A new poll says climate change is no longer first on Americans' list of the most critical environmental problems.
Some scientists are connecting events such as the record heat and Colorado wildfires -- suggesting warming is a real threat. The proof, according to scientists such as Princeton University Professor Michael Oppenheimer, is right outside. "What we're seeing really is a window into what global warming really looks like," Oppenheimer said. "It looks like heat. It looks like fires. It looks like this kind of environmental disasters."
A study of media headlines from April 1 to June 30 didn't quite reflect these scientists' views. Coverage barely mentions climate change or global warming. Of more than 350 broadcasts and print articles, just 3 percent linked the wildfires to climate change.
Natural Gas Demand High as Drilling Expands
While New York State ponders lifting a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking" for natural gas, North Carolina lawmakers voted to override Gov. Beverly Perdue's veto of a bill that legalizes the technique in the state. The nudging vote, made in error, allows the formation of an Energy and Mining Commission tasked with creating regulations to govern natural gas production, both through horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing.
As states consider getting in on the nation's shale gas boom, some of the places companies are considering targeting -- parks, churches and playgrounds -- are raising eyebrows. The latest is a 122-year-old cemetery in eastern Ohio. Opponents of the lease say the cemetery is sacred ground that shouldn't be violated, while defenders argue drilling is so deep it won't disturb the graves and could generate needed revenue.
Natural gas demand continues to increase even though, for the second consecutive year, total U.S. energy production declined. It is projected natural gas will increase 6 percent and account for 27.4 percent of the U.S. energy market, due in part to low prices and environmental regulations that will reduce consumption of coal. One blogger argues: Natural gas liquids just may be the next "fossil fuel glut to follow natural gas."
Health Care Decision's Effect on Environmental Regulation
Days after a federal court ruled the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act, Texas -- one of the plaintiffs in the original lawsuit -- is considering appealing the decision. (Full disclosure: Shortly after the ruling, I participated in a teleconference with three other experts in which we went over the ruling in detail.) Wednesday, the EPA reaffirmed it will not revise permitting thresholds under the Clean Air Act. The tailoring rule, the EPA said, will continue to focus on the largest emitters -- both new and existing.
The same week as the EPA ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act, and since then, several have questioned what the ruling means for the Clean Air Act. The Court's ruling that the federal government cannot coerce states to accept the law's Medicaid provisions may have implications for the Clean Air Act's state implementation plans, and new limits on the Commerce Clause may affect other regulations as well.
The Climate Post offers a rundown of the week in climate and energy news. It is produced each Thursday by Duke University's Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions.
Follow Tim Profeta on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NichInstitute
http://larouchepac.com/mastering-nature
This fact, the origin of life, does not appear too difficult to understand, so why do everybody still discusses only phenomena (like global warming and uncontrollable wildfires), while the simple fact is that all these phenomena are related to overall increased presence of reactive nitrogen in our biosphere, mostly due to human activities. First due to the burning of fossil fuels and secondly, during the past decades, due to the enormous increased use of synthesized fertilizer. If we don't take this serious, soon the limiting elements will be hydrogen and oxygen (water) and then humans and all organic life will be in real trouble.
Be expecting the conservatives to once again play the puppets for the big energy companies, and as we experience ever more destructive climate anomalies, to scream that it is NECESSARY to use every last resource in order to combat the effects which will be wrecking our economy. And the people, realizing that we have made no efforts at either mitigation or adaptation, will suddenly panic in the understanding that their very children are at stake. We will then rush to embrace the use of the very last drop of oil, the last clump of coal, the last of the poisonous nuclear energies. And like lemmings, we shall all rush to witness the finality that is on the other side of the veil.
There used to be a consensus of 97% of all scientists. Now we're down to "some" scientists. Soon we'll headed for "some scientists used to believe that"...
These are two completely different things:
1. Agreeing that human activiites are affecting Earth's climate, and
2. Connecting climate change to specific events.
But, deep down inside, you knew that, didn't you?