iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tom Watson

Tom Watson

Posted March 1, 2009 | 04:30 PM (EST)

Limbaugh in the Lead: A Gift for Obama


Looking for all the world like the sweating floor manager on the late afternoon shift at Larry Flynt's Hustler Club in an unbuttoned shiny black shirt and undersized sport coat, Rush Limbaugh leaned his meaty hands on the lectern at the CPAC conference and slipped a greasy dollar bill into the G-string of the writhing conservative dead-enders packed into the garishly lit Omni Shoreham in Washington DC.

Jowls rolling like thunder from the right via CNN's unfortunate high-definition feed, Limbaugh took control of the sad and tattered remnants of the mainstream conservative movement, and urged continued allegiance to the noble Lost Cause of Reagan, metaphorically carrying his rebel-yelling followers into the hills like modern-day Quantrill's Raiders standing firm against change.

If there's any doubt that the GOP's own Paulie Walnuts  is now firmly in command of the Party of Lincoln, the "breaking news" style coverage of Limbaugh's bellow-cose rant dispelled the notion. CNN, for one, went wide - with the kind of uninterrupted live footage usually reserved for Presidents and Popes, followed by a panel of analysts to weigh and consider the import of the speech to this republic of ours. There were other dancers on the stage, to be sure - including Ward Connerly, Ann Coulter, Phyllis Schlafly and Karl Rove - but only Limbaugh's hour-long ramble (he went over by 30 minutes) garnered opposition leader status. "As the movement searches for a front-and-center spokesman to provide inspiration and direction, Limbaugh's refusal to tilt toward the center may place him out front in a Republican Party already suffering from a disappearing moderate wing," wrote Tom Schaller in Salon.

Limbaugh is a showbiz talent, and he is taking full advantage of this moment of rudderless, thoughtless spinning in circles by Republicans to seize the stage in full-throated opposition to the overwhelmingly popular new President - and virtually everything he stands for. In rooting publicly for Barack Obama's failure, Limbaugh may be leading the conservative movement to a smaller, fringe-like existence in the halls of power - but it will an existence that he can easily dominate.

Leading gullible Republicans into the hills of guerrilla ideological resistance during the nation's toughest economic crisis in 80 years constitutes a gift of incredible political proportions for the Obama Administration. Instead of principled point-by-point opposition by a chastened party of experienced professionals ready for tough dealings at the bargaining table, President Obama is blessed with clownish truculence and pure rejectionism - embodied in the Republican response to the President's forceful Congressional address by Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, a moment of excruciatingly tone-deaf ideology rescued only by the attention lavished on its shockingly poor delivery.

President Obama, of course, is aware of this lumbering and clumsy gift from the right - so much so that he sent chief of staff Rahm Emanuel to Bob Schieffer's CBS studio this morning to declare Limbaugh "the voice and the intellectual force and energy behind the Republican Party." 

And it's that blustery intellectual force that convinces Republicans like Jindal and Governor Haley Barbour of Mississippi that their political futures are enlarge and brightened by a nihilistic refusal of Federal funds to their own communities. "White kids on dope," jibed conservative Rod Dreher, one of a small cadre of right-wing commentators to take on the Limbaugh lemming movement, the willful ignorance of the current crisis and the nation's ultimate rejection of a failed a humiliated party leadership. "No need to return to first principles and recalibrate policies to account for new realities," wrote Dreher. "Just find a better messenger for the same old same old. You begin to see why nobody inside that bubble could grasp what a flop Bobby Jindal's reheated Republican mush of a speech was going to be ahead of time."

Rush Limbaugh is right about one thing: President Obama is indeed on a mission of reinvention. That much was clear from his speech on Capitol Hill last week - and even clearer in his budget proposal. And, as Limbaugh undoubtedly knows, the President holds the whip hand for the foreseeable future. So Limbaugh plays to that loss of power in his audience, and in a speech that referred bizarrely to "slave blood" and a defense of John Thain (who seems to literally be asking for a set of numbered orange duds from Andrew Coumo) and the spending habits of bail-out bankers, he laid on some false concern for Obama:

President Obama is one of the most gifted politicians, one of the most gifted men that I have ever witnessed. He has extraordinary talents. He has communication skills that hardly anyone can surpass. No, seriously. No, no, I'm being very serious about this. It just breaks my heart that he does not use these extraordinary talents and gifts to motivate and inspire the American people to be the best they can be. He's doing just the opposite. And it's a shame. [Applause] President Obama has the ability -- he has the ability to inspire excellence in people's pursuits. He has the ability to do all this, yet he pursues a path, seeks a path that punishes achievement, that punishes earners and punishes -- and he speaks negatively of the country. Ronald Reagan used to speak of a shining city on a hill. Barack Obama portrays America as a soup kitchen in some dark night in a corner of America that's very obscure. He's constantly telling the American people that bad times are ahead, worst times are ahead. And it's troubling, because this is the United States of America.

Yes, Rush this is the United States of America. And your timely and spectacular gift to the President is much appreciated indeed.

Looking for all the world like the sweating floor manager on the late afternoon shift at Larry Flynt's Hustler Club in an unbuttoned shiny black shirt and undersized sport coat, Rush Limbaugh leaned h...
Looking for all the world like the sweating floor manager on the late afternoon shift at Larry Flynt's Hustler Club in an unbuttoned shiny black shirt and undersized sport coat, Rush Limbaugh leaned h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 424
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indy girl
Sorry, this micro-bio did not meet HP guidelines.
12:51 PM on 03/05/2009
There were about a hundred sponsors of the CPAC meeting, most of them the far right-wing organizations you'd expect. However, I was surprised about AT&T and Google. There also were black, hispanic and non-Christian groups in the sponsor list. (I think we can assume these people have never listened to Rush rail about them on the radio!) The full list of sponsors of the CPAC: http://www.cpac.org/sponsors.html

If you would like to complain about these two companies sponsoring an event with Rush Limbaugh as keynote speaker:

Google: 1-650-253-0000
Corporate Office: 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043 CEO: Eric Schmidt

Google's diversity and inclusion statement can be found here:
http://www.google.com/intl/en/corporate/diversity/community.html

*******

AT&T: customerservice@att.com
Corporate Offices: 208 S Akard St, Dallas, TX 75202 CEO: Randall Stephenson

Read this page about AT&T's diversity, outreach and multicultural programs, which reads in part: "At AT&T, diversity encompasses respect for all individuals......"
http://www.att.com/gen/corporate-citizenship?pid=7738

Their corporate policy is an odd contrast to Mr. Limbaugh's hateful messages.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
carlgt1
11:01 AM on 03/05/2009
If Rush wants to seriously debate, he should run for office and win. His arch-nemesis Al Franken did, consequently Al will have more say on what goes on in the US than the dittoheads. That's the way America works; or do dittoheads have a problem with that and just want to usurp authority based on their phony Arbitron radio ratings?
04:20 PM on 03/04/2009
Kudos to Tom Watson for displaying such fantastic writing skills. Increasingly, this seems to be a lost art.
01:33 PM on 03/04/2009
Today Rush announced an interesting strategy and come back to the left push against him.

He has challenged President Obama to a debate. His claim is that since they have elevated him to the status of leader for the Republicans, it is only right that they allow him to debate. Certainly not a spin I expected to see. No matter how the WH responds, a response is a win for Rush.

It will of course never happen, but it certainly calls their hand if this gains momentum in the media.

http://federalistblogs.wordpress.com
02:17 PM on 03/04/2009
No, not really a win for Rush. See, most folks "accept" that Obama IS President. By Rush asking for a debate he is bascially saying he does not recognize Obama as such. That speaks volumes. By the way, Rep. Cao, Republican, LA, said he might be a "closet Dem". This is just great! Now, Rush has to worry about Repub's being 'closet Dem's'. Let's start a movement and call it (drum roll here) "OPERATION CLOSET CHAOS". Turning the Repub's to Dem's a little bit at a time. heh
06:52 PM on 03/04/2009
I've never heard of a sitting President participating in a debate against someone who is not running for his office. Rush is trying---perhaps successfully---to stay relevant and boost his audience.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nomccain
12:40 PM on 03/04/2009
I absolutely love it! These right wing extremists didn't learn one damn thing from this last election! American people demanded that bipartisianship be returned to our government along with cooperation in getting things done. Instead, the Republicans, at Limbaugh's urging have ignored this warning and lead a war against Obama and the democrats in thier effort to correct the mistakes the Republicans made under Bush and Cheney. They are now known as an obstructionist party with no new ideas or agenda, except more of the same policies of the Bush administration which led to this financial debacle. They actually appear to not have any idea where America is OR why it got there. Their ideology and power appears to be more important to them than the success of this country. If they continue to listen to the likes of Hannity, Coulter and Limbaugh, they will lose more seats in the next election and just dig their political grave deeper. There is still time for Washington Republicans to join some of their colleagues outside the Beltway and become partners in progress. As Americans, we should all hope that happens. But if the GOP sticks with its strategy of failure and obstructionism as the only option, further eroding its brand with the people who decide elections, They will find out what it means for a political party to hit rock bottom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
12:32 PM on 03/04/2009
ST R0NALD saw the shining city on the hill because he was delusional.......and blind. I G@G
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Suzanne525
FourMore, WooHoo!!
12:31 PM on 03/04/2009
For years, Bush & Co., the Repubs (and Rudy) used 9/11 as their fear tactic. It kept people under their wing for a while.

Now to stir up the fear, they use words like socialism, freedoms (or loss thereof) and whatever else they think will work.

They don't realize we have moved beyond that, and are looking to rebuild a great country.
12:09 PM on 03/04/2009
Another reason Franken failed as a radio commentator: libs, dems and rads could get their fill of Bush-bashing at dozens of other media outlets, thus distracting from the eloquent utterances of Al Franken on the boring old AM radio.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Suzanne525
FourMore, WooHoo!!
12:19 PM on 03/04/2009
What you still fail to realize is that we, the libs, dems & rads, actually obtain information from a variety of sources including, but not limited to: TV, newspapers, magazines, radio and (gasp) actual interviews! Many of us pay attention to news sources outside of the U.S. We think about the information and draw our own conclusions.

You, on the other hand, just believe what Rush tells you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Token12ga
No good deed goes unpunished
12:38 PM on 03/04/2009
I'd rather have him in the senate, than sitting in a booth spewing nonsense, like your dear beloved leader.
11:32 AM on 03/04/2009
Yes, new realities prevail: just who is feeling punished by Obama's policies? Does this idea that 95% of the American people feel outraged that the government will make the top 5% pay a slightly higher tax rate have any resonance outside of some inner-fantasy life that Rush is so good at conjuring up in his listeners?

Just ask yourself, if you are making, say $65,000, whether you'd mind switching places with someone who makes over $250,000?

Conversely, if you are making $250,000, would you rather give up the $185,000 in order to be at the $65,000 level so that you could be taxed at a lower rate?

Were the Clinton era tax rates punitive socialism that killed the entrepreneurial spirit?

People who are losing their jobs, their health insurance and retirement savings are rightly unconcerned with a marginal tax hike for people who can well afford to pay it.
Even those people at the $250,000+ income level will benefit greatly from universal health care, a higher level of educational skills, and cheaper energy costs. It's a good investment for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
12:26 PM on 03/04/2009
I do want to comment that I am pretty "mature"........I was born in 1940..........The Clinton years were the very best I had seen in my life..................Prosperty without war............Go figure.....Now, after 8 years.......Depression with war..........diosgusting.
01:36 PM on 03/04/2009
Coveark:
I like your post. here's why: Dispite the fact that I was a Republican and did not like the ground Clinton walked on, during the 90's every year--for SIX YEARS--I recieved $3,000.00 Christmas bonuses and a 3 week vacation period per year, 100% medical, dental, and visual coverage! Can you believe that? And I was badmouthing the man as an inveterate liar. But when Bush stepped in and the 911 deal went down, so did my fortunes. The company I worked for had to eventually close its doors. I was reduced in 2004-2005 to no electricity for nearly 10 months (and rent wasn't paid either). I found food in dumpsters or selling alluminum cans and odd day jobs, etc. All true.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leftyandproudofit
Jesus was a liberal
03:46 PM on 03/04/2009
Show me one wealthy person who actually pays the tax rate they're supposed to (i.e they take no deductions) and I'll show you a liar. A truly patriotic Republican would take no tax breaks for the next four years so that we can dig ourselves out of this morass. It'll never happen. Not even with Rush and his $40 million annual salary.
10:30 PM on 03/04/2009
I could show you several wealthy people who do not pay the proper amount of government taxes.

They all happen to be on President Obama’s cabinet.

(You made that way, way too easy for me..!!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SweetBabu
Don't wanna cry, so I guess I'll laugh
11:20 AM on 03/04/2009
The first sentence of this article is sheer perfection! " . . . slipped a greasy dollar bill into the G-string of the writhing conservative dead-enders" Brilliant, just brilliant.
11:12 AM on 03/04/2009
Yeah, that's right stiv53, Franken has failed, Well, except for that Minnesota Senate race he just won. What a failure! And Air America has failed too! Well, except that it's still on the air, with hosts like Rachel Maddow and Thom Hartmann gaining more and more national popularity every day. I'd love to be the kind of "failure" that Al Franken and Air America are!
10:45 AM on 03/04/2009
Why did Franken and Air America fail, while Limbaugh has maintained his 20-million-a-week audience for 20 years? For one thing, Franken uttered about 10 words a minute and dealt exclusively in Bush-bashing. His message was for the most part negative. Whereas, Rush can talk animatedly for 3 solid hours. Sure his spiel includes liberal-whacking, but it also includes humor and inspirational moments as well.

It's a matter of taste.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
julia23
11:21 AM on 03/04/2009
Rush talks to his listeners in baby talk and tells them they aren't very smart and he has to 'xplain things to them with half his brain tied behind his back.

I guess its a matter of taste.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
12:44 PM on 03/04/2009
He probably learned in writing class that the average person reads on the level of a 12 year old............K I S S
12:07 PM on 03/04/2009
Franken didn't fail, he ran for office. Air America didn't fail, I still listen everyday. I need my Rachel! Am I to take it that you mean Al Franken isn't funny? He is funny, but the subject matter discussed was not. That's the difference. I'd like to see what Limbaugh's listener count is down to by the end of this year...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:43 AM on 03/04/2009
LIMBAUGH,

THE GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING, AND GIVING, AND.................
02:14 PM on 03/04/2009
Like bad sushi.......it can last for months.
photo
Obamalicious
Obama's Kool-Aid is mm, mm, good.
02:32 PM on 03/04/2009
I get a kick out of anyone that can get liberals so wound up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wmholt
You can't not know. You can't not care.
10:41 AM on 03/04/2009
Who is the real Rush Limbaugh? I see pictures of him where his head varies from normal-sized to that of the celestial gas giants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
12:46 PM on 03/04/2009
Really.....scary .................alien perhaps ...........Great comment
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hank10303
Reality Check
10:25 AM on 03/04/2009
Rush Limbaugh right now is the best that the republican party has; its not good enough.

The republican party has already stated that should the economy turn around in 2 years that they will find the alternative reasons for that occurrence. It will be plain and simple for the American people to see that first with Bush we witnessed how devastating a negative presidency can be on everyday Americans and two how stabilizing a positive presidency can be. This is a direct assault on the republican party's basic claim. Less government is better. The success of the Obama administration negates that claim and assertion; leaving the republican party searching for yet another theme or to continue to re-write history in its favor.