More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Will Perez, PhD

Will Perez, PhD

Posted: February 5, 2010 01:29 PM

Obama's Message to Undocumented Immigrants: No Se Puede

What's Your Reaction:

It's quite possible that President Obama's omission of a comprehensive immigration reform agenda in his State of the Union address is exactly the spark that immigration reform proponents needed to reinvigorate their efforts. Activist groups are drawing on their frustrations to develop new campaigns to bring immigration reform back to the forefront, as illustrated by Illlinois Representaive Luis Gutierrez's visit to Olvera Street in Los Angeles.

This single event brought together representatives from a broad array of immigration reform supporters, like the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, labor unions, immigrant advocacy organizations and student activist groups. A similar trend seems to be occurring in other places, such as Illinois, where a student group, the Immigrant Youth Justice League, raised $243,000 on Saturday to bring 10,000 marchers to Washington, DC next month to lobby for immigration reform.

Perhaps neglecting to lay out an immigration reform agenda in his State of the Union address was the best thing president Obama could have done for immigration reform. The pressure on the president and on Congress will certainly continue to increase as a result.

When presidential candidate Barack Obama began his surge in the polls over a year ago, he captured the imagination of an entire nation with the phrase, "Yes we can," or "Si se Puede." Many across the country were energized. Few, however, recognized its origins and the significance it holds for immigrant Latinos. As I listened to Obama's State of the Union speech last week, it dawned on me that when it came to immigration reform, President Obama's message had changed from "Yes we can," to "No se puede," or "It can't be done."

Possibly in an effort to invigorate the Latino vote, Obama's campaign crafted a slogan inspired by the rally cry of immigrant agricultural workers fighting for labor rights. United Farm Workers (UFW) co-founders Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta adopted the motto Si se Puede, or "Yes we can," in the 1970s for their labor rights campaigns to demand fair wages and better working conditions for agricultural workers. In the Latino community the term has come to symbolize the struggle against all forms of exploitation. Today it is a phrase that has reemerged to galvanize undocumented students across the country in their fight for access to citizenship and higher education.

It is precisely for that reason that many immigrant rights advocates were deeply disappointed by the near absence of an immigration reform agenda in the state of the union address. Understandably, the central theme of the speech was economic growth. In line with this goal, recent studies released by UCLA, USC, and the Public Policy Institute of California demonstrate the economic benefits of providing a path to legalization to undocumented immigrants. Current national polls as of November 2009 indicate that two-thirds of Americans favor providing a path to legalization to undocumented immigrants, yet Obama's and Congress' position remains the same: "No se puede."

The continuing neglect of immigration reform not only ignores countless studies about the economic benefits, it also ignores the hardship endured by millions who live in American society as de facto second-class citizens, and the ongoing intellectual loss of thousands of talented college-going undocumented students. Often referred to as DREAMERs, whose hopes and aspirations are tied to the passing of the Dream Act, they have been waiting for almost ten years for the opportunity to gain legalization and contribute to the economic vitality of American society. As chronicled in my recent book, We ARE Americans: Undocumented Students Pursuing the American Dream, many DREAMERs exhibit the same drive and determination that led recent famous immigrants to this country -- people such as Jerry Yang, the co-founder of Yahoo, or Sergei Brin, the co-founder of Google -- to create Fortune 500 companies that employ thousands of American workers and donate millions of dollars to social causes. In light of overwhelming research evidence and public support for providing a path to legalization to the undocumented, I remind Congress and President Obama: Yes we can, Si se Puede!

 
 
 
It's quite possible that President Obama's omission of a comprehensive immigration reform agenda in his State of the Union address is exactly the spark that immigration reform proponents needed to rei...
It's quite possible that President Obama's omission of a comprehensive immigration reform agenda in his State of the Union address is exactly the spark that immigration reform proponents needed to rei...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Lloyd
07:54 AM on 03/07/2010
Maybe I'm nuts but it seem to me there's a direct link between the unemployment rate and the increase in illegals: as illegals increase, more Americans lose their jobs.

In other words, if we rid ourselves of the 20 million illegals, wouldn't there be more jobs?
08:30 AM on 02/08/2010
How much longer are Americans going to be made fools of? The county is in shambles and if we don't
wake up soon we are going to become a third world county. Its bad enough we are controlled by
everything but how many of us Americans have proper access to enough food medical care and housing
when is enough enough?
03:40 PM on 02/06/2010
Immigration reform needs to consist of the following:

A total clam down on employers that hire illegal immigrants, including massive fines and possible jail time. Of course, the government will need to come with an easy and foolproof way for employers to quickly verify the status of any worker they are about to hire.

Family reunification needs to be eliminated except for the children of US citizens that are under 18. Most US immigration falls under the family reunification policy. It is next to impossible to get a green card unless you fall under the family reunification category.

Eliminate H1B visa program which keeps many foreign workers in indentured servitude to one employer for six years.

Implement a points based for immigration like in Canada and Australia. The government would issue a list of occupations that are in job supply in America once a year. You get points for having a degree, work experience in the field, your age (the younger the more points) and the ability to speak English.

Immigration should also be reduced when the economy is in a downturn like know or can be increased when the unemployment rate is very low.

Why can't our government do this? I think this type of reform would get a lot of support from most Americans but of course not from immigrant special interest groups.
08:24 PM on 02/06/2010
I agree! That makes sense. Family reunification should be limited to the closest family members; children under 18, husband/wive. Point system works in every country that has it and it will bring wise, intelligent, well educated people; sorry but we have lots of uneducated people in this country and we don't need more of them to abuse our welfare system. Employers are the problems; as long as they will be greedy and keep hiring people for below the minimal wage those people will come, because they have nothing to lose and they just want to give their families better lives like everybody else in this country. Although, we need to give papers to those who have been living here for years; we cant separate families where one person have papers and the other doesn't. That would be just wrong, immoral and unamerican. We are the country of immigrants, our ancestors were immigrants and we need to give chance those people who are here as well, as our ancestors were given.
11:27 AM on 02/14/2010
That is already pretty much the case; as a legal immigrant from a European country it would take about 20 years to bring my siblings or parents to the US legally. That is because there are quotas for family members (except husband/wife and children), now the immigration form Europe is relatively low compared to Mexico or other Latin American countries. I recently heard on npr that you would have had to apply in 1983 in the Philippines as a sibling for the state department to even look at your case.

Trust me legal immigration for a husband is cumbersome and if you don't have the money (about $3000), time(about a year you are not allowed to visit the US), and legal skills (try for once to find out what you have to do, and trust me nothing will turn out the way it is described on any government homepage), you will not succeed.

Besides, I know legal immigrants from other countries than mine, and it is also tremendously beneficial to be white and male.
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
03:30 PM on 02/06/2010
Here is a bit of food for thought that ought to be part of the dialogue, but it never is.

A lot of sea rise and anthropogenic global warming skeptics are fond of waiting to see what happens if the climate goes or is already going over the tipping point or if sea levels actually rise significantly. They sometimes propose amazingly well coordinated mass migrations that would make everything ok. They even express sympathy for the poor living nearly at sea level and they are not uncharitable. Oddly, they are very often the same people screaming the loudest about illegal immigration.

It is conceivable that many undocumented workers in the U.S. are actually climate refugees -- who among us can say with certainty that spreading drought in agriculture dependent areas to the south is not the leading edge of permanent climate change? If they were called climate refugees,would we have a change of heart?

There are already some island nations that are actively seeking resettlement because sea rise is making their traditional home untenable. Are we ready to receive such people with the magnanimity and pragmatism that we claim, or do we demand that they look elsewhere? Are we even ready to absorb into inland areas Floridians who ponder their fate after notification that their home insurance is being cancelled? Should those without foresightful government and negotiated agreements be denied on a legal technicality? Where's the plan?
03:26 PM on 02/06/2010
No president would take on immigration reform in this economic climate. It would be political suicide. Think that the health care debate was divisive, watch what would happen with so called immigration reform.
02:55 PM on 02/06/2010
Democrats love the votes, and Republicans love the cheap labor.
10:08 AM on 02/08/2010
do you know any democrats with children, a kitchen floor or a lawn?
Linda from Deerfield
Paying attention
02:42 PM on 02/06/2010
If those who looked the other way and quietly condoned illegal immigration over the years had played their cards right, they would have made it clear to the public who expected housing to go up forever that the only way to make that happen would be to encourage more immigration to push demand from the bottom. I'm just saying. It's a really tough issue for good times, and it becomes an incredibly hot issue in tough times.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
purplet
01:21 PM on 02/06/2010
This is not the time to debate immigration- That would be enough to push people over the edge- It would be more harmful than helpful to start that debate-
03:23 AM on 02/06/2010
Si se puede HEAVILY fine those who hire ILLEGALS. Then the jobs would dry up and ILLEGALS would self-deport. This would open up jobs for American citizens and LEGAL immigrants. Si se puede use the BILLIONS that CA is now spending on ILLEGALS on our own. Si se puede get along just fine without ILLEGALS. They need to go back to their own countries and make life better for themselves and their fellow countrymen.
01:17 PM on 02/06/2010
NO SE PUEDE!!! It's interesting. when I called Luis Gutierrez's office last month after one of his tirades on legalizing illegals, I telephoned his office and asked the questions others on this blog are also asking: "why aren't you leading a coalition to go down to Mexico to demand better wages, education, heath care, affordable housing, etc......for all Mexican citizens rather than DEMANDING these priviliges from the United States for illegals?" The answer?....a telephone slammed in my ear! Why is the U.S. press giving the Mexican government a free ride? Why isn't the Mexican press going after Calderon, ex-pres Vincente, and all other cronies in the Mexican government. What have they done with all of the money the Mexican government takes in....especially from oil?.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
purplet
01:20 PM on 02/06/2010
I have asked the same questions- I am in CA -
01:36 PM on 02/06/2010
So true pvbeachbum.
08:03 PM on 02/06/2010
great, except some of the legal immigrants have wives or husbands who have no papers, so should they be separated? Should we break their lives and marriages? Is it OK to separate families? don't think so. Let's face it, when economy was great, we did not do anything about illegal immigrants, because we hire them and pay them minimum wages and we did not pay taxes, and now after we use them for years we want to kick them out of here. Sorry, but I think that it is wrong and immoral. We also need to remember that because of the broken immigration law many of those people who came to US legally became illegal. So, first of all we should blame ourselves, our employers and politicians for creating the problem. The sooner we fix it the better for us.
09:47 PM on 02/06/2010
People who choose to break the law are seperated from their families everyday. I don't care who we blame we just need to get all ILLEGALS no matter where they come from or who they are realted to out of our country!
09:41 AM on 02/07/2010
That is not true. Like it or not, president Bush did try to do something about the immigration problem. You know what happened? His party fought him tooth and nail. The dems were on board to support it but the conservatives in this country went nuts. NOw that was during good times. Can you imagine what would happen when we have a 9.7% unemployment rate what would happen?
We have to do something but I don't know how much would get accomplished now
10:37 PM on 02/05/2010
Immigration reform will not happen at any point during the Obama presidency. With unemployment and homelessness at historic highs, it will be tantamount to political hari kari for the Democratic Party to fight for foreigners who knowingly broke federal law and give them American jobs. This will not happen which why the illegal immigration amnesty movement is DOA and deservedly so.

What illegal immigrants need to do is protest in Mexico to create greater education and job opportunities for its own citizens. Protesting to be given more rights in America while waiving Mexican flags and chanting in Spanish has no chance in Hades of succeeding in this political environment.
05:04 PM on 02/05/2010
Bravo Mr. Perez!

January 2008 = Start of Deportaion/Starvation of good hard working Immigrants, and their "Leagal children"

January 2008 = Start of the "Worst Recession in U.S. History!


"Magic Repair" for our Economy? Fix what Really Broke it!

Si se Puede!

Yes We Can!

To: Good and Brotherhood from sea to shining sea!
05:28 PM on 02/05/2010
Yes, because this is exactly the good and brotherhood we all seek:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/05/BA431BT666.DTL&tsp=1
11:06 PM on 02/05/2010
Deportations started decades before 2008. January was the start of the Worst Recession in U.S. history? Let's try going back to the Great Depression period decades earlier.

With Americans scambling to find any work they can find with record unemployment and homelessness, do you really expect the President or any major political party to get behind giving illegal immigrants jobs that could be going to American citizens? Not a chance.
10:27 AM on 02/06/2010
Stupergenious;

The E-verify Law and the I.C.E. Deportaion program both started January 1st, 2008.

The worst "Recession" in U.S. History began at the exact same time, January 2008.

A Depression is not just a Recession, try first grade again?
(This time don't chew the pencil lead?)

Millions of Immigrants Dwellings were vacated literally overnight, after January 2008.

For simpletons that think they are smart, let me explain;

Phoenix Az. for example now has approx: 30% less Tax Base, than as counted all along by the U.S. Census Bureau to base the size of our Government Services on.
The State is now Gutting Government/trying to raise Taxes to match their now Smaller Base.

Besides "Triggering" the home Forclosure Crash of our Banking System, and puttting a massive hole in the "Real Estate Bubble" these Immigrants now vacated Dwellings, either homes or apartments, have made Phoenix approx: 30% overbuilt, Completly Halting Construction and Growth, causing Arizona to have the highest number of lost Const. related jobs in the entire Country.

In short the Hard Labor these Immigrants do is Vital to our Strong Economy!

Though Narrow minded people say Americans want these jobs, The TRUTH is they DON'T!

Fact: These Immigrants Hard Devoted Labor supports All other Jobs!

A wise 1840's French Historian said: "America is great, because it is good, when it ceases to be good, it ceases to be great."

To: Liberty.
08:13 PM on 02/06/2010
well, they already have jobs, so I don't see how they would get our jobs; they already have them. I think that we should leave them alone, give those people papers, so at least they will pay taxes. What we should do though, is to lower the levels of immigration when we have bad economy and make sure that the borders are secured well, so the problem won't continue. We should make sure that the new immigrants will not be eligible for the well fare system until they become at least permanent residents, and they should learn English before they would be given citizenship. Dear immigrants you need to change too, don't go to Washington and protest in Spanish, don't wave Mexican flags for God sake, and you my dear fellow Americans stop whining, be human beings and stop breaking families and peoples lives!
04:57 PM on 02/05/2010
Let's hope it continues to be 'No Se Puede.'

Americans are not obligated to rewards criminals, and that is what illegal immigrants are, straight and simple.

That they should be clamoring for further rewards is extremely ridiculous. They should be content they aren't rounded up and forced to go back to where they came from.
10:40 AM on 02/06/2010
These are not Criminals Loolylu, these are good Hard Working "Humans" mostly family units with Citizen Children.

We need to remember the "Good" Principles and "Values" that built our Great Nation.

The U.S. Border Patrol used to maintain water stations in the U.S. desert to help these Immigrants on their rough journey here.

P.S. When Americans live together unmarried/Ilegally are they criminals?

After a few years they are considered "Common Law Married" Legally.

Perhaps after a few years these parents of citizen children are "Common Law Citizens?

They definitly deserve to be treated as "Human Beings"!

To: The Good America.
01:39 PM on 02/06/2010
David ILLEGAL ALIENS make up 20% ouf our prision population in CA. Are these people "hard working "with "good principles and values"? ILLEGAL ALIENS are human beings - human beings that need to go BACK to their own countries and be "hard working" there.
03:19 PM on 02/06/2010
The people that hire illegal immigrants are also criminals. For years and years the US government has turned a blind while illegal immigration continued to grow. I guess when you're getting huge campaign contributions from companies that hire illegals that's what happens.
04:06 PM on 02/05/2010
"Perhaps neglecting to lay out an immigration reform agenda in his State of the Union address was the best thing president Obama could have done for immigration reform. "

Not as far as I can see. Ignoring a problem is never going to address it. The health care/insurance reform never addressed this. So the illegal imigrants should return to their country of origin if they get sick? Can the extremely poor afford to return to Meico for treatment? If they don't make it before burial or treatment...what then? If they infect citizens in the US before they make it back to Mexico what then? Wo pays for the poor that infected...I am guessing it's not the corporations that employ them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:50 PM on 02/05/2010
Why pass new immigration laws if nobody bothered to adhere to the last ones passed.
03:07 PM on 02/05/2010
Simple question is did you imigrate legally or illegally.
08:32 PM on 02/06/2010
many people immigrated legally, but because of the immigration law they were often forced to become illegal.