More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Cocoa Popps

Cocoa Popps

Posted: January 7, 2011 11:30 AM

The Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN) launched successfully, ranking third after the networks ESPN and USA among women in the age range of 25-54 during its first block of primetime programming. This debut dispelled speculation that Winfrey wouldn't be able to pull off this major media event, and is an impressive feat by anyone -- let alone a black woman. And though I'm enjoying some of the offerings, I was hoping OWN would display ethnic diversity in a way that historically hasn't always been reflected on The Oprah Winfrey Show. I found myself disappointed.

Winfrey's built an empire with her "cross-over appeal" because we all know that if you're a black person who wants to be A-list, it's important to be mainstream. Just ask Will Smith. Is there anything wrong with it? Not really, it's just part of the game. And Winfrey, who's been long criticized by some in the black community for not providing black experts a platform and jump-starting careers the way she has for Dr. Phil and Nate Berkus among others, has played this game like Serena Williams on her best day. She's been lobbing her intellect, business savvy and talent across the net of a white male dominated industry, defining and redefining television with vision. And yes, Winfrey did give spiritual teacher Iyanla Vanzant a chance back in the day that Vanzant admittedly sabotaged, but have we seen any other people of color since then (besides Winfrey's "bestie", Gayle King) springboard into super stardom via an association with her? Nope. It's a situation that feels parallel to that of the black men who get burned by one black woman and then decide we all suck. I understand the politics behind the makings of a black mogul, but when one attains that level of black power I would certainly like to see it used to provide a platform for more ethnic and cultural diversity because there still isn't enough on network or cable television, particularly in leading roles.

NBC canceled Undercovers, and the future of its drama, The Event, starring Blair Underwood looks questionable. And though cable television is doing a better job with diverse casting it also needs to open more doors. On an episode of the USA network show Psych the character Shawn, (James Roday, whose actually half Mexican but plays a white guy), makes a revealing quip, telling the character Gus, (Dule' Hill) he's the only black male lead on cable television. (That may actually not be true depending how you categorize Andre Braugher's role on TNT's Men of a Certain Age, but it still raises a good point.) So though Winfrey's new venture is a partnership with Discovery channel, the network is still black OWNed, and with a black female CEO, Christina Norman, it possesses an opportunity to provide smart programming relating to ethnic viewers; not only with the content but with the hosts of the shows as well. Time will tell if the winner of Your OWN Show will be a person of color. If that happens it will be great, and I'll want to see more.

Winfrey is not a black brand but she's still a black woman with a significant voice. I would like to see her leverage that and add more brown faces to her circle of media friends. More recently Winfrey's talk show has had a better amalgamation of guests and experts of color, but her empire is still marketed to a middle class white audience, as are most networks. So though we don't know all of what's coming down the pike on OWN, it's not surprising that currently there's virtually no ethnic diversity in the line-up of talent. Okay Lisa Ling has a show, but this makes me recall that time I spoke to a white network executive about the lack of diversity of writers for the channel's website, but pointed out that the one Asian person was a start. He just shrugged, verifying my observations that many have subconsciously dismissed Asians as being people of color. Well they are, but I would like to see even more diversity on OWN. It's not about Winfrey proving her ethnic solidarity as a black woman, but about using unprecedented power to provide unprecedented opportunity.

This is not to knock Winfrey, but to appeal to her. Women of color support Winfrey as well, and we have middle class money and tastes too. So it would be great for the audience and advantageous to the network if we could see reflections of ourselves and experiences on OWN. Winfrey got a black man in the White House so it's time to wield that clout and put some more brown faces on TV. Though some argue she has no obligation to diversify her programming I disagree. Winfrey clearly believes in the value of diversity in media having bankrolled several black projects including the films Beloved and The Great Debaters as well as the Broadway musical The Color Purple, so I would love to see this commitment translate to her channel.

Winfrey has enough power now not to have to play the game so hard anymore. Winfrey, you won. So let us all enjoy your victory and OWN your power to provide programming that reflects and respects the ethnic diversity of the world in which we live. (After all isn't being inclusive part of living your best life?) I'll keep watching OWN and keep hoping. Will you?

 

Follow Cocoa Popps on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CocoaPopps

The Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN) launched successfully, ranking third after the networks ESPN and USA among women in the age range of 25-54 during its first block of primetime programming. This debut ...
The Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN) launched successfully, ranking third after the networks ESPN and USA among women in the age range of 25-54 during its first block of primetime programming. This debut ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 57
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:52 AM on 01/18/2011
I write about "urban" pop culture and typically "urban" is used to refer to African Americans-so those are the issues I write about, and that is the perspective from which I write-unapologetically. In this piece when I say brown faces, I do mean Black, Latino, Indian, etc. but yes, I also mean that I'd like to see more African American faces on television. My apologies for the "whose' typo mentioned. And when I say Roday plays a white man-it's not because he doesn't portray stereotypes as a Mexican American, but because both parents of his character are white. I do realize that diversity means gay/lesbian/disabled, and more-and that the term is not limited to race, but in this piece it is. Thanks so much for reading, sharing and debating!
04:44 PM on 01/14/2011
I think Oprah is just thinking from a financial status. She like a lot of white network executives believe blacks do not get ratings. I wish the OWN network was more diverse.
www.everwaywoman.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robjh1
That Job Just Isn't Into You!
02:46 PM on 01/10/2011
OWN is new and it will take time for the network to build a solid foundation and audience. It's still days old. Time will tell how OWN evolves. We can't be to quick to start wanting immediate changes. Making a suggestion is one thing but altering the entire format is another. Plus, Oprah is true to what she feels and sees. Loyalty is key. You must appeal to the mainstream or stay behind the rest. At the end of the day it's about money. Who knows this better than the O.
11:56 AM on 01/10/2011
OK, I get it. Since black people make up 13% of the population, they should have 13% of TV appearances, 13% of novels should be written for/about blacks, 13% of NBA players should be black, and there should be 13% black participation in all human endeavors in this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VanessaFas
11:15 AM on 01/10/2011
Maybe she's not who she says she is. Rarely are public figures, right? Maybe she was the powerful female black voice on network TV. But as a network owner, she's playing to the ratings masses, and not even trying to give female black voices more power. Or employ more smart black men. It may be all about success and money. It often is.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
scholasticus
I don't have to believe your "-ism".
07:45 AM on 01/10/2011
Oprah has made a billion dollars by getting white folks to confess their wickedness, in front of a white audience!
01:28 AM on 01/10/2011
I'm confused. Are you viewing the same OWN network that I am? First, I agree with mfrantom's comment. I don't think Oprah went into this venture to tick off the number of people in different race categories. I believe she is looking for quality first. Secondly, for gosh sakes, it's only been up and running for one week! It takes time to develop shows and to get into a rhythm of programming what viewers want.

So far, I love it.
photo
mfrantom
Proud Veteran, Minority, Southern and Conservative
11:00 AM on 01/09/2011
Maybe she isn't looking at what a person's race is! Maybe, just maybe, she is looking at talent.
08:30 AM on 01/11/2011
Yep and as we all know, whites are the only ones with talent in this world right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
02:52 AM on 01/09/2011
"whose actually half Mexican but plays a white guy" Just maybe he is a white man who is playing a white man, there is no reason why one can't be both Mexican and white.
photo
lcr999
scientist
10:19 PM on 01/09/2011
Correct

Not to mention the proper contraction for "who is" is " who's" not "whose". Whose is the possessive form of who.
07:29 AM on 01/10/2011
This statement annoyed me in the story.
Is he "playing a white guy" because he doesn't "act Mexican" or talk like the housekeeper on Family Guy?

I thought what was important is getting diversity onto television. Not "how they're acting" because not everyone behaves stereotypically by their race.
12:36 AM on 01/09/2011
Who cares, she has the best record so far as I'm concern, and a great role model! What the heck she is human not Jesus Christ!
08:31 AM on 01/11/2011
Jesus Christ was human too!
photo
FTracy3
My micro-bio is as empty as the rest of my life.
08:37 PM on 01/08/2011
You can't just do a head/face count, for a true measure of diversity you also have to measure the star power along with the ethnicity. Since Oprah is in her own stratosphere, if she wants to she can take up several of the scale balancing African American slots. For those who are not familiar with the current cable network affirmative action value formula (subject to frequent change):
1 Oprah=6 Rachel Rays=5 Lisa Lings=3 Ellen Degeneres=15 Montel Williams=23 Maury Povitches= 26 Mo'Niques= = 4 Regis Philbins=14 Kelly Ripas=20 George Lopezes =137Jerry Springers
03:55 PM on 01/08/2011
By diversity you mean more Blacks right ? Cause that's what diversity is code for when uttered by white liberals or blacks. Until you fight for Asians, Indians, Hispanics to also gain more air time, even if its at the expense of Blacks, then and only then will I support your stance.
09:48 AM on 01/09/2011
I'm a Black woman, I'll support you on that.
04:24 PM on 01/09/2011
Its good to know that at least one black person understands my position !
01:41 PM on 01/08/2011
Oprah's resume doesn't list her job as a community activist.
In the US, ~13% of the population is ethnically African-American or African - and ~13% are Hispanic. (Around 3% are Asian.) So the reality is that a whopping 87% of potential TV viewers are not Black. Few companies create a business model based on 13% of a potential demographic (unless that group is defined by their wealth). This may not be the social ideal, but it's the commercial and financial reality. It's not always about race - but it's always about $$$.
10:51 AM on 01/08/2011
I have friends who quit watching Oprah because she favors blacks on her show. Go figure!
08:33 AM on 01/11/2011
She favors Blacks? Are they watching the same Oprah is there is another Oprah we all don't know about because I hardly see Blacks on Oprah's show. I see more Blacks on Nate and Dr Phil than I see on Oprah Winfrey
09:45 AM on 01/08/2011
I completly agree with this she has a fan base why not expand it even more.