iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Tom Vander Ark

GET UPDATES FROM Tom Vander Ark
 

Why States Should Require Online Learning

Posted: 01/20/12 12:32 AM ET

Question: What do algebra and online learning have in common?

Answer: Most kids would not experience either if not required.

Graduation requirements translate society's expectations to the young. It's our collective best guess at the knowledge and skills they will need to participate in the society they will inherit. If we did not require algebra, not many students would take it. Low-income, minority, and struggling students would be steered away from advanced math. Setting minimum education requirements promotes equity and participation.

All high school students should take at least one course online while in high school, according to Digital Learning Now!, the state policy project co-chaired by former governors Jeb Bush and Bob Wise. This recommendation, and all 10 Elements of High Quality Digital Learning, resulted from the vigorous discourse of 100 experts.

The recommendation is based on the fact that nearly all young people will learn online after high school, whether it's in college, corporate, or military training. Online and blended learning is rapidly becoming the dominant mode of formal and informal post-secondary learning. High school is a great place to discover learning online.

I'd go a step further and strongly encourage every high school student to take at least one online course each year. The requirement would cost-effectively expand options for students. Every high school student should have access to every Advanced Placement® (AP) course, foreign language course, advanced STEM courses, and dual enrollment courses. Making online learning a graduation requirement would accelerate access to these courses and expand opportunities for our highest-achieving students.

The requirement would also benefit struggling students by creating to good teachers and quality content. In Utah, where students can choose between online and a variety of online options, a group of students switched to Open High last semester to gain access to a great English teacher.

Online learning is growing by almost 50 percent, and more than one million students are taking online courses on a part-time basis where states and districts make them available. Some of this will take care of itself over time as barriers are reduced and access is improved, but in the meantime, it will leave millions of young people not as well-prepared as they should be. Promoting the graduation requirement is, to some extent, an effort to bring up the rear in states slow to create options for students.

Alabama, Florida, and Michigan require students to take at least one course online in order to graduate. Idaho requires two. New Mexico requires a dual enrollment, AP, or online course. Legislation in Georgia (SB 289) and Indiana (SB 179) would add one high school course to graduation requirements.

More broadly on the digital learning front, the Kentucky chief will recommend digital learning legislation in February. The Ohio Digital Learning Task Force will make recommendations in March. Plans to advance digital learning are underway in at least 15 more states.

Taking an online course in high school is a learning experience in the digital age that will prepare students for online learning in college or career where the stakes for success are much higher. A student who learns the study habits, mechanics, and skills of learning online -- using learning management systems, social platforms, email, Web conferencing, and other rapidly growing tools in online courses -- will be better equipped for life after graduation.

 

Follow Tom Vander Ark on Twitter: www.twitter.com/tvanderark

 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:17 PM on 01/25/2012
As a past online learner, a present online instructional designer and online professor; let me just say this: If you have not taken an online course that was properly designed and executed; do not talk about the inability for online education to produce quality knowledge. It is, just like in all educational settings, dependent upon the development of the course materials, the rigor of the content, and the expertise of the teacher in their role. Online education is NOT for all people; just as traditional learning environments are not for ALL people. Online education demands a lot of time management and motivation. If designed properly and facilitated in a manner that promotes (a) community of learners, (b) strong discussion based learning, (c) critical thinking, and (d) accountability; then yes, it is a viable resource for most students. I learned more in the online programs than I ever did in the traditional classroom. My Doctoral program, when held up to a similar one in a brick and mortar school; provided me with more contact to experts in the field, more rigor, and gave me the opportunity to learn in a way that was conducive to my learning style. There are "bad" online schools, but there are also "bad" traditional schools. Secondary students should be aware of their choices; online learning is one of them...and it is not a "new" trend nor is it a fad. Please check the facts about distance education before spouting rhetoric on the topic.
04:36 PM on 01/22/2012
This statement is too broad and takes very few of the problems inherent to online learning into consideration- current quality of online courses, development of critical thinking skills,computer literacy before taking an online class, outsourcing of online classes, assessments, relationship to subject matter,qualifications of instructor....and so many other academic issues that it becomes a laughable 'op ed" piece with very little substance and a great deal of opinion based on few tangible facts. And I teach an online class, which a great a many students are not mature enough, motivated enough, nor have the literacy or computer skills need to succeed. This type of delivery method is not one size fits all.
photo
SeptimusDSX
Always question the obvious.
03:17 PM on 01/21/2012
This new trend of "online learning" is diluting and destroying the meaning of education. Only those who don't understand or appreciate the meaning of working for an education push for such rubbish. Education is not about passing a test, learning a bunch of facts or acquiring knowledge. A good education will teach you about life, its complexities, difficulties and how to handle them. Essential to this mix is some form of human interaction. Say a teacher who inspires you, talks to you after setbacks, encourages you to aspire for something more than what you thought was possible. I don't see "online" "education" doing this.

The only thing that can be conceded is that the state of classroom education (from my experience at the college level) is also pretty poor, with hundred plus students crammed into a classroom, fighting for the instructor's time.With regards to K12 classes, I will unequivocally say that there is no way I would have traded my teachers for a computer screen.

This "online" rubbish is just a scam with so called Education CEOs (an oxymoron if there ever was on!) looking to loot the public coffers.
photo
HopeLiesBleeding
Still holding out for a macro-bio
01:21 PM on 01/22/2012
Amen. Your last sentence says it all. It is these people (and their lobbyists) who are distorting public perception and controlling the conversation (in the media) to suit their own purposes.

Fanned & faved.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:26 AM on 01/20/2012
I stopped reading when I got to Jeb Bush.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Steve Nelson
08:55 AM on 01/20/2012
Oh my goodness! So the rationale for constructing learning experiences should be that "everybody does it?" There is little evidence that online learning is effective for any purpose other than superficial, short term training. Even on the terms of the "accountability crowd," online programs have been shown lacking. I second the very good suggestion (Mooshki) below.
04:49 AM on 01/20/2012
The on-line classes I have taken are SO slow it is painful.

With each slide, you read it (while it is being read to you) then make breakfast, take out the dog, shower, get the mail and then return for the next slide.

Perhaps the providers could differentiate between students who can read and those who cannot.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:20 AM on 01/20/2012
I could not agree with you more.
03:49 AM on 01/20/2012
Ugh. How about instead, we ban post-secondary online courses? Young people are having far more trouble learning how to properly interact with other people in academic and/or professional situations than they are learning to do things online.
03:32 AM on 01/20/2012
Digital learning is fine, and yes, students should have some exposure to it, especially when the instructor has a talent for clarifying ideas, such as Salman Khan of the Khan Academy. However, some concepts are best learned hands-on, and that includes algebraic concepts which tend to be abstract. With a hands-on approach we have shown how even 3rd graders can understand and solve equations such as 4x+3=3x+9. This recent newscast shows how students respond to this approach:http://www.wsvn.com/features/articles/parent/MI93793/

Students who understand and are successful with algebra early on will have a desire to take Algebra I and possibly Algebra II. Simply mandating courses for all students as graduation requirements will not mean that students will attain those levels when the means by which such goals can be reached by all students are absent.
04:53 AM on 01/20/2012
There is very little that is abstract about algebra.

Perhaps the real issue is that the 3rd grade teacher doesn't like math.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lecloche
03:28 AM on 01/20/2012
At least one required online course is not a bad idea. But a better idea would be to require local school districts to design, author and implement the required course. To do so would ensure that at least one person per district would have some idea as to what is involved. Admittedly, online courses for just about all subjects exist so it should not be neccesary to start from scratch. A course syllabus can be formulated from pieces culled from such existing online courses much in the same manner as syllabi are created traditionally. In fact, he OpenCourseware movement encourages just that. The end result is someone would hopefully become aware of the efficiencies to be garnered from compiling an online course of study.
02:17 PM on 01/21/2012
Actually the reason ole Tommy wants online learning is to feather his own nest. HP needs to quit all this free advertising for him.