Early this week, disgraced former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich warned that "a commitment to religious freedom and God-given rights is being replaced by a secular oppression..." Just hours after those words appeared on Human Events, Gingrich issued a statement forcefully opposing the construction of a community center and mosque in downtown Manhattan, two blocks from Ground Zero.
Gingrich's affinity for religious freedom and his belief in God-given rights it would seem, doesn't extend to Americans who are Muslim. Such outright bigotry and blatant hypocrisy from Gingrich, an avid historian and former college professor, is even more repulsive when you consider his reasoning.
"There should be no mosque near Ground Zero in New York," he writes, "so long as there are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia." Gingrich, who has been railing against the so-called secular socialist machine for trying to take religion out of the public square, and who, like most conservatives, decries the influence of foreign law, wants the U.S. to apply the same standards on Muslims that Saudi Arabia applies to those who are not Muslim.
That's rich.
As the Washington Monthly's Steve Benen, after noting that conservatives continually justify despicable acts of torture on the premise that other nations and non-state actors employ such tactics, points out, "We're not supposed to lower ourselves to the levels of those we find offensive."
Gingrich's clarion call continues: "Those Islamists and their apologists who argue for 'religious toleration' are arrogantly dishonest." What makes them Islamists, apologists or even dishonest? Gingrich doesn't say but if you ask him, he'll likely tell you about the Katusha rockets that Hamas has fired into Sderot or how Iran is hell-bent on acquiring nuclear weapons. Anything and everything to take the subject away from the "religious freedom and God-given rights" to which American Muslims are entitled.
To understand Gingrich's paranoia that "America is experiencing an Islamist cultural-political offensive designed to undermine and destroy our civilization," one must delve deeply into the polarizing, overzealous and paranoid minds of professional Muslim-baiters and the politicians who depend on their support and cater to their illiberal demands.
Many of them are monomaniacs who have made it their life's mission to defeat Islam and "expose" all Muslims as radical Islamofascists. If one asks them for evidence to support their claim that no Muslim can be trusted, they will likely mention a purported plot by Muslim Brotherhood operatives to destroy America from within. The Council on American Islamic Relations and their intern/spies are routinely placed at the epicenter of the evil conspiracy.
Among these folks, any and all Muslims who "refudiate" such insane theories -- who denounce violence and terror, profess their loyalty to the American system, take part in the democratic process and who have assimilated into the American landscape -- are cleverly employing taqiyya, which, as any Muslim-baiter would tell you, is religiously sanctioned deception. The same was said about Jews decades ago and anti-Semites once evoked the specter of "Judeo-Bolshevism" the way that Muslim-baiters and politicians like Gingrich today warn of "Islamofascism." But none of those awful facts really matter, even to a historian such as Gingrich, because facts have long been accused of being part of the secular-socialist machine.
Gingrich's stand against the mosque project and his attempt to smear its backers as "Islamists" and apologists earns him his anti-Jihad bona fides, and with that, the support of an increasingly mistrustful and hateful electorate which lives off of tying American Muslims to every heinous act that occurs anywhere that remotely sounds Islamic. In this world, if the media fails to make the connection, they are clearly part of the soft-jihad.
Here is the key: The connection rarely has to be solid. In fact, the more specious the connection, the more the Muslim-baiter will be seen by others as a patriot and an enterprising investigative reporter. For instance, the New York Times' Robert Wright highlights one smear that has been contrived to defame the man leading the effort to bring the project to fruition. The imam behind the project is not to be trusted because conservatives say that "[his] wife has an uncle who used to be 'a leader' of a mosque that now has a Web site that links to the Web site of an allegedly radical organization." If you can't keep up with all of that nonsense, then you're complacent about the Jihad.
Any and all statements against violence made by Muslims must always be placed in the right conservative context: scare quotes. Gingrich does this masterfully. That simple act in effect says that Muslims who preach peace are actually jihadists.
As Gingrich and his buddies believe, either you are with them or you are, through your dhimmitude, a proto-Jihadist. No, you're worse since you probably support a second genocide against Jews. (Prominent Muslim-baiters have argued that Muslims instigated the Nazi holocaust!) Now that you've learned all of these made up facts, you simply do not have an excuse to not fight! Wake up and oppose the "Ground Zero Mosque" the "Islamization of America" and prove to those who hate the freedom in America that those freedoms, as Newt argues, don't actually apply to all Americans.
Cross-posted on PoliticalCorrection.org
Follow Walid Zafar on Twitter: www.twitter.com/WeeZieInc
Rev. Chloe Breyer and Matthew Weiner: The Faithful Search: A Civics Primer for Real Patriots
Bloomberg, Palin Agree to Disagree on Ground Zero Mosque Plans
Sarah Palin's Facebook Post Against Ground Zero Mosque Vanishes, then Reappears
GOP Hopeful George Demos: Rebuild Church At Ground Zero, Not Mosque »
Loading comments… 
http://www
If the backers of Park51 will endorse Mr. Ghouse's proposal, I will endorse theirs.
Here is a statement made by a famous RCC"
"She also said, at a March 2007 speech at Bates College, "By getting married, the woman has consented to sex, and I don't think you can call it rape."[36] On March 30, 2006, Schlafly provided an interview for The New York Times in which she attributed improvemen
http://en.
According to the Vatican article, 2009, the washing machine did more to liberate women then did the pill, or the abortion rights (sovereign
Should we allow Sharia Law to be implimente
Do you have an opinion on that issue?
http://art
Of course you can, and thank the founding fathers that you can, because no religion should be allowed freedom, or we are all damned. We have the right to be free of religions draconian teachings and practices, such as their cruel and unusual punishment
Free: not restricted in rights: not subject to censorship or control by a ruler, government
It's a free country.
Nothing similar is offered back to other religions. The fact of the matter is that the muslims demanding a right to build wont say a word against the harassment and discrimina
It's time for people to take a closer look at the "religion" of Islam and realize that it is a totalitari
Islam is the religion of the sword. When they come to convert you, should you resist they will eventually take off your head. Submit or die. Read the Koran and Hadith.
And it's not at Ground Zero, it's a few blocks away.
Saudi Arabia does not have "freedom of religion" as part of their constituti
Do American Muslims have no responsibi
I smell hypocrisy.
Or is it fear I smell? Saudis put a lot of money into American mosques.
Both?
Prince Alwaleed bin Talal al-Saud of Saudi Arabia, through his Kingdom Holding Company, owns 7% of News Corp.'s shares, making Kingdom Holdings the second largest shareholde
You're wrong.
You sarcastica
Are we suppose to swallow your bald opinion without evidence?
An uncritical reader would assume you are backing up everything you say with proof. This proves not to be the case.