iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Vicki Larson

GET UPDATES FROM Vicki Larson
 

Is Divorce Easier If You Don't Have Kids?

Posted: 07/11/2012 12:10 am

One wants a baby, the other doesn't, yet -- can this marriage be saved?

Not Katy Perry and Russell Brand's 14-month marriage, evidently. According to reports this week, the singer and comedian split because Brand, at age 37, was eager to start a family and Perry, 27, wasn't ready.

It seems like having a discussion about kids -- do we want them? when do we want them? how many do we want? -- would be a no-brainer for a couple before saying their "I dos." Couples who don't see eye to eye about kids are twice as likely to divorce, according to studies, and childfree couples divorce more often than couples who have at least one child.

Still, many feel that a divorce without kids is no big deal; there's no custody or co-parenting battles, child support or fears about how your decision will impact the kids for years to come. You're just splitting up stuff and money -- it's sort of like "divorce lite."

But is it easier?

It certainly wasn't for "Eat, Pray, Love" author Elizabeth Gilbert, who didn't want kids. She detailed the agonizing reality of her decision in the best-seller and movie that catapulted her into near-goddess stature for legions of middle-aged divorcees. Gilbert described how she wept and prayed on the bathroom floor as her then-husband slept in the next room, blissfully unaware that she had no intention of ever having babies with him -- or anyone else, for that matter. It was a costly divorce, emotionally and financially (for her); on top of that, she felt like she had to defend her decision not to have kids, too. That hardly seems like "divorce lite."

Yet, in the awkward moments after learning someone is getting a divorce, we often find ourselves saying something like, "Well, at least you don't have kids to deal with." While that is a small blessing in the big picture, that doesn't really ease his or her pain and sadness in the moment, kids or no kids. Plus, according to marital therapist Lisa Rene Reynolds, author of "Parenting Through Divorce: Helping Your Kids Thrive During and After the Split," "You may be opening up a whole other wound if your friend had wanted kids and didn't have them before her marriage ended."

Besides that, childfree divorcees are not without their own set of worries. They tend to spend more time agonizing about repeating relationship mistakes as well as having enough resources to keep up the lifestyle they had when they were married, experts say.

It's true that divorcing couples without kids may avoid a lot of the nasty legal stuff -- often they can mediate or use alternative dispute resolution. They also may have an easier time getting back into the dating world; there are no custody schedules to navigate, no worries about whether your kids like who you're dating, no fear of dragging them through another breakup. Plus not everyone wants to get involved with a single parent.

But if kids were an issue in your marriage as it reportedly may have been Perry and Brand, imagine what it would be like if your former "I don't want kids" spouse marries again and then has kids with his or her new spouse -- that can't possibly feel good.

Of course, given the generalizations almost all childfree women face -- notably that they're being selfish, writes Ellen Walker, author of "Complete Without Kids: An Insider's Guide to Childfree Living By Choice Or By Chance" -- maybe it's even worse to be divorced and childfree!

Huffington Post bloggers Vicki Larson and Susan Pease Gadoua are the authors of "The New I Do: Reshaping Marriage for Cynics, Commitaphobes and Connubial DIYers." Join them on Facebook and contact them at info@changingmarriage.com

 
 
 

Follow Vicki Larson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/OMGchronicles

FOLLOW DIVORCE
One wants a baby, the other doesn't, yet -- can this marriage be saved? Not Katy Perry and Russell Brand's 14-month marriage, evidently. According to reports this week, the singer and comedian split ...
One wants a baby, the other doesn't, yet -- can this marriage be saved? Not Katy Perry and Russell Brand's 14-month marriage, evidently. According to reports this week, the singer and comedian split ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 120
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
06:40 AM on 07/16/2012
Why would you want to get married if you don't want to start a family with your partner? I think that it is just the same, divorcing with or without kids. Divorce is never easy.
05:23 PM on 07/14/2012
But I will give you a better example of your point - Elizabeth Gilbert's husband.

EG's nameless husband was busy saving up and building a life with EG. He thought they were going to have kids together and was waiting until she was 30. Meanwhile, she was having an affair. She decided she didn't really want to have kids.

So she leaves, travels around the world, has more affairs, finds true love, and writes a best seller about it all. She doesn't say too much that's mean about him, but she writes off their marriage as something that was never meant to be. That has got to sting.

He's left looking for someone to settle down with him and have kids. The biological clock isn't as bad for guys, but it is there. And it may not be that easy to find a woman you really want to have kids with now that he's older. He can't even get any woman to sympathize his problems since so many women read her book and just loved her.

Anyhow, I think he is a better example of the kind of pain that could come from a divorce without kids.
05:08 PM on 07/14/2012
I don't really think Elizabeth Gilbert is the best example for your point. While she was miserable during her divorce, she landed on her feet. She traveled the world, had affairs, found God, wrote a best-seller, and ended up married to a guy she thinks is amazing. Except for the God part, this is not something a divorced woman can do if she has kids.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:39 PM on 07/15/2012
Yes, sounds pretty good if you ignore the husband, or the "marriage revenue provider", as the role might better be termed...
11:46 PM on 07/15/2012
I agree. Sounds good to me! =).
02:01 PM on 08/13/2012
I agree. You cant just easily leave your kids and travel the world and have affairs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ryan Tippens
republican.
03:20 PM on 07/13/2012
Its easier with no kids...infact,I didnt even go to the divorce and I read about it in the paper a few weeks later.
photo
Sprinks678
Have I said too much? Probably.
02:32 PM on 07/13/2012
No divorce is ever easy, but divorces without kids to share must be far less of a hassle. You can divorce and never see the guy or girl again if you don't want to, but if you have children you're forever linked.
01:53 PM on 07/13/2012
I would have loved to divorce without kids. If she hadn't been three months pregnant after we married, that's probably what would have happened. We could have both went our separate ways and I would have never had to deal with her again.
01:46 PM on 07/13/2012
A discussion about children (or anythig else) before marriage does not guarantee on party won't change his/her mind.
11:18 AM on 07/13/2012
Why do people get married anyway? Serious question! Fidelity isn't an issue because you have to be faithful to your significant other married or not. And you don't need marriage to have kids. What is the point of marriage? Health insurance for heterosexuals? Tax deductions?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kmc528
I ALWAYS have an opinion....
11:00 AM on 07/13/2012
The divorce itself was no easier, because he wanted to fight over every little thing (someone had told him if he made my life miserable enough, I'd pay him to go away), but life afterward is much better because I have no contact with him whatsoever. No visitation exchanges, no consultations about childrearing or battles over who's going to pay what unexpected expense. I never have to see or speak to the jerk again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
boxerbuddy4
I am a proud American
08:08 PM on 07/13/2012
Mine walks out of property negotiations when he doesn't get what he wants. Worse yet, he's remarried and I am not. He told his sister he would destroy me because I wanted a divorce. It's almost three years and it's still not settled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hiitthedirtboys
Always laughing,playful and friendly ...
10:46 AM on 07/13/2012
Love thy neighbor all through the day... but first make sure her husband's away!
09:19 AM on 07/13/2012
This article is all over the place. The title asks if divorce is easier without kids, then goes on and on about a couple who wanted to have kids and didn't... it just seems to play into the "defending yourself for choosing not to have kids" argument rather than a real discussion about divorcing and not having any ties -- children -- to keep you having to socialize with each other.
08:18 AM on 07/13/2012
Been in both situations. I had good friends get me through both divorces. Way easier without kids, so most friends assume the same. Casual friends really have no stake in your well-being and will make those comments,"at least you have no kids', so take them with a grain of salt.
Divorce is never a fun proposition.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:47 PM on 07/12/2012
I divorced my ex and I absolutely believe it was easier because we did not have kids. Maybe the actual divorce itself was no different, but the aftermath certainly is! I never have to see or talk to him again, about ANYTHING. In fact, I haven't spoken to him since the day the divorce was finalized.
photo
jf12
When I saw her I marveled greatly.
06:09 PM on 07/12/2012
Although our youngest daughter was only 5 at our divorce, over 30 years ago, my ex-wife has barely spoken to me since. She just glares.
dallassinglemom
Living life in Dallas and blogging about it
10:39 AM on 07/12/2012
Having been on both sides of the divorce fence with kids and without kids the term "easier" is relative. For both marriages, I should have known better and it wasn't until I went through the church's annulment process that I really seemed to "get it." From my personal experience the only hard part about a divorce with children is having to figure out custody, force civilized communication, and manage the sometimes costly and constant battles that can happen even after the divorce is finalized. Whether you divorce with children or without, people need to realize that they need to really take a deep long look at themselves. I believe getting divorced without children and then moving on too quickly out of loneliness or working yourself to death may not allow you to have self reflection (I know that was my mistake). Then when you get divorced and you have children, your divorce still remains a constant in your life because your children and their parent are still a part of your life and still something you have to love, take care of and manage. That is a big reason why for me, I was able to really reflect on myself as a person after my second divorce because there are other people involved and not just me. That's my humble opinion on this subject but really divorce is not easy for anybody the only easy thing would have been to not get married in the first place.
08:49 AM on 07/12/2012
no good marriage ends in divorce. none. so if there are no kids involved, it is absolutely easier and ridiculous to say otherwise. that doesn't mean it's pain-free, but shit. of course it's easier.