Congress just sold you out to Comcast, Verizon and AT&T.
Big phone and cable companies are so determined to dismantle consumer protections on the open Internet that they've spent millions to flip Congress against you. Earlier this week, many in Congress delivered.
On Monday, 74 House Democrats joined 37 Senate Republicans to sign an industry-written letter that tells the Federal Communications Commission to halt all efforts to protect Internet users and stop big companies from blocking Internet traffic.
Net Neutrality -- the principle that would keep users in control of the Internet -- was the top communications policy of President Obama when he came into office last year. Obama has repeated his support for an open Internet on several occasions since, and last summer appointed Julius Genachowski to lead the FCC and fulfill this presidential promise.
That promise has now been cast into doubt by dozens of Democrats willing to sell out their president, their constituents, and millions of Net Neutrality supporters to do the bidding of special interests.
Big Money vs. Common Sense
| The President wants it and so do millions of Americans |
Their letter warns Chairman Genachowski against pursuing a plan that would enable the FCC to act as a watchdog and serve the public interest over the Internet, preventing phone and cable companies from blocking access to websites and services, while promoting policies that ensure universal and affordable access.
"The uncertainty this proposal creates will jeopardize jobs and deter needed investment for years to come," the letter says. "We urge you not to move forward with a proposal that undermines critically important investment in broadband and the jobs that come with it."
Say what? Even the top executives at Verizon and Comcast say that the FCC's proposal will have no impact on their investment in broadband networks. And experts overwhelmingly agree that extending broadband services to those stuck on the wrong side of the digital divide would create more jobs.
A study by the Brookings Institution and MIT estimated that a one-digit increase in U.S. per capita broadband penetration equates to an additional 300,000 jobs. If our broadband penetration were as high as a country like Denmark's, we could provide approximately three million additional U.S. jobs.
The Dirty Little Secret
The letter is so full of misleading information that it's hard to know where to begin.
But behind it all is one dirty little secret: Nearly every one of these representatives has accepted massive contributions from the phone and cable lobby.
Such behavior by elected officials is outrageous and unethical. Perhaps some of these representatives just didn't know what they were signing. Or perhaps this is just business as usual -- members willing to sell out the public in exchange for campaign cash. (Is it any wonder the latest Gallup public opinion poll counts a congressional disapproval rating of 73 percent?)
But in putting their names to this letter, these members are telling us to have blind faith that phone and cable companies have the best interests of Americans in mind - and will deliver fast, open and affordable Internet services without government oversight.
That's a huge mistake. Comcast and AT&T can no better police themselves to protect the Internet than BP can police itself to protect the oceans. We already know how that ends. The phone and cable companies must play by the rules.
In response, Free Press (my day job) is urging hundreds of thousands of people to sign our own letter telling the FCC that Congress doesn't speak for you, President Obama or the millions of other Americans who support a fast, open and affordable Internet.
Congress can't hand these companies control over the future of communications. The results would be disastrous.
If only more members of Congress knew that their bad deeds couldn't be swept beneath the carpet - unnoted and unpunished. It's time they heard from us.
Follow Timothy Karr on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TimKarr
Consumer welfare? What’s that? Isn’t that what Free Press is talking about when it banters around the notion of consumer protection?
Unfortunately, the answer is no. Attacking a congressman on the issue of money he received from a corporation may be good tabloid fodder, but in the world of public policy, it’s pointless.
Free Press should be concerned about consumers realizing increased levels of broadband services for the same level of price. Free Press should be concerned about increasing consumer surplus. Regulation has never brought that about.
The telephone system worked all over the country because "Net Neutrality" was forced on the phone companies, so they couldn't refuse to carry calls based on their content or destination. What, I ask, is wrong with the same rule being applied to the internet?
I just got an announcement in my e-mail from Cox Cable about settlement of a class action suit. Seems Cox was doing exactly what Net Neutrality is designed to prevent; they were deciding what will and will not flow and slowing selected access down. They admitted no wrongdoing but settled anyway.
Without Net Neutrality all big companies will do what Cox did, they won't apologize and they'll be no way to prevent them.
I would love to support network neutrality if I could get a clear and succinct answer on the true impact of the regulation. It is frustrating. Tim Karr talks about misleading language from those who signed this letter, however, his entire post here is wrought with misrepresentation and overstatement of the facts.
This all is about the big boys v the big boys and we are all being strung along to believe it is bigger than that. Don't believe the hype people.