More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tara Fass

GET UPDATES FROM Tara Fass
 

The Power of the Anonymous Letter

Posted: 01/12/12 12:30 PM ET

More times than I can count, true zingers are relayed to me after someone asks what I do for a living and I say I'm a therapist with a specialty in divorce and co-parenting. This morning was no exception.

A law student in his mid-twenties, call him Dusty, and I were side-by-side on the elliptical trainer at the gym. On the other side was a gentleman with earphones on making rather loud and frequent grunting sounds. Both Dusty and I found ourselves exchanging glances of disbelief and laughing while staring at this man, who did nothing to change his behavior. We weren't wearing ear-gear so we struck up a conversation.

A few minutes in, Dusty began to pour his heart out and told me his sister's husband, let's call him Bill, asked him to put up a photo of the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem as the background on his mobile telephone. In complying with Bill's request, Dusty stumbled upon incriminating sex-texting with someone clearly not Sis.

"That jerk," Dusty exclaimed infuriated. What should he do in my professional opinion? Tell Sis and possibly jump-start a separation or divorce? Reluctant to pass judgment or give advice, I did anyway and said that in my opinion, Bill was feeling guilty and inadvertently reaching out for help, unconsciously perhaps, as to be caught and stopped. Look at his choice of background photo. The Wailing Wall is a place to lament loss. Unconvinced, Dusty clearly felt he needed to do something. Rather than confronting his brother-in-law straight forwardly, what did I think about Dusty sending an anonymous letter?

Double-Edged Sword

Let's put ourselves in Bill's shoes -- you're on the receiving end of an anonymous letter. Such a letter might cause introspective grief, be a wake up call to stop acting out and reach for help -- an opportunity to grow from missteps. Or, Bill can see Dusty as an antagonist and feed the accusations by blowing up and becoming defensive. In any scenario, Bill would likely piece to together it was Dusty who sent the anonymous letter.

After all, Dusty mentioned that Bill quickly snatched the phone from him even before he could get the Wailing Wall up. If nothing else, Bill might suspect his flirting or secret about cheating was starting to leak out. The problem with an anonymous letter, as I see it, is the disruption can be enormous without much effort on the part of Dusty except to ease his feeling of protectiveness towards Sis and the children. Undoubtedly Dusty is angry but doesn't want anyone in his family to ever know or just yet.

Heard it through the Grapevine

Perhaps Dusty could approach Bill and ask him if there was something he misunderstood about the sex-texts he stumbled across? This way he'd give Bill a chance to clear up any confusion or come clean. Who knows, though it's unlikely, maybe Sis has an open marriage?

I might also suggest Dusty tell Bill that he was hurt by what he saw, separate from the harm to Sis and the kids, and see what Bill does. If Dusty decided to write, I'd suggest he describe the issues which he perceives as too personal, damaging and/or incredulous to say out loud in a rational manner. Before sending it, Dusty could take the letter into his own therapy or share its contents with someone he trusts. If necessary, Dusty might reconsider how to word what is weighing so heavily on him.

Doing Nothing Evades Responsibility

By maintaining a code of silence, arguably Dusty becomes a betraying brother (son and uncle too) and an unwitting accomplice to Bill. It's completely understandable that Dusty wants to safely get Bill's attention. Clearly Dusty would prefer that Sis's marital relationship heal but he's not in charge of this outcome. Dusty is in crisis -- frustrated and stressed by this unwanted knowledge and his confusing feelings.

Information Has a Life of its Own

Anonymous letters, like direct confrontations, can set in motion unpredictable changes. In some ways, the damage is already done and arguably Dusty isn't the guilty party or the one who needs to feel remorse. He is challenged and forced to come up with an agenda -- one isn't to be subversive, vengeful or hostile.

The Masquerade is Over

If Bill slips and reveals his secret once, it's likely to happen again. Next time the recipient may not be as caring as Dusty. Dusty could also buy time, wait a bit and see how events unfold -- but not too long. In a sense, Dusty has no good options. He neither wants to be so disengaged or beset by analysis paralysis and do nothing or do too much and see himself as a knight on a white horse heroically saving Sis by swooping into a power vacuum. Dusty also seems to think that if there is substance to the sex-texting, his parents will want to chime in, further disrupting generational boundaries by trying to come to the rescue of their daughter and grandchildren.

Dusty seems like a strategic thinker. He knows there is a potential for creating false moves and that the chance for faux pax increases dramatically with whatever action he takes. Dusty doesn't want his contribution to lead to unproductive growth and a no-win situation to develop. What else is Bill hiding he wonders out loud?

To write or receive an anonymous letter or to do nothing and remain silent is to have a volatile bomb in hand -- an explosion waiting to happen. A simple request reveals all too clearly how messy life can be. Look at the gentleman next to us who was oblivious to those around him. What should Dusty do to sooth the tumult inside him? Can Dusty forget what he read? Please reflect and then chime in. I'm curious to know what you think.

 
More times than I can count, true zingers are relayed to me after someone asks what I do for a living and I say I'm a therapist with a specialty in divorce and co-parenting. This morning was no excep...
More times than I can count, true zingers are relayed to me after someone asks what I do for a living and I say I'm a therapist with a specialty in divorce and co-parenting. This morning was no excep...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:00 PM on 01/17/2012
The comments here are very interesting....
12:31 PM on 01/16/2012
Depends on the circumstances but I probably would tell, especially if it was the spouse of my brother or sister or good friend. My ex wife of nearly 20 years was having an affair for over a year before I found out. So many people knew. I wish someone would have told me. She and her friends were all cheating and none of the husbands knew it. They're all divorced now, except for one and she was the biggest cheater of them all. I know about several guys she's been with and could get pretty good proof of it for her husband, but I don't know him well and they had a surprise baby in their early forties. I don't want to damage their relationship if she's changed, and, this is one of my ex wife's best friends and if I told it would really sour things between my ex and I and we have to deal with each other so much because of our kids. It would just be a huge mistake. He is a nice guy though. I feel for him. His wife has millions of friends. People think she's such a good girl, just like my ex. I thought she was an angel. Until the end I couldn't imagine her cheating. She looked me in the eyes and swore to God and did it so convincingly that I felt guilty for suspecting her. Expect the cheater to lie and plan for that. You need proof.
11:39 PM on 01/15/2012
How very self righteous and presumptuous that the brother would assume he is protecting his sister. By relaying potentially damaging info, if it is even true, he really shows his own self regard. I know of several righteous brothers who ended up blamed instead of heroes. Leave it alone.
01:10 PM on 01/16/2012
I would be so pissed if my brother kept information about my wife cheating from me. He'd expect me to tell him and I expect the same from him. Self righteousness doesn't enter into the picture. It's loyalty. We're brothers. We stand up for each other, have each others backs. And to be quite honest, if he was cheating on his wife I'd never say a word about it, and he would do the same for me. I wouldn't want to be involved, wouldn't encourage it, but I wouldn't say anything to anyone either. How is it self righteousness to tell your brother or sister that their spouse is cheating on them?
11:00 AM on 01/14/2012
I was cheated on and guess what, found out, by looking through his OLD phone. The sis might already know, have an idea, a general gut feeling or might totally be in the dark, but the point is that she has a right to know that the person she is married to is lying to her (and possibly exposing her to STIs). All the brother has to do is say take a look at his phone, I thought I saw something odd on it. I would have loved anyone to say something to me. Seriously, slip the woman a note, a text, an email, carrier pigeon. Why do so many people cover for cheaters?? Just because its not your marriage/relationship, doesnt mean its your duty to continue to cover for someone. Just ask yourself, what would you like done, if you were the one being cheated on?
12:37 AM on 01/16/2012
I agree. The brother-in-law is could expose the sister to an incurable disease or be planning on leaving the sister and systematically hiding marital assets at the same time. What this guy should do is follow the in-law and find out who the woman is and where they go. Then he and his sister should accidentally on purpose wind up in the same place.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Kingpleasure
Live for Pleasure
07:31 PM on 01/13/2012
If I were Dusty I wouldn't do anything. Look at Anthony Weiner, he was sexting and he is still with his wife. I say pick your battles. Sexting isn't on the same level as actually having sex with another woman. Yes it's stupid...But Dusty should just talk to Bill about it. Say hey dude what's up with these messages? Then just ask him, is he sleeping around on his sister. Dusty should let him know that what he thinks is not cool, but don't involve the sister in it. Dusty is man enough to call his brother in law into account about inappropriate behavior without the sister getting involved. He can call his brother out on it, have a man to man talk about it. (Hey that's my sister dude, don't let me find out you are effing her over, or you will answer to me)..and that's it.
07:11 PM on 01/13/2012
I received an anonymous email while my (then) husband was having an affair. It was the other woman's ex-boyfriend who knew both of them and he knew what was going on. He didn't tell me anything specific - instead it was a note asking if I wanted to know the truth. You see, my ex walked out many months before that and was having the best of both worlds while we "worked" on our marriage and I raised our child alone - all the while begging him to come back home (I was weak and I was a slave to my vows). But the anonymous message was just enough to push my suspicions even further and finally discover the truth with the help of a PI. I'm grateful for that anonymous email. If I wouldn't have known the truth, I may have continued to blame myself for being a bad wife (as my ex led me to believe) rather than realizing that I had a lying, cheating, bad husband.
02:46 PM on 01/13/2012
Should you tell someone they're being cheated on?

It's simple... ask yourself, "If I was being cheated on, would I want to know?"
Do unto others as you would have done unto you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Helena Williamstom
06:05 PM on 01/13/2012
Its not that simple. Some women prefer to live in blissful ignorance. I on the other hand have told all my friends; male and females, TELL ME!!!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tara Fass
01:34 AM on 01/13/2012
I hope Dusty, Bill and Sis all have the opportunity to read your fine comments HufPo community members...
01:14 AM on 01/13/2012
absolutely NOT.
01:04 AM on 01/13/2012
2 of 2 If sis knows about her husband's other sex partner(s) (a possibility that I think is more likely than most other readers seem to, though still slim), all three can begin a conversation about this. If she does not, and if she gets upset and/or Bill gets angry, Dusty can comfort/protect her. In any case, husband and wife do not HAVE to go home together from the meeting, and Dusty has demonstrated his concern for the relationship first. If it turns out that Bill is mistreating his sister, Dusty can shift his concern to her. This course of action does require maturity and poise, as well as careful choices of location, time, and words on the part of Dusty. It is hard to see how if he does this, he could feel as if he failed his sister, his brother-in-law, or himself. This is a kind of modified intervention, which is what Dusty clearly wants to do. It is unusual for one person to intervene with two in this way, and as a rule interventions benefit greatly from the presence of many concerned friends and family members, but bringing the situation out into the light of day like this is one of the only ways to guide it towards a healthy resolution sooner rather than later. I certainly don't envy Dusty, Bill, or sis, but Dusty is in the best position of the three to effect a desirable outcome. An anonymous letter won't work.
01:00 AM on 01/13/2012
1 of 2 Haven't read all the posts, so I apologize if someone else has suggested this, but it seems reasonable to me in this rather unusual situation (surely it's at least somewhat more likely that Dusty would discover infidelity in a friend's marriage that in his sister's) that Dusty might ask to talk with Bill and his sister together - preferably in a neutral location. If it were an option, he might ask a trained mediator to be present, but even if it's just the three of them, he could say that he saw some texts on Bill's phone that concerned him, and he wanted to give them both the chance to help him understand. It might be harder for Dusty to work up the courage to arrange this scenario, but it will mitigate many of the potential bad outcomes that could arise from a confrontation with only one or the other of the spouses. With all three present, Dusty's sister and Bill are both less likely to attack Dusty or one another (although this is still a possibility, which is why I suggest a neutral and somewhat public location, like a booth in a restaurant, or a picnic table in a park), and it will be much harder for Bill to obfuscate the truth.
12:51 AM on 01/13/2012
I'm sorry, but I'm not sure why this is such a hard question to answer. It certainly seems clear to me. Think of it another way: What if Dusty believed that he had discovered evidence that Bill had been that Bill was behaving in an emotionally abusive fashion toward his sister? The answer is clear. Step in and stop it, right away, by whatever means necessary. If Dusty is correct about Bill's actions, then Bill has indeed abused his partner. In my opinion, affairs rank pretty high up there on the emotional abuse scale. Certainly, if he IS having an affair, Bill has abused his partner's trust, if nothing else. Not to mention the fact that Bill is, potentially anyway, putting his partner at risk by having an affair.

Sending an 'anonymous' is certainly not the correct course of action, and seldom is. If you feel strongly enough about a situation to become involved at all (as I would hope you, would, where one's sister is concerned) then you should be able to be honest enough to put your name to whatever action you take.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:41 AM on 01/13/2012
This is a keg ready to explode. Mind your own business. That's my advise. This is dangerous stuff and you're putting yourself in the middle. I have a responsibility first to myself. And that means not getting injured or hurt. This could backfire on you, so keep out of it. Your marriage or someones else's is their own business.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:31 AM on 01/13/2012
Tell his sister that he wants to give her a heads up , cause he loves her , check his texts sis , through the cell carrier . Then if she investigates on her own , the results are hers to do with as she sees fit.

If she figures out that he knew or had an inkling and didn't share this with her right away , that is just like condoning the brother in laws inappropriate behavior , almost covering for him.

Give her the tools to come to her own conclusion , where it goes from there ? It's out of his hands .
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
peegan
Obama 2012
12:29 AM on 01/13/2012
What an awful situation to be in and no "right" answers. How I would handle it would depend so much on the individual players. But i would probably advise Dusty to tell Bill he has 24hrs to tell his wife the truth or he will. And as hard as it might be, Dusty should refrain as much as possible from showing too much judgement because we rarely know what all is going on in another person's relationship, even a siblings. Stick to the facts, try and leave emotion out of it, and be up front. 

As much as i normally believe in staying out of other peoples relationships, Dusty's loyalty should be to his sister and to do what he can to protect her. But again, refrain from being too judgmental, because if his sister and husband work things out, he could become the bad guy here, the one who insulted her husband even though he may have just been trying to offer comfort. 

And skip the anonymous letter.
Pennsylvanianne
There is no sin but ignorance.
08:57 AM on 01/16/2012
I like your suggestion best. Dusty needs to talk to Bill directly. Dusty may be the only one who knows about the sexting, so Bill would probably know who sent an anonymous letter. And then Bill needs to come clean with Dusty's sister and work things out with her. I think this marriage could be saved, but it's up to Bill and his wife to get counseling and figure out what went wrong.