William Bradley

William Bradley

Posted: November 27, 2009 10:25 AM

Heads Should Roll Over Obama State Dinner Security Breach

What's Your Reaction?

It turns out to be shockingly easy to assassinate President Barack Obama.

In a fabulous show of security, it emerged late Wednesday that a pair of reality show contestants succeeded in crashing the Obamas' first state dinner. One posted photos of the couple with Vice President Joe Biden and White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, who she referred to as "Ron," on her Facebook page.

Amusing though it may seem, this situation is very serious, and totally unacceptable. Heads should roll over this.

President Barack Obama hosted Prime Minister Singh of the Republic of India at a State Dinner on November 24, 2009.

It's great that his Secret Service detail liked Obama enough to give him the watch they wear for his 46th birthday two years ago, a watch he wears constantly -- it's a terrific watch, I have one -- but this is ridiculous.

Especially since Obama, the first black president, assailed by right-wing extremists as illegitimate, gets far more death threats than any previous president.

The guy, who easily penetrated White House security, looks like a total dweeb. Not that appearances mean much. But the reality is that the woman, who also easily penetrated White House security, could have been a serious threat, too.

Let me tell you a little story.

As a political writer, I have frequently penetrated various security schemes to get to a principal. I'm recalling now a cover story I did for the LA Weekly a decade ago on Michael Milken, the infamous global financier. His handlers, Democrats all, imagined I was out to demolish him. Not exactly so. I viewed him as a flawed genius. But they granted no access. So I took to finding out where he would be, showing up there, and chatting with him.


A spokeswoman for Bravo says the couple who crashed a White House state dinner were trying to get on a reality TV show.

In the end, I easily penetrated his big dinner at the Century Plaza Hotel in Los Angeles, despite not having an invitation. What I did have was one of my Armani suits and an authoritative yet polite attitude. Even though Milken's security was seemingly everywhere.

It was child's play, actually, and, notwithstanding his vaunted, and very high-priced, Hollywood security detail, I ended up talking with Milken for 20 minutes as his handlers looked on in dismay.

A skilled person can nose around any situation. It's the role of security to minimize the ability to do that.

It's never occurred to me to penetrate a state dinner at the White House, where I've been several times with appropriate clearance during the Bill Clinton days. I've been to a great many snazzy events, and my observation is that they generally do not live up to their billing, though of course it's always nice to be there. Except when it's a bore.

But if I lived on the East Coast rather than the West Coast, and cared about not being invited to the first state dinner of the Obama era, I see now that I've been missing out.

Evidently all you need is a very nice suit, a pretty blonde, and a bit of attitude. None of which are all that hard to pull off.

So, how could this go very badly for America?

Let's count the ways.


Death threats are mounting against Obama and liberal Democrats. Watch Fox News commentator Glenn Beck "role play" an assassination of Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

One could deploy a biological weapon such as anthrax or a radiological weapon. Yet, the reality is that one would not have to be able to do any of that to assassinate President Obama. A fairly pudgy far right blogger, or a benighted admirer of Al Qaeda, would still be able to pull that off.

All that is needed is to get within a few feet of the president.

And it does not require a gun.

Frankly, even the yutz who accompanied the blonde in crashing Obama's first state dinner could have wreaked havoc. We see pix of the couple with Biden and Emanuel. Their deaths would have been disrupting enough.

Now, the White House says that there was no danger for the president because everyone went through a magnetometer.

That's actually rather amusing.

You don't need a gun to kill the president. You don't even need a fork or a knife -- and those were available on every table at that state dinner -- to pull off an assassination. All you need is a few feet of access and a pair of strong and knowledgeable hands.

Now, I don't want to unnecessarily alarm people. But this president has done any number of things to seriously piss off a great many folks.

From the international far left, in the form of Islamic jihadists who have designs on Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq, to the domestic far right, which feverishly imagines that Obama isn't really an American at all, but is instead a fraud who owes his election to the manipulation of ACORN and answers to radical Islam. It's all nonsense, but it's dangerous nonsense.


The couple who crashed a White House dinner shouldn't need legal help, an attorney who knows them said Thursday, as the Secret Service remained quiet publicly about the incredible security breach.

I worry about Obama. The far right in this country -- which increasingly dominates the Republican Party (over 40% believe that Obama isn't really an American, and that the relatively powerless ACORN, somehow, bizarrely, stole the election for him) -- is bent on painting him as a "Manchurian Candidate" other.

The jihadist far left -- or is it really far right? -- is coming to realize that Obama is their worst nightmare. He is America's first black president, with an unusual name and an obvious affinity for the "other." Since he is the "other."

As Rachel Maddow pointed out a few months ago, when she merely replayed an assassination fantasy of an increasingly famous broadcaster, the notion of violence and even assassination is being played up in our political "discourse."

Both extremes -- the Glenn Becks and the Osama bin Ladens -- want this president gone. Both extremes are, whether they acknowledge it or not, setting the stage to rationalize an assassination.

If I were in the White House, given the overall situation and the extraordinary security lapses of this first state dinner, I would be sending some folks to guard snow plows in Antarctica this weekend. The snow plows that aren't being used in vain to try to stop ice shelves from breaking off into the ocean, that is. The stakes are simply too high to be nice about this.


You can check things during the day on my site, New West Notes ... www.newwestnotes.com.

 
 
Comments
319
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (7 total)
photo
hischagal   01:52 PM on 11/29/2009
There is NO excuse for this. These people should be sent packing, never to return again. The couple should be arrested and promptly put behind bars.
photo
BarryS   11:39 PM on 11/28/2009
Oh yes, and India should be pissed too. What country would send their head of state to the USA knowing that there are such security breeches.
photo
BarryS   11:38 PM on 11/28/2009
Someone is not so competent. We should find out who pronto. and fire them. or maybe send them to protect someone else like glenn beck.

Full disclosure and many many firings. ASAP.
Partisan59   09:03 PM on 11/28/2009
John F Kennedy died because the secret service blatantley failed to do their job properly. More than a few people held and hold the opinion that this failure was due to the culture of those in the service being more than a little sympathetic with those that wanted Kennedy gone.

Are we seeing a repeat of what happened with Kennedy?

I am not claiming that the officers of the service would deliberately allow anything to happen but if they are less than completely motivated then mistakes will occur.
Winning09   02:36 AM on 11/29/2009
More than a few people hold a lot of bogus opinions.

>>>> More than a few people held and hold the opinion that this failure was due to the culture of those in the service being more than a little sympathetic with those that wanted Kennedy gone.
Partisan59   07:01 PM on 11/29/2009
So are you saying the secret service acted competently protecting Kennedy?

Or are you saying that they are acting competently protecting Obama?

The failures speak for themselves so what are you saying?
photo
SpoonlessEddie   08:57 PM on 11/28/2009
Yes, there are ceramic guns. Knives, too. And explosive devices can be surgically implanted.

Bradley is 100% on the money. I hope our security people pick up on this, and take vigorous and enthusiastic action. This event was p-poor.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SadieGirl   08:51 PM on 11/28/2009
The Secret Service has shown a total lack of interest in their job of guarding this President, since day one. They show a total lack of professionalism. I bet there isn't one in today's Secret Service that would take a bullet for this President. It seems everytime he's out in the open, they almost distance themselves from him. Shame on them. Obama needs to clean house.
Winning09   02:37 AM on 11/29/2009
I don't think that's true at all.
Bluelynx   08:16 PM on 11/28/2009
I am sick of this lack of security. These people are jokes on the universe, social climbers, compulsive liars, self-absorbed bores. But the excuse is that "nothing happened". SO WHAT? Someone needs to pay for a mistake this grave.
MadxAsxHell   08:30 PM on 11/28/2009
Yes, but not this couple. Obama should THANK them for benignly finding this broad hole in security. Some butthead went to an Obama rally a month or two ago with a loaded gun. Think about the implications of a pro with a ceramic Glock that the metal detector doesn't pick up.

That the Secret Service is looking into preferring charges against them clearly is nothing but scapegoating their own f**kup.

I cannot think of ANY crime they committed--if ANY security person had asked them to leave they would have. All they wanted to do was meet the President and be photographed with him.

And even if they get charged, I would say Obama should immediately pardon them!
Winning09   02:38 AM on 11/29/2009
I think the answer isn't legal, it's social.

They should be shunned. The whole stupid "reality" celebrity culture needs to be rethought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent   08:11 PM on 11/28/2009
I think the Secret Service may have allowed this breach of presidential security as a way of sending a message to the President. It's clear that the security establishment has an agenda. It's not completely clear that the Secret Service is in on that agenda. But this may have been a way of reminding the President that he is vulnerable, and that his security can be compromised at will. It's hard to know what should be done, in the circumstances, but Federal prosecution of the gate-crashers is a good place to start.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GunnyJ   08:36 PM on 11/28/2009
Let's hope this is not their way of asking for more people or expanding their budget. If this turns out to be the case (like we'll know) then the President should fire SS Management because there are other ways to make your point. These people crashing this party also sends another type of message that is still disturbing to many Americans, another problem we need to work on. This whole situation is ridiculous! Professionalism should always come before a personal or group agenda...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
shutterbabe   12:20 AM on 11/29/2009
Querent,

An admirable theory but I think it is a far stretch of the imagination to believe Secret Security would intentionally chose this manner to alert President Obama to potential dangers.

The President knows he is vulnerable. I have heard others say that he is not fully invested in his position because of threats against him and his family.

Speculation, yes, but all we can do is just that-exercise our opinions, post impressions and read what others have concluded from this terrible breach of protocol against our President and every distinguished guest who attended Tuesday's State Dinner.
photo
Ironhelix   07:45 PM on 11/28/2009
careers should be ended over this.
aware4O   10:19 PM on 11/28/2009
Indeed. If you and I made this kind of mistake at work, even if it was not-security related, we would be gone. and forget about a recommendation!

this is definitely not fair.

i am still shaking over what could have happened. we do have a history.
Aneesia   07:14 PM on 11/28/2009
So some people screwed up. Nobody got hurt and there was a lesson learned !
People screw up some of the time. Homeland security that is supposed to defend our borders (?) screws up most of the time, heads should roll there !
Laserbeam   09:54 PM on 11/28/2009
Guarding the President of the United States of America IS homeland security.
laksa   06:34 PM on 11/28/2009
If they want a reality show so badly, how about one in jail? that should be good.
Laserbeam   09:54 PM on 11/28/2009
I agree.
laksa   06:33 PM on 11/28/2009
You know what? O is more accessible than Palin.
photo
NotMcCain   06:12 PM on 11/28/2009
So. True.

Magnetometers and perimeter checks? THAT'S what we're relying on to (incompetentlly) guard our President in the 21st century?

As you say, this couple wasn't screened for biological weapons or the kind of explosives that could have killed everyone there. (The Indian Prime Minister has his own numerous enemies).

Think about who was at that state dinner! Not to mention the next three people in the line of Presidential succession.

This president has received more death threats than any in our history. And he faces more ignorant and easily equipped haters who are being egged on to violence by the worst people in politics and the media.

And yet...in these circumstances....our President's life is apparently mostly dependent on.....LUCK????? (Even on Inauguration Day there were dangerous breaches in security as people entered behind the Washington Monument without any clearance check at all).

The SS and Homeland Security need to call in EXPERTS to revamp and tighten up procedures (and educate our President on its importance. He really should stop some of his completely risky activities--and also not be in the same place as Joe Biden.

From concern for their own personal safetys, "security" is the one thing that Bush and Cheney seem to actually have gotten right. Someone needs to get the Obama Administration to get far far more serious--more cautious and careful.
liveandlearn   08:58 PM on 11/28/2009
bush surely needed security with all the people he pissed off. but obama needs security, too.

what troubles me besides the secret service's obvious screw-up is how the supposed journalists and editors choose to fulfill the wishes of the fame seekers. stop showing their pictures and telling us about them.
Winning09   02:39 AM on 11/29/2009
Barack's staff screwed up, too.
JJK   05:53 PM on 11/28/2009
Every time Obama appears in public, there are a couple dozen doors, corridors, roofs, lobbies, kitchens, elevators, etc., that have to be secured. Every time he steps foot outside of his vehicle, there are multiple sight lines that have to be cleared against the threat of sharpshooters who can function, under the right circumstances, from as far away as a mile.

The fact that the Secret Service couldn't secure the person of the President at a State Dinner in the WH at, makes the above very scary and makes me worry. It is impossible now for me to have confidence in his safety and that makes me feel very bad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws   05:48 PM on 11/28/2009
Certainly a magnetometer isn't enough protection. Countless things are lethal and non-magnetic. On the other hand, the media coverage had vague references to other security protocols. At one point I had the impression that they were on a list of people who were cleared by the Secret Service to attend presidential events, and just not on the list of invitees to that particular event. That would probably mean that the Secret Service didn't fail too badly.

Also, the claim that all you need is "a pair of strong and knowledgeable hands" seems likely to be overstated. It's certainly possible to kill barehanded, but not instantaneously. There presumably are security people within a few feet of the president at all times, who would stop such an attempt.

The problems should be figured out and fixed. But I don't know enough to say whether that means reassigning people to Siberia or what. If someone was told to check names against a thousand-name list at a rate of three per second, the blame should go to whoever was responsible for the procedures and staffing, not the person who failed to check names.

Twitter Edition