iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Waymon Hudson

GET UPDATES FROM Waymon Hudson
 

Catholic Church Chooses Discrimination Over Charity in Illinois

Posted: 06/01/11 12:03 PM ET

"Now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity." --1 Corinthians 13:13, King James Bible

Catholic-Charities.jpgApparently the Catholic Diocese skipped that part of the Good Book.

Catholic Charities in Rockford, Ill., have decided that rather than abide with the new civil unions law going into effect in Illinois on June 1, they'll end all the adoption and foster care services they provide. This move will displace around 350 children in foster care, terminate $7.5 million in state contracts with the "charity," and lead the organization to fire 58 of its employees who work with their state-funded adoption services.

Not sounding so charitable, are they?

Ellen Lynch, general counsel for the diocese, gave this "loving" excuse when they announced their decision following the failure of an amendment to the Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Unions Act that would have allowed Catholic Charities use their public funds to discriminate as they see fit:

"It's the moral teaching of our faith that we believe in the natural order of marriage. In order to serve our children best, we believe that they be in that kind of a family."

This move isn't anything new from the Catholic Church. They have a history of simply shutting down services and punishing both those they serve and employees when they are forced to decide between taking millions in public dollars and continuing their faith-based discrimination against a class of people. Just last year, in March 2010, the Washington, D.C. Catholic Charities announced it will no longer offer spousal benefits to any employees to avoid offering benefits to same-sex partners of employees after D.C.'s marriage equality law went into effect.

The church certainly has the right as a private institution to believe what they want and to act accordingly. However, they simply do not have the right to bring that discrimination into the public sphere by taking tax dollars while not serving the entire community, only those they see fit and worthy.

But beyond the actual private belief versus public funding/services issue, the choice of the church to put "faith" (or, rather, faith-based discrimination) over actual charity is a good insight into the priorities of the institution. And this certainly is an institutional Church issue that doesn't represent how polls show the average Catholic feels about LGBT Americans and their relationships. Recent polling from the Public Religion Research Institute shows that Catholics overwhelmingly support marriage or civil unions for same-sex couples by some 74 percent. Yet the church chooses to hurt the hundreds of children in its care, the employees that work for them and the community it supposedly serves.

The Catholic Church is free to discriminate as they please. They can do things like back anti-gay marriage amendments, kick-out foster kids and fight condom use to prevent HIV/AIDS. But all they do is further isolate themselves from not only society as a whole, but from their own shrinking membership, as well as remove themselves and their services form the public sphere. Prioritizing discrimination of LGBT people and holding charity hostage has sadly become their top goal.

As the Bible once again says: "Though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing" (1 Corinthians 13:2, King James Bible).

Faith, hope and charity? Not so much from the Catholic Church.

 

Follow Waymon Hudson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/WaymonHudson

 
 
  • Comments
  • 179
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HeadAches
I'm here, getting into your head giving you...
06:30 PM on 06/03/2011
The Catholic Cult is beautifully dismantled by Hitchens and Fry in this excellent debate on whether the Catholic Cult is a force for good in the world.

See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kuzYwzGoXw
02:37 AM on 06/03/2011
For starters if you're going to quote scripture then don't use the KJB, it's not recognized by them. That's rich. If the egotistical proud perverts were so concerned with the children then leave the adoption agencies alone.
You're just pissed off that they won't play nice with you.
12:40 AM on 06/03/2011
I think that neither group has put the children's welfare as a first priority. The Catholic church has displayed extreme uncaringness in withdrawing suddenly, leaving children without support and employees without jobs. But the LGBT movement also needs to examine its own conscience. In targeting agencies that have a genuine, if ill-founded belief that adoption by gay people is wrong, the LGBT movement is putting political action, however laudable, ahead of the welfare of existing children in Catholic systems. Why not simply apply to LGBT-friendly agencies instead of using children as collateral damage in your struggle? And wasn't it Shakespeare who said 'A plague on both your houses'?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:39 AM on 06/03/2011
Do you actually imagine that adoption is some sort of do-it-yourself activity? Wrong. It's entirely controlled by government and any organization involved in the activity is acting as an employee of the state with no say whatsoever in regard to policy and state law in Illinois prohibits discrimination against couples in same-sex unions. It has absolutely nothing to do with the gay community "targeting" anyone. The only party here more concerned with gay rights (as in opposition to them) than the welfare of children is the Catholic church.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:05 PM on 06/06/2011
The Catholics were not "targeted" by gays. They were told by the state that they had to obey the law or lose their funding. They chose to lose their funding.
photo
Dragosurfer
I surf, therefore I am…..
01:53 PM on 06/02/2011
Yet another example of the hate the Catholic church spews out on a daily basis. This organization is a disgrace to humanity, always has been, always will be. Millions of children live in slums around the world as a direct result of the Catholic church and other religious organizations anti-birth control, anti-family planning dogma.

If the Pope and all religious leaders band together to promote birth control and family planning, we could end the cycle of poverty. It seems that most, in not all, religious leads have no real interest in ending poverty. Now Why is that?

P.S. The Catholic Charities Group does nothing more than put a band-aid on the massive problem that they helped to create.
04:36 PM on 06/02/2011
Last winter in Guatemala we saw so many examples of exactly what you are saying. Tragic. And no real signs of change on the horizon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
10:58 AM on 06/02/2011
The catholic church got out of the adoption business in Massachusetts a few years ago for the same reason. Anti-gay discrimination trumps charity; it's a wonderful bit of catholic irony.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:41 AM on 06/02/2011
A great loss for the children and also for the LGBT couples who want to adopt - but it is time to cut off funding for ALL "faith-based" religious groups who practice discrimination in their work and also hiring practices.

Let them depend on private donations to do their work - not our tax dollars. And if they stick their noses into politics, cut off funding and also their tax-exempt status.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
09:50 AM on 06/02/2011
Amen! Why should I and other GLBT have to pay to be discriminated against and to have the churches constantly try to keep us unable to have even legal CIVIL unions?
photo
WheelsOnFire
Equality Crusader
06:23 PM on 06/03/2011
Well said.

The religious corporations, especially the Catholics, are self-centered, self-absorbed and, well, just plain selfish.

They demand representation without taxation.

Time to repeal their tax-exempt status, which they exploit and abuse.
photo
Inkosi
The gods themselves rage against stupidity
11:58 AM on 06/02/2011
I totally support taxing them. The religious organizations are getting way too involved in politics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:52 AM on 06/02/2011
Ultimately, the Catholic church's complaint in this matter is with modernity. With the exception of a few completely non-functioning countries, the modern state everywhere regards the welfare of society's children as its prerogative (Blame the French Revolution, perhaps) and the state, ideally at least, bases its decisions on pragmatism, not theological dogma, (and it's been exhaustively demonstrated that same-sex couples are in no way inferior to opposite-sex couples at the task of raising children). The Catholic church by involving itself with adoption (and by taking money from the state) understood that it was entangling itself with the state and effectively it chose to make itself an arm of the state. So, Catholic church, when, for whatever reason, you can't perform the governmental duties you signed up for, it's obviously time for you to resign.
09:22 AM on 06/02/2011
Which is exactly what the Church did. And for which Mr. Hudson is now criticizing it. Anti-Catholic bigotry is an ugly thing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:15 PM on 06/03/2011
Seriously? Have you been keeping up with the news about the horrible things the Catholic Church has done (and is still doing)?

Pretty sure anti-Catholic mistrust is well-founded.
09:39 AM on 06/02/2011
"(and it's been exhaustive­ly demonstrat­ed that same-sex couples are in no way inferior to opposite-s­ex couples at the task of raising children"

I hate to get into a whose-science-is-better argument, but those studies have serious methodological problems. However, the good news is we do have tons of good, statistically significant studies that show one man - one woman relationships are significantly better than any alternative. Granted, we may be able to correlate those results with other factors (parental happiness, etc) and obviously NO studies can show causality.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:34 PM on 06/02/2011
Forget the studies then. Here's something that's undeniable to all but the most willfully ignorant - If children raised by same-sex couples didn't fare as well as other children the religious right would be trumpeting the news to the heavens. But they're not and with the religious right, as we all know, all it takes is one single anecdote for a smear campaign against gay people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:16 PM on 06/03/2011
And plenty of evidence of heterosexual couples abusing foster kids. What's your point?
06:47 AM on 06/02/2011
In other respects, the Church abides by the findings of science, e.g. evolution, astrophysical findings about the age of the universe, etc., but it does take them a while. I'm sure that at some time the church will accept that some people are born gay, and that, thus, "God made them gay," so it shouldn't be regarded as wrong. But who knows when?
08:44 AM on 06/02/2011
They already do accept that some persons (if not most/all) are born gay. That is not the issue; it never was.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
08:58 AM on 06/02/2011
The issue is that they want GLBT people to live celibate lives, born that way or not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:33 AM on 06/02/2011
They do accept that fact, unlike evangelicals. Beyond that the Catholic church can't seem to decide whether same-sex orientation is gravely "disordered" (the conservative position) or that all sexuality, regardless of orientation, is a "gift from God", but gays are called upon by God to remain "chaste" (the "liberal" position). The liberal view is an obvious absurdity and the conservative view lands them in serious trouble with all Christian tradition by effectively creating a class of people who BY THEIR VERY NATURE are intrinsically more prone to sin than other people. Perhaps the Catholic church needs to fully embrace science in this matter - That homosexuality is a natural phenomenon which occurs in many animal species, and not as a mere aberration, and that sex in higher animals often serves other purposes than procreation.
05:27 AM on 06/02/2011
Amazing, I find all these comments referring to the church as " hypocritical" a misunderstanding over what the definition means in the terms of what the church is doing. If the church moved forward with the law and accepted it, then the church would be lauded for keeping with the times No? But it would be hypocritical for the church to accept it at the expense of what they believe. Its a no win situation for them. If you despise the church then it won't matter what they do, you will citicize its every move. Having said that, I applaud the decision, not because I'm prejudice against gays, on the contrary, I have many gay friends who have a robust opinion about the gay marriage issue, but because they are vigilant in keeping with the montra of the church.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Jade
08:42 AM on 06/02/2011
keeping the "montra of the church" could have been accomplished by not taking public funds and continuing on private funds but they decided to punish everyone and throw a hissyfit. They took their ball and went home. That is immature, tactless and hypocritical. Would they have still gotten flack for refusing the funds, yeah, there's always someone saying something negative but it would have been slightly more respectable than what they pulled.
04:40 PM on 06/02/2011
It would be interesting to watch you run an orphanage with no funds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
09:48 AM on 06/02/2011
Sure you do. All you haters say "I have many gay friends".....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MagicManDoneIt
When facts are lacking. Just say...
04:16 AM on 06/02/2011
That's the RCC, getting it wrong for seventeen centuries and counting.
12:54 AM on 06/02/2011
So?

I am sure other organizations will be happy to take over their duties.
01:51 PM on 06/02/2011
Thank you for saying that! I absolutely agree.
09:55 PM on 06/01/2011
"This move isn't anything new from the Catholic Church. They have a history of simply shutting down services and punishing both those they serve and employees when they are forced to decide between taking millions in public dollars and continuing their faith-based discrimination against a class of people."

Translation: they have been acting on this issue in accordance with their religious beliefs.

I find your argument very poorly reasoned, Mr. Hudson. They are not ignoring the admonition to do charitable work. They have a couple thousand year history of doing charitable work. They are simply trying to do so in a manner consistent with the age long religious and moral traditions.

If we are going to insist that those who receive public money for charitable endeavors follow whatever the current public policy is, we have to expect that those who cannot do so for religious reasons will withdraw.

So why the attack? Really, what else could they do?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Jade
08:44 AM on 06/02/2011
They could have continued on private funds only. They were violating the law by taking tax money to discriminate which is illegal regardless of your religious beliefs but nothing stops them from using private funds but they decided to kick everyone out in their anger
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrHomerS
Mmmmm...purple
01:36 PM on 06/02/2011
I agree completely, despite my own opinion about gay marriage which diverges from that of the institutional Church. Forcing the institutional Church to act contrary to its beliefs and teachings about marriage leaves only one option: do not accept public funds.
09:31 PM on 06/01/2011
"The church certainly has the right as a private institution to believe what they want and to act accordingly. However, they simply do not have the right to bring that discrimination into the public sphere by taking tax dollars while not serving the entire community, only those they see fit and worthy."

And when this was affirmed, they stopped providing the services. Which is absolutely their right. Or should they be forced to provide services in the way you want? You won. They aren't discriminating with public money. You knew this would be the result, so stop your bitching. It's a private organization that is in no way compelled to do things the way you want them too. It's no different than any other number of private organizations who do things according to their beliefs.

Your article is rather pointless. It's just whining and moaning that an event you wanted had a predictable outcome. They are a religion with certain fundamental moral tenets and beliefs. Of course those beliefs come first in their decisions.

Pointless article from a community that feels the need to play the perpetual victim even when they win (correctly) on an issue.
photo
Richbruin
We'll walk this world together through the storm
10:32 PM on 06/01/2011
Fanned and faved, you are absolutely right. Catholic Charities was unfortunately put into the position of being forced to place children in homes headed by unmarried couples (not just gays and lesbians) in opposition to the organizations moral convictions, or refuse to do so and be open to liability. I sympathize with gay couples wanting to adopt, but perhaps a different organization could have been more appropriate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Jade
08:45 AM on 06/02/2011
They could have continued on private funds.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceymarie
the President is black, deal with it
11:38 AM on 06/02/2011
I work with the elderly and the Catholic Charities in Houston refused to help an elderly gay couple, discrimination and hate is displayed daily by the church and all religions.
08:59 PM on 06/01/2011
So let me get this straight -Gay- couples want to be able to adopt children and give them a loving family atmosphere and upbringing and then they shut down the Catholic churchs ability to give children a loving family atmosphere through Catholic charities? So minority children have to be sacrificed by the Gay community for the greater cause of Gay rights or there hatred of the Catholic church???
12:57 AM on 06/02/2011
Or you can look at it this way....OTHER organizations who obey the law take over.

Nobody is forcing the Catholics to do anything.

You really don't think the Catholic charities are the only ones out there, do you?
No loss to society if they quit.
09:40 AM on 06/02/2011
My guess is the state of IL will have to take over. I don't know any humanist organizations that provide services for a loss.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Watching rock grow
FE = Iron, and Female = Iron Male :)
08:24 PM on 06/01/2011
Disgusting!