iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tom Vander Ark

GET UPDATES FROM Tom Vander Ark
 

How Digital Learning Will Benefit Low Income Students

Posted: 12/28/11 10:53 AM ET

Digital learning will benefit all students -- particularly students from low-income families where education leaders are proactive. In light of the 'OER exacerbates the gap' flap this week, I thought it would be worth expanding on the ways in which EdTech, blended learning, and open education resources (OER) will benefit low-income kids. Following is a list of 10 ways that digital learning will benefit low-income students:

1. Good teachers. States that authorize multiple providers and allow part-time enrollment (like Florida, Idaho, and Utah) give every student access to great teachers in every subject.

Public Impact is building on the Innosight Institute report, The Rise of Blended Learning, and identifying strategies -- most using technology -- that extend the reach of great teachers. The net benefit is that five years from now more students will benefit from great teachers.

2.Good content. During the next five years most states and districts will shift to predominantly digital content -- it will be more to date, more engaging, and provide more expansive learning resources than print. The shift will disproportionately benefit low-income students that have had less access to quality content.

3. Diagnostics. Adaptive assessments and improved diagnostics are beginning to pinpoint learning levels and gaps that must be addressed. These tools -- like NWEA MAP, Wireless MClass -- are of particular benefit to students whose learning has not been well supported.

4. Special services. We're beginning to see the deployment of online services for students with language and learning difficulties. Available on demand, they often work better and are less expensive than traditional approaches.

5. More options. Personal digital learning is enabling a wide variety of school options -- some that blend online and onsite, and some that are purely virtual. Where states allow it, families have a wider variety of options to meet specific needs.

6. Advanced courses. Soon, most states will give every student access to every advanced math and science course, as well as Advanced Placement and college credit courses. With scaled providers it is logistically simple and very affordable to provide cost-effective access to consistent quality. This relatively new capability unquestionably benefits low-income students.

7. Time. As the high performing elementary Rocketship network is demonstrating, school models that blend digital learning with classroom instruction can extend the learning day for students that need an 8-hour school day to overcome an early childhood vocabulary deficit.

8. 24/7 access. Over the next five years, most schools will provide take home technology (at least for secondary students) that will extend access to learning resources around the clock. States, cities, and school districts will continue to make progress on extending access to broadband. The combination of devices and broadband will narrow the digital divide.

9. Free. There has been an explosion of free and open educational resources. With Khan Academy, every family has access to at least one great math teacher. Teachers can use social learning platform Edmodo, video sharing service SchoolTube, and math games from MangaHigh all for free (Learn Capital portfolio companies). Free content is helping schools make the shift to personal digital learning -- that's good for all kids but particularly for low-income students.

10. Culture. Good schools have a powerful culture of high expectations and strong support. As education shifts from a place to a service, social learning groups will extend a culture of learning beyond traditional classrooms. Teacher social networks are connecting subject area teachers across the country. Reducing the isolation of teachers and students and promoting a college/career ready culture will disproportionately benefit low-income students.

Digital learning won't close the achievement gap, but it will lift the floor. More students will be more academically successful. Five years from now, a higher percentage of students will soon graduate from high school ready for college and careers. Most will have benefited from Common Core expectations. Some will have benefited from Race to the Top funded programs. Many will have benefited from these 10 reasons that digital learning will benefit low-income students.

 

Follow Tom Vander Ark on Twitter: www.twitter.com/tvanderark

Digital learning will benefit all students -- particularly students from low-income families where education leaders are proactive. In light of the 'OER exacerbates the gap' flap this week, I thought ...
Digital learning will benefit all students -- particularly students from low-income families where education leaders are proactive. In light of the 'OER exacerbates the gap' flap this week, I thought ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:23 PM on 01/02/2012
Online / digital learning will be very valuable for a very small number of students, those who are raised in a family and environment that values learning, but whose available schools are too disrupted and chaotic to support a learning environment.

I do not expect online / digital learning to add much value for disaffected students.
01:35 AM on 12/31/2011
The idea that great teachers are the solution is not true. Look at: "The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics" in American Journal of Physics, May, 2011. This study shows it is what the teacher does in class, and not who the teacher is that counts. In one case the same teacher who achieved only 13% gain raised this to 50% gain by switching methods. The higher gain was using a method with a low percentage of lecturing. The Modeling program at modeling.ASU.edu trains teachers who routinely get better gain from their students. While technology is used, it is used appropriately. Power point, smart boards... are not routinely used.

The Physics education research (PER) has shown dramatically that it is possible to achieve much higer gain routinely by changing the method of instruction. But it does not require a large amount of advanced technology. Everyone is looking for the quick fix, but there is no substitute for well trained respected teachers. Look at Finland which achieves excellent results with little homework, no high stakes testing, and less time in class.
08:42 PM on 12/29/2011
I LOVE THESE BLENDING IDEAS!!! IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT WE BRIDGE THE DIGITAL GAP FOR STUDENTS IN COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE STAGGERING UNEMPLOYMENT AND CRIME. HERE IS THE RUB, WE NEED THE HUMAN TOUCH BECAUSE WE ARE IN DIRE NEED OF A NATIONAL REFORM IN HUMANITY. I HAVE SAT IN A ROOM FULL OF BRILLIANT PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IT IS LIKE IN AMERICAN CLASSROOMS TODAY.

OFTEN THE CLASSROOMS DON'T HAVE INTERNET ACCESS, ANCIENT COMPUTERS, NO COMPUTERS, NO SOFTWARE AND REGULAR SUPPLIES LIKE PENCILS ARE DIFFICULT TO GET. IN MY CLASSROOM, I HAVE A MYRIAD OF CHALLENGES IN ADDITION TO THE LACK OF SUPPLIES, SOFTWARE/HARDWARE. THERE IS A DESERT IN THE HEARTS OF CHILDREN THAT FACE A DECAYING COMMUNITY THAT IS STRUGGLING TO STAY VITAL AND INNOVATIVE. THE ADULT ILLITERACY RATE, CRIME, BLIGHT PEPPER THE CITY, FAMILIES ARE FIGHTING TO KEEP THEIR HOMES AND JOBS ARE MANIFESTED IN THE CHILDREN THAT COME TO MY CLASSROOM EVERYDAY. WE NEED REAL VOLUNTEERS THAT WANT TO HELP ALL YEAR ROUND BECAUSE A COMPUTER CANNOT WIPE THE TEARS AWAY FROM A HOMELESS CHILD NOR CAN A CANDY CANE AT CHRISTMASTIME FILL A HEART WITH OPTIMISM OR HOPE. I AM USING WHATEVER PROGRAM, EQUIPMENT AND RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO ME. IT TAKES A VILLAGE TO RAISE A CHILD. THAT'S NOT A SLOGAN, IT IS ESSENTIAL TO PREPARE OUR STUDENTS FOR A GLOBAL COMMUNITY. BRING YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND ENTHUSIASM BECAUSE WE NEED ALL OF YOU! PLEASE GIVE ME THE RESOURCES AND SUPPORT. JUST DO IT!
01:32 PM on 01/01/2012
Now I can't hear. Thanks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:05 PM on 12/29/2011
Would asking you to elaborate with plenty of details be unreasonable? Because your effort currently is unpersuasive.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
09:57 PM on 12/29/2011
sorry for the brevity, there is a book length version here:
http://www.amazon.com/Getting-Smart-Digital-Learning-Changing/dp/1118007239/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1317680732&sr=8-1
11:54 AM on 12/29/2011
I taught for over 40 years first in primary grades and later in middle school, in NYC, and in 1998, I was the choice for the Educator of Excellence by NYSEC. My middle school practice was a cohort for the New Standards, because of the success of my students.

I know something about how learning takes place, and the Habits of Mind, that enable it. The 'disadvantage' is not that they lack a computer. It is that they lack an environment that develops the HABITS OF MIND that leads to learning and literacy.

It is obvious that Tom has never taught low income or disadvantaged children. Does he expect the parents of low income children to build these habits and skills? Tom undervalues the actual work a teacher does.

There is GENUINE research that outlines the NECESSITIES for the brain to acquire both SKILLS and INFORMATION (2 different things) whichis LEARNING. The REAL standards research was done by Harvard on the EIGHT PRINCIPLES OF LEARNING. It takes the entire conversation out of the realm of OPINION, validating the things that must be in place to develop the crucial HABITS OF MIND that result in that acquisition, AND the ability to APPLY SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE.
Motivating students, helping them to organize time to learn and to practice -- TO APPLY what they learn IS WHAT TEACHERS DO. The profession of pedagogy is so poorly understood, that the media and the business dollars that support e-education is able to publish such nonsense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tultican
Thomas Ultican, MEd. BS Mecahnical Engineering
05:44 PM on 12/29/2011
It is amazing that professional educators like you are ignored and business executives like Ark with his connections to Bill Gates have a large platform from which to espouse his unstudied beliefs about education. I true apply the material I learned from studying the Habit of Mind. It is only by making a cultural change that students in a community can make significant advancement. It is certainly not going to be achieved by authoritarian control based on testing or using new technologies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dede4007
09:06 PM on 12/29/2011
Wonderful post. My husband has found this to be true as well. He taught public school for over 25 years, and much of it in lower income schools. The city we were in (in North Carolina) merged the county and city schools to benefit the inner city, lower income students. This was to give the less advantaged students access to better teachers, better equipment, and was supposed to give them a platform in which to succeed and to grow. New schools were built, and city students were bused to the county and vice-versa. Well, things didn't turn out the way the system leaders thought it would. Since the city students had very little family or structural social upbringing, they destroyed the schools they were bused to, and one brand new high school had to be closed down (for major repairs) after ONE year, auditoriums and gymnasiums were destroyed, students didn't come to class and books and computers were stolen and/or also destroyed. All the students grades went down, the teachers were severely depressed and teacher moral was LOW. Then, the county kids that were bused to the city, got depressed and frustrated from being bused to other areas, and their grades went down. NOBODY WON, and everyone LOST. It was a good thought but it FAILED miserably.
09:34 AM on 12/29/2011
"I promise, it won't be like it's usually been so far. A bunch of really, really great stuff is going to happen. Really, it is. It won't be like it's been so far. It's going to turn around completely, for no really apparent reason. And people are going to make a whole bunch of money, but it's going to be GOOD for kids. Really. Am I getting paid by the people who are going to profit? Why would you think that? I'm shocked! It's going to be really good for kids. Really!"
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
10:21 PM on 12/29/2011
At least 4m U.S. kids currently benefit from online learning and I suspect that 5x that gain some benefit from digital learning. But the real benefit is the near term ability to provide a decent high school education to 500m kids in emerging economies that don't have any access today. And I think that is good for all of us.
08:25 AM on 12/31/2011
If online classes were as good as you say they are, it would indeed be good for all of us. In practice, they're usually a mechanism by which we award credit to a kid who didn't earn it, in order to grease them through the system. That's not good for any of us (except the people who've invested in online education and are getting huge amounts of government money to grease the kids through).

As for emerging economies, while online education can be cheaper than actual education (or else the people who invest in it and those paid to shill for them wouldn't be pushing it so hard), that assumes a first-world infrastructure that those emerging economies lack. It'd be both cheaper AND more effective to send them teachers.

Online education has a legitimate place, but it's MUCH more limited than you'd have us believe. Mostly, it can be used as a second-best option for motivated kids who want to take a class that, because of low interest, isn't economically feasible for schools to offer. They can also be a second-best option for kids who, because of illness or injury, can't attend school. But they're definitely a second-best option, at best, and really only effective at all with highly motivated kids.
09:30 AM on 12/29/2011
I agree with the concept of the digital learning and it can help not just the low income student, but all students. As long as it is a supplement, but not the replacement of a live teacher in the classroom. There are many benefits that low income students can achieve by even just taking their time because of reading, comprehension, and retaining knowledge. Language barriers can be a problem with many of the students coming from other countries where English is not spoken, and this can help fill this gap. Again, as long as it is a supplemental way of learning, there is no problem, but if it is the only learning tool, then they all miss out.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
10:02 PM on 12/29/2011
I think many low income kids, particularly new to English, could use 2x the productive learning time they get today. Blended learning models and take home tablets can do that. Rocketship is proving that it works for a high poverty, mostly ELL population.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dallas Dunlap
07:24 AM on 12/30/2011
Online resources are wonderful, but the kids who will do best with digital resources are the same kids who do well in a printed word, chalk and talk environment. The problems are: children who do not pick up the habit of reading at an early age and households that are indifferent to or actually hostile to school and learning.
The middle class student with her own room, computer, and college educated parents who work in a profession will still have an overwhelming advantage against the child who shares her room with siblings and has to do the housework or work parttime to help keep the family going.
07:46 PM on 12/28/2011
Hoping that free wi-fi for all students is next
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
05:01 PM on 12/28/2011
Will it also provide free internet at home? Most of my students do NOT have internet at home. So those take home digital appliances won't do them much good, now, will they?
09:22 AM on 12/29/2011
I agree, most low income families can't afford any kind of internet. Include in the fray is dial-up, and everybody knows how slow that is. There has to be a better way to have some type of wifi available that students can log into. Lastly, the students can only log into the lessons they are to learn, which means lots of security putting into play that they cannot access outside info (i.e. pornography, gambling or even social networking). Even logging into yahoo, msn, or google could be a dangerous precedent. One site and one site only. The bad thing about this is is the cost and can the school district afford it?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
10:05 PM on 12/29/2011
Internet access at home is an important part of narrowing the digital divide. Cities, districts, and broadband providers will need to work together to make that happen. In the mean time, downloading customized playlists to take-home tablets that can play offline is one solution.
02:49 PM on 12/28/2011
I agree with the benefits of blended learning as I piloted a school here in Detroit, Hustle & TECHknow Preparatory High School in 2006-2007. Unfortunately, the politics of education closed the school. Low Income students have low achievement as the politics always get in the way of great ideas to raise that achievement.

I launched Fluke - the wealth building game of accidental inventions is a board game where players enter into the wild, wild world of intellectual property, Corporate America. Corporations hire a fleet of lawyers to fight and protect their ideas with patents, trademarks and copyrights as it is the core of their financial wealth. The game exposes players to patents of real life generic named patents with their history on the rear of each patent replica. Players buy, sell and license patents. They also buy and sell research corporations with emerging technology. The player with the largest portfolio of patents, research corporations and cash wins. http://www.xconomy.com/detroit/2011/12/23/a-detroit-moms-quest-to-breathe-innovation-into-young-minds/2/

This game should be racing through Urban America. It is moving faster in suburban communities all over the country. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIykAFoA4EI
02:17 PM on 12/28/2011
Tom,

The statement, "Teacher social networks are connecting subject area teachers across the country" understates the global collaborative revolution that digital learning is fueling right now to the benefit of low-income students here and abroad.

Here is a sample, graduate research from Michelle Lee Johnson, "Latino High School Student Cross-Cultural Collaborative Learning Utilizing Global Technology," Pepperdine University, 2011
http://www.scribd.com/doc/60682121/Cross-Cultural-Collaborative-Learning

Teachers connecting across the world will increasingly benefit low-income students.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Tom Vander Ark
10:13 PM on 12/29/2011
Thanks, great research report.
I've watched the Edmodo community grow to more than 500,000 teachers over the last two years and am impressed and inspired by the collaboration we see across the network.