iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Valerie Jarrett

GET UPDATES FROM Valerie Jarrett
 

Just Plain Wrong: House Republican Bill Undermines the Violence Against Women Act

Posted: 05/16/2012 8:26 am

The passage of the Violence Against Women Act nearly two decades ago was an historic moment for America's women and girls. The law gave women new legal protections that help ensure their safety.

Last month, Democratic and Republican Senators came together to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act. The bill they approved would address the high rates of domestic violence committed against Native American women, ensure that LGBT victims have access to services, and make college campuses safer places to live and study.

This is in keeping with the tradition of the Violence Against Women Act, which puts women's safety above partisan politics. Through its bipartisan vote, the Senate not only acted to preserve the original bill -- they improved it, protecting even more women from violence and abuse.

Unfortunately, the bill being considered in the House of Representatives today would do the opposite. It leaves out the important new protections found in the Senate bill, exposing more students, Native Americans, and LGBT Americans to the threat of violence.

But the House bill doesn't stop there. It also rolls back existing protections, leaving women less safe. For example, if this bill were to become law, abusive partners would have an easier time using immigration status as a tool to control and further abuse victims. It would make it harder for immigrants to cooperate with law enforcement to prosecute criminals. It would eliminate confidentiality that allows many women to leave their abusive relationships, without fear of retaliation. In other words, the bill going through the House right now would leave more women at risk.

That is just plain wrong. Keeping women safe isn't about which political party you support -- it's about protecting basic human rights. That's why President Obama applauds the Senators of both parties who came together to preserve and strengthen the Violence Against Women Act -- and it is why the President's senior advisors, myself included, have recommended that he veto any bill that puts women in harm's way.

As President Obama has said before, women are not an interest group. We are mothers and daughters, sisters and wives, friends and neighbors. We deserve the same basic dignity and safety that every American deserves.

The Obama Administration will continue to stand against any bill that would roll back protections women have spent decades fighting for. At the same time, we are proud to work with both Republicans and Democrats to continue making sure that America's women and girls can live free from fear, and able to reach their full potential, in the greatest country on Earth.

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
The passage of the Violence Against Women Act nearly two decades ago was an historic moment for America's women and girls. The law gave women new legal protections that help ensure their safety. Last...
The passage of the Violence Against Women Act nearly two decades ago was an historic moment for America's women and girls. The law gave women new legal protections that help ensure their safety. Last...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 700
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
05:02 PM on 06/02/2012
^ Fiebert, Martin (May 2011). "References examining assaults by women on their spouses or male partners: an annotated bibliography". California State University. Retrieved 13 October 2011. "This bibliography examines 282 scholarly investigations: 218 empirical studies and 64 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 369,800."
11:51 PM on 06/01/2012
When is everybody going to stop this discrimination. Laws are already in place for acts of violence against anyone. To target men because violence was done against women is not needed and discriminatory. Laws are already in place, just stop the banner carrying.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
10:28 PM on 05/26/2012
I don't know why this bill was even controversial.
10:15 AM on 05/21/2012
Republicans hate women, plain and simple. If the GOP gains further control if the government they'll take us back to the stone age. They rejoice every time a woman is abused...if we are serious about ending violence against women, we need to do away with the republican party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibertyDeathWatch
A proggie mind is a foggy mind.
12:43 AM on 05/21/2012
Have you ever heard of "equal protection under the law?"

Violence against anyone, except in self-defense is illegal. Why do we need special laws for women?
11:54 PM on 06/01/2012
You are exactly right. Passing special bills based on sex or race is discrimination, knock it off. When are women going to stop this bull. Men are dicriminated against more than anyone, especially white men. Get off it, enough is enough. lets pass a bill that stops women from discriminating against men for a change, its about time.
12:17 AM on 05/21/2012
The dems want continued Balkanization and class envy so they can get enough votes to pass their radical agenda. What have the dems done for the middle class? They have made you poorer and more dependent on them in hopes you will vote for them to continue the dependence.
photo
Roses
In a gentle way, you can shake the world.
12:03 AM on 05/21/2012
It is very important for all women to vote in this coming election. Not just for president, but for the House and for the Senate as well.

Obama/Biden 2012
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:00 AM on 05/21/2012
In many ways I disagree with any law that targets one group specefically. Laws like this show that we as a nation do not and never have seen all people as equal in the eyes of the law or god. If a law has to be written to make people act more like human beings and less like animals what does that really truthfully say about us and our society? Why cant there be one rule of law that covers us all regaurdless of race, sex, size, age, or love preferance. Sure more women and gays get abused then straight males, but why do we have to specify who gets helped by the laws. I agree with what the laws that help and protect against abuse and intollerance but why not make them universal.
11:11 PM on 05/20/2012
It's just more evidence that the war on women being waged by the GOP is real...it's as if they think that women don't have any importance, and they are free to use issues like this to intensify their fight to insure nothing positive for the president can escape Washington, to nullify anything that could possible be positive for Obama
photo
Roses
In a gentle way, you can shake the world.
11:56 PM on 05/20/2012
Fanned.
I don't think that the GOTP think women are of no importance.....after all in their world someone has serve men......but that women don't pay attention and will just go away when told over and over that there is 'no war on women'.
My mother taught me that actions speak louder than words, and right now the GOTP actions say it all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yellowcab
100 % Cotton
12:10 AM on 05/21/2012
I keep hearing some hopeful women saying "Women are too smart to fall for this "War On Women" bunk, but apparently they aren't.
11:07 PM on 05/20/2012
Republicans are NOT waging a “war on women,” but the Democrats are definitely waging a “war on men.” Taking the constitutional right away from men! Who wanted it Bill Clinton, for what reason, a payoff to the radical feminist (Hillary). VAWA is feminist pork that has already squandered over one billion dollars each year on programs that have done little or no good for real victims of domestic violence. Instead, the funds been allocated on a highly political basis to fill feminist coffers and to lobby for feminist objectives and laws.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
12:42 AM on 05/21/2012
posted without a single fact based assertion...lots of vague scary sounding hooey like "feminist coffers" or unsupported claims of "pork" barrel spending but nothing more than Fox talking points to back it up
03:37 AM on 05/27/2012
The money does go into the pockets on Obama supporters.
11:04 PM on 05/20/2012
Val get off the soap box -- we all get it. Abuse is abuse - man vs. woman; man vs. man; woman vs. woman; woman vs. man. You sock -- you serve.
Equal protection under the law. No more - no less.
If you are lobbying for 'pre-existing' conditions for Indian or for non-heterosexuals to receive a more equal treatment under the law - forget it.
You will not win this battle on the field of public opinion.
photo
Roses
In a gentle way, you can shake the world.
12:00 AM on 05/21/2012
You just don't get it. And the GOTP doesn't get it.
This is not about being 'more' equal. This is about righting a very grievous wrong. A wrong that is still going on and many wrongs that are not that far away in history.
Watch the early episodes of MadMen......times were just like that. My older sister does not want to watch it. In her words "Been there, done that".
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
12:44 AM on 05/21/2012
How is including Native women or LGBT citizens "more equal treatment" --- is that to be found with all the "special rights" that LGBT supposedly enjoy ?
10:26 PM on 05/20/2012
All the kings horses and all the kings men, even Valerie, cant put Humpty together again...
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
10:13 PM on 05/20/2012
are women exempt from assault and battery laws?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thisboy
11:24 PM on 05/20/2012
Apparently. They can now be legally and unnecessarily, medically probed when exercising their legal rights.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
12:46 AM on 05/21/2012
often times they are "excused" and or minimized by misogynist cops...or like in the case of gay bashings the victim is blamed
03:33 PM on 05/21/2012
I've been there, and this was WITH the protections of VAWA. The first time I had to call the police because of DV, my daughter was about 6 weeks old. In spite of my torn clothes, the red marks near my neck, and the marks on my hands (I'd tried to leave, and he'd decided that if I did, I didn't get to keep my heirloom engagement ring ... even though my fingers were still swollen from my pregnancy), I had an officer tell me that "It's not domestic violence, you're suffering from Postpartum Depression. Go back inside, make yourself a cup of tea, and work things out with your husband."

A year and a half later, when I'd had enough of the emotional, verbal, and financial abuse (the physical was kept minimal, after he'd been arrested for publicly threatening me), and I again tried to leave, his MOTHER assaulted me after announcing that she was taking our child from BOTH of us. When I called the police, I was told to "sit down and shut up or they'd have me committed", that "I didn't look like I'd been hit", and that I was "too hysterical to take care of my child." They escorted my now-ex-husband out of our home with our child, then mocked me to friends I'd called to help me, who'd just pulled up and asked what was happening.

Nothing happened to ANY of the officers after this was all reported.
10:09 PM on 05/20/2012
Valerie is sexist. She failed to mention the Republicans' support of the Anti-Violence-Against-EVERYBODY-(equally)-Act.... What is this, the '60's? Ahhh, selective-reporting...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thisboy
11:25 PM on 05/20/2012
You are an inspiration to your gender. Of the 1800's
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
TeraWatt60
Cogito Ergo Sum
12:47 AM on 05/21/2012
you sound like the entitled little brat who wonders why there is no "kids day" like there is for Mom or Dad
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Blomberg
Lying is Never Patriotic
09:55 PM on 05/20/2012
Remember though, to the Republicans, ANYTHING that the President is for, THEY are against! It doesn't matter how good or logical or needed or how much a "no brainer" it is, the GOP will do anything that they can to defeat the measure (even if they were for it in the past).