Taking stock this second Christmas after the election of Barack Obama to the presidency, as a conservative Republican (with growing tea-party tendencies) I'm filled with a thrilling, unexpected hopefulness that the president may be well on his way to losing his battle for the hearts and minds of the American people -- tempered by a shocked disbelief that so much long-term damage could have been perpetrated on the American economy, national security and way of life in just 11 months of ill-judged governance.
Inevitably, Charles Dickens' immortal opening sentence to "A Tale of Two Cities" comes to mind:
"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times; it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair; we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going directly to Heaven, we were all going the other way."
Remarkably, this view could apply equally to the left and to the right. Mr. Obama first thrilled, then disappointed and now enrages the left with his policies of (as they now see it): (1) giving the banks, health insurance companies, drug companies, for-profit hospitals and Washington lobbyists everything they want; (2) doing nothing for middle-class homeowners; and (3) escalating the war in Afghanistan.
Of course, conservatives are appalled at (among other things) the trillions of dollars in new deficits, the nationalizations, the trillion-dollar partisan slush fund (i.e., stimulus packages), the attempted federal government takeover of the private economy via carbon taxing and regulating, the weakening of our anti-terrorism efforts, the never-ending worldwide apology tour, the undercutting of allies while appeasing enemies, and the ongoing effort to destroy our health care system and replace it with a socialized, rationing Euro-system.
Remarkably, the president cannot even credibly make the claim that if he has the left and right agitated it is because he is going down the sensible middle. The Dec. 9 Quinnipiac Poll mirrors what other polls are showing: Mr. Obama is losing the independents, too. In that poll, overall, the president's approval/disapproval was 46 percent to 44 percent. However, with independents he was at 37 percent approval and 51 percent disapproval.
Of course, for both the left and the right, all our hopes and dreads hinge on how an increasingly volatile American public expresses itself on Election Day. Currently, in head-to-head polling of generic party voting intentions, the Republicans, who had been steadily down by double digits (and as much as 18 percent) to the Democrats, in the past few months have surged to a 2 percent to 3 percent advantage (RealClearPolitics' latest average: 43.3 percent to 41 percent).
But all is not solidity on the right. In one of the more remarkable entrances into American politics, the tea-party movement, which did not exist until spring, already has gained a second-place affiliation status in Scott Rasmussen's poll last month: Democratic Party, 36 percent; tea party, 23 percent; Republican Party, 18 percent.
That number is, if anything, probably understated because the polling respondents are taken from voter registration lists. And based on what I have observed while attending tea-party events (and from other sources), it is my sense that many tea-party people may not even have registered to vote in the past. (They are registering now, by golly.)
Keep in mind: They have no national leaders -- no billionaire Ross Perot-type nor nationally admired Barry Goldwater-type. Of course, individuals are stepping up across the country to help organize, but they are the purest example of what Thomas Jefferson might have called an aroused yeomanry (back then, the small freeholders who cultivated their own land). They are a reaction (in the very best sense of the word) to the ongoing attempted power grab by Washington of a free people's wealth and rights.
In the aftermath of the economic collapse and the election of a glamorous new, young president who seemed to many people as a fresh force, unentangled with entrenched special interests (emphatically not my view, during the election or afterward) -- the country could have gone one of two ways: Fearing the rigors of economic hard times, people could have sought shelter under the wing of a stronger government (as Americans did during the Great Depression), or, fearing the power of government, they could seek shelter in freedom - come what may economically.
It may turn out to be one of the most important facts of the 21st century that the American people -- as exemplified by, but not limited to, the tea-party fighters -- came down on the side of freedom over fear. I don't know if there is another people on the planet who would have had a similar impulse and judgment. It is, to use a word, exceptional (as in "American exceptionalism").
It is why we live in hope this Christmas season that we may yet claw back our government in time to protect our grandchildren's freedom and prosperity.
"Yet, Freedom! yet thy banner, torn, but flying, streams like the thunderstorm against the wind." ~ Lord Byron.
Tony Blankley is the author of "American Grit: What It Will Take to Survive and Win in the 21st Century" (Regnery, 2009) and vice president of the Edelman public-relations firm in Washington.
Loading comments… 
You must be talking about the grandchild
You give President Obama a lot of credit if you believe he is responsibl
Hypocrisy, Republican is thy name.
Just to enlighten the debate a little bit:
Single payer public health care whether the health care workers are private or public costs around 50-60% of the present US system for the same service (and for all).
The saving rate in the USA has for many years been around zero while in the EU it is around 12%.
Inequality in the US is far greather than in Europe. If you remove the 10% richest in the USA the income for the rest of the population equals that of Portugal, one of the poor EU countries.
In 1973 the mean income for a male us employee was 45.000 USD (value 2008) and in Denmark it was 34.000 USD. In 2008 the income for the male us employee was still 45.000 USD, but in Denmark it was 62.000 USD.
You are no more a middle class role model as you used to be in the 60ties. Actually we fear being like you.
The health care costs of the cooperatio
And calling Obama a socialist? how on earth do you get that idea. He would in Europe be considered a right wing conservati
And the GOP would be seen as right wing crackpots not worth serious considerat
I'm sure that posting this un Huffpo gave all of your colleagues a good laugh. Merry Christmas.
I no longer work for that guy, and I no longer vote for Republican
I too am optimistic in the ability of this country to recover and thrive - by facing our current problems and adjusting the system to emerge stronger and more robust. By the time Obama's policies take root and foster an economic recovery, I'm sure Blankley and his buddies will be eagerly stepping forward to take the credit.
Because the current administra
This President can do nothing that would pleases the repubs...n