I have a confession to make. It's something I've been holding inside for a long, long time, and in light of my spiritual quest, I've decided honesty is the best policy.
I don't like Marc Jacobs.
In fact, I think he's an over-rated, self-indulgent, un-professional hack.
[In the interest of disclosure (God, I love saying that! Sounds so professional.), and before I go any further, I have to admit: I own a Marc Jacobs bag. That said, I'm not a hypocrite. I just like the bag.]
But back to the fun stuff: What I think!
I think that calling Marc Jacobs a "designer" is bit of a stretch. That would imply that he actually sat down in front of a blank piece of paper and "designed" something from scratch. As far as I'm concerned (and yes, while I'm admittedly unimportant and admittedly have no idea what I'm talking about, my blog: my opinion), Marc's "design" process involves trolling vintage shops, copying the pattern, adding hearts, and changing the color to purple. But hey, people like vintage! And hearts! And purple! So, there's something to be said for that. He gives the people what they want, even if it's the same thing, over and over and over again.
That said, I could handle the cutesy designs and the purple hearts, and I could maybe even enjoy a little bit of the almost requisite designer drama, if it weren't for Marc's blatant lack of professionalism and complete disregard for other people. The man showed up to his own Spring 2008 show two hours late, at 11pm, and remarkably unapologetic. Two hours late? At eleven o'clock? At night?! No siree. Not okay with me.
The worst part of his fashion show shenanigans? Normally intelligent editors such as The New York Times' Cathy Horyn chose still to fawn over fashion's so-called golden child, leaving Suzy Menkes of The International Herald Tribune as one of the few with any common, let alone fashion sense! Suzy (rightfully) criticized the "parody of a show...with an inexcusably late start" as a "none-too-original vision of vintage clothes". Thank you, Suzy, my thoughts exactly!
Marc's response to her honesty, that is, besides sticking his tongue out at her after his Louis Vuitton show in Paris? A hissy-fit of an interview with Women's Wear Daily:
"I expect people, whether we're two hours late or two hours early or we don't show at all, to look at what they see: the clothes. [Suzy Menkes] wants to observe a Jewish holiday, but I start a show two hours late [and] she gets her nose bent out of shape."
No, Marc. A fashion show is a presentation. If you show two hours late, expect to be judged on your presentation. And more importantly, if fashion is style, and style is all about presenting yourself, (and, of course, we all know how I feel about manners), what says more about a person's presentation than the embarrassingly poor etiquette it takes to keep people waiting for two hours?
But it's only fair to show both sides of the story, so let it be known that Marc has every intention of making amends! For fall, he has given up his long-held Monday night, 9pm slot for a Friday night, 7pm slot. The amazingly circular logic? That it can't be "[guaranteed] that Marc won't be late... and if [the show] comes late, it comes late. Even if he's two hours late, people can still go to dinner at 9:00 or 9:30." How very thoughtful! Oh, don't forget that the new show time is "a nightmare for [his] salespeople...but [they'd] rather be inconvenienced than anyone else." Aww, thanks! Who doesn't enjoy a side of guilt with their apology?
So look, while I know that it's like, totes not cool to be anti-Marc, at least I know I've got the powers-that-be on my side. At his Marc Jacobs show in New York, the Anna Wintour had this to say about the fashion world's enfant terrible: "It's not as if he's some young 19-year-old. He's a grown-up with a huge organization behind him."
Marc Jacobs, get off The Hills, get over yourself, and most importantly, grow up.
Come back every other Tuesday for more stylish opinion by Verena von Pfetten.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.