With more than 500 million Facebook users across the world, it's hard to refute that the social networking site has profoundly changed the way we communicate and share information. But what is Facebook's effect on kids? When it comes to navigating the social networking world -- whether it's Facebook or fan fiction sites -- the terrain becomes even murkier.
Parents worry about what is age-appropriate, what should be kept private and exposure to cyber bullying, among many other issues. And it's true -- there's a lot to navigate, even for adults. But Facebook and social networks aren't going away anytime soon, and the better parents understand this, the better they'll be able to help their kids understand it, too. Rather than block all access to the Internet, they can see that for every pitfall, there's a potential promise, too.
"Parents can and should moderate sites, but they have to give kids the opportunities to figure out what it means to be digital citizens, and allow kids to be empowered," said Carrie James, who's conducting a qualitative survey of kids and social networks at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. "They need prompts and supports to develop guidelines together."
CONNECTION AND SELF-EXPRESSION
For better or for worse, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and their ilk provide ways for kids to connect with each other and to express themselves. This level of unchecked expression, some argue, is too much for young kids, who can't handle the complexities of social networking sites. "The amount of angst has increased in my school in the past few years," said Anthony Orsini, principal of Benjamin Franklin Middle School in Ridgewood, New Jersey. With three suicides (including Tyler Clementi) in the past year, he says "it's been a fearful time in our town for our parents."
The irony here is that the fear doesn't come from the traditional "stranger danger" but from how kids behave toward each other online.
"Stranger danger is unbelievably minute compared to the social and emotional damage they receive from each other everyday," Orsini said. Add to that the strict anti-bullying laws that Orsini says renders schools responsible for kids' online behavior, and the matter becomes that much more complicated.
But for administrators like Eric Sheninger, principal of New Milford High School in Bergen County, New Jersey, privacy and cyber bullying issues are a red herring. "What if a kid swears in the hallway? It's the same thing. People want to hide behind the legal issues, but it's the same as swearing on Facebook," he says.
Either way, kids will have to learn that their digital footprint is born from the moment they start posting on each other's walls and create their first online avatar. They'll have to figure out that every YouTube video they upload will be a reflection of themselves as the public sees them. With guidance from parents and educators, they can figure out what the world knows about them. But at the moment, it's not a high priority at most schools, Sheninger says.
"Schools aren't teaching kids to be digitally responsible," he said. "We can't fault kids for doing something wrong on Facebook or Twitter because we're not teaching them. We need to have digital citizenship curriculum in schools."
It's important to note here that Orisini is the principal of a middle school, while Sheninger is the principal of a high school, and the age difference can be a factor in how kids behave online.
LEARNING
Chances are, anytime the computer is on near a kid (and let's face it, even adults), some kind of social networking is happening. Whether it's Facebook or instant-messaging, or watching or uploading videos to share, the distractions are endless. As we all know, one link can easily lead to another until suddenly an hour and a half has passed and we've lost track of the task at hand.
Last year's comprehensive study by Kaiser Family Foundation found that kids age eight to 18 actually manage to pack in almost 11 hours worth of media content into seven and a half hours of using media, through 'media multitasking'.
So is there any time left for learning? Researchers like Henry Jenkins would argue that the best kind of learning -- engaged and collaborative -- is happening on social network sites.
Jenkins talks about "deeply meaningful forms of learning... taking place through engagement with affinity groups and social networks online," such as Harry Potter Alliance, which has mobilized more than 100,000 people against the Darfur genocide and labor rights at Walmart.
But because of privacy laws like the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, most schools shut off access to social networking sites -- with a few exceptions. To principal Sheninger, "if you're not on Facebook, you can't really communicate with us. Our new hub of real-time information is Facebook. I post things about what the kids are doing, and when they comment or parents comment, as a principal, I'm proud," he said.
Facebook's changing privacy settings and its tendency to default to more open information is a source of constant annoyance for its users. We have to keep close tabs on those changes, especially when it comes to kids. But young children are not the primary target user for Facebook, which does not allow kids under age 13 to sign up for an account. Parents must decide whether they'll allow their children to become a part of the vast Facebook network, or to harness the social networking world into smaller, more contained sites like Togetherville or Club Penguin.
Parents can use the subject of privacy settings as an opportunity to teach kids about navigating the online world. They can talk about what information they agree is acceptable to be shared with friends and with the public at large and about social media etiquette. With guidance and support, and with parents to set examples of what they think is appropriate, kids can learn their place and their responsibility as part of a worldwide online community.
Follow Tina Barseghian on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@mindshiftKQED
Larry Magid: Yet Another Google Attempt at Social Networking
FBI — Parent Guide to Internet Safety
Let's teach kids how to be safe on the internet instead of hiding them from it. There is an age appropriate, safe and secure social networking site for kids, check out www.WhatsWhat.Me and its Parent Resource Center.
While Facebook is definitely not appropriate for kids under 13 that doesn’t mean these “tweens” should be banned from social networks altogether. WhatsWhat.Me is a safe, secure, “kids-only” social network for “tweens” ages 7-13 which uses patent-pending facial recognition technology, moderation and kid-friendly features to teach kids positive online behavior, Internet safety and related life skills. It’s also compliant with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). WhatsWhat.me (Beta) provides an age-appropriate, “no-bullying allowed” community that requires parental permission to join. For parents, WhatsWhat.me offers its online Parent Resource Center providing expert advice, news, Internet safety tips and information on cybersafety for children.
Now it seems like there's a constant barrage of 'Don't post that, someone may not like it someday.' and we're supposed to care what some random person thinks in the future. Now I understand saying not to threaten anyone, but nowadays calling someone a name is just as bad if it's online.
The legal age for FB is thirteen, yet so many don't obey the rule. I'm hoping to keep my kids off until high school - I'll settle for eight grade. Still, I just don't think middle schoolers have the capacity to handle the ramifications.