Pakistan's Long March to Democracy

The "long march" to Islamabad undertaken by thousands of Pakistani lawyers and activists advocating for the restoration of an independent judiciary represents a resounding call for democracy amidst Pakistan's political volatility and oppressive rule by President Zardari teetering it towards chaos.

Due to corrupt, ineffectual leadership -- a role admirably played by Zardari -- and a series of military dictatorships -- most recently exemplified by General Pervez Musharaff -- Pakistan's Constitution and democratic processes seem as malleable as Play-Doh putty.

In 2007, Chief Justice Iftekhar Chaudhry -- one of the most respected and popular personalities in Pakistan -- challenged Musharraf's autocratic decision to run for President while remaining Chief of the Army. Musharaff declared Martial Law and unilaterally removed Chaudhry along with 60 other judges. The U.S. ally in "The War on Terror" suspended the Constitution and the Parliament, shut down independent TV stations and arrested thousands of activists, dissidents and lawyers.

Zardari rode the "democracy card" promising several times to immediately reinstate Chaudhry if elected. However, Zardari also received a Christmas present in 2007 with a loathsome piece of Machiavellian legislation entitled The National Reconciliation Ordinance. Chief Justice Chaudhry initially moved to suspend the unlawful Ordinance, which was subsequently signed into power by Musharaff, granting amnesty to politicians, bureaucrats and political workers accused of corruption, embezzlement, money laundering, murder and terrorism. No wonder Zardari, a convict with major corruption charges pending in four countries in 2007, never kept his promises thus prompting the "long march" and protests engulfing the country.

Presently, the increasing instability of Pakistan, which barely avoided bankruptcy, faces rapid Talibanization of FATA, and suffers from increased suicide bombings and terrorism, has effectively removed Zardari's Cheshire grin forcing him to use Musharaff's 2007 "State of Emergency" playbook.

In the surreal soap opera that is Pakistani politics, history now presents itself as a rerun.

Zardari recently allowed the police to arrest nearly 700 protestors in Punjab, detain nearly 450 opposition party workers, and block the broadcast of independent news channel Geo TV. Most foolishly, Zardari's Supreme Court disqualified popular political opponent Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan's twice former Prime Minister, and his brother Shahbaz Sharif from holding elective office.

Muneer Malik, one of the most prominent attorneys in Pakistan spearheading the lawyer's movement, almost died in prison after his 2007 arrest following Musharaff's State of Emergency. With regards to Zardari's current crackdown, he emailed me on Friday and wrote: "I am trying to make myself scarce to reach Lahore by tomorrow to join the long march. I was arrested yesterday and released late last night. I don't know if I will be arrested again."

Similarly, Ali Zaidi, a spokesman for popular cricketer turned politician and activist Imran Khan, emailed me describing how the police were destroying their party's offices, smashing equipment, and fastidiously searching for Khan, who is currently in hiding.

Ironically, one of the greatest beneficiaries of this chaos is Sharif, who holds considerable power and influence in Pakistan's most populous province of Punjab. Apparently, Zardari was just issued an ultimatum by Prime Minister Gilani and Chief of Army Kayani that he would be removed from office unless he complied with certain conditions, one being returning political control of Punjab to elected members of parliament -- loyalists of Sharif.

Nawaz Sharif, who himself resigned as Prime Minister under corruption accusations, ironically has transformed himself into the greatest advocate for the judiciary, which is absurdly comical due to his history of stifling dissent. He humiliated his own Chief Justice Sajjad Ali Shah in 1997 due to the latter's principled stand in ordering the release of civil servants unjustly arrested by Sharif's order. He also issued "The Registration of Printing Press and Publication Ordinance, 1997" curbing the press and freedom of expression. One can safely assume this latest exhortation for democracy by Sharif is just a cynical ploy for another power grab.

As back channel diplomacy is in full effect with U.S. envoy Richard Holbrooke talking to Zardari and Sharif, the United States would be remiss to neglect the lawyer's movement, which is representative of a moderate, democratically inclined Pakistani electorate.

The U.S., which provided substantial support to General Zia and Musharraf's respective dictatorships, should use its diplomatic resources to force the reinstatement of Chief Justice Chaudhry and the independent judiciary. As Malik told me, "Absent a revolution the only hope is to empower the people through a fearless and independent judiciary and thus chip away the domination of the military bureaucratic- Zardari establishment."

By playing musical chairs in supporting Pakistan's recurring cast of rogues, both Pakistanis and the U.S. now risk playing a deadly game of Russian Roulette in light of the drastic rise in extremism igniting the AF/PAK region.

It would be a symbolic and fitting bookend to the 60 year ordeal of Pakistan if the lawyer's movement sowed the auspicious seeds of Pakistan's heralded democracy planted by her political and philosophical forefathers, Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Allamah Iqbal, who coincidentally were attorneys as well.

Although the road to that realization is beset with volatility, dissension and violence, the long march defiantly moves forward.

Comments

[arvay]

Ultimately, a stable, democratic­ally-incli­ned population is the best defense against extremism. This is still the majority in Pakistan. Our association with the recent military dictatorship has not helped Pakistan or us.

The new government will have its hands full persuading its military and intelligence forces to withdraw support from militants who want to convert Pakistan into a Sharia state. They're probably going to want to keep some militants as a bargaining chip with India, but these state services can't really want their "instruments" to take control of the state, either.

It's going to take time and patience to defuse the current situation, work out a solution for Kashmir (which is something we can do little to help except to encourage the peace process) and keep a lid on religious absolutists.

We have to rid ourselves of the delusion that we can "manage" things like this. Encourage, aid the democratic forces, support them with money --but stop appearing to constantly butt ourselves into their business.

[Paulo1]

"The U.S....should use its diplomatic resources to force"

Excuse me? No the US should not force the Pakistani people or their government to do anything. When we exert our power all we get is resentment. If we told the current Thug In Power to give milk to poor babies and care for the elderly some Imam who can barely read the Quran would put a hundred thousand people on the streets of Islamabad by morning claiming we defiled Islam and insulted the Pakistani people.

Pakistani democracy is a messy and often bloody affair but they need to solve its own damned problems not have us meddle in their affairs. There is a reason that just about every Pakistani with an education immigrates to the west you know and it isn't the nice snowy weather.