Meet Don Draper, the protagonist/anti-hero of Mad Men.
The much acclaimed, if not so much watched, Mad Men makes a welcome return for its third season Sunday night. I've found the series, now the flagship show on AMC, a channel once best known as a reliable source for late night viewings of Commando, to be very compelling from the beginning, if not exactly action-packed.
There are a number of ways to view Mad Men. For my own part, I can take it as a period piece, a sort of time capsule of the early '60s, at once relatively close yet far enough away to be intriguing for its unfamiliarity. Or as an evocation of style, with the sort of glamour and cool associated with JFK and the early Bond films, in this case a New York variant including chain smoking, constant drinking, and sexual play continually tinged with sexual harassment.
It's a character study, as well, for the surface glitter of the persuader class and those who attend them masks confusion and lack of identity. That could also make it a cautionary tale, albeit one set during the height of the post-war expansion of American affluence.
Which makes it, in turn, a meditation on the American Dream, then and now. Not entirely unlike The Sopranos, on which Mad Men creator Matthew Weiner served as an Emmy-winning writer and producer. Well, except for the fact that Mad Men protagonist/anti-hero Don Draper is a charismatic and enigmatic New York ad man, not a perpetually depressed, poetically crude New Jersey mob boss.
Mad Men takes place in a fascinating transitional period which coincides with JFK's America. It's the time which reaches from a period of conformity, the late '50s, to a period of chaos, the late '60s.
The essential milieu of Mad Men is not all that admirable.
Mad Men is about advertising, which means it's about the American Dream, in a period in which the American Dream was being assembled and yet already starting to change.
Advertising is a fascinating industry, an intriguing window into our society and ourselves. It's how we are sold, and how we sell ourselves, on things. It both reflects and mutates life's fundamentals.
Mad Men examines what is real, what is artifice, and whether there is any real difference in modernized society.
As Don Draper puts it: "Advertising is based on one thing: Happiness. It's the smell of a new car. It's freedom, from fear. It's a billboard that screams the reassurance that, whatever you're doing, it's okay."
Goldfinger's "Into Miami" track captures the swanky materialism and sensuality that Mad Men is headed toward.
Don Draper is the Connery Bond as ad exec, charismatic, confident to the point of arrogance, commanding. But that's only on the first couple of layers. Beneath, he is in turmoil, literally a man not himself. He is really, or rather, he really was, Dick Whitman, product of an abusive and impoverished background who joined the Army to get away from it all, only to find himself in the crucible of the Korean War. Where he seized the main chance, a quirk of fate, a combat accident he inadvertently helped cause that allowed him to assume the identity of Don Draper, a well-educated officer near the end of his tour.
In the series pilot, which Matthew Weiner, a former comedy writer clearly very taken with the period and his themes, used as his writing sample for years before being hired by Sopranos creator David Chase, the 1960 Dick Whitman/Don Draper struggles to help a tobacco company keep selling cigarettes in the face of new, damning health evidence. Later, he tells the wealthy, attractive, and female owner of an oldline Jewish department store, whom he earlier insulted for her "forwardness" in challenging him, only to decide to apologize in order to win her business, his philosophy of love: "What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons," says Draper. "You're born alone and you die alone and this world just drops a bunch of rules on top of you to make you forget those facts. But I never forget. I'm living like there's no tomorrow, because there isn't one."
Small wonder that his solution to the cigarette maker's dilemma is a slogan that sounds good and means absolutely nothing.
Yet, for all that nihilistic bravado, Draper does have a code, and is as admirable as he is appalling.
Deception and confusion lie just beneath the glamour of Mad Men.
His ad agency, Sterling Cooper, isn't his, but it might as well be. Without him as creative director, it would be lost. Sterling Coo, as it's affectionately called by its fun-loving crew (except for Mr. Cooper, naturally) is introduced as an older Madison Avenue agency, owned by a small group of partners, not a conglomerate, already struggling with newfangled ways but entranced with the growing materialism and sensuality of early '60s America.
You can see it's falling out of phase with the shape of things to come when the dapper and witty legacy senior partner Roger Sterling delivers this gem to Draper about the 1960 presidential race: "Consider the product. He's young, handsome, Navy hero. Honestly, it shouldn't be too difficult to convince America that Dick Nixon is a winner."
Yet by the end of the first season, which includes some sardonically amusing efforts by the Sterling Coo crew to help Nixon, they've gotten more used to the idea of adapting to the more open-minded new generation swank of Kennedy as the coming thing, and in season two are very much into it.
By the end of the first season, after which Mad Men won Emmy and Golden Globe awards as the best dramatic series, the characters are all well-established, the artifice and deep deceptions of their lives mirroring the business they are in.
In season two, the women came more to the fore, just beginning to break through the glass ceiling of helperdom in some cases, and just beginning to rattle gilded cages in others.
Though Don Draper's journey is the central arc of the series, the female characters otherwise usually outshine their male counterparts. Aside from Weiner, the writing staff is mostly women. Which is unusual in Hollywood. So of course Mad Men is probably the best-written show on television, garnering four of the five current Emmy nominations for dramatic writing. Lost got the other one.
Last season ended with the resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis, the temporary resolution of relationships, and the sale of Sterling Cooper to a big British outfit. In season three we find ourselves in 1963, with the brief spring of Camelot approaching its sudden end, and business, personal, and social change accelerating.
Throughout it all, the American Dream is being constructed and sold, as relentlessly as Madison Avenue mad men can sell it, mutating all the while. Just as it is today.
Each episode of this show can be written about as a feature film can be, so after each episode airs, I'll give my take on it.
These are most of the players in the Sterling Cooper crew, at least the ones we've come to know so far. (The arriving Brits, including an officious executive secretary known behind his back as "Moneypenny," are just becoming known.) They're played by a terrific cast of mostly lesser-known actors, reminding of how big the talent pool really is.
Mad Men's first season was a great success on the awards circuit.
** Don Draper: He could end up as a master of the universe. Or he could swim out to sea and never come back. And he could be equally satisfied with either outcome, though he might have a twinge about the kids. He's played brilliantly by Jon Hamm, who out of character appears to be a floppy-haired, 38-going-on-25 Obama enthusiast.
** Betty Draper: Think Grace Kelly, stuck out in Westchester County. She embraced the dream package of 1950s womanhood, marrying a handsome provider, having two kids with a third on the way, entertaining for her husband's career and becoming deeply dissatisfied with her life. She's played by January Jones, whose astonishing good looks manage to distract at first from the subtlety of her performance.
** Peggy Olson: Draper proves to be her unexpected mentor, elevating her from his secretary to become Sterling Cooper's first female ad writer. The show sets you up to root for her. At times wholly admirable, at other times distressingly affectless, she is nearly as much an enigma as is Draper, for she has an even stronger sense of denial than he does. She's memorably played by Elizabeth Moss, best known before as Zoey Bartlett, President Martin Sheen's spirited daughter on The West Wing.
** Joan Holloway: The queen bee of the female support staff, Joan might just be the smartest person there. But she's hamstrung by her much vaunted -- and much flaunted -- sexuality, as she learns to her chagrin when she proves to be a creative natural in a pinch, but is tossed aside without a second thought in favor of a clearly inferior male. Christina Hendricks brings great beauty, verve, and sensitivity to a finely etched performance.
** Pete Campbell: From an old New York family, Pete is set up as the office weasel. Except, irritating as he can be, he's right more often than not. And, among the men, he seems to get the business better than anyone except Draper. Vincent Kartheiser makes what could be a hissable character surprisingly appealing with nuance.
** Sal Romano: The art director of Sterling Cooper is gay. Who could see that coming? But it's the early '60s, so he has to pretend to be straight, going so far as to drag a pretty young wife to Manhattan from the old neighborhood back in Baltimore (along with dear old mom). Bryan Batt brings a sophisticated performance to the table, especially when he feigns great enthusiasm for hetero hijinx.
** Ken Cosgrove, Harry Crane, and Paul Kinsey. Played by Aaron Staton, Rich Sommer, and Michael Gladis, "the guys" are unusually well-fleshed out secondary characters, junior executives who function as a sort of office Greek chorus but also have key plot points turn on their action. Or inaction.
The characters on Mad Men don't always get along.
** Roger Sterling: Okay, I will admit it. This guy is probably my favorite character. I smile every time he comes onscreen. The sardonically witty senior partner and son of the agency's founder is a great sparring partner and drinking buddy for Draper. Played by John Slattery, who I loved in Charlie Wilson's War as the CIA bureaucrat boss of Philip Seymour Hoffman's Gust Avrakotos, he has a smart-sounding line for everything. Such lines are all the more amusing when he is, in hindsight, so wrong. His decision to throw over his wife in favor of Draper's 20-year old secretary -- a woman who, not coincidentally, also looks far more modern than the others -- triggers a chain of events leading to the sale of the agency to a large British firm, with potential chaos in its wake. Slattery, incidentally, plays the father of Robert Downey, Jr.'s Tony Stark in Iron Man II.
** Bert Cooper: The rather eccentric senior partner of the agency, a staunch Republican, shows his ability to adjust to change, noting that business will get most of what it needs from JFK, buying a Rothko and amusingly setting his juniors up to give their reactions, and famously allowing as how he doesn't care in the least that Don Draper isn't actually Don Draper. Played by Robert Morse, who of course starred in the '60s classic, How To Succeed In Business Without Really Trying, Bertram Cooper is the splash of Worcestershire sauce on the steak tartare that is Mad Men.
You can check things during the day on my site, New West Notes ... www.newwestnotes.com.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Don Draper's now-famous remark about advertising (quoted by Bradley in the article) is a total rip-off from the series Thirtysomething. As Miles Drentell tells the character Michael Stedman, in the climactic scene toward the end of that series,
"No one wants to be unpopular. That's why we're here. That's the dance of advertising. We help people become popular. Through popularity comes acceptance. Acceptance leads to assimilation. Assimilation leads to bliss. We calm and reassure. We embrace people with the message that we're all in it together. That our leaders are infallible, and that there is nothing -- absolutely nothing -- wrong. That is what we do. It's what we've always done, and under your gifted stewardship what we will continue to do. Onward toward the millennium. In return for our humanitarian service we are made rich. I'm sorry if you misunderstood the nature of this covenant. But you've done so well up to now; I thought you knew."
Amazing how short peoples' memories are, that this direct steal has gone unremarked upon.
Personally, I think Mad Men's subtext is that all people have secrets, and no one presents his/her true, unvarnished story to others.
See William Bradley's Profile
I don't really see it.
It's a reflection of where our country is today. Only wealth and consumption matter.
See William Bradley's Profile
Well, perhaps not "only" ...
Terrific season premiere last night! It's 1963, Don Draper is Don Draper, the philandering family man. The Brits are wreaking havoc at Sterling Cooper, Peggy's secretary won't work for her, Sal is cracking that closet door.
We're off and running.
As a Stewardess in 1960 NYC, this show is all too real. I remember it well and sometimes wonder how I survived. I'm looking forward to season 3.
See William Bradley's Profile
How did you survive?
:)
Seriously, I find stories from this period fascinating.
Everything on this show comes down to one truth: Nothing is ever as it seems.
See William Bradley's Profile
Sounds almost like the old X-Files slogan: "Trust no one."
X-Files was a great show.
I find it ironic that pop culture mover shakers are still panning the past when we are now living in some of the worst times in American history in which our economy and sovereignty has been tanked by special interests. This makes the smoking, drinking and womanizing mad men of the past pale in comparison to the Mad Men of the present, who from the beltway to the 4th estate, have sold this country out like there's no tomorrow. And so levels of craziness and the biased perceptions therein are not immune to generational ageism. For indeed, once man's vivid satirized past is another's blind doomsday present and future.
See William Bradley's Profile
Actually, almost all TV series are set in the present.
Is Frank Rich trying to scare us? Let's hope he is simply guilty of a little over-the-top hyper-analysis. Geesh.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/16/opinion/16rich.html?_r=1
See William Bradley's Profile
I think writing only once a week brings out a certain overwrought quality ...
During Canada's last federal election, I was doing volunteer work for my local socialist candidate's campaign. I happened to talk with the campaign manager about MAD MEN, and it turned out that her father had a job just like Don Draper! (At much the same time, too.) She recalls that he was often bringing home products for his family to sample, and watching their reactions to them.
I can definitely imagine Rahm Emmanuel at Sterling & Cooper.
I love it!
>>>> I can definitely imagine Rahm Emmanuel at Sterling & Cooper.
See William Bradley's Profile
I think Rahm is more of a hardball political operator than a messagemeister ...
Who do you think is the 'messagemeister' within the Democratic party?
So much of this show rings true, all the little details. My husband was born 4 months before Kennedy's assassination (and has a baby movie of his parents taking him to see Kennedy's body lying in state!)
-The scene where the daughter (8?) mixes drinks for Don and guests, classic.
-The styling and props! My grandmother had one of the lamps that's featured, oh the memories :)
- The scene with the dangerous 3 foot antenna on the boy's toy and the girl in a plastic dry cleaning bag, hilarious
Can't wait for the new series.
I'm new to this....I don't watch much TV other than news (adult ADD!) but I came across the season 2 on Comcast on demand and watched them all on one lazy Sunday so I'm caught up!
See William Bradley's Profile
It's a blast from the past, all right.
William, I totally agree with you about this show being about the American dream.
One reason Don Draper's such a compelling character is that he really embodies the conflicting impulses of the American dream. He sleeps with a Bohemian woman and even attends a poetry reading, but expresses disdain for the lifestyle. The family he's built with Betty is clearly vital to his sense of self, but he risks it with multiple affairs. He loves his brother, but Don's rejection of his childhood is so complete he's able to tell his brother upon first reacquaintance - with a straight face - that he doesn't know him.
Don Draper - after only two seasons - is amongst the deepest and most fascinating characters in the history of American scripted television. And Jon Hamm - who, from his talk show appearances, has shown quite clearly he's not Don Draper in real life - has done an amazing job crafting a compelling performance.
See William Bradley's Profile
Thanks. Draper is quite a fascinating character, fundamentally conflicted or well-integrated, in at least two distinct personas.
Yes I agree with that too..
Todd DiRoberto
http://www.newsguide.us/art-entertainment/movies/Todd-DiRoberto-of-American-Satellite-Hosts-Independence-Day-Charity-Event-for-Operation-Bigs/
See William Bradley's Profile
Thanks for the link.
Mad Men -- that wonderful show where there are no minorities, not a single person of color anywhere in New York or America -- sounds like the America that the Birthers have been screaming for
I find the show dull and hapless
Wrong. You don't know much about the show. Blacks are in the show. They aren't ad execs because there weren't black ad execs in 1962.
Spoken by someone who has obviously never seen the show. Of course there are Black people on the show.
Why do people come on threads to be negative and ignorant?
There was an episode where they went to a party in a black neighborhood in Newark. (One character said about coming there, "I have nothing against them, but I worry about my car.")
One of the show's partners had a black girlfriend and went on a freedom ride with her.
Gay civil rights are in the same position now that black civil rights were then.
That and more, for any critic who actually bother to know anything.
See William Bradley's Profile
Good point, though I think gay rights are in better shape.
I came of age in this time and went into advertising just after the period shown so far in the series. It was a remarkable watershed era in so many ways, standing between early rock and what was to come in the mid-60s.
They have already done a bit on the cool jazz of the era with the media buyer character (I can't remember his name), but I'd like to see more. Nothing symblozed that time more than going to someplace like Basin Street East to hear Peggy Lee and Dave Brubeck or to the Village Gate to hear Herbie Mann.
There were a lot of dark things in those days, such as the sexism and racism the show touches upon, but there were some really, really cool things, too. Take it from me, it was a great time to be in your 20s and in New York.
See William Bradley's Profile
That sounds like you had a tremendous experience! I didn't mention it in the piece, but the score to the show is quite good, perhaps reflective of at least some of your experience.
It's a great show, but I can't agree with the praise given to the Don Draper character.
I find him dull. Betty too.
The rest of the characters are great, with the exception of Pete Campbell who suffers greatly from Vincent Kartheiser's awful acting. In the hands of a better actor, the character would be more effective.
Nah, Don Draper is The Man! Best character on TV.
See William Bradley's Profile
Hmm, not impressed by half the lead characters ... What is it you like so much about the show?
***Hmm, not impressed by half the lead characters ... What is it you like so much about the show?***
I like the other characters and office dynamics.
When the show is based at Sterling Cooper it's interesting.
As soon as it shifts away from that and focuses on Don/Betty's home life and marriage it grinds to a halt. I think the whole "Dick Whitman" storyline is a dud.
After following some of the Mad Men comments on New West Notes, I caught a few episodes during the recent marathon. I don’t like getting hooked on too many series but I’m sorry I missed this one. What can I say...AMC is kind of an obscure channel in my neck of the woods...but, I suppose, that’s the point as this series is not exactly the kind of fare offered up on the more popular networks. Let’s hope it doesn’t go the way of other good projects that often seem to decline in quality after the third season, or so.
Anyway, just wanted to thank you for highlighting it on your site...and, for this excellent review!
See William Bradley's Profile
You're welcome. I think you'll find it quite intriguing.
If unfamiliarity breeds intrigue, then call me intrigued. Though, it may take a couple more episodes before you can call me duly impressed.
And, on a separate but not unrelated note...
I like your style - I just hope I'm never on the receiving end of the 'wrath of Bill'! :)
Bill, you've convinced me. Definitely Tivo, possibly ever actually watch live.
See William Bradley's Profile
Tivo works, too.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with