More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Tanya Greene

GET UPDATES FROM Tanya Greene
 

Tightening Belts Means Loosening Restraints: Illinois to Close Supermax Prison

Posted: 02/23/2012 3:16 pm

One of the more positive things to result from deteriorating state budgets across the nation is that some state lawmakers are looking to smart criminal justice reform as a way to trim budgets. Whether motivated by cost savings or human rights, these changes are an important step toward a more humane justice system. One such change began yesterday in Illinois, where Gov. Patrick Quinn announced a budget plan that includes closing the state's Tamms Correctional Center — reportedly saving $21.6 million in the upcoming fiscal year and $26.6 million annually thereafter.

Tamms is a notorious "supermax" prison that houses approximately 400 prisoners in conditions of extreme social isolation and sensory deprivation. They are locked down, alone, for 23 hours a day and barred from anything more than the most limited human contact. In 2010, a federal judge found that "Tamms imposes drastic limitations on human contact, so much so as to inflict lasting psychological and emotional harm on inmates confined there for long periods." Many prisoners at Tamms have been in isolation for more than a decade. Mental illness runs rampant, as illustrated by Tamms prisoner Anthony Gay, who is serving 97 years for throwing feces. Advocates have pushed for reforms and closure for years.

Like most supermax and solitary facilities around the nation, the inhumane conditions at Tamms have been of little official concern. In fact, the stated mission of Tamms is "to improve the quality of life, safety and day-to-day operation of other Illinois Department of Corrections facilities and to enhance the safety of staff, offenders and the public (emphasis ours)." But in reality, long-term solitary confinement does more harm than good: it jeopardizes public safety by leaving prisoners ill-equipped to re-enter society; exacerbates mental illness and even creates symptoms of mental illness in formerly healthy prisoners; and actually costs more than operating standard prisons — in the case of Tamms, three times more than the average prison in Illinois.

Gov. Quinn's decision comes at a notable time in U.S. incarceration history: not only are states reconsidering their options and looking to alternatives to prison terms for offenders, but corrections departments around the country are reducing their populations in solitary confinement. States are finding safe and less costly ways to handle rule violators — ways that will even support their eventual reentry into the outside world.

We applaud Gov. Quinn's decision to close Tamms, an institution that has resulted in so much unnecessary human suffering. While his decision may have been a fiscal one, the human cost of solitary should be enough motivation to shut down similar facilities around the nation — with the substantial savings a positive byproduct of just decision-making. As a nation, we must stand up for humane treatment of prisoners, particularly the mentally ill.

Go here to take a stand against solitary confinement. And if you or someone you know has been affected by solitary confinement, go here to share your story.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markspence
12:28 AM on 02/27/2012
"Tamms prisoner Anthony Gay, who is serving 97 years for throwing feces."

97 years for nothing more than that? Is that correct?
10:22 AM on 02/27/2012
This is from the award winning series "Trapped in Tamms" at the Belleville News Democrat:

"Gay, 37, was convicted in 1994 of punching another youth and stealing his hat and a dollar bill. Gay has been held in solitary confinement for seven years. Convictions for throwing feces at guards -- acts that his supporters say are typical of mental illness heightened by solitary confinement -- have extended his overall prison term to almost 100 years. During his seven years in solitary, he has mutilated himself hundreds of times with bits of metal and glass, behavior associated with mental illness, experts say."

Read more here: http://www.bnd.com/2011/10/23/1912016/groups-join-inmates-effort-to.html#storylink=cpy
07:34 PM on 02/25/2012
It is not true that you only end up in Tamms for committing violent crimes in other prisons. That was Tamms's intent. But there are no standards on the books that anyone has to comply with for sending someone to Tamms. The result is, many are sent who had no disciplinary tickets at all. There is an article at the Belleville News Democrat that documents that a shocking number of Tamms prisoners were actually sent to Tamms for throwing urine. Does sending someone to indefinite solitary confinement, possibly for the rest of one's life fit with the crime of throwing urine?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markspence
12:34 AM on 02/27/2012
If you assault people repeatedly using bodily fluids, then I would say yes. There is a serious hazard to prison staff that should be considered.
01:14 AM on 02/25/2012
It gets on my nerves how this phrase "the worst of the worst" gets thrown around. But look, there have never been any rules or regulations about which prisoners they could send to Tamms or for what reasons. The result: many prisoners were sent there on the whim or word of one guard or warden who took a disliking to a prisoner--get this guy out of my hair, send him to Tamms. There are also many prisoners there because they have mental illness, and the worst thing you can do to someone with mental illness is subject them to solitary confinement, with no reality checks, no socialization for years on end. It's also a myth that the prisoners in Tamms can't be housed elsewhere. Sometime in the past couple of days, the John Howard Association put out a statement saying that there are only just a few prisoners that might need to be isolated, but the rest can and should be dealt with just as prisoners always were before there were supermaxes. Remember, it was not that long ago that there were no supermax prisons! It is simply a myth that we need them. And the best argument that Tamms defenders keep repeating is that it houses "the worst of the worst." But that phrase too is a myth and a lie intended to scare folks and make us think Tamms is full of untouchable toxic people who can never be around another human being. It's not true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
markspence
12:36 AM on 02/27/2012
There was a day when we did not have gay marriage, Affirmative Action, and food stamps. Should we return to them as well?
01:26 AM on 02/27/2012
My point is just that we shouldn't pretend that supermax prisons are necessary or natural. They are not an act of nature or God. And since they are an assault on our conscience and a human rights abuse, we should ask ourselves if there are alternatives. In the case of Anthony Gay, as the BND.com reports, he went to prison for punching someone and stealing their hat and a dollar bill, but because Gay could not follow rules (maybe because he had mental illness, I don't know) now he is going to spend his life slowly deteriorating, at a cost of $90,000 per prison per year in total solitary confinement. (The BND.com reports $90,000, though other sources say $64,000. But the $64,000 is just the cost of the minimum security part of the institution averaged with the cost of the supermax, so it brings the total down. The truth is, it costs much much more to run a supermax, because the salaries are higher etc.) This is just not productive intervention in someone's life. It is making people worse.

And my point is, safety does not depend upon this human rights abuse. It's wrong calculus to say, well it is a shame and an abuse, but it's necessary for the sake of safety, because it is not necessary for the sake of safety.
05:06 PM on 02/24/2012
The problem with Tamms Supermax is the worst of the worst are SUPPOSED to be housed here and they (according to the original purpose of Tamms) were only supposed to be housed for a year. Instead people are being sentenced TO Tamms, which isnt the purpose. It should also be noted that many of the prisoners housed in Tamms are not "lifers," they will be re-released into normal population, you and I sort of population. Stop and think about how incredibly damaging Tamms is to the prisoner that is released into society, then take that a step further and notice that is then damaging to society. Also the reason Tamms is now housing "the average convict," is if Tamms actually served its purpose, there would not be enough inmates for Tamms to be useful. Tamms is a massive waste of money, as much of our "justice" system is, and it should be closed down. The only unfortunate part of this event is that people will lose their jobs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
03:38 PM on 02/24/2012
Give me a break. The worst of the worst are housed here. The ACLU needs to acknowledge that there are certain criminals who will NEVER be rehabilitated. There needs to be a place for them.
photo
mikey09
Living off the grid.
07:19 PM on 02/23/2012
First you only end up in a place like Tamms when you have continued to commit violent crimes while in other prisons. This topic reminds me of other times when people started feeling our justice system was to harsh, then lots of people get released, some will go on to committ other very horrific and high profile crimes and the pendulum swings back to law & order again. Seen this one many times now.