More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Trevor Neilson

Trevor Neilson

GET UPDATES FROM Trevor Neilson

10 Reasons Why the Giving Pledge Will Reshape Philanthropy

Posted: 12/10/10 12:36 AM ET

It was announced that 17 additional families have committed to return the majority of their wealth to charitable causes by taking the Giving Pledge. The announcement followed the news in August that a group of 40 families had taken the pledge, a long-term charitable project launched by Warren Buffett and Bill and Melinda Gates.

Among the most famous is Mark Zukerberg, co-founder, CEO and president of Facebook, who said:

"People wait until late in their career to give back. But why wait when there is so much to be done?" "With a generation of younger folks who have thrived on the success of their companies, there is a big opportunity for many of us to give back earlier in our lifetime and see the impact of our philanthropic efforts."

As always seem to be the case in the nonprofit world, some "experts" offered a vague, odd criticism. From their perch on college campuses and at obscure NGOs, some said that maybe the Giving Pledge wouldn't motivate all potential philanthropists to get involved.

Others said that some of the people on the list had already said they were donating their money (something which everyone involved in the Giving Pledge proactively pointed out some time ago).

Others offered a half-baked and half-hearted criticism that the money being donated wouldn't be accountably tracked -- as if it were being accountably tracked before it were donated?

As someone who works closely with philanthropists every day, I can clearly say that the Giving Pledge is going to have a huge impact. Here are 10 reasons why:

  1. Peer pressure matters. High net worth individuals care what their friends think, and emulate their friends.
  2. Most high net worth individuals do not incorporate philanthropy into their lives in a meaningful way. Philanthropy is not buying a table at a party or bidding in auction. Those things are helpful to nonprofits, but serious philanthropists design serious, deep strategies.
  3. If philanthropy is cool, more people will want to do it. People buy art because it is cool. We can do the same thing for philanthropy.
  4. High net worth individuals look up to Bill and Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet. These are three of the most admired people in the business world. By having created the Giving Pledge, they have sent a message that people in their target audience will listen to.
  5. Positive PR for philanthropists is a positive thing for the world. We should heap praise on people who donate their time and money to the world's most pressing problems. That means more people will do it. It's always been odd to me that it is commonly accepted that an athlete should be worshiped by society for throwing a ball, but when philanthropists receive praise, that is seem as unseemly!
  6. If more high net worth individuals get involved in philanthropy, the nonprofit space will improve in quality. The sad reality is that many nonprofits do not perform well. Business thinking can help many of them improve their results, and smart donors will insist on smart strategies.
  7. By creating a list, the Giving Pledge creates a permanent commitment among those who take the pledge. Twenty years from now, the people who signed the list will still be focused on philanthropy.
  8. The children of these philanthropists will likely inherit their tradition of philanthropy. The inter-generational impact of this commitment will be exponential.
  9. People who aren't billionaires can make the same commitment. It was smart for the Giving Pledge to start with billionaires, but huge sums of philanthropic capital exist among those who might not have billions, but have hundreds of millions.
  10. The nonprofit sector can begin to count on sustainable funding from those who take the Giving Pledge. A major problem in the nonprofit world is the inability to predict sustainable revenue. As the participants in the Giving Pledge speak more publicly about their plans, this problem can be mitigated.


Congratulations to all of those who have taken the Giving Pledge, and to Warren Buffet and Bill and Melinda Gates who have set an example that all philanthropists should follow.

 

Follow Trevor Neilson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/trevor_neilson

It was announced that 17 additional families have committed to return the majority of their wealth to charitable causes by taking the Giving Pledge. The announcement followed the news in August that a...
It was announced that 17 additional families have committed to return the majority of their wealth to charitable causes by taking the Giving Pledge. The announcement followed the news in August that a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:40 AM on 12/13/2010
Thank you Trevor for a thought provoking article. Unfortunately, the government keeps slashing budgets for community initiatives whether for the youth at risk, the elderly or other needed programs. Nothing is perfect, but I like philanthropy with a strategy, connecting the dots. We have to find ways to work together. The billionaires are a great place to start. I commend your work Trevor and enjoy following your efforts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
guttersnipe76
Queerly Complex, Utterly Simple
06:17 PM on 12/10/2010
Tired of listening to all these folks talking about how the rich need to be in control of non-profits (aka #6) to ensure accountability. Accountability to what? Their own pocketbook or their own bottom line (aka CSR)?

I am tired of the sneaky assault on non-profit leaders and workers that is embedded in this notion. That only those with money know what to do. They do not. Corporate and capitalistic greed is what got us into this mess in the first place. Maybe they need to step back and actually listen. Maybe instead of them "getting involved" because they have money and power, they actually take a moment to get involved and put their own perspective on hold for a minute to find someone elses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andy Clark
unappreciated servant to society (teacher)
10:02 PM on 12/11/2010
You think you're alone? Keep an eye on the field of education...
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Levi Ben-Shmuel
Tai Chi & Kabbalah Teacher
03:18 PM on 12/10/2010
As I explored in a post this past summer (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/levi-benshmuel/how-much-is-enough-sharin_b_661108.html), it is an open question in a free society how much is enough when it comes to giving, in particular for the super wealthy. Considering how much help society needs right now, I can only see this as good news. Thanks for the update, Trevor!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:38 PM on 12/10/2010
self serving pr0pagaNda - nothing more - you guys want to make a real difference - how about you cut the cost of your products and services in half - then we all benefit
01:01 PM on 12/10/2010
Like I wrote in another post but what is perhaps more approriate here; this also changes the way we think about wealth and money in general. If the value of money were an aesthetic, it can be seen as more fluid and less static. So instead of seeing money as something to be accumulated, it is something that moves and flows through the world going where it needs to go. And like any monk worth his salt will tell you: you can't hold on to water.
12:20 PM on 12/10/2010
Let's hope that most of the philanthropy stays right here in the US. Our current system is concentrating wealth in the upper 2% while denying the middle and lower classes any significant share of economic growth, even though it's middle class workers who really generate the wealth. Thus, it's a zero sum game. There's a lot of suffering in this country right now, as corporations have outsourced jobs and manufacturing. It's time for the rich to re-invest in America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
uncc49er
Only the truth and nothing more
12:10 PM on 12/10/2010
I am not in favor of the control that Bill and Melinda Gates are going to have on such pile of money. If each one of these people had a foundation the society would be benefited much better.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:08 PM on 12/10/2010
Philanthropy is commendable but if these people want to really improve things they must organize with the working class to restructure the economy. The unprincipled wealthy must not be allowed to own and control vital assets of the essential economy. These assets must be managed in an efficient and sustainable manner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeCanDoMore
Enjoying a fact based reality.
02:24 AM on 12/11/2010
Exactly right. Fanned and faved for accuracy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
11:52 AM on 12/10/2010
That's all well and good but why don't these philanthropists invest in opening factories that makes products, or build railroads for high-speed commute, or pave roads and make more highways, anything that will PUT PEOPLE TO WORK. Donating to charities do not do that. Most charities spend too much on overhead anyway and half the money doesn't even go to their primary causes.

MAKES SOME JOBS people. That's what we need more than charities. Give the people work!
11:48 AM on 12/10/2010
They are not giving anything away. They are buying influence.
11:48 AM on 12/10/2010
While we appreciate their philanthropic spirits,

This is just a pledge there is no accountability.

I am not sure if there is audit mechanism to know who gets benefited.
photo
humansareinsane
To think and to be fully alive are the same.
11:30 AM on 12/10/2010
I’m no economist wizard by any measure but I do know that capitalism 101 tells us it’s essential to have a fairly balanced distribution of wealth in order to have a healthy economy and this was proven in the U.S. during the 1950’s (a.k.a. the golden age).

Since a billion dollars is 20,000 times more money than the average American makes, doesn’t this make billionaires a counter productive force to a healthy capitalist economy?

Just wandering.

F.Y.I.
Visualizing One Billion Dollars.
http://www.wallstats.com/blog/visualizing-one-billion-dollars/
11:49 AM on 12/10/2010
Are you proposing the Government steal their money and give it to people who did not earn it?
photo
humansareinsane
To think and to be fully alive are the same.
05:26 PM on 12/10/2010
WTF?

No.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andy Clark
unappreciated servant to society (teacher)
10:05 PM on 12/11/2010
Are you saying the working class didn't earn the wealthy their billions?
photo
WendySSmith
Author of "Give a Little: How Your Small Donations
10:34 AM on 12/10/2010
As the author of "Give a Little: How Your Small Donations Can Transform Our World," I agree that the Giving Pledge is likely to influence the giving patterns of other high net worth families. My sole complaint is that giving patterns of everyday citizen philanthropists receives so little press when it comprises such a vast amount and proportion of total giving in the U.S.

A conservative estimate of giving from households earning less than $250,000 LAST YEAR ALONE shows that cumulatively these donors contributed well over $100 billion dollars. The billionaires pledge is believed to be able to raise a one-time total of about $150 billion.

So, let's be sure to acknowledge this most important group of philanthropists and take full account of their vital importance in the efforts to improve the world.
photo
GravitonX
10^300 bosons could care less.
10:26 AM on 12/10/2010
Everyone knows it's just theater for the rich.

Oh, yeh, they'll give everything away to a foundation which they control - Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation anyone. Just like transfer money from one pocket to your back pocket.
11:20 AM on 12/10/2010
co-sign.
10:24 AM on 12/10/2010
Good points!