Release 0.9: Don't Cry For Me, MicroHoogle!
The big news is already old news. It's not that traditional online advertising will go away, but its profitability will suffer as it becomes diminishing-returns efficient.
The big news is already old news. It's not that traditional online advertising will go away, but its profitability will suffer as it becomes diminishing-returns efficient.
We finally have a resolution to Carl Icahn and his machinations at Yahoo! so we can all go back to worrying about the economy, interest rates and mortgage foreclosures.
The news of Sen. Obama's $48 billion offer for Yahoo sent a shudder through Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign, which for the past six weeks has been subsisting on Ramen noodles.
How could Microsoft actually achieve the goals Kevin Johnson laid out? There's only one answer: Buy Yahoo.
With new targeting data available, especially on the Internet, advertisers should consider targeting people of a certain life-stage, rather than a particular age or gender.
Having a new owner doesn't magically create a healthy business any more than a new government or even elections can create a civil society.
The spectacle of Microsoft trying to buy Yahoo feels like watching two dinosaurs trying to mate: painful and irrelevant. It is revealing not in its denouement but in its genesis.
If Yahoo and Google appear headed toward a full-blown search deal, Microsoft needs to buy Yahoo even more now -- if only because it will then be able to fire Google as Yahoo's search partner.
Fifty percent of searches aren't monetized- but extracting concepts rather than keywords will change the face of online advertising, vastly improving monetization.
A social network? Us? Could that be? Every day we have as serious a discussion of current business-related events as the facts warrant!
Microsoft's knockout offer is an obvious benefit for Yahoo holders. Does it make sense for Microsoft?
Microsoft took a page out of Rupert Murdoch's book and made an offer for Yahoo that Yahoo can't refuse. For several reasons, the deal makes great sense strategically.
The fact that no one cares about the antitrust considerations shows how far we've come from the days of Joel Klein and Clinton's antitrust team.
Going carbon neutral was fairly cheap for Yahoo! On the other hand, it's cheapness demonstrates that it's not doing a hell of a lot of good beyond the symbolism of it.
Clearly a Microsoft-Yahoo combination will change the game in a major way. But this is not the beginning of the contest, nor is it the end. It is a major milestone and turning point in the battle.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Ichan knocked Yahoo and people sold stock which he bought cheap. He saved millions and picked up stock. That is a reverse pump and dump and is illegal but the SEC can't stop Hedge Funds from robbing people with excesses of swaping and trading oil futures either.
I wouldn't count on the idea that just because someone is sitting on the board of directors means they will develop a conscience and do the right thing. When is the last time we read about a director going to prison, or losing their home, because of some fraudulent conduct by a business? It doesn't happen.
If Joe owns a corner store, everything he does is between him and the customers. It's a personal, direct relationship, and has the tendency to force a business owner to stay honest or shut down. The corporation is designed to allow people to operate a business in a dishonest and fraudulent manner, to harm the customers, suppliers, and the community, to enrich the few, and to completely escape liability for doing so.
The real solution is to eliminate the corporate form which exists only for the purpose of helping people avoid liability. All businesses should just be run as dbas (Joe's grocery), and the "investors" invest money and take a percentage of the profits. The people who run the business (and the investors if they participate in the decisions) are responsible for everything the business does, and can lose their assets and go to prison for corporate acts. Tobacco executives, for example, in a non-corporate business, could be tried for murder. Halliburton owners and managers could be charged for the rape of its female employees. Blackwater owners and managers could be tried for the murder of Iraqi civilians.
Eliminate the corporation.
a corporation on protects personal assets of the owners (the investors). meaning it has limited liability (only to the extent of equity invested in the corporation). that only applies to investors in the corporation.
the managers and directors are not above any liability. blame the govt. for not making a case or not prosecuting them. Dont blame "the corporation".
Icahn doesn't go after companies with great management. Icahn is there because Jerry couldn't do his job. stocks have been in a downward spiral since he(Jerry) took control a little over a year ago.
And dont play Carl off as being naive about how a board works. He's done this a couple times....
I listen to yahoo! Music Jukebox - at least I did untill yesterday when I was transfered to Rhapsody because there will not be any yahoo jukebox anymore after sep 30
The quality of sound I got on yahoo was much better than rhapsody.
I wish yahoo were allowed to build a good product like the japanese instead of being constantly harangued by hyenas like carl icahn who squeeze the juice out of a product and leave behind a dead corpse of no use to anybody
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in