It was only a matter of time before the hate mongers would start to blame illegal immigrants for the swine flu and stir up anti-Mexican sentiment.
"Make no mistake about it: Illegal aliens are the carriers of the new strain of human-swine avian flu from Mexico," Michael Savage stated in his April 24 nationally syndicated show. "If we lived in saner times, the borders would be closed immediately."
And his bigotry becomes more sinister.
"[C]ould this be a terrorist attack through Mexico? Could our dear friends in the radical Islamic countries have concocted this virus and planted it in Mexico knowing that you, [Homeland Security Secretary] Janet Napolitano, would do nothing to stop the flow of human traffic from Mexico?"
This is completely absurd but so is what other commentators are spewing.
During the April 27 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show, Neal Boortz, said, "So if you want to get that epidemic into this country, get it going real good and hot south of the border. And, you know, then just spread a rumor that there's construction jobs available somewhere, and here it comes. Because we're not gonna do anything to stop them from coming across the border."
And they won't stop at xenophobia either.
In an April 25 blog post, syndicated columnist and Fox News contributor Michelle Malkin, wrote, "9/11 didn't convince the open-borders zealots to put down their race cards and confront reality. Maybe the threat of their sons or daughters contracting a deadly virus spread from south of the border to their Manhattan prep schools will."
Luckily, Media Matters, a nonprofit dedicated to monitoring misinformation in the U.S. media is keeping tabs on these right-wing racists.
But we have to debunk the hate. First of all, there's no evidence illegal immigrants are bringing the swine flu into the United States and other countries. It appears it may be carried by American and European tourists who have visited Mexico.
But the hysteria over the swine flu has to stop. Let's just put it in perspective with some simple facts.
There have been 159 deaths in Mexico. Only seven have been confirmed as swine flu and the rest are suspected, according to the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control. But the population in Mexico is over 100 million. So can we really call this a pandemic?
I don't think that's cause enough for us to close the borders or boycott Mexico.
There also is, tragically, one confirmed death in the United States, a 23-month-old Texas child.
More important to note there are an estimated 36,000 people who die from flu related causes each year in the United States, according to the CDC.
That's the REGULAR flu. Since January, 13,000 people have died of complications from the seasonal flu, according to the CDC.
The regular flu looks to be far more deadly that the swine flu. Let's just keep those numbers in perspective.
Yes, we do need to take some precautions and it's a good thing the Obama Administration is making plans for a new vaccine.
But as Obama said, "This is obviously a cause for concern and requires a heightened state of alert. But it is not a cause for alarm."
This means the television networks should also dial it back and stop making people so afraid.
They need to put the actual numbers into perspective -- swine flu vs. regular flu. So far you're more likely to die from the regular flu.
But if it makes you feel better, go ahead and wash your hands more often and use hand sanitizer. But I don't think we all need to start wearing masks or pulling the kids out of school.
Let's not bash Mexico or view Mexicans or brown people in the United States with suspicion.
We have to stand up to the people fomenting all the fear and hysteria.
Teresa Puente teaches journalism at Columbia College Chicago and is the editor and publisher of Latina Voices.
Follow Teresa Puente on Twitter: www.twitter.com/tcpuente
I couldn't agree with you more that any Hispanic hysteria as it relates to the swine flu is unfair, unrealistic and unwarranted. I doubt that anyone, Hispanic or otherwise, wishes to contract this malady or spread it unnecessarily. However, your comparative discourse of swine flu to "regular flu" is an 'apples and oranges' straw man argument and, at best, sophomoric. Even more so, your "since the illegal immigration issue reared its ugly head" blather childishly dismisses American concerns regarding the illegal immigration crisis as if it is some kind of fringe issue. Since when is enforcing and obeying the law of the land a point of view. Sick or otherwise, these law breakers have no legal right being in this country and you know it.
fear, like sex, sells ad space
nothing else matters, especially the truth
To keep the numbers in perspective, the 13,000 deaths from regular flu since January occur on a background of millions of cases.Mortality rates from "regular flu" are in the area of 1 per 1,000 cases. The spanish flu had a mortality rate of only 2.5 %, and yet 50 million died worldwide. So far it is impossible to say what the mortality rate from swine flu will be, because we do not know the total number of people affected.
In Texas there are 19 confirmed cases, with one death and 2 patients in critical condition. So the mortality rate may potentially be as high as 15%. In Mexico there are approximately 2,000 suspected cases, 1,000 hospitalized patients and about 200 deaths. So potentially a 10% mortality rate. The actual rate is almost certainly going to be lower than 10 to 15%, but by how much is impossible to say. It will all likely become clearer over the next week. In the meantime I see little benefit in falsely reassuring people. If this outbreak remains limited it will be because governments and citizens have taken it very seriously indeed.
A couple of links for Guadalajara and Mexico City Newspapers follows:
www.jornada.unam.mx/ultimas/2009/04/30/dos-muertes-mas-en-el-df-por-males-respiratorios-ahued/
Extract:
Dos muertes más en el DF por males respiratorios: Ahued
[Two more deaths from respiratory diseases]
Aún falta determinar eran portadores de influenza porcina, señaló el secretario. De los 28 decesos, sólo cinco están confirmados que fueron por el virus.
[It's still to be determined whether they were carriers of swine flu, said the secretary (of health). Of the 28 deaths, five have been confirmed as having been caused by swine flu]
La Jornada On Line y AFP
Publicado: 30/04/2009 08:39
La Jornada is a large and usually reliable Mexico City newspaper, published today.
www.informador.com.mx/mexico/2009/99292/6/suman-28-las-muertes-en-el-df-por-influenza-porcina.htm
CIUDAD DE MÉXICO.- El secretario de Salud del Distrito Federal, Armando Ahued confirmó dos defunciones más en la ciudad por enfermedades respiratorias, con lo que sumarían 28 en el DF, cinco de éstas comprobadas por influenza porcina.
El Informador is a major Guadalajara newspaper and says pretty much the same.
The word is HATRED.
HATE is a verb.
HATEFUL is an adjective
HATEFULLY is an adverb.
and HATRED is a noun.
I know that we can frequently make nouns out of verbs (hit, light, jump, etc), but not when there already is an existing corresponding noun!
Do you say “The economy’s fourth quarter grow has been unexpected” ?????
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hate
http://dictionary.reference.com/dic?q=hate&search=search
Swine, Flu or both?
Doctors in Houston stated that he also had a history of other medical problems, but would not disclose what the issues were.