More

Taylor Marsh

Taylor Marsh

Posted: August 8, 2008 03:51 AM

Bill Clinton, Race Baiting and Phallic Symbols


"I am not a racist." - William Jefferson Clinton (Interview with Kate Snow, ABC News)


You know Democrats are in trouble when the only two-term Democratic president since F.D.R. is reduced to stating he's "not a racist." Especially when this president was championed by the African American community during his presidency, right up until Jesse Jackson, Jr. questioned whether Hillary Clinton cried for Katrina victims, the primary moment when the baiting over race began. But once someone like Bob Herbert starts drawing out phallic symbols and juxtaposing "call me" references from Harold Ford days, when there are none, you know we've all gone down a rocky one way road. Can Keith Olbermann bringing up the phalluses be far behind? Nope, he did that just recently; yet another moment when Mr. Olbermann chose his anti Edward R. Murrow persona that lurks within. You'll have to figure out why Bob Herbert also selected the role of being James Clyburn of the general election. It's certainly not going to do Barack Obama any good at all. But John McCain's got to love it.

Everyone knew we had racial issues in this country, but what we're seeing play out from the primaries to the general election isn't coming from American voters. It's coming from Democrats, politicians, analysts and strategists, including liberal columnists and media types, including bloggers who jumped the race gun, all because Richard Nixon, the GOP's southern strategy, followed by Lee Atwater, once divided to conquer in order to win the presidency, back when race baiting was the thing.

However, when you have William Jefferson Clinton feeling compelled to say in an interview that he is "not a racist" after a tough Democratic primary season, you know that whatever sins the GOP delivered before (and will again), they've now been passed along to Democrats and so called progressives in an effort to either get ahead of what is believed to be coming, or to draw a line on a dare that challenges people who are afraid to stand up to false race charges, because in America, we all know the prejudice is there, especially if you're willing to conjure it up, ala Bob Herbert.

Not even William Jefferson Clinton is safe. Can anyone doubt why he holds fury?

Jon Stewart had a blast with all of this as you can see in the video above. It made my heart sing to see him roundly reject the race baiting, while ridiculing the players on both sides. Because Democrats have lost our race cherry, which in a year that was supposed to be a walk, we seem intent on making it a slow, embarrassing crawl.

But what this whole affair does for Democratic nominee is something quite horrifying. Not only does this recent back and forth on race belittle the candidacy of the first African American who began this general election with an overwhelming advantage. It hands John McCain a shield, protecting him and his party from all the scurrilous things that will no doubt continue to be said, emailed and whispered about Barack Obama. Because when the politically astute hear an African American Democratic candidate telling a crowd that his Republican opponent will ask "Did I mention he's black," when his opponent has done no such thing, we hear ugly things echoing forward, as a disquieted wolf cries. It also rips the scab off memories, which many of us are trying to put down for country.

So, let Bob Herbert trot out imaginary fiction of phalluses in McCain ads, citing scantily clad white women, in rhetorical flourishes of race baiting that would make someone prejudice blush at the audacity. Keith Olbermann can ask Jonathan Alter about them, too, because he long ago proved he has no boundaries on his type of "journalism." However, when on the same day William Jefferson Clinton is compelled to insert into the political blood stream that he's "not a racist," the combination of sound bites meets up in a fusion so explosive for Democrats that it becomes a gift of dynamite for Republicans that could propel them to a racial high road they don't deserve to hold.

"I am not a racist" is something William Jefferson Clinton should never feel compelled to utter. That he did sends a message to John McCain, which was delivered loud and clear when Obama stated "Did I mention he's black?" Republicans won't make Democratic mistakes, because they don't care what you call them, as long as they win. It's repetitive, but it's also a reminder.

This all traces back to the Democratic primaries. It also traces back to Rep. James Clyburn, who inflamed it because he could and he knew it would work, though it left carnage behind that's not long forgotten. Oh, and by the way, like Bob "fantasy phalluses" Herbert, neither of these guys are white. Just in case you're keeping score. McCain is and right now it's his advantage.

Follow Taylor Marsh on Twitter: www.twitter.com/taylormarsh

"I am not a racist." - William Jefferson Clinton (In...
"I am not a racist." - William Jefferson Clinton (In...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 119
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:22 AM on 08/09/2008
"Not even William Jefferson Clinton is safe." Taylor Marsh

Why should he be? He holds no office, shares the past president title with others and made an ass out of himself during his campaign--ooops I mean his wife'e campaign.
01:53 PM on 08/09/2008
He is the chair of the DLC. DNC is trying to dismantle DLC. Anything but inclusion and the opposite of unity. How's that for hypocrisy? Dean = DNC, who selected Obama. Obama doing Dean's dirty work. Hey its politics - Chicago style.
02:34 AM on 08/09/2008
From what I can tell much of this is power plays between the DNC DLC and the DCCC. Of course the power plays reflect differences in policies, but those policies may or may not be real as reflected in the actions of the parties.

Taylor has been the ONLY online (and I guess on air but not in my neck of the woods) pundit who transcends the disputes between these committees and the very real clashes between the many parties involved. She has strongly stated her preferences and then when her first choice - Hillary - did not get the "apparent" nomination she strongly shifted her position. Hey, look at her website.

I wish you, Taylor, would write an article on the relationships between these committees and their players.

Of course I am assuming you all know Obama is a player for the DNC and Bill is for the DLC. Hillary is, IMO, in her own class. Her committee has yet to be formed and it might be the best yet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:32 AM on 08/09/2008
Bill Clinton feels fury because he was counting on Hillary's election as president as the salve to his concience. Yes, she sacrificed her political ambitions for his. Yes, he rewarded her for it by publicly humiliating her. But if he helped who to become president, all debts would be paid, and Bill could start feeling a whole bunch better about himself.

But now he can't, and he's blaming Barack Obama for it.
07:10 PM on 08/08/2008
Well, while on the subject of phallic symbols just add to this Dem Debacle the Edwards bufoonery.

Y'all sink yourselves. McBush doesn't have to do anything.
photo
mypov123
It is what it is
06:01 PM on 08/08/2008
Well first Taylor I'd like to "congratulate" you on finding the "starting point" for the race baiting that took place during the primary election.

Apparently you missed the post on HuffPo detailing the Clinton campaign's strategy for using racial rhetoric in order to convince White voters that Obama is the "Black candidate", another Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton running for President. Look, I am an African American young woman and I do not believe that the Clintons are racists, and I tell other Blacks who say otherwise that I do not believe the Clintons are racists. But they ARE seasoned politicians who thought they could get away with engaging in race-baiting in order to win. They expected a backlash against Obama (and ultimately a loss in the election) from White voters for criticizing the Clinton's statements because the Clintons have had (until now) such a positive relationship with the Black community for many years, and Bill was affectionately called "The First Black President". They thought that people would say "how dare Obama accuse of all people, the Clintons, for trying to marginalize him as the Black candidate", he's just "playing the race card."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:42 PM on 08/08/2008
"the cited Clinton" first mistake.
"the unreferenced media" rest my case
"the system" many practitioners cashing cheques from a myriad of pay masters who both with and without integrity and with or without accountability foisted inevitable compromise on "the Clintons" and all and I mean all others--now there's a debate.
By the way you are right but the bigger picture is lost on them--and for--everyone else. In order for Barack Obama to be elected you better get every friend you have to the booth because one thing Hill had right... it ain't gonna be easy.
08:21 AM on 08/09/2008
Mypov123: "If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck...it is a duck!" So, are you saying that the Clintons are NOT racists, but that they thought they could get away with race-baiting to win the primaries? I am confused, that you have come up with a new term for racism..."a seasoned politician." In the southern states that the Clintons won by land slide happens to be the most racist states, where they voted for Bush twice, though they are poor uneducated people. As "seasoned poiliticians", the Clintons said everything the racists wanted to hear. The attitudes of the Clintons towards Obama is disheartening, and it questions their sincerety of being the liberals (1st Black Pres.) they claimed to be when race was not an issue in the campaign. When these "seasoned politicians" began their Carl Rove race-baiting tactics, they offended and disappointed MOST African American that believed that the Clintons were dubbed the first "Black Family" . We felt betrayed, so the Clintons made it easier to choose Obama as the real "Black President", for he brings change we can "BELIEVE IN." We do not trust the Clintons (seasoned politicians). Obama 08!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Skepticat
Supporting skeptical felines everywhere
05:15 PM on 08/08/2008
During the campaign the Clintons took their black constituents for granted while they ran a Rovian kitchen sink campaign against Obama. They praised the old Republican Bush guy above the smart black US senator from their own party. Many blacks - and some white folk noticed this spiteful opportunism and were not impressed at all.
To ensure that white "low information" prosperity challenged voters weren't swayed to Obama the Clintons used "dog whistle" politics by bring in "Jesse Jackson" - the hidden message to the targeted voting block (hence the term dog whistle politics) was this guy Obama is a Blaa-ack candidate only - just like Jesse - and won't do anything for you "hard working" white folk.
It worked - but not well enough - more people recognize the technique - especially now that it has a name.
04:11 PM on 08/08/2008
Look, Bill Clinton was a great president, and I don't believe he is a racist. But you have to admit, he is to blame for words that come out of his mouth. You can't blame Sen. Obama for this. I have yet to hear Bill Clinton give a good reason for why he compared Sen. Obama's victory in South Carolina to Jesse Jackson's victory in an earlier primary in that state. Any way you look at it, it appears that he was attributing the victory to Obama's race, not his merit. Coupled with Hillary's later comments about Sen. Obama not doing well with the "hard working white, working class voter," you have to wonder what on earth they were thinking.

Again, he's not a racist (and she's not a racist), but he was probably campaigning too aggressively. It's unfortunate, and while I hated to see it, I think the press was correct in asking him about this.
04:10 PM on 08/08/2008
Bob Herbert wasn't wrong (although the phallic symbol idea may be a stretch). There is still a lot of antagonism against the idea of black men being linked to white women. I should know - I am a 54 year old white woman, married to a black man for 15 years. We still get hostile glares. Ask Harold Ford - folks don't like this. Why do YOU think McCain chose two blonde, white women instead of oh, say, Oprah?
And what's wrong with calling Bill Clinton a racist? The quote about him being the first AA president referred to how much trouble he got into, not about his own views on race.
06:57 PM on 08/08/2008
This is bull pucky!
photo
MorpheusXNYC
Web/graphic designer and former freelance writer
09:58 PM on 08/08/2008
Exactly right on the "first Black President" label. Writer Toni Morrison was the one who bestowed that ignoble honorific who's meaning has been misunderstood and misapplied in a cool, hip sort of way ever since.

But I will say this about the phallic symbolism - has no one ever heard of subliminal advertising??
It's called "subliminal" for a reason. Just because we don't consciously register the message doesn't mean we didn't subconsciously understand the communication.
Mentalist Derren Brown has proven that fact over and over again, as seen on his Sci Fi channel TV series where he consistently gets people to say or draw or choose predetermined things he subliminally suggests to them visually or auditorially.

So we dismiss subliminal messaging at our own political peril.
02:27 PM on 08/08/2008
I don't know if you knew this, but William Jefferson Clinton goes by the name "Bill."

Bill and Hillary thought that b/c of their past relationship with the black community, they could get cute with race, and it blew up in their face.

Are they racist? No. Just ruthless and calculating.
03:44 PM on 08/08/2008
Right on, MrWinky. It was Bill Clinton's remark that "Jesse Jackson won South Carolina - twice" that angered African-Americans. It was an attempt to marginalize Obama's win in that state. No, I don' t think that the Clintons are racist either. But some of the things they (and some of their surrogates, like Geraldine Ferraro) said during the primary race stirred up racial discontent. McCain may not have injected race into the campaign directly, but he certainly has been trying to use fear as a tactic to make people leary of Obama, just like the Clintons did (see "3AM ad").
11:12 PM on 08/08/2008
Yes, you are right, it was definitely downplaying Obama's win. That is what politicians do. Obama did it too. Who really started to stir up the the racial insensitivity was Jim Clyburn. A few others. And you know Bill had been a friend and supporter of Clyburn. Maybe Clyburn has thin skin or maybe he saw an opportunity. Anyhow it was Clyburn who started screaming "Fire", ...or rather "Wolf" and it became a meme. And since this blog is populated with the prep rally meme crowd the obots ran with the meme. Actually what Bill said from a purely political pov (and he is a political animal -as is Obama) is completely true. It was also true that MLK's work was implemented into governmental policy and law under LBJ and that was supposed to be a racist statement too. I don't see Bill's remark as calling for the feinting "I'm so shocked and offended" that he got and STILL gets.

Also, you can bludgeon other dems with the PC stuff but not republicans. They could care less and will laugh at you. By then you will have driven off many potential allies because you have accused them of things they are not really guilty of and you have done that simply in order to win a primary. How hopey changey of you.
05:32 PM on 08/08/2008
Yes they are politicians like Obama - who is an even better and slicker politician. So If he was not racist why was he smeared as racist?
photo
JayHorus
Your talking points don't impress me!
06:48 PM on 08/08/2008
I think that was more of the mainstream media, and other Democrats that were saying that his comments were racially divisive. I don't think that Bill Clinton is a racist, but what he said was seen to be racially insensitive at the very least. That is what shocked many African-Americans, especially here in South Carolina. How could this man, whom most of the African-American’s look to as one of the greatest Democratic Presidents in recent memory, someone who has done so much for African-Americans in the past say something so insensitive. That is how I thought and many of the people I talked to, from my friends and family, co-workers, etc, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goldnchyl
07:50 PM on 08/08/2008
DXP, you ask that because you believe smears tend to be true? You must be a McCain supporter.
01:56 PM on 08/08/2008
"Republicans won't make Democratic mistakes, because they don't care what you call them, as long as they win."

Therein lies the subtle but dramatic reason why old John just might win.
01:49 PM on 08/08/2008
I wonder sometimes if so many of the Obama fans aren't so young that they can't remember any history - I guess they were still into Barney and SpongeBob during the Clinton years. Bill Clinton was often cited as being the first AA President because of the relationship he enjoyed with his AA supporters as both Governor of a Southern state and as the only DEmocratic president since I've been an adult. I think more people should distinguish between a racial comment and a racist comment. Mentioning race does not make a person a racist - it means they're awake and enjoy relationships with AAs, they're not afraid to talk about what's real. I think the people who scream racism too quickly probably don't have any relationships with AAs.
04:46 PM on 08/08/2008
Well said.
04:54 PM on 08/08/2008
I am a Barack Obama supporter who is old enough to remember the Clinton years and his relationship to the African American community. Unfortunately, African Americans were seduced by the Clinton's just like many poor whites are seduced by the Republicans.
Clinton was 'dubbed' the first African American president by writer Toni Morrison but it wasn't because of his political record...she was attempting to show how the Repbulican attacks on Clinton regarding his extramarital affairs was similar to the plight of African Americans, especially African American males...
Like John McCain, the Bill Clinton of today is not the Bill Clinton of the 1990's. In the 1990's Bill Clinton was careful in the words that he chose. Today's Bill Clinton opens mouth and inserts foot.
07:07 PM on 08/08/2008
Toni Morrison had years to clear up that statement while the big dog was still president and she didn't..........not until there was viable black president.. It was a convenient excuse for betraying the C's,
01:38 PM on 08/08/2008
I'm surprised to hear myself say this, but, Taylor Marsh is right! The only thing she got wrong was that the Clintons injected race into this nomination...and now, Bill Clinton, offered up that he was not a racist when he was not even being asked if he was...and he did it to undermine Obama so his wife could run again in 2012. Just go see if you can purchase the URL www.hillary2012.com. Already been bought! Guess who!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LoyalOpposition
02:42 PM on 08/08/2008
Taylor Marsh is also wrong in that the Republican Playbook does not need to "conjure" up racism in this country. You don't conjure up something that exists. Rather, they scratch the facade where the fear lies. What Obama did with his remarks was to confront the fear. BIG difference . . . and healthy. Which is what this country needs.
07:09 PM on 08/08/2008
And it was playing the race card, just like he and M0 did during the primaries to their benefit.
04:10 PM on 08/08/2008
Bob Herbert wasn't wrong (although the phallic symbol idea may be a stretch). There is still a lot of antagonism against the idea of black men being linked to white women. I should know - I am a 54 year old white woman, married to a black man for 15 years. We still get hostile glares. Ask Harold Ford - folks don't like this. Why do YOU think McCain chose two blonde, white women instead of oh, say, Oprah?

And what's wrong with calling Bill Clinton a racist? The quote about him being the first AA president referred to how much trouble he got into, not about his own views on race.

Post Comment Edit Cancel
01:18 PM on 08/08/2008
Bill Clinton made the statement comparing Obama's win in SC to Jesse Jackson's win. It was an attempt to belittle Obama and it did have racial overtones. That doesn't make him a racist. That makes him a politician that probably got caught off guard by a microphone in his face just after the sting of an unexpected loss. You cannot really blame the Obama campaign for pointing that out. Bill Clinton said it himself, politics is a contact sport. On McCain, while he has not personally said that, he certainly hasn't denounced or made a concerted attempt to stop the racial overtones of this campaign - Barack Obama is a muslim, he is a friend of Louis Farrakkhan, Obama is the antichrist....The smearing of Obama's wife--this has been done by the Republican party and it has largely been race based. Obama saying that in the future it is going to be even more openly done by the McCain campaign is true.
02:32 PM on 08/08/2008
Just one correction, Obama's campaign did not point out that Clinton's comment was racial. It was others commentators who made that remark, maybe parsing, but an important fact.
04:06 PM on 08/08/2008
I seem to remember Obama himself actually coming out to defend him.
07:10 PM on 08/08/2008
" It was an attempt to belittle Obama and it did have racial overtones"

That is redicules. Hill had 67% of the black vote at that time.....; so what would be the advantage of playing the race card. You know BC is a much more astute politician than that. The MSM and certain politicians like Clyborn and Kennedy wanted to leave that impression.........and they did.
12:46 PM on 08/08/2008
One would wonder why Clinton would feel compelled to defend himself so vociferously when no one was really attacking. Indeed, his subsequent comments about Obama's unreadiness for the office of President were clearly and cynically designed to cast doubt on his party's candidate.

The fact is, only one Democratic candidate can really claim to have had an advantage going into this primary, and that was his wife. She pissed it away through bad choices, poor hires, and a slipshod operation all the way around. Despite what the pro-Clinton faction would have you believe, the race wasn't so much stolen by Obama because of race, but won because Obama out-classed his rivals at just about every level. The Clintonian sour-grapes recently aptly demonstrates this, as they are highly reluctant to give up power in the party, and Bill's continued invokation of race and racism is clearly designed as a passive-aggressive attack on Obama. Once again the Clintons are displyaing their class.

The up-side is that despite Taylor's whining about how this only helps McCain, like so much else in Obama's campaign, she has underestimated the determination of the people involved. Will McCain make political hay out of this? Maybe -- but it's unlikely that anyone who would respond to this sort of thing would have voted Democratic anyway. The truth is that McCain's playbook was vetted and authored by the Clintons, and a Democratic loss in November (unlikely, at best) will be squarely laid at their feet.
04:19 PM on 08/08/2008
That was a really good post. I too was bothered by his answer about whether Obama was ready to be president. He clearly has issues remaining from the primary, and as one of the Democratic Party's biggest names, he should be enthusiastically supporting the Democratic candidate. Instead, he's acting a little immature, and I understand why people are questioning the Clintons' motives.
05:25 PM on 08/08/2008
I also agree. I have my issues with the way the "fairytale" comment was spun, but what's been said and done since then has made it clear that putting the party and the country ahead of sour grapes is a struggle for Bill. He needs to win that struggle soon. Maybe the speech at the convention will help.
06:49 PM on 08/08/2008
I was FURIOUS with Bill Clinton's "philosophical" answer to the question regarding Omama's readiness to lead. He and Hillary should both be 100% behind Obama at this point. To withhold their support is spiteful and damaging to the Democrats. I also think Hillary should do a little something to curb those rabid PUMAs, and to make it absolutely clear that she does not want her name put on the ballot at the convention. I hate to believe the worst, but am beginning to wonder if they secretly hope that Obama will lose so Hillary can run again in 2012. Do they give a rat's ass about the nation or not?
12:44 PM on 08/08/2008
true to everything clinton, "it's always someone else's fault."

the king and queen can do no wrong. all hail!