Wind Turbine Base Jumping--INSANE!
T. Boone Pickens would have a field day with these wild wind turbine base-jumping bandits. This video is insane! Base-jumping off the blade of a giant wind turbine . . . jeeez.
T. Boone Pickens would have a field day with these wild wind turbine base-jumping bandits. This video is insane! Base-jumping off the blade of a giant wind turbine . . . jeeez.
I ask you to join with me to call on every candidate, at every level, to accept this challenge -- for America to be running on 100 percent zero-carbon electricity in 10 years. We need to act now.
Big Oil makes more money when prices go up and that money is nicely spread among its allies in Congress. Trusting these guys is like trusting your neighborhood pusher.
Tom Friedman distorted Al Gore's new energy challenge, which called for an energy policy based on 100 percent renewable sources, by including the role of coal. Isn't coal a nonrenewable fossil fuel?
Pelosi's decision to share the stage with Gore is an interesting one. She clearly knew he was coming. But can Gore manage to stay out of the political arena as he skirts so close to it?
Lost amongst all the "solutions" to the energy crisis lies the fact that the energy crisis is simply one component of a much broader ecological crisis.
Dealing with one sector without thinking about the other is one-hand clapping. That's why we have popular alternative fuels like ethanol that don't factor in the drain on water resources.
When has money ever been an issue when America has set its mind to achieving something? How many people wondered if World War ll and the Apollo Program were cost-effective?
Imagine! Almost an entire installment of Meet the Press devoted to an interview with a private citizen who is not running for office -- who receives the attention because he...knows something.
More people are now moving past the denial stage and are beginning to consider intelligent responses to the env=ergy problems we will face in the coming decades.
Rightly blamed for everything from rising food and commodity prices to water degradation and soil erosion, biofuels have seen their cachet plummet in recent months.
Al Gore has sent a target, an objective target: 100% renewable electricity in a decade. This is possible, even though a very serious objective level target.
To decrease the use of oil in our cars we need the kind of retooling we did for World War II. Now we are in another war -- a war against this debilitating addiction.
This is the fifth and final article of my HuffPo series on finding an optimal solution for Peak Oil and Global Warming.
"Either you're on the bus or you're off the bus," was the hackneyed statement proposed to me by three members of Dartmouth College's Big Green...
Despite millions of dollars of high-priced hype, the "new generation" of "standardized design" power plants actually does not exist. All cost estimates are completely up for grabs.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Greenwash for coal gasification, privatization of water resources (see http://www.tpj.org/watchyourassets/pickens/index.html) and ongoing monopolization of traditional power generating capacity.
You people trust this guy to act on behalf of the public good, rather than his own private profit and personal power?
Yeh, right.
what a crock of fear mongering FUD that article was. 20 GW of wind was installed last years, up 30% from the previous years. at that rate of growth we can be installing over 100GW of wind per year in 6 years. That's average gw not peak. and that's a 1.4$ per installed average watt. So the cost is around 1 trillion dollars to generate enough electricity to replace coal nukes and 90% car oil fuel use, assuming plug in hybrids.
In the ten years we spend converting to wind and solar, we will continue to use existing generators as needed. As we completely phase out slow to change output nukes and coal, we can continue to use natural gas turbines which are cheap and quick on off. It's what the electric companies use now to ":top" high demand. Since methane is 20x the greenhouse gas that co2 is, we should burn up the big deposits of it.
Eventually more hydrogen storage will be used for leveling winds output.
Note, even Nuke plants have to be shut down 39 days every 17 months for refueling.
Pickens wants to make money. We may not like him but his entrepreneur and daring. These are the people that have shaped America like Ford.
His putting his money where the future of energy is at and that I think is a good thing. His thumbprint serves as a valid point that we can and should get off of oil. Its a finite source of energy that will one day run out. So I think its a good thing.
He's also appropriating all the water in Texas and privatizing it:
http://www.tpj.org/watchyourassets/pickens/index.html
So it doesn't exactly warm the cockles of my heart that he's making moves to monopolize the wind as well.
The public sector should be developing wind power and water resources for the public good, not for private profit.
Can it be done? Of course, it can be done. The question is, will it be done.
How much will it cost? A lot. However, it will cost even more if we don't do it.
Actually it's, Can it be Done? Yes. Unless you ask a republican and they will give you a million reasons why it can't be done. The can't do spirit of America.
All of this talk means nothing with the "not in my back yard" attitude when it comes to wind mills. Ask the Kennedy's all about it. I, for one, am all for a comprimise on both sides to get us to energy independence.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in