One of the dangers inherent in jailing journalists for not disclosing confidential sources, is that this draconian punishment can be invoked selectively against targeted journalists. Two excellent and independent reporters may go to jail while Robert Novak has not -- to my knowledge -- been presented with the tragic choice of disclosure or imprisonment. Why has he been exempted? Is it because he toes the administration's line? Is it because he knows whether Karl Rove was the source? An explanation for this apparent double standard is called for!
UPDATE
After I wrote this, Robert Kuttner published an op ed piece in The Boston Globe making a similar point in greater detail. I urge readers to access the Kuttner article.
Tina Fey graces the cover of the January issue of Vanity Fair, and in an...
President Bush let it all out today during an interview with ABC News' Charlie...
President-elect Barack Obama announced Monday that Robert Gates would remain as...
The following is Part I of Sean Penn's piece, Mountain of Snakes (Read Part II here) The
The Campaign Finance Institute (CFI)...
Governor Palin Neglects Alaska Duties for Partisan Stumping on Campaign Trail...
Reuters has a Q&A with John Travolta to promote his animated film "Bolt." At the end, they ask him...
Via ThinkProgress, in an interview with NewsMax, President Bush's brother Jeb...
NEW YORK — Rush Limbaugh has seldom been a fan of...
The seventies are back in a big way: shaggy hair, plaid prints and idealism have all...
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration backed off proposed crackdowns...
It started with the fist bump seen 'round the world. Soon...
A revolutionary device that can harness...
Posted July 5, 2005 | 04:55 PM (EST)