- BIG NEWS:
- Fox News
- |
- Magazines
- |
- Oprah
- |
- Keith Olbermann
- |
Every now and then comes something that is a perfect expression of what the Internet is about.
The latest, if you haven't already heard, comes via Kutiman, an Israeli Web impresario who mashed and mixed video clips of amateur YouTube musicians to create a near-flawless overture to the Twittering masses.
ThruYOU, his resulting record (if you can call it that), has taken the Web by storm, garnering more than a million YouTube views in the seven days since its release.
That's impressive when you consider its humble beginnings. Kutiman sent an e-mail about the project to just 20 friends. They told their friends about it and ThruYOU took on a life of its own, spreading like a netroots brushfire via Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, YouTube and blogs.
| Track 3 |
After seeing ThruYOU yesterday, Larry Lessig, the author of "Remix," the bible of the free-culture generation, wrote: "Watch this, and you'll understand everything and more than what I try to explain in my book."
Jon Newton of P2P.net added that ThruYOU is "absolutely, 100% guaranteed to inspire artists around the world to produce art which has never been seen before, and never could have been seen without the Internet."
All Bets Are Off
Kutiman, who also goes by the name Ophir Kutiel, has captured the Zeitgeist of the moment -- a time when our rapidly evolving Internet culture is toppling old regimes and handing over control of popular information to people like you, me, Kutiman and his YouTube orchestra.
| Track 1 |
In fact, that change is already happening.
In politics, economics, arts and culture, an era of privileged access is giving way to something that's much more decentralized, participatory and personal.
We no longer passively consume media, we actively participate in it. This often means creating content, in whatever form and from whatever sources -- what author Jonathan Zittrain calls "generativity."
We no longer limit our political involvement to television ads and the polling booth. This means organizing via Facebook, "Googling" candidates to learn more, joining text-messaging lists and creating Twitter hash tags to stay ahead of our issues.
No More 'Mass Media'
This development cuts across our social landscape, enhancing core democratic values, and empowering more people (although not all).
Like the many singers and musicians that make ThruYOU a work of tremendous grace, it prioritizes alternative voices over mainstream pap.
| Track 6 |
Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web with the understanding that the freedom to connect to anyone, anywhere was the Internet's First Amendment. This openness, known to many as Net Neutrality, leaves ultimate control over your online experience with you, the user.
Taming the Dinosaurs
Users of the Internet may take Net Neutrality for granted. But this could change if the dinosaurs of old media (namely, phone, cable, recording and film companies) are successful in taming new media that threaten their twentieth-century fiefdoms.
They've talked about filtering content for perceived violations of copyright and have been caught blocking access to popular Web applications that put control over video more firmly in users' hands. They have deployed their lobbyists, lawyers and PR flacks to paint Net Neutrality as cumbersome regulation that will destroy their plans to enhance your Web experience -- as if they knew what that was.
Congress will have the opportunity this year to stop old media's latest plans to remake our Internet in their image. Net Neutrality has the support of several key members, the White House and the incoming FCC leadership; it's only a matter of time before legislation makes it to the floor.
These are hopeful signs for Kutiman and the next genius who seizes upon the Internet to take us all to a new level.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Yeh baby!
Finally somone wrote about Thru-you in the HuffPost (except for me in irrelevant posts' comments).
I don't agree with all the post, but i think that if someone will take the time and fall in love with this beautiful project like thousands of us (hopefully millions), he will understand more where you come from and what you mean.
Usually i can be a quite cynical person, but this project inspired me so much - there's something special in it that makes you feel better about the world - it sounds lame - but it truly does.
So maybe you went a bit far - but i won't judge you like the other commentators. I think that it's better to have those beautiful ideas, and to be able to be less cynic and more hopeful from time to time.
I'm amazed by Kutiman's music videos as well, but the celebration of the new internet era proposed by this article is so idealistic it's ridiculous. Consider one statement, as an example, because pages could be written about the absurdities here.
"We no longer passively consume media, we actively participate in it."
This oft repeated truism about the internet is so easily refutable, it's a wonder anyone can say it with a straight face.
With Kutiman's videos, we have a single artist, Kutiman, who has produced a series of music videos with the aid of a set of musicians, functioning not unlike studio musicians, but which he found on YouTube. This group of musicians is not terribly large, no larger than a typical orchestra. So there is one artist and a relatively small group of musicians. These are the people who can be said to be "active" participants.
Then there are the millions of internet viewers, who passively engage with the music, by watching it on a screen. This is so fundamentally similar to watching a music video on television that to propose that it represents a revolution is absurd. There is nothing more active about it than the way we consume television and music already. The internet viewer may have more choices and be able to "flip" channels more rapidly, but more does not make the experience in any basic way different. Indeed, the fetishistic pursuit of "more" is one of the hallmarks of modern consumer capitalism.
This is unmitigated wankage. Any fool who cant tell the difference between new age navel gazing one minute wonder Youtube distraction of the day, and the korporate produced media machine that makes worldwide billions off blockbuster films is pathertically self delusional.
The word missing from this post is "collaborate." The Internet didn't make collaboration possible, just easier. It didn't create alternative voices, it just gave them a new platform. Maybe it's time to stop gushing.
"In politics, economics, arts and culture, an era of privileged access is giving way to something that's much more decentralized, participatory and personal..."
I see shades of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and other 1960s activist groups in this. Tom Hayden and his colleagues were just a few decades ahead of their time. As is often the case with visionaries!
My hunch for the "next genius" Mr. Karr ponders may be Steve Wolfram and his brainchild wolframalpha.com. For now, stay tuned.... His concept for a web-based Answer Engine is in itself a paradigm shifter. I predict that our hindsight view of the Google dominated Seach Engine Era might just become yesteday's news. Watch out Sergei!
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with