More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tara Tidwell Cullen

GET UPDATES FROM Tara Tidwell Cullen
 

Cook County, Immigration Detainers, and the Real Cost to Public Safety

Posted: 02/ 8/2012 10:46 am

Critics of Cook County politics often blame our elected officials for squandering taxpayer dollars. That this complaint is such a common refrain here is just one reason why recent efforts to roll back a county ordinance that saves residents from picking up the tab for federal immigration enforcement is perplexing.

People who are forcing the issue show a fundamental lack of understanding of the so-called "immigration detainer ordinance," which passed the Cook County Board of Commissioners by a wide margin last September.

What's at stake

Immigration detainers are requests U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issues to police when the agency identifies someone in local custody it believes is potentially deportable. The detainer instructs the police to hold that individual for an additional 48 hours after their authority has expired so that immigration officials can assume custody.

Last fall, the county board discovered that the sheriff's office was expending millions of local dollars each year and clogging limited jail space to honor these detainers. In addition, the vast majority of individuals held on detainers faced only minor criminal charges. Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart also reported that police involvement in immigration enforcement was undermining public safety because immigrants who were witnesses and victims of crime feared interacting with police. But cost was the main motivation for the board to pass the detainer ordinance, which says that Cook County cannot honor an ICE detainer unless the federal immigration agency has agreed to reimburse the county for the costs of the extended detention. On Thursday, the Cook County Board of Commissioners will meet to consider amendments that could weaken the ordinance.

Why is the board rethinking its September vote?

Tragedy and misinformation

ICE is exploiting one family's tragic loss to fuel anti-immigrant fear and strong-arm Cook County into complying with the harmful detainer policy. Last summer, Chicagoan William McCann was killed in a hit and run. The perpetrator, Saul Chavez, was an undocumented immigrant with a previous DUI conviction. A Cook County judge gave Chavez an uncharacteristically low bond, which Chavez paid. Chavez has since disappeared, and officials suspect he returned to Mexico.

ICE and the ordinance's detractors are perpetuating the false argument that an immigration detainer would have kept Chavez in the United States to face justice. But that's not how detainers work. Once Mr. Chavez paid his criminal bond, ICE would have had to pick him up within 48 hours. ICE would have quickly initiated deportation proceedings and Mr. Chavez would have been deported to Mexico, a free man, before he was ever brought to trial for the crime.

ICE is not a backstop for errors in the criminal justice bond system. As Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle said in a letter to ICE, "Immigration status should not be the driving force for detainment." Blaming the Cook County ordinance for what happened in Chavez's case does a disservice to community safety and wastes money on unnecessary detention.

What happens at Thursday's hearing could have national consequences. Cook County has been a leader in rejecting ICE's attempts to turn local police into federal immigration agents; its influence is evidenced by a letter Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley and a group of senators sent last month to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano demanding legal action in response to the county's rejection of ICE's detainers mandate.

Heartland Alliance's National Immigrant Justice Center Executive Director Mary Meg McCarthy will be at the hearing on Thursday to testify in support of immigration detainers ordinance. Before that, commissioners need to hear from county residents to know that we demand public policy that protects everyone.

What do you think Cook County should spend taxpayers' money on rather than helping ICE lock up people who pose no threat to our community? Tweet your suggestion to @CookCountyBoard with the hashtag #nodetainers.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:06 PM on 02/10/2012
"People who are forcing the issue show a fundamental lack of understanding of the so-called "immigration detainer ordinance,"..."

And writers who spout this nonsense show a fundamental disregard for the sovereignty of the United States, our rule of law, and all the immigrants who are willing to come to this country the correct way: by standing in line, requesting and receiving permission, and paying the costs that are assessed. These people have broken the law by entering the country the way they did or by not leaving the country when the time they could legally be here expired. We're not supposed to enforce laws depending on whether or not they cost us money. We're supposed to enforce laws because it's the right thing to do.
10:26 AM on 02/11/2012
I agree 100%. What don't people understand about illegal immigrant.
02:43 PM on 02/11/2012
Oh, I think they understand. They understand quite well. That's the reason for these kinds of articles. It's necessary to cloud the issue with heart-wrenching photos of little girls and their mommies. It's necessary to play to base instincts by wailing about the waste of money while our citizens suffer through this economy. It's necessary to throw out any of the 28,357 dodge-and-deflect canards that are used to take the conversation down a different path. If they allow us to focus on the *real* issue, they know they're in a whole lot of trouble. Because just how *does* one promote the breaking of federal law, willfully ignoring the requirements of detaining those who are here illegally, and working to further undermine our system of legal immigration? To admit that those are their real objectives would be to pull the curtain back on the entire operation...and they really *can't* have that.
06:39 PM on 02/12/2012
I think that illegal immigration as a national problem remains unsolved because both political parties derive tangible benefits; Dems can garner votes via entitlement programs and Repubs can deliver a docile workforce to business owners.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reformtxcs
07:56 PM on 02/08/2012
Its a blame game. Bottom line the United States Government and Every Single Illegal Alien are the parties responsible for Illegal Immigration. Close the borders. Place the Illegal in a work camp - work them to pay off the expense to deport them. If they return it should be an automatic death sentence. Nothing brings them here but the freebies and the discovery that they can commit countless crimes and simply change their name and start afresh the following day. They are not held accountable for their crimes which begin the second they set foot on American soil and escalate from that second on. The U.S. Government has failed Americans.....REMEMBER that when you vote - when you vote for Government, Education, Judicial leaders.....REMEMBER
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:17 PM on 02/08/2012
If they are illegal they have already committed one of more crimes, what makes you think they won't commit more ?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ChiGuy
Just an earthbound misfit, I
09:05 PM on 02/08/2012
What makes you think they will?
03:44 AM on 02/09/2012
History.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elizabeth Lutrell
01:19 PM on 02/09/2012
Well, they have only two ways of working here: stealing someone elses ID, or working under the table. Both are crimes. They drive with no license, no insurance. Crime, and the reason you have to pay for uninsured motorist insurance. That's a pretty good start for "other crimes", not including gang membership and other violent crimes.