More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Warren J. Blumenfeld

GET UPDATES FROM Warren J. Blumenfeld
 

Boycotting Chick-Fil-A While Conservative Christians Play "Victim" Card

Posted: 02/ 3/2012 11:04 am

"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." - Mahatma Gandhi

College and university students throughout the country have organized boycotts and petition drives to terminate their schools' relationship with the national fast food chain Chick-Fil-A because of the restaurant's direct connection to organizations dedicated to restricting the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. Chick-Fil-A's charitable division, WinShape Foundation, works with and supports such groups as the National Organization for Marriage, the Ruth Institute, the Pennsylvania Family Institute, Focus on the Family, and Exodus International among others, all fighting to ban marriage for same-sex couples, and some advocating for the "curing" of homosexuality.

Students at Indiana University South Bend successfully lobbied their school to dissociate from Chick-Fil-A as a vendor, and students at other campuses are taking their lead, including students at University of New Orleans, Texas Tech University, Mississippi State University, University of North Texas, and Gainesville State University, Florida Gulf Coast University, and Duke University. By petitioning administrators, students are sending the clear message that discrimination in any form cannot be supported on their campuses.

According to the wording on one of the schools' petitions:

Mississippi State should be a place that supports equality for everyone -- where all students, staff and community members feel welcome. We should not be allowing corporations to do business on our campus if they are using their profits to strip fundamental civil rights from gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans. Please join me in calling on our school's leadership to remove Chick-Fil-A from campus -- unless and until the restaurant chain withdraws its support for anti-gay organizations.
Dan Cathy, President and Chief Operating Officer of Chick-Fil-A issued a press release in an attempt to counter the boycott by stating that, "While my family and I believe in the Biblical definition of marriage, we love and respect anyone who disagrees." He went on to define Chick-Fil-A's Corporate Purpose as:
To glorify God by being a faithful steward of all that is entrusted to us, and to have a positive influence on all who come in contact with Chick-Fil-A... [and] we will continue to offer resources to strengthen marriages and families. To do anything different would be inconsistent with our purpose and belief in Biblical principles.
Bishop E.W. Jackson Sr., founder and president of STAND (Staying True to America's National Destiny), accuses these student leaders of hatred against devote Christians. Though students involved in these actions represent all sexual and gender identities, in an interview with Christian News Wire, Jackson argued that,
This is further proof of the insidious and dangerous hatred by homosexual activists of any Christian who dares try to live out their biblical values. The problem in society today is not hatred of homosexuals, but hatred by homosexuals of anyone who refuses to say 'amen' to their sexual behavior.
The Bishop goes on to accuse members of the "homosexual community" of attempting to demolish the faith foundations on which our country is based since "it is an affront to them and they want a sexually amoral society remade in their image." Jackson argues that the oppression toward Christians, which he terms "Christo-phobia" and "Biblo-phobia," is so extreme and extensive that now "may be the time to make Christians a protected class."

I would ask Dan Cathy and Bishop Jackson, to which biblical marriage values are they referring? Do they prefer that men engage in polygamous relationships like Abraham, the patriarch of Jews, Christians, and Muslims, who conceived progeny with two women, his wife Sarah and maid Hagar? And I would think that many women today, homosexual and heterosexual alike, may find difficulty in Ephesians 5:22: "Wives, be submissive to your husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior." And, Cathy and Bishop Jackson, do you really promote the commandment to women in 1 Corinthians 14:33-35: "As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silence in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church."

I wonder how many parents really subscribe to Exodus 21:15 & 17, which dictates: "And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death. And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death."

Rather than reverting to a boycott, Jackson is calling for a "Buycott" of Chick-Fil-A, in support of the company's defense of marriage, and protection of family and Christian values.

Over the years, similar boycotts to those currently underway against Chick-Fil-A have been waged against companies. For example, some have boycotted Domino's Pizza when it was discovered that its founder, Tom Monaghan, supported a number of anti-abortion groups like Operation Rescue. Some people do not shop at Hobby Lobby, a chain of craft stores, since it actively promotes (proselytizes) a form of Christianity in its ads, especially around Easter, and often plays Christian music over the airwaves in its stores.

For all those on the political right and others who promote a "free market" system, you should be in full support of the boycott since this strategy maintains that very system.

With the recent actions taken against Chick-Fil-A, a critical question must be addressed. While private companies like Chick-Fil-A most certainly and clearly have the right to support organizations and causes of their choice, should public tax-supported institutions such as universities maintain connections with those companies that expressly violate campus non-discrimination policies?

While conservative Christian theologians like Bishop Jackson pose as victims in this drama, most campus non-discrimination politics now include sexual identity and gender identity and expression as enumerated categories. By opposing the basic civil rights of LGBT people, Chick-Fil-A and its allied organizations clearly fall under the definition of discrimination according to campus policies.

Current events show that students nationwide are taking the lead in raising critical issues, and they are holding campus administrators accountable for upholding their stated policies.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 91
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:44 PM on 03/21/2012
As one of the most successful restaurant chains in the nation... CFA certainly has NOT missed your $5:) YOU... on the other hand... have missed out on the best chicken in the country:)
10:05 PM on 03/21/2012
They seem to think that they have some god given right to try to trample on everyone else freedoms and that anyone who tries to prevent their discrimination and blatant infringement of the constitution is oppressing them. What a joke. I have news for you guys:
1. you do not have the right to force your belief system on anyone
2. Your belief is just that and cannot be proven
3. Whether or not you "agree" with homosexuality is beside the point. The point is that you cannot use that belief to try to pass laws that take another persons freedom away. Satan himself could move to Montana and as long as he is a citizen of the USA he has the same freedom as anyone else here. Let me say this again just so you understand- your belief that homosexuality is evil is completely and utterly beside the point and has no bearing on their rights as citizens of this country
11:57 PM on 02/09/2012
Chick-Fil-A has a right to support whatever it wishes... I, on the other hand, have a right to show them that their bigotry is unacceptable by withholding my dollars... As a matter of fact, I used to eat there regularly, but haven't spent one cent there in the past 5 years...
05:19 PM on 02/07/2012
Chick-Fil-A has the right to support groups that it believes in, but it deserves to pay the consequences. [based on a saying]
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Valerie Keefe
07:35 PM on 02/05/2012
I prefer the take that West Wing had on Ephesians 5, saying it was an argument that we should all serve one another, that doing so was a holy duty, but then, it does seem that when Aaron Sorkin and the bible get together, both seem better quality work.

Good piece, though I'd like to have seen some focus given to the organizations' cissexism.
02:37 PM on 02/05/2012
Chick Fil A has never hid it's Christian root. Why would you expect for it not to support traditional values? I like the food and admire them staying true to their beliefs.
AliveInNYC
Actually in DC now but still fighting the fight
07:04 PM on 02/12/2012
hatred and intolerance are not what I would call traditional values.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Priestess of Ryleh
06:24 AM on 02/23/2012
reread the bible... that book should seriously be rated X, and children should be kept from it.
12:13 AM on 02/05/2012
But their chicken sandwiches are oohhh so tasty.
photo
antigaychristianssuck
deus cinaedus est
12:36 PM on 02/05/2012
you must not have a very educated palate.
11:14 PM on 02/22/2012
Oh, I dislike their stances, but their sandwiches are quite tasty.
12:10 PM on 02/24/2012
Ah, the sacrifices involved in taking a stand. I love Chick-fil-A food, but I haven't eaten there in years because of their attacks on me and people I love.
10:59 PM on 02/24/2012
Chick-fil-A attacked you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tomteboda
07:46 PM on 02/04/2012
Free market principles include allowing people to choose whether or not to purchase from a vendor. They don't actually include institutional bans on vendors.
08:34 PM on 02/04/2012
I'm not sure why they wouldn't. The students are purchasing from a vendor via their board fees. If enough students want to drop them, they should be dropped.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tomteboda
09:16 PM on 02/04/2012
Under free-market principles, so few students would purchase from the company that it would be no longer economically viable. In this situation, all students were deprived of choices.
12:12 PM on 02/24/2012
Free-market principles allow actors to decide who to do business with. Universities are actors too, allowed to do business with - or refuse to do business with - whomever they please.
12:24 AM on 02/04/2012
Chick Fil-A, to my knowledge, and I think I would know unless it was quite recently (I stepped down from NOM last August) has never given a penny to the National Organization for Marriage. does truth matter?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Warren J. Blumenfeld
01:02 AM on 02/04/2012
Maggie,
I attempt to always check my facts before I publish. I've read a number of news accounts stating that Chick-fil-A's corporate foundation, Winshape Foundation, has either direct ties to the National Organization for Marriage, or the Ruth Institute, which is a spinoff of NOM.

See, for example,

http://news.change.org/stories/yes-chick-fil-a-says-we-explicitly-do-not-like-same-sex-couples
http://unews.com/2011/02/14/chick-fil-a-comes-under-fire-for-anti-lgbt-support/
http://tpcmagazine.org/blog/free-speech-or-hate-speech-chick-fil-john-galliano-and-westboro-baptists
http://boycottchickfila.com/category/articles/
http://christwire.org/2011/12/chick-fil-a-a-good-sandwich-and-a-better-message/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Priestess of Ryleh
06:26 AM on 02/23/2012
warren hun, im thinking you've just been trolled... but hey if that really is maggie there... excellent job posting your sources... kind of hard for them to dispute things when the evidence is right in front of you.
photo
antigaychristianssuck
deus cinaedus est
11:05 AM on 02/05/2012
LMAO. Since when has truth mattered to NOM? From misleading photos to misleading polls to presenting itself as a grassroots movement, you should be ashamed of yourself. Is it any wonder that NOM is on SPLC's watch list?
12:13 AM on 02/04/2012
"Bishop E.W. Jackson accuses these student leaders of hatred against devote Christians"
And what do they call when they try to strip people form their citizen rights, or the right to be free, or the rights to have a family???
11:11 PM on 02/03/2012
Poor Christian believers, they have the freedom to practice their religion as their conscience dictates in their churches, but if a minority group in the general population speaks up for equality of civil rights that don't match the holy rollers religious morality, the holy rollers immediately start up a 5 alarm fire to try and prevent the change of law for equality and cry "we're the minority here". To all you holy rollers, nobody's going to force you to change your morality inside your sanctuary if you so decide how to live. Besides, you already do a good job of pretending that morals are not being broken in your church on a daily basis. So why do you feel that you need to control the general population? Why should your religious beliefs be the litmus test for laws dealing with civil rights such as equal rights for gays? Are you not violating the "separation of church and state" when the belief structures that you all agree to practice inside your church, is forced thru law onto the general population who don't agree with your religious perspective? Doesn't this process of law fall into the realm of oppression against a minority?This forcing of your morality on a minority population qualifies as stepping outside of the guidelines as outlined in the First Amendment of the Constitution.
07:48 PM on 02/03/2012
Why the outcry against progressive boycotts? Shouldn't these conservative organizations view this as a wonderful example of the beauty of the Milton Friedman free markets? :)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jen Celli
Done sitting and watching quietly.
04:31 PM on 02/03/2012
I have been to the Chick-Fil-A and eaten their bland fare. The fact it is a religious business is pretty much the death knell for me. Bad food and scriptures don't interest me in the least.
02:59 PM on 02/03/2012
I will now double my patronage of Chick-Filet.

They are a private organization and can affiliate, or not, with who they wish. Don't like it? Eat somewhere else. The drive-throughs at these places look like the line to get into a Shakira concert. I'm sure they will be just fine without you and never miss a beat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Julia Bailey
06:54 PM on 02/03/2012
Haha, you really expect people to believe that people in the drive through lines look like concert goers? How about concert goers who all added 50 pounds to their body frame.
Conservatives talk a lot about personal responsibility, yet they mostly seem to be unable to take responsibility for their own bodies and are at least double the size they should be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
07:48 PM on 02/03/2012
Hey, it's your clogged arteries ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dirtydog1776
rub my soft, furry, objectivist tummy
02:57 PM on 02/03/2012
Students voting not to allow their colleges to do business with companies they disagree with. Sounds like a dictatorship of the majority, almost as bad as dictatorship of a minority.
03:23 PM on 02/03/2012
Wouldn't another name for a dictatorship of the majority be just another name for democracy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
07:49 PM on 02/03/2012
Sort of like what happened with Proposition 8 in California, huh?
05:08 PM on 02/04/2012
Amen. Conservatives feel it is ok to put right to work and marry to a vote but don't take away everyone's constitutional right to clog our arteries! Priceless:)