More

Tim Roemer

Tim Roemer

Posted January 16, 2009 | 12:49 AM (EST)

Bin Laden's Message in the Era of Obama


The release of yet another tape from Osama Bin Laden Wednesday serves as a reminder of the many leftover issues Barack Obama will inherit from the Bush administration.

In the 22-minute audio tape, the al-Qaeda leader boasts of "new fronts" against the United States and places the blame for the fighting in the Gaza on the United States and moderate Arab states.

His comments on Gaza are a reflection of al-Qaeda's desire for relevance to its target audience. On the issue that has most transfixed the Islamic world, al-Qaeda, the self-appointed spokesmen and "defenders" of the Islamic world, are totally absent from the storyline. The fighting in Gaza is the direct result of Hamas's continued rain of rockets on the heads of Israeli civilians. But Bin Laden, vying to compete with the attention Hamas is receiving, turns the Gaza conflict into a parable about the need to follow al-Qaeda's prescription of violence against America and support for an ultra extremist Caliphate. In the absence of an operational capability in Gaza, Bin Laden is trying to frame his past efforts against America and its moderate Arab allies as a greater threat to Israel than the rockets currently being fired by Hamas.

Still, Al-Qaeda may reclaim its place in the headlines sooner rather than later. As al-Qaeda's safe haven in Pakistan allows it to thrive and the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan gains momentum, the next president will be forced to confront a terrorist group that has gained strength since 9/11, not lost it, and remains a serious threat to the stability of South Asia and the security of the American homeland.

Fortunately, Bin Laden's latest promise of "new fronts" against the United States will not go unmatched. President-elect Obama has already signaled that he will open up his own "new front" against al-Qaeda on the as-yet untouched ideological battlefield. Obama's moves to close Guantanamo and strong anti-torture stance will help deny Bin Laden the political oxygen he needs to incite potential recruits to violence.

Fortunately, Barack Obama has already delivered a blow to al-Qaeda in the "war of ideas." His election, by signaling to the world that America is a country of limitless opportunity whose democracy can correct its own mistakes, has turned Bin Laden's narrative of a corrupt and belligerent America on its head.

The release of yet another tape from Osama Bin Laden Wednesday serves as a reminder of the many leftover issues Barack Obama will inherit from the Bush administration. In the 22-minute audio tape, t...
The release of yet another tape from Osama Bin Laden Wednesday serves as a reminder of the many leftover issues Barack Obama will inherit from the Bush administration. In the 22-minute audio tape, t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joebhed
Greenback Revolutionist
08:42 PM on 01/18/2009
Obama's opportunity with regard to the Islamic community will not have a thing to do with Usama.
His main engagement will be through our relations with Iran.
And here, Obama's and Hillary's policy statements have been sorely lacking of any hint of a new Obama era, actually doubling down the policies of George Bush.
Clinton and Rice have each shown a lack of understanding about Iran's nuclear intentions and the results of its actions.
Both have shown a willingness to propagandize on the charges against Iran for its sanctions.
Both have called for denying Iran its rights under international treaties to which we and over a hundred other nations are signatories.
If Obama wants to do anything meaningful with regard to improving our position in foreign relations, then he needs to act responsibly in strengthening the International Non-Proliferation Treat(NPT).
This is really the foreign policy challenge of this administration, and the Israeli conflicts are a costly distraction.
The Obama Era.
I can't wait.
04:26 PM on 01/19/2009
Of course you know all of this because you've been sitting in on the briefings.
08:07 PM on 02/02/2009
I would love to see Tim Roemer in the Obama cabinet , I do wonder why hasn't been.
Indiana needs Roemer
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:21 AM on 01/18/2009
The ability to mislead and manipulate poor people is all that is needed to insure a loyal following. Stopping terrorism is unlikely to ever happen, we will always have enemies. We would be better off educating the poor as best we can, for once one has his eyes opened, he is far less likely to blind his neighbor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FogBelter
Illegitimis non carborundum
07:12 PM on 01/17/2009
Congressman Roemer, I think many Americans, like myself, are anxious for a thorough investigation of the events that led to and occurred on September 11th, 2001. I believe it still awaits to be determined whether Bin Laden and Al Qeada were the masterminds of the terrorist attacks or merely hired hands that carried out the hit on the United States.

There are, after all, about 3000 murder victims, and their families, awaiting justice ... and though it may be enjoyable to torture Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to the point of madness for his participation in the crime, it is difficult to believe he is the Alpha and Omega of the treachery that occurred 9/11/2001.
01:49 PM on 01/18/2009
Indeed.

Btw, Mr. Roemer, why did you attempt to discredit Norman Mineta's testimony when he described Cheney confirming unidentified "orders" in the PEOC at 9:25 a.m. as an aircraft was tracked approaching the Pentagon? Why did the Commission claim Cheney did not reach the PEOC until 10:00 a.m.? You do realize that the Commission admits the Langley fighters were not scrambled to intercept AA77, but were vectored over the Atlantic to intercept a "phantom" aircraft, don't you?

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/clock-stoppers/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:44 AM on 01/17/2009
I'm looking forward to a presidency where Bin Laden's voice no longer has has more command in politics than an American citizens.
02:38 AM on 01/17/2009
I want to see Bin Laden not hear him. Until I do, I believe he is dead. I also want to seem him mention something dated. Osama, give your Super Bowl pick at the end of you tape saying how you hate American hate Israel and will destroy us all.....blah, blah, blah...
11:09 PM on 01/16/2009
Oh come on, are you saying that you believe Bin Laden is still alive? He's been dead for years.
The CIA usually makes the "Bin Laden Tapes"...so we can take this with a grain of salt.

Its just another red herring to draw attention away from real issues. Like the war "over there so we wouldn't have to fight them over here" was so very handy as cover for the looting of our treasury and the hacking away at our civil rights.
We decimate Iraq and in the process destroy our Democracy, helluva hand that George Bush.
04:39 PM on 01/17/2009
Many believe as you say .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:13 PM on 01/16/2009
Obama has lost a lot of potential support in the Middle East by not urging Israel toward moderation. We'll see what the man who captivated audiences with slogans like the "Fierce Urgency of Now" says next week about the Palestinian crisis. Despite the blogger's claim, Obama missed the opportunity to be a strong voice of moderation. Disaffected muslims seeing the carnage and injustice in Gaza have likely responded in a positive way toward bin Laden's message. The blogger only wishes it weren't so, claiming that Obama is winning the "war of ideas". War-schmore. Undercutting the designs of a criminal mastermind still at-large will depend on Obama being able to put Israel in check and providing a safe state for Palestinians to live. Only then will moderation take root.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidwayneosedach
06:00 PM on 01/16/2009
Let Ossama wallow in his own UNIMPORTANCE!
05:03 PM on 01/16/2009
Looks like Jeb was right.

"The truth is useless. You have to understand this right now. You can't deposit the truth in a bank. You can't buy groceries with the truth. You can't pay rent with the truth. The truth is a useless commodity that will hang around your neck like an albatross all the way to the homeless shelter. And if you think that the million or so people in this country that are really interested in the truth about their government can support people who would tell them the truth, you got another thing coming. Because the million or so people in this country that are truly interested in the truth don't have any money." - Jeb Bush
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SueMVetforObama
09:11 PM on 01/16/2009
Ask Jeb how much a gallon of milk costs.........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mommadona
I paint. I blog. Therefore, I am.
03:25 PM on 01/16/2009
The best thing Obama can do is ignore this fool.

The Arab countries are.

He is an old relic with residual followings.

The new "Base" no longer is interested in what he says.

They've decided on their own battle plans.

Bin Laden is a pathetic old man with a big mouth and delusions of grandeur.

Much like George W. Bush.

They fed each other's needs.

No need to 'buy into it' .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deminmo
just looking for answers
12:31 AM on 01/17/2009
That's pretty much whatI heard. Al Qaeda has split into hundreds
of factions and no longer needs Bin Laden. Even if he is still alive
in a cave somewhere, he isn't the threat he once was.
Obama has problems with Palistine/Israel, Israel/Iran, Syria, Lebanon,
India/Pakistan, North Korea/So. Korea, China/Tiawan, US/Russia.
So basically, besides the economy, Obama will have his hands full
of trouble for the 4 years of his first term.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
03:07 PM on 01/16/2009
"America is a country of limitless opportunity whose democracy can correct its own mistakes, has turned Bin Laden's narrative of a corrupt and belligerent America on its head".

Say what? I guess you mean America could be and was create for that end. The means are more corrupted than ever before in history. Obama has not walked the talk, but has made a step in the right direction. Time will tell, I am hopeful, but surely not counting Chickens before the hatch.

I do not see why OBL has been stood on his head. 3000 people fight for the independence of the Arab World responds to Sharon/Bush Policy " a corrupt and belligerent" shooting students upset over Sharon's Synigog visit and OBL rushed his attack on the US on 911. Support his narrative and actions as unGODly as it was.
04:26 PM on 01/16/2009
Say what?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
06:20 PM on 01/17/2009
What IS! The mighteous military looses once again (Korea, Viet Nam, Iraq, Afghanistan) trying to deny freedom. Saying Mission Accomplished" is only talk and that is cheap. WAR is very very expensive.

We should be smart, not stupid
01:37 PM on 01/16/2009
FROM NEWSDAY:

Obama: The man from Raytheon....
One in an ever expanding list of ironies about Obama is his nomination of Raytheon lobb ying exec William Lynn, to the Number 2 slot at defense -- which on the surface, seems like a strange way to end the influence of Washington.

It's already apparent that anyone who took (or takes) everything Obama said at face value was a fo ol.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:16 PM on 01/16/2009
There are many indicators that Obama is turning out to be a Pied Piper. We'll see.
04:49 PM on 01/17/2009
We need wait and see to be fair. He's not even in yet and there may be method to what seems to be his maddness. Ever hear of keeping friends close but enimies closer? Think about that for a minute. I mean, really think deeply what that would entail. Many think he's genious and I'm betting on him until I see for myself. .
01:05 PM on 01/16/2009
Mr Roemer writes:
"a terrorist group that has gained strength since 9/11, not lost it, and remains a serious threat to the stability of South Asia and the security of the American homeland."

I won't pretend to be an expert in this area, but the fact seems to be that Al Qaeda has not managed to use operational assets, either manpower or equipment, against the US homeland since the 9/11 attacks - so how exactly have they gotten stronger ? If it were so, wouldn't they have been able to stage a successful operation here by now, or is Mr Roemer suggesting that, although "stronger", they have decided for strategic reasons to hold off on a mainland strike ? Are they "stronger" overseas and, if so, how exactly ? More men, money, material ? Seems those three things are the only thing that makes a terrorist organization strong.
No disrespect to anyone, but I'd love an answer from someone with credentials, not some radical idealist who wants to rant in an effort berate others. Thanks !!
02:16 PM on 01/16/2009
While Al Qaeda has not successful struck the mainland they have hit many US targets and corporate targets in the ME and Africa. Even if their star is no longer as brilliant as it was the rise in jihadist movements with a concurrent increase in money, men and materials is undisputed. Further, as governments and alliances shift within governments we see a "normalization" of positions that were considered radical a few years ago, as we see in Pakistan and the resurgence of the "new, improved, kinder, gentler Taliban" that is reported to be the shadow gov of much of Afghanistan....
Ever since Bush and Condi decided to rescinded the order to maintain strike ready status on Osama bin Laden that they inherited from Clinton we have been flat footed and behind the eight ball. Nobody can doubt that Iraq and the emergence of Al Qaeda in Iraq along with other movements is a direct result of the invasion and occupation. The Abu Ghraib scandal and the proclavity of US to torture became a rallying point for the disenfranchized and those who lost family and friends to US bombs...
03:04 PM on 01/16/2009
"proclavity of US to torture " -- that was the rant I was hoping to avoid. Roemer said that Al Qaeda has become stronger since 9/11 -- you answered by saying that although Al Qaeda's star may not be as bright (implicitly acknowledging that Al Qaeda has in fact not gotten "stronger" as Roemer claims), other jihadist groups have become strong and Al Qaeda in Iraq has "emerged" -- obviously this doesn't answer the question I raised in response to Roemer's vague statement. As far as Al Qaeda strikes abroad, you must appreciate the limits of US abilities to do what may need to be done and the cooperation of foreign nations necessary to prevent such incidents. Would love for Mr. Roemer to put some meat on the bare bones statement that "Al Qaeda has gotten stronger" -- maybe this is so, but just saying it doesn't make it so. If a purported expert is going to write such a thing, it's not to much to ask for the details upon which the statement is made.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
03:50 PM on 01/16/2009
I cannot give you facts although I heard a CIA person discuss the intell that if America would leave the region and let them alone they could at least try to over throw the Pupet Governments we helped establish and maintain they would care less about America and our way of life. If only we could show this kind of wisdom instead of selfish action I think peace would have a chance.
11:34 AM on 01/16/2009
Mr. Roemer, as a member of the 9/11 Commission--the most outrageous whitewash in US history--you must have had difficulty keeping a straight face as you wrote this.

Interesting use of language, however: "Bin Laden's narrative of a corrupt and belligerent America"

So anyone who concludes that the US is "corrupt" and "belligerent" (perish the thought) is a victim of "Bin Laden's narrative".

OK. Since there is nothing about it in the Commission Report, please be so kind as to tell us how Osama pulled off this heist through the WTC computers?

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/the-ghost-in-the-machines-the-mystery-of-the-wtc-hard-drive-recoveries/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
03:54 PM on 01/16/2009
I do sympathize with Freedom fighters who wish to over throw tyrants. But I can only support and respect great leaders like Gandhi and MLK who did this with NON VILENCE.
09:52 AM on 01/16/2009
Jollyelle, thanks for the context.

Oh, and it's worth noting that it was Israel - not Hamas - who broke the cease fire in place since June 2008 by killing 6 Palestinians in Gaza on November 4th while the world was watching the US elections.

Nice timing.

Until December 27th, no Israeli, civilian or military, was killed as a result of rocket or mortar fire from Gaza.
None. Not one. And there was very little rocket or mortar fire out of Gaza until Israel broke the ceasefire in early November.

But wasn't this rocket fire provocative in the first place? Well, no.

Under the terms of the ceasefire, in exchange for Hamas ending rocket fire out of Gaza, Israel was supposed to end military operations in Gaza and its economic strangulation.

Not only did Israel bring the ceasefire to a premature end on November 4th, it failed to live up to its obligations under it to lift its economic embargo. Hence the sporadic retaliatory fire by Hamas.

So what kept Israel from responding sooner? Bad timing.

What with the the power vaccum in the US during the transition and impending National elections in Israel, Israel's governement figured November 4 would be a better time to burnish its hawkish credentials to stay in power by beating up on Gaza while US attention was distracted.