iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Will Kryder
 

Mitt's Battle: How Santorum, Gingrich and Paul Are Good for Romney and Hurt Obama

Posted: 01/06/12 02:15 PM ET

Perhaps the most common assertion coming out of Iowa is that such an evenly divided Republican field represents a victory for President Obama, and corroborates the notion that Mitt Romney is unable to find widespread support in his own party. Pundits from across the spectrum pointed to the circus as evidence of a divided electorate, with the inevitable nominee (Romney) unable to form a quorum around his agenda. While the Republicans bicker, Obama just sits back and waits for term number two.

Unfortunately, both common sense and history fly directly in the face of this argument. Just four years ago John McCain sealed up his nomination literally months before the bitter, caustic primary battle of Obama v. Clinton had resolved itself. Clintonites vowed to vote for McCain in the general election should Obama steal the primaries - we know how that turned out.

Similarly, John Kerry faced a light challenge in the 2004 primary. John Edwards was able to slip in a few wins through regional popularity in the Carolinas and Wesley Clark won Oklahoma by a percent, but after Iowa and New Hampshire - both won by Kerry - it was pretty much a done deal. In 1996, Bob Dole won 44 states in the primary. Al Gore literally cruised in 2000. The conservative elite has also been quick to note that Reagan - whose deification in the GOP has made his story more-or-less the Republican presidential playbook - was unable to win Iowa in 1980 (losing to his future V.P, George H.W.).

But it's been Romney's perceived "wall" of 25% support that has been most often cited as evidence of his limited appeal. In their view, and in spite of his victory, it says more that he couldn't get beyond that stubborn hurdle of ¼ support. Fair point, until you actually consider history again. According to the National Journal, the eventual GOP frontrunner has averaged 25.8% of the popular vote in the Iowa Caucus since 1980. Romney finished at 24.6 - par for the course. Furthermore, Romney's victory came in spite of the relatively small amount of time he spent campaigning in the Hawkeye State, unlike his chief competitor Rick Santorum, who had focused his resources almost exclusively on Iowa.

Still, even viewed through the most favorable lens, Romney's Iowa victory was too close for comfort - ensuring that the field will remain somewhat competitive at least through South Carolina. Yet there is a strong case that a protracted primary actually helps his chances in November. True, the mudslinging has dealt some blows to the Romney image, but these criticisms - namely that he is a flip-flopper and that he is in the pocket of Wall Street - will increase tenfold in the general election regardless. A primary fight will only serve to toughen and immunize him for when the Democrats unleash invective on him six months from now.

It doesn't hurt Romney that the more time the average voter spends looking at Mitt's well coifed hair and immaculate dental features, the more time he gets to articulate his case to them. For his part, Barack Obama has been decidedly OUT of the spotlight for the first time since his days in the Senate. If, as the pundits have asserted, Obama is content to just let the GOP infighting continue unabated, why did he show up looking like he was 72 to give a webcast speech to the Iowa Caucus on Tuesday?

Meanwhile, the immensely stratified Republican field has strengthened its connective tissue. True, Santorum, Paul and Romney represent three very different factions of the GOP, but the areas in which they do overlap - the debt crisis and ousting Obama -- will be articulated threefold to the American electorate over the coming months. In other words, these perceived party fractures end up ultimately solidifying message.

The long-term stratification of the GOP is a whole other can of worms -- something that I'll be focusing on as I traverse the Granite State covering the primary. If you're a Republican prognosticator it's hard to feel sanguine about the future of the party. But this election is its own story, and the best thing that could happen to Mitt at this point is to get toughened up in South Carolina and beyond. If he's got the nomination secured - and let's face it, he is going to win - what's the rush?

Will Kryder has been covering politics in Washington D.C. as a researcher for author Ron Suskind since 2009. This is his first piece for Off the Bus, with more to follow through the New Hampshire Primary. If you would like to contribute as a citizen journalist to the Huffington Post's coverage of the 2012 elections, please write to us at www.offthebus.org

 
Perhaps the most common assertion coming out of Iowa is that such an evenly divided Republican field represents a victory for President Obama, and corroborates the notion that Mitt Romney is unable to...
Perhaps the most common assertion coming out of Iowa is that such an evenly divided Republican field represents a victory for President Obama, and corroborates the notion that Mitt Romney is unable to...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:32 AM on 01/07/2012
I really don't think the examples of history prove anything. In the examples used, it was only division among two candidates, not the countless numbers involved in Republican primaries. Also, correlation does not prove causation. Just because there was a division in the primary followed by a win later on, it does not prove at all that divisions in the primaries lead to success in the general election. Many who support Santorum do so for his evangelical Christian values, values which do not go along with Romney's Mormonism. There is even talk that Gingrich and Perry should step aside to unite the evangelical Christians behind Santorum against Romney. I'm not saying for sure whether or not Romney will lose out on a majority or any of the votes for being Mormon, but I think there is a high possibility this might happen, and I don't think history says otherwise.
12:14 AM on 01/07/2012
Kryder has written a thoughtful piece. We need an election badly in this country, and a toughened-up Romney will look pretty good to the right-center, which reps 75%, not 1%.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjirish44
11:41 PM on 01/06/2012
Will you are soo wrong. The more people see of Romney the more he looks like an empty suit. Did you see Romney speech after winning Iowa. Who was he trying to convince when he talked about loving the hyms of the star spangled banner? Romney can't hide his pandering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dandy12
Moderate, Progressive fiscal conservative.
11:35 PM on 01/06/2012
What ever happened to the axiom, "divide and conquer"? Such a divisive party with no real strong front runner is a sign that within the party itself that a weakness exists. All of the frontrunners perceive each other as flawed, and their supporters tend to share this perception.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montreauxg
Control freaks are losing control
09:04 PM on 01/06/2012
But c'mon. The mass media and typical American voter loves Romney! Please continue your bipartisan support of undeclared wars, banker bailouts, and the Patriot Act/NDAA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Binea
Only a fool denies she is a fool, I am no fool
08:46 PM on 01/06/2012
pssst dear media..wanna see fox news apologize to Obama and support him ? help us nominate Ron Paul.
they treasure their wars more than the economy or anything else..and Obama will keep them going
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
05:07 PM on 01/06/2012
I really don't see the connection between the Obama/Clinton battle in 2008 and what we are seeing and going to see in 2012 with the Republicans.

Number 1 the mud thrown between Obama and Clinton will look like feathers compared to the bombs that will be thrown by the Repubs.

And second Romney is no where near the candidate Obama was in 2008. Sure Repubs will hold their noses and vote for him but he will not get the independent vote.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim jones 2011
06:20 PM on 01/06/2012
are you kidding?

thew nukes that team obama threw at the clintons - racists/corrupt/liars will NEVER be forgiven by actual Democrats and supporters of the Clintons.

the repubs will never go that far. no one ever did before.

it has this dem dying to vote for mitt....
photo
Imago1122
Hurry up, we're dreaming
07:30 PM on 01/06/2012
Mitt is vowing to overturn Roe v Wade and the ACA. Mitt doesn't support the repeal of DADT. Mitt was 47th out of 50 in job creation at a time the economy was still in half decent shape. Mitt won't release his tax returns. Mitt's shape shifting is more diaphanous than the whirling of the Northern Lights. Mitt's staff cleared their hard drives when he was leaving Beacon Hill, something never done before.

Do you want more?

Mitt's record at Bain Capital has been a heart stopping exaggeration of success. Mitt tells untruths. Mitt's tax proposals inordinately support the 1%. Mitt doesn't believe a bureau that will protect consumers from nefarious banks and credit card companies. Mitt poll tests his positions. Mitt made the lives of many people incredibly sad while he was at Bain.

And you call yourself a Democrat?

Well, since you say you're dying to vote for Mitt, I do hope that when you reach the other side, you don't shed too many tears because he didn't win the election.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
paid trawler
reply to me for a half penny
09:43 PM on 01/06/2012
i love when a wizened puma slithers out now and again, nice to see you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kfodom
08:40 PM on 01/06/2012
Yeah, and remember that no matter how nasty things got between Clinton and Obama back in '-9, around seven in ten Democrats were committed to vote for the party's nominee no matter who it was. Now, can Romney REALLY say that?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:48 PM on 01/06/2012
Apart from the key difference - in the prolonged Clinton-Obama grind both candidates were capable and made sense. Now we've got the semi-suitable Romney and a crowd of complete clowns (unless Hunstman does something to cling on in NH).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littleolwinemakerme
Put A Cork In It!
04:08 PM on 01/06/2012
I'm so proud that you found a use for stratified & stratification, really highlights your writing chops. Not!
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
03:17 PM on 01/06/2012
Wrong.
The infighting will write President Obama's re-election ads.
03:16 PM on 01/06/2012
disagree. santorum, paul and newt are going to pull romney into extremist right territory. walking back to the middle in the general election is going to be very difficult for the mittster.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim jones 2011
06:22 PM on 01/06/2012
VOTERS WILL SEE HE IS NO RIGHT WING FREAK AND VOTE FOR HIM because OF THIS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shauni Waterdragon
Squeak now or forever hold your peas.
08:27 PM on 01/06/2012
He personifies the 1 percent. He's going down.