THE BLOG
08/09/2012 10:23 am ET | Updated Oct 09, 2012

Seeing Gun Violence Through International Eyes

I happened to be away on a vacation to Europe when the horrendous news of the shooting in an Aurora, Colorado movie theater showing the Batman movie came across the news. The only real television media outlet available was BBC news, which covered the shooting of 71 people and the killing of 12 non-stop for days. But beyond just the horror of the story itself, I was struck by the tone of all the international reporting on the incident-- every news story, from print to television, ended with incredulity that the shooter had gotten his two handguns, shotgun, assault-style rifle, and high-capacity clips legally.

It's not a tone seen in mainstream media reporting in the United States, where the issue of gun control is the third rail of politics and media coverage. That understandably shocked reaction at the ease in which people can legally get guns and ammunition is almost always missing in the American coverage of gun violence. It barely made a blip on the radar in January 2011 when Rep. Gabby Giffords (D-Ariz.) was shot in the head by a man who used a high-capacity 30-round magazine, which he also used to shoot 19 people and kill a federal judge and 5 others. It has also been largely missing from the coverage of the recent shooting in outside of Milwaukee, Wisconsin this week at a Sikh temple that killed six people and wounded three others using a 9-millimeter, semi-automatic pistol.

Seeing America's gun violence epidemic through international eyes really drove home the absurdity of gun control politics in this country. Even the most basic talk of trying to curtail obvious problems, like high-capacity clips and assault rifles, is met is screams of "2nd Amendment remedies" and stockpiling of these dangerous weapons that have no practical use for personal protection or casual sport hunting. The powerful lobbying group, the National Rifle Association, even shuts down talk of closing dangerous loopholes for gun shows that allow buyers to circumvent background checks.

Gun control conversations, despite the repeated violence we see in our country, not just in these mass shootings but also every day in cities across America, simply cannot be had in a meaningful way.

Hearing in-depth discussions on why anyone would need high-capacity clips or automatic weapons for any legitimate reason from these international news sources only further drove home the realities of our broken system and our inability to fix it -- or even talk about it.

Instead, we as a nation pretend that our current situation with high powered weapons that can kill large numbers of people quickly is somehow still at all comparable to what our constitutional forefathers foresaw when they lived in a time of muzzle-loaded rifles that fired a single shot and took a long time to reload.

While crazy people intent on doing violence will undoubtedly find a way to hurt people, the outcomes and causalities of those events would be vastly different if we still lived in those muzzle-loading colonial times as opposed to an age where weapons of mass carnage can be legally purchased by anyone with enough money. We as a nation must step back, stop screaming at each other, and look for real solutions to the ever-growing problem of gun violence. A small dose of that international incredulity could go a long way in cooling the overheated rhetoric that has for too long defined our country's relationship with guns.

Subscribe to the Politics email.
How will Trump’s administration impact you?