrying his sister or a pedophile marrying a child?
Linda Hirshman | Posted 01.19.2009 | Politics
A copy of what seemed to be a draft of an inaugural invocation by Pastor Rick Warren arrived in my fax machine this morning. I've posted it here.
Frank Schaeffer | Posted 01.19.2009 | Politics
Progressives are too used to failing. Stop worrying about little battles, you just won a war. It's all about real results now, not words, and not symbols. It is time to think like winners.
Paul Jenkins | Posted 01.19.2009 | Politics
Obama's choice of Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration is dreadful. His explanation is even worse. He shrinks Warren's statements about gay people down to a "disagreement," as if we're talking about ethanol subsidies.
Trey Ellis | Posted 01.19.2009 | Politics
What if the Obama team is thinking more than just one move ahead on the chess board? What if they plan on actual actions to bring long overdue civil rights to the nation's last unprotected minority?
Chris Durang | Posted 01.19.2009 | Politics
I'm trying to be open to the "we must talk to those we don't agree with" idea. Still, this is the first event of his presidency, and gay people's feelings seem so easily sacrificed by Obama.
Cenk Uygur | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
The Rick Warrens of the world pretend that the Bible says marriage is between a man and a woman. But the Bible is full of men taking on second wives, prostitutes and concubines. And all the while, God heartily approves.
Morra Aarons-Mele | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
I wish progressives would get half as mad about today's Health and Human Services decision to publish "its "conscience rights" rule as they are about Rick Warren.
Phil Bronstein | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
This choice illustrates the downside of inspirational figures and the accompanying bad habit of investing in Obama your own ideas, values, priorities and views just because he moves you.
Lucia Brawley | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
Obama's campaign proved that reaching out to those with whom we differ achieves the advancement of the progressive agenda - incrementally, rather than all in one fell swoop.
Joe Cutbirth | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
Warren's selection is a thumb in the eye of every lesbian and gay citizen, and an insult to kind and decent Americans who believed that Obama's presidency was the beginning of a new era.
John Leo | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
Gay activists are giving Rick Warren the full treatment, accusing him of homophobia and hate speech and of comparing gay marriage to incest. None of this is true.
Morgan Warners | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
President-elect Barack Obama erred in asking Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at his inauguration. A spokeswoman for Obama implied that the move ...
Jon Hoadley | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
The choice of Warren underscores the fact that no openly-LGBT person has been selected to take part in the Inaugural ceremony, or be named to any level of Obama's White House staff.
Jeffrey Feldman | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
Putting Rick Warren on the inauguration dais is tantamount to leaving civil rights leadership to someone else. This is a troubling sign for a president elected to be a new kind of leader.
Bob Geiger | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
Obama and his staff are being incredibly disrespectful to Progressives -- having Warren anywhere near the festivities is just flat-out stupid politically.
Peter Daou | Posted 01.18.2009 | Media
For online political operatives and observers this is a prime example of the truism that the medium can quickly flip from being an asset to a liability.
The Huffington Post | Rachel Weiner | Posted 01.18.2009 | Politics
On Wednesday, the Huffington Post reported that gay people and progressives were not pleased when Barack Obama chose Rick Warren to deliver the invoca...
Lee Stranahan | Posted 01.17.2009 | Politics
There's something bigger at play here and you can't say Obama didn't warn you. He talked about reaching out, about expanding our politics and that crazy bastard actually meant it.
Isobel White | Posted 01.17.2009 | Politics
Obama could have chosen any clergy member in the nation to deliver his invocation. So why one who spoke out so publicly in support of Prop 8. Why re-open painful wounds?
Thomas de Zengotita | Posted 01.22.2009 | Politics