On Halloween, just ahead of Tuesday's local elections, we received a second attack flyer in the mail from conservative activists. This one was entitled "Save Our City." (Save it from progressive, radical, extremist socialists, that is.)
Last February, Mark Liebovich penned a New York Times column entitled, "'Socialism!' Boo, Hiss, Repeat," describing the resurgence of "socialist" as the rhetorical weapon of choice among conservatives. Their "permanent Republican majority" washed away by Democratic victories in 2006 and 2008 (and by the waters of
Last week, a squad of Republican cardinals bagged a "heretic," New York Republican assemblywoman Dede Scozzafava. Her voting record was only "slightly more conservative" than average for New York, making her utterly unacceptable to the tea-party Hard Corps. Scozzafava dropped out of the three-way race for NY-23 and endorsed Democrat Bill Owens, who Tuesday night won a seat held by Republicans for over a hundred years. Next, Newt Gingrich may have a date with the comfy chair.
But back to those socialists. Joshua Bolin of Augusta, Ga., founder of a Web site, "Reagan.org," calls socialism "something new for us to hit Obama over the head with." Exactly. It is a cudgel with all the intellectual content of "When did you stop beating your wife?" It is not meant to spark debate (intelligent or otherwise), but to stop it cold. It is a rhetorical taser for the fear center of the lizard brain.
As Bolin hints, facts are irrelevant. A fact is merely the stick closest at hand, and useful for hitting opponents over the head. Once the stick breaks (or is publicly debunked), it is disposable. Another will do just fine. Truth is just as disposable. A real fact, a "true fact" conforms to conservative orthodoxy and makes a suitable weapon against "socialists."
In a YouTube clip making the rounds on the right-wing spam circuit, the 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, a former Maggie Thatcher advisor and climate change skeptic, claims that a United States president, Barack Obama, will help create a "communist world government" in Copenhagen this December. "[U]nless you stop it," Lord Christopher Monckton warns melodramatically, "your president will sign your freedom, your democracy and your prosperity away forever, and neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back again."
(Like when another president gave away forever America's power to torture people?)
To borrow from another Christopher (Buckley), does the modern conservative get "moist on his own petard" delivering such fear-mongering twaddle? Or after decades of looking for commies hiding in woodpiles, are they incapable of letting go of the S-bombs and the red-baiting? Is it because the vaunted collapse of communism was just another "Mission Accomplished" or because it is another case of "I wish I knew how to quit you."
Since losing the White House last November, America's disenCheneyed far right has renewed its obsession with rooting out the socialist menace they told us Ronald Reagan defeated when the Cold War ended twenty years ago.
And they wonder why in 2006 and 2008 American voters chose leaders who live in the 21st century, not in the last one.
NO FEAR FOR THE VAMPIRES. It is what they run on.
1: Loading the Language. Words and phrases used as thought-terminating jargon.
”Stick. Head. Repeat.” Republican are not presenting reasoned debate, their “facts are irrelevant. A fact is merely the stick closest at hand, and useful for hitting opponents over the head.” This is about dehumanizing the opposition.
2:Sacred Science. Liberal doctrine or ideology is considered to be the ultimate Truth, beyond all questioning or dispute. Truth is not to be found outside the group. (i.e. Stick. Head. Repeat.") Factual evidence is not required to condemn a Republican, only a bald assertion.
3:Doctrine over person. Denial of personal experiences and opinions of those outside the group. Factual evidence opposing Liberal position is denied. Truth is disposable.
4:Erasing existence. Those in the (Liberal) group have a right to exist, others do not. Outsiders are less than human, or unenlightened, or unconscious -- erased as human beings from the group’s reality. They are paranoid, liars, “tea-baggers.” Thus, the outside world loses all credibility.
There's also the matter of "I know you are but what am I" responses, being what they are, no matter how many big words they're dressed up in...
I said nothing about anyone's right to exist, only noted the fearmongering and the use of socialism as a stick (see the NYT article and reagan.org).
A healthy society is one that strikes a healthy and fair balance between the two extremes.
We need a balance of socialism and capitalism, and balance of liberal and conservative, to meet the needs of all the pople of America. Not just one side or the other. We dont want to be polarized.
To be fair, the conservatives have had their way for way too long. It is high time for the liberals to come into power and have their way for a while too. We must be fair and balanced.
`Amongst our weapons are fear, stupidity, and a fanatical devotion to the pope'
"Well, all right, you Mongols..."
http://speakonit.com/
I don't see any legitmate arguments coming from the right.
They certainly don't care about the future of our country otherwise they would have plans, proposals, information, and provide support in a bipartisan way.
Instead just shouting, lying, putting forth false information, creating fear and creating mistrust.
The only thing I have seen recently and was the Republican candidate Dede, bowing out due to pressure from her own party and endosing the Democrat.
That took a lot of courage and I respect her enormously.
The right, Pawlenty, Sarah Palin, and pals who spent big bucks going after their own Party member did so only because of the "choice" issue. They abandoned their own to support another candidate not from the district he was running in, based on his pro-life stance even though he wasn't qualified for the postiion.