More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Warren Mosler

Warren Mosler

Posted: April 5, 2010 11:18 AM

A Primer on Gold Lending

What's Your Reaction:

Recently there have been a lot of what I believe to be gross misconceptions regarding the lending of gold and the absence of actual gold in various gold depositories. I'm writing this to clarify the lending process itself and the further ramifications of gold lending.

Gold has been lent to short sellers ever since I can remember, and it might go back thousands of years as well. So this is nothing new. If you hold gold lending it's a way to make extra money with very little risk. Lending gold is nothing more than selling gold for spot delivery and buying it back for forward delivery. You lend it to someone who gives you cash as collateral along with a mark to market agreement. The fee charged to the borrower of the gold which is the incentive for the lender of the gold is the below market interest rate the lender of the gold has to pay on the cash collateral he receives from the borrower. And when rates are near 0 as they are now, the lender of the gold gets the cash collateral plus an additional fee, or he doesn't do it. The fee paid to gold holders to lend their gold is a market price for that service. At some price holders of gold will take cash collateral, fully marked to market, plus a fee to lend their gold. It's voluntary. It adds to their incomes. It more than pays for their storage charges. And when the collective desire to hold actual gold and not lend it goes up, that desire is expressed in the higher fee paid to people who do lend. So if you watch that fee you can see the supply and demand for lending rising and falling.

Gold lending does perform at least one useful arbitrage function. A lot of the short sellers are gold producers. They sell for forward delivery because they have to mine it and refine it before they can deliver it. And they don't want to take the chance prices might fall, but would rather lock their profits in upfront. So if their cost of production is maybe $400/oz they might sell gold for 6 months forward or more for over $1,100 and be happy locking in that much profit, rather than waiting to sell and taking the chance prices might be lower. And if they have bank loans financing their gold operations the lender may insist they sell forward and lock in that known spread. So when buyers want their gold right away and producers won't have it ready for 6 months, what brings those people together? It's the holders of gold lending their gold in the spot market so buyers can get it right away, and then the lender getting the gold back 6 months later when the producers make their deliveries. Market forces organize this process and with the current relatively high levels of world gold production it's no surprise that lenders are very low on inventory, as only a fraction of the world's gold is available for lending.

GATA (Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee) is complaining that the US govt. has lent gold and is therefore artificially keeping the price of gold lower than it would otherwise be. There is some truth to the idea that lending keeps spot gold prices lower than otherwise, as it keeps the spreads between spot an forward prices 'in line' but you can just as easily say that lenders selling spot and buying forward keep the forward prices higher than otherwise, giving gold producers a better price than otherwise.

So all that gold 'missing' from depositories is in the form of cash in the depositories and contracts to buy gold in the forward markets. And with gold being produced in large quantities for untold years into the future it's hard to say for sure that there isn't enough gold coming to market over that time to satisfy the demand. In fact, market theory would say the continuously changing clearing price means there is always exactly the right amount.

 
 
 

Follow Warren Mosler on Twitter: www.twitter.com/wbmosler

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Max Keiser
04:39 AM on 04/07/2010
The problems arise due to naked short selling

What we are discovering on the LBMA and Comex is rampant naked shorting. This is effectively the financial equivalent of counterfeiting.

Why Mosler would defend counterfeiting is not clear - and then to sweep his faulty defense under the rug of 'efficient market theory' is intellectual laziness at best.

Nobody wins when exchanges are engaged in fraud as we see on the LBMA and Comex except the bankers and brokers who use their criminal proceeds to buy more politicians to pass more 'deregulation' of the system in ways that is causing real harm to millions in America every day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Piper
11:33 PM on 04/06/2010
Mr, Mosler....you jumped the shark and you have not even been elected yet. After this, I am pretty sure you won't be.
04:17 PM on 04/06/2010
Mr. Mosler, are you serious?!?! I cannot believe you resorted to the 'efficient market hypothesis' to attempt to prove that market fraud cannot exist, given all that has happened over the past ten years. That is truly embarrassing. Even Chris Dodd knows better than that. That prompted me to take a look at your CV. Word of advice. Peter Schiff is going to hammer you in any debates unless you tighten up your lines.

"So all that gold 'missing' from depositories is in the form of cash in the depositories and contracts to buy gold in the forward markets. And with gold being produced in large quantities for untold years into the future it's hard to say for sure that there isn't enough gold coming to market over that time to satisfy the demand. In fact, market theory would say the continuously changing clearing price means there is always exactly the right amount."

Like Daniel Drew said, "He who sells what isn't his'n, Must buy it back or go to prison."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SWRichmond
05:16 PM on 04/06/2010
http://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/14484/gold-hedge-book-falls-to-236-tonnes--14484.html

"The latest Global Hedge Book survey from Société Générale, (compiled by GFMS Ltd, using the Brady TrinityTM trading and risk management software) shows that at the end of 2009 the global delta-adjusted hedge book stood at just 236 tonnes, a far cry from the 2,064 tonnes when it was at its peak in 2000. De-hedging in the fourth quarter was 125 tonnes, making up more than half the year's total of 246 tonnes. This means that net mine supply in 2009 was reduced by 9% last year, to 2,317 tonnes against production of 2,553 tonnes (GMFS figures)."

"AngloGold Ashanti, which was the second largest de-hedger in the quarter (14t) is now the largest open book, at 108 tonnes - or 46% of the outstanding position, meaning that the rest of the hedged population account for 128 tonnes."

"The largest component of the options position is sold calls (65% of total - an implied 85 tonnes)."

So as to this statement: "and contracts to buy gold in the forward markets." I'm curious; From whom? Not from producers, apparently.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SWRichmond
11:28 AM on 04/06/2010
I am very interested that huffpo has taken up the gold issue and will be watching and participating in it. A financial system cannot function unless it is based on truth, honesty and transparency. There are too many government agencies, and private agencies that possess unquestioned government protection, that are not required to tell the truth. If they don't have to tell financial truth, why do I? The government is supposed to work for me, not vice versa.
11:54 AM on 04/07/2010
Bullseye! Furthermore, I don't expect truth, honesty, and transparency from the financial industry or business in general. These folks can be expected to behave based upon their own, (often short-term) best interest. I have little quarrel with that. The role of government is to make and enforce laws that require truth, honesty, and transparency. You cannot reconcile the roles of enforcer and pro-business facilitator. Business can take care of itself as long as government is making sure the playing field is fair, transparent, and level.
10:44 AM on 04/06/2010
If I understand what has been said so far, the case is not that gold lending exists, but that it is not being done transparently, that naked short selling exists, and that the lending is not being transparently accounted for.

This is less a primer on gold lending, and more a primer on how to answer the question you would have liked to have been asked, rather than the one that has been put forward.

Its all about honesty and transparency.
11:58 AM on 04/06/2010
I don't see short selling in the cash markets as functionally different than short selling in the futures markets?

The futures markets are longs and shorts with no actual physical gold.
03:22 PM on 04/06/2010
You need a primer on the difference between honesty and fraud, per the astute observations on Cafe Americain. Read them in full here:
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2010/04/for-warren-mosler-primer-on-difference.html