BRÅVIKEN BAY, Sweden -- A worker at the Kolmården Wildlife Park in Sweden's Östergötland district was killed on Sunday by a pack of wolves. Kolmården, the largest wildlife park in the Nordic region, located 150 kilometers south of Stockholm, attracts some 500,000 visitors each year to its attractions that include Tiger World, dolphinarium and a drive-through safari park.
According to sources, the deceased, a 30-year-old woman, entered the wolf enclosure at roughly 11 a.m. Her body was later recovered by a team of rescue workers including an armed park official.
Said a spokesperson for the Ostergotland police, "We do not know why they attacked."
Says me, "Because they're wolves."
Whereas the typical 30-year-old zookeeper is a nearly hairless biped with no claws or fangs, the typical wolf is 85 pounds of muscle and sinew armed with interlocking two-inch canines. Wolves can run 40 miles an hour and can bring down prey as large as a musk ox. Wolves have no natural predators and in a pack they can best virtually anything on dry land. Wolves are also wild animals, wild carnivores to be precise, and as to why they would attack a virtually defenseless woman, I refer you to common sense, fairy tales and basic animal psychology.
I will almost certainly never be attacked by wolves. That's because I live in a city and I don't go where wolves go. I also don't go in the Gulf of Mexico. That's where sharks live. Every year about this time I start hearing about this, that or the other poor sap who got bitten by a shark in the Gulf of Mexico. I'm tired of hearing those stories. Tell me a guy got bitten by a shark in my neighborhood and that would be news. A guy getting bitten by a shark in the Gulf of Mexico, that's foreseeable.
Whether it's a woman in the suburbs getting mauled by a chimp, or an illusionist getting torn up by his own tiger or an Australian getting run through by a sting ray, stories of wild animals killing people who get too close are not the sorts of stories that make me say "wow." They make me say "duh." Animals are very good at what they do or they wouldn't have made it through the process of natural selection, let alone the spread of humanity across the earth. If what an animal does is kill things, then unless it's a very small animal, I don't get close to it.
Take whales.
I know it's common these days to think that whales are some gnostic peace-bringers. The Sea Shepherds, the Ocean Conservancy and Leonard Nimoy, among others, want us to believe that whales have an important cosmic lesson for us. They probably do have a lesson for us and that lesson is: Don't go swimming around with things that weigh 60 tons. I know they have elaborate forms of communication and big brains, but just because a whale can sing doesn't make it Cass Elliot. A whale can kill you quicker than you can say, "Holy crap it's a wha... "
Wolves too. You are not Little Red Riding Hood and there is no huntsman nigh. You have no business messing around with wolves. Animal Planet will show you all the wolves you could ever wish to see without you even having to leave your couch. So you can leave the wolves where they belong -- with the whales and sharks and sting rays and chimpanzees and the rest of the world's deadly beasts -- on television.
Follow Tony Phillips on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TPhillipsSD
That's what the wolf advocates always say, but an objective look at facts tell us differently.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_attacks_on_humans
http://www.aws.vcn.com/wolf_attacks_on_humans.html
" ,,,You're really actually stirring up irrational hatred of wolves ,,, "
Nope, no hatred here, just an objective look at the history, from older times, and continuing right up to current times.
http://www.rferl.org/content/tajikistan_wolf_attacks/24457676.html
"Compared to other carnivorous mammals known to attack humans in general, the frequency with which wolves have been recorded to kill or prey on people is much lower, indicating that though potentially dangerous, wolves are among the least threatening for their size and predatory potential."
Anyway, there's darn little chance you'll get attacked by wolves if you don't go where wolves are.
"Because they're wolves."
It's not the first time that wolves have killed the keeper who cared for them and fed them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Wyman_wolf_attack
It's because they're wolves.
Whether in a zoo enclosure, or in the wilderness, or in a livestock pen, they're still wolves.
"Because they're wolves."
It's not the first time, either, that wolves have attacked & killed the keeper who cared for them & fed them.
, again from the article, "typical 30-year-old zookeeper is a nearly hairless biped with no claws or fangs"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Wyman_wolf_attack
Because they're wolves.
It's what they do.
Most zoos are not interested in creating the domesticated version of a wolf, at which point it would no longer be a wolf anyways. Problems arise when humans expect an animal that is genetically wild to behave predictably like a domesticated animal. There doesn't have to be a clear or logical trigger for a wild animal to attack a human, they do not think the same way we or pet dogs do. A wild animal cannot be successfully tamed into reliability and domesticity, so while they may have been hand raised and neutered, one cannot ever truly predict future behavior. They will always be wild, dangerous, and unpredictable.