On February 29th, 2012, Rush Limbaugh called Sandra Fluke "a slut" and "a prostitute" because she argued that medical insurance should cover birth control.
Limbaugh also announced that Fluke was "having so much sex, it's amazing she can still walk" and that "she's having so much sex she can't afford her own birth control pills" (not only making up fiction, but begging the question of whether he understands how birth control pills actually work).
The number of appalling things that Limbaugh has said on this topic only continues to grow. The uproar over his comments has largely centered on how wrong it is to label a woman a slut and a prostitute simply because she advocated for health insurance to cover birth control. But there's a larger conversation to have here: one about the continuing use of the term "slut" to refer to any woman, for any reason. Isn't it time we retired the term entirely and moved on?
In her book, Slut: Growing up Female with a Bad Reputation, Leora Tanenbaum writes that while sometimes girls are called sluts because of actual or rumored sexual experiences, they are often deemed sluts simply because they are threatening the status quo, are disliked, or in some way they do not fit a social norm. In this sense, Limbaugh's comments are not surprising. They can be seen as an age-old move: attempting to silence or marginalize a woman who is speaking out, by attacking her to the core: as sexually cheap, as "loose," as "dirty."
On his show on Monday March 5th, Rush himself said, "I do not think she is either of those two words. I did not think last week that she is either of those two words." I believe him. He didn't call Fluke a prostitute or a slut because he believed she was. He just made up some lies to discredit her Congressional testimony.
I'd argue that most people -- women and men -- who call women prostitutes, whores, or sluts don't do so because they think that's the truth. They do it to defame, demean, and shame. They do it to keep women quiet and to keep women cautious in speaking about their own sexuality -- whether they are speaking about their views on contraception or reporting a sexual assault.
Young girls are particularly affected by the prominence of terms like "slut" and "whore" in our culture. As Tanenbaum writes in her book, slut-bashing "affects every single female that grows up in this country because any pre-teen or teenage girl can become a target." Sadly, at every middle or high school, there are girls who have been labeled sluts. It is equally unconscionable for a young girl to be labeled a slut because of her sexual experiences, consensual or nonconsensual, or simply because someone doesn't like her.
We can take this moment to let companies know we will not support them if they support this kind of demeaning speech in the media. We can also take this moment to create a movement of people saying: Calling women "sluts" and "whores" is antiquated and offensive. There is no place for these terms in my vocabulary and I will speak up when I hear the words used.
If we aim to treat other human beings with respect and decency, is there any use for for these terms?
If we don't want young girls to be shamed or marginalized by their peers because of sexual rumors, sexual experiences, or simply words aimed to wound, is there a use for these terms?
If we understand that women are neither "dirty" nor "clean" because of their sexual experiences, is there any use for these words?
In the words of counselor Rachel Whalley, "Goodbye, 'slut.'
 I would say you have overstayed your welcome, but you were never a kind or helpful word to begin with. Your existence was born out of ignorance and fear. Gradually, we are all embracing our better natures; we have no need for the shame that you stand for."
Let's retire the term. "Slut:" Born 1402. Died 2012. Rest in Peace. We won't miss you.
Tara Sophia Mohr is an expert on women's leadership and wellbeing. Visit www.taramohr.com to learn more. Visit www.donewithslut.com to add your voice on this issue.
References:
Tanenbaum, Leora Jane. Slut: Growing UP Female with a Bad Reputation. New York: William Morrow, 2000.
Slut. (2012, February 18). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 20:14, March 5, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Slut&oldid=477550836
Follow Tara Sophia Mohr on Twitter: www.twitter.com/tarasophia
Women should be incensed any time one of our own is dehumanized and marginalized, and by one of our own I mean female, not simply similar in political ideology.
Myself, I will always watch for that kind of disrespect in the future, regardless of whether I agree with the politics or behavior of the woman in particular.
No I say keep it because it has it's place in the language. It describes a set of behaviors that at times deserve to be condemned. It's also applicable to males.
I don't believe in creating a Utopian society. I would rather we put with some bad things, because stamping out the bad is to often an attack on freedom itself. Everything that hurts girls feelings does not need to be eliminated. Females are not fragile creatures incapable of taking offense. I think they are strong enough to deal with the whole assortment of terms good and bad within the human language.
Am I correct in understanding that you believe people, male or female, need to be shamed for having sex?
Why?
And the point isn't that this word "hurts our feelings," the point is that it's widely used to silence women. It's often used to label a woman in a conversation that isn't even about sex. For example, when people have called Sarah Palin a slut, how is that relevant to a conversation about whether or not she's a good leader? It isn't.
"Slut" is not a word that belongs in any kind of conversation. It's a crude insult designed to call women "dirty" and indicate that they should be avoided. And it's based entirely on assumptions--how does anyone know how much sex a woman is having (assuming that's anyone's business, which it isn't)?
How much sex is "too much"? 2 partners in a lifetime? 5? Who decides when "slut" is an accurate judgement?
Why are we judging anyone based on how much sex they have at all?
But the best thing we can do right now is to teach our children the power and responsibility that comes with language. Words really do break bones.
It's important to note that this isn't a liberal or conservative issue; it's a human issue!
This term isn't okay, regardless of who says it.
It's not okay to demean anyone because of the sex they are or are not having, regardless of the reason you don't like them!
What's so important to note is that we're saying these terms should be retired across the board. My problem isn't that Rush said it; I don't think it's okay for pundits to say it about Sarah Palin, either. It's not a liberal issue or a conservative issue, it's a human issue.
If you disagree with someone's point, how about saying that? Personal insults of any kind are simply a way to stay at war. Don't we want to move forward into more happiness and better health as a country?
I encourage everyone reading this post to take the pledge. I vow not to demean anyone with my words simply because I don't like what they are saying or doing.
It's not easy, by the way, but it is SO worth it.